On 13-Dec-03, 11:12 (CST), Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A replacement? I'm pretty sure you need both; /sysfs doesn't include
> *everything* that /proc does (and vice-versa). I'm not sure what the
> long-term plans are, but /sysfs can't replace /proc right now.
There's no intent for /proc to go away. The point of sysfs is to remove
all (or at least most) the non-process related info from /proc (which
had become a dumping ground).
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net
