> > * New upstream release \1
> > * fixed "BTS summary line of #1" Closes: #1
> > * fixed "BTS summary line of #2" Closes: #2
> > * fixed "BTS summary line of #3" Closes: #3
> >
> > in changelogs would probably go a lot further to correcting this very minor
> > issue than reopening dozens of
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> A script to convert eg.
>
> * New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3)
>
> to
>
> * New upstream release \1
> * fixed "BTS summary line of #1" Closes: #1
> * fixed "BTS summary line of #2" Closes: #2
> * fixed "BTS summar
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:01:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Is this possible?
>
> It would be really "cool"(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every
> program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug
> it into a different network.
>
> Just venting my irritation for the day
Is this possible?
It would be really "cool"(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every
program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug
it into a different network.
Just venting my irritation for the day...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your email to Crown International has been sent. You should receive a response
within 1 business day. If you need a faster response, feel free to contact us
Toll Free at 1-800-715-4227 during regular business hours.
Thank You,
James P. Cox
President, Crown International
Hi,
I've noticed the growth in the debian archive with some concern
over the last few weeks/months. We're now hitting the limit of
the partition that debian is on and it will be quite difficult
technically for us to deal with this in the short term.
We have some new storage which is being comis
I'm cc'ing PSG, maybe he'll be interested.
> * New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3)
>
> to
>
> * New upstream release \1
> * fixed "BTS summary line of #1" Closes: #1
> * fixed "BTS summary line of #2" Closes: #2
> * fixed "BTS summary line of #3" Closes: #3
>
> in changelogs wo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send
> "confirmation" emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email.
>
> TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid end-user
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:42:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> PS Before someone raises the issue of license of viruses. I believe that
> anyone who distributes a virus does so with the desire that it be installed
> on as many systems as possible and that the implied license permits you to
>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:34:58PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> It's not about summarizing how the bug was fixed. It's about summarizing the
> bug *itself* in the changelog.
>
> The description of the bug is already available(as the title of the bug
> report). At the very least this should be plac
Dear Candidate,
Thank you for getting in touch with Prometric Auto Response System.
We are in receipt of your e-mail. This e-mail contains the following
I. KEY WORDS TO PUT IN THE SUBJECT FIELD OF YOUR E-MAIL TO US.
In order to get a reply from us, you are required to put ONE of the relevant
key
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead,
> use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation that it is fixed in
> such-and-such a version. The changelog bug closing facility is only a
> convenience.
I'm confused
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:16:04PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Of course there are downsides either way, but there is no dispute
> that the size of the Debian archive is huge, and mirrors are struggling
> to keep up as a result.
Is this so? I havent seen reports in this area for a while.
Greetings
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:08 AM
Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V2003 #1147
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> If I report "segmentation fault in ls", I--as a user of ls, not a
> developer--couldn't care less about why it was segfaulting or how the
> bug was fixed; I only care that it's been fixed. If a developer wants
> to spend their limited time researching h
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package
> stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package
> is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has
> a symlink at that lo
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:12, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the
> > messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages
> > temporarily.
>
> Hmm, how about
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send
> "confirmation" emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email.
Really?
> TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid en
Hi,
I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have
a dependancy on glibc >= 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just
on glibc? BTW: Why are all those packages going into testing if they are
uninstallable?
Regards,
Mike Dornberger
PS: Please Cc me, I'm not su
> > "The bug has been fixed" is everything I would need to know. I don't
> > really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic
> > incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed.
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> This approach surely don't rais
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged
> "upstream" was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream
> ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the
> package)?
> Can someone familiar with
I've actually sent him an email but got no answer. I've posted in
debian-devel few days ago and nobody complained that GDM could source
/etc/environment in the init script. That's an one-line patch (already
tagged as patch in bts for more than a year)...
I think that if the maintainer doesn't tak
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:05:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> A proper entry is as follows:
>
> * New upstream release.
> * no longer does foo when bar happens. Closes: #12345
> * wrapper script rewritten to not use $$ in tempfile names. Closes: #12345
>
> Please, everyone remember, a change
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ITP: libdata-formvalidator-perl
Version : 3.12
Upstream Author : Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Data/
* License : GPL + A
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Mike Dornberger wrote:
> I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have
> a dependancy on glibc >= 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just
> on glibc?
Binaries built against glibc 2.3.2 really do depend on glibc 2.3.2
Hello,
I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package
stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package
is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has
a symlink at that location, instead of a directory. dpkg, however, does
not
µã»÷ http://hengingv.533.net ½Ì¸øÄúÈçºÎÀûÓÃÍøÂç׬Ǯ
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > > We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
> > > not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
> > > the Debian BTS.
> >
> > Because users that submit
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:12:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
> > again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
> > several days.
>
> Why no
北京子撰图文设计中心
本公司是北京专业的平面设计中心，有平面设计专家、专业设计师亲自动手为您的事业锦上添花！
服务项目包括：
企业形象设计
企业广告创意、设计制作
平面广告创意、设计制作
企业产品包装设计、制版、印刷
企业产品宣传册设计、制版、印刷
精美印刷品设计、制版、印刷
报纸广告、杂志广告设计、制版
精美彩色杂志设计、制版、印刷
海报设计、制版、印刷
图书封面设计、制版、印刷
户外、室内广告喷绘设计制作
联系人：袁林 TEL：13311210700 010-85762212
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:32:57 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
>
>> "[...] distcc sends the complete preprocessed source code across the
>> network for each job."
>
> Hmm, OK, but that would just speedup the actual compilation. Granted,
> that's the largest chunk, but
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > #2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity.
>
> People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm the
> e-mail.
the point t
reassign 207300 humanity
thanks
On pe, 2003-08-29 at 10:36, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
> design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
> stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings.
The fac
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > Also, I don't have any hard data to support this, but it's obvious to
> > me that the volume of mail generated by virus scanners in response
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
> When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
> again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
> several days.
Why not make your tmda package depend on amavis-new and clamav-freshclam? If
th
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> That doesn't help all that much - it's also important see why the bug
> has been closed.
Because it is fixed...
> whatever it was I was trying to do when I generated the error rather
> than by fixing the error handling.
it wont help
on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > #2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity.
>
> People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm
> the e
debian-devel，Hi！
Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux
Best Regard!
Cong Ming
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
$B"#5^$0$"$J$?$N6/$$L#J}!*%"%$%(!<%+!<%I$N%b%P%$%k%-%c%C%7%s%0(B
$B"#$*?=$79~$_$+$i?69~$_$^$G:GB.(B20$BJ,!#5^$J=PHq$G$*:$$j$NJ}92$F$kA0$K$^$:Ev\:Y$*$h$S%a!<%k$G$N$*?=$79~$_$O%"%$%(!<%+!<%I(BHP$B!!(Bhttp://www.i-a-ai.com/aiei/index.html
$B"#$*EEOC$G$N$*?=$79~$_$O%U%j!<[EMAIL
(BPROTECTED]"
Please contact your system administrator.
The infected file attachment in the scanned document was deleted.
Virus Information:
The attachment your_details.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was
deleted.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: module-assistant
Version : 0.1 (currently beeing written)
Upstream Author : myself, nativ package
* URL : http://modass.alioth.debian.org (when it has been approved)
* License
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Updated alien
>
> The alien changes have been in testing and unstable for a similar
> amount of time.
>
> Unfortunately I can't find the source for the above packages.
...? Context error.
> I also remember some talk about start-stop-daemon having to be
> alter
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:31:59PM +, benfoley wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
> > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
> > > design, and all anti-spa
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> > > "The bug has been fixed" is everything I would need to know. I don't
> > > really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic
> > > incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed.
>
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
> design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
> stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings.
Oddly eno
hello,
Can't reply to your mail at the moment, I will reply as soon when possible.
If you didn't send a message, please control your pc for virusses.
greetings
christophe
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:46:48AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> Earlier, you've stated that your time is precious. Well, so is mine.
> How dare you assume that the time I spent reviewing *your* callenge mail
> and deciding it was junk is less precious than the time you (could have)
> spent r
I do receive "a lot" of messages and use pine's filtering
features to sort them out to different folders. The same
thing happened with folder "IMOBILIARE". I have sorted there
some messages after i've readed them. After i renamed the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Fabio Rafael da Rosa]
> > I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the
> > environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the
> > same problem ..?
>
> It is probably a PAM configuration
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > [Short version: see the patch below.]
> (after a few days w/o answers from Snort's maintainer)
> Sander, any comments wrt to this patch? Please at least say wether you are
> going to forward this to Snort maintainers or use it in
At Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:24:15 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are
> currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc.
I may need to explain the status glibc:
2003-03-22 glibc is 2.3.1-17. The next version of glibc is 2.3.2-2,
which was upload
* GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 11:05]:
> I may need to explain the status glibc:
> [...]
>
> The current version is 2.3.2-4. We're working for fixing bugs,
> some bugs were resolved.
Sorry, I didn't want to step on your feet. I know that glibc is a
nasty beast, and you're really goo
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:47, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The comparison to mailing list software makes no sense.
>
> Maybe not in the context of viruses, but for the "Joe Job" problem it does.
If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather th
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the
> messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages
> temporarily.
Hmm, how about giving tmda its own special header so we can auto-filte
Herbert Xu wrote:
This is bullshit.
We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
the Debian BTS.
Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead,
use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explana
* Adam McKenna
> #0, #1, #2 and #11 are basically opinion and rhetoric.
Well. Let's take a look at what Karsten had to say about point #2,
"Misplaced burden":
[...] «C-R may place the burden on third parties either inadvertently
(via spoofed sender spam or virus mail), or deliberate
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails,
> > of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97
> > being delivery failure messages or other autoresponders (e.g.: ISP help
> > desk).
>
> How many were
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>
> >> Format: 1.7
> >> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
> >> Source: kaffe
> >> Binary: kaffe
> >> Architec
I will be out of the office starting 08/28/2003 and will not return until
09/02/2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> The virus responses are irresponsible, and have been for almost two years
> as the number of sender-spoofing emails has grown.
BTW, amavisd-new has
# Treat envelope sender address as unreliable and don't send sender
# notification
Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>> > We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
>> > not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
>> > the Debian BTS.
>>
>> Because users that submitted bugs u
on Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > > My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails,
> > > of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97
> > > being del
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:31:59 +
benfoley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Oddly enough Spamassassin doesn't exasperate the problem. TDMA does.
> exacerbate is probably what you meant here.
Quite so. 1:30am emails before the requisite
[Fabio Rafael da Rosa]
> I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the
> environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the
> same problem ..?
It is probably a PAM configuration problem. You need the following
line in the /etc/pam.d/ file used by gdm:
aut
I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not
set the environment variable I've set in /etc/environment.
Anyone has the same problem ..?
--
Fabio Rafael da Rosa - f 2 r
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian- http://debian.org
Debian-BR - http://debian-br.org
Debian-SP - http://sp.debian-b
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in
> > light of the Blaster worm.
>
> Not extreme at all.
I imagine there are some legitimate people I might receive emails from,
reply to them and never know i
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:29, wrote:
> debian-devel，Hi！
>
>Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux
http://www.m17n.org/linux-sh/debian/ and go from there.
greetings
-- vbi
--
Sterility is inherited. If your parents never had kids, odds are you
wont either.
--
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:25:30PM -0400, Brian Mays wrote:
>
> Thus, the situation is as follows. If someone can point me to an new
> upstream source that is fairly similar to the source in the current
> Debian package, then I can incorporate these changes into Debian in a
> very short time. If
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>> Format: 1.7
>> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
>> Source: kaffe
>> Binary: kaffe
>> Architecture: source i386
>> Version: 1:1.1.1-1
>> Distribution: unstable
On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
>
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
> > design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
> > stopgap measures
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
> > not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
> > the Debian BTS.
>
> Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian BTS do not deserve
> the right
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:59:04PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in
> > > light of the Blaster worm.
> >
> > Not extreme at all.
>
> I imagine there are some le
72 matches
Mail list logo
