Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> 3.2.1. Version numbers based on dates >> ------------------------------------- [...] > I started a thread on -policy recently where I suggested this was bad > and should be something like 0.19960501 instead, to avoid epochs when > upstream finally declares a 1.0 release.
I've just read it, thanks for the pointer. -- .''`. Arnaud Vandyck : :' : http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/ `. `' `-
