On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged > "upstream" was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream > ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the > package)? > Can someone familiar with the BTS code tell whether this change is > trivial or not?
It's not trivial in the slightest, sorry. The BTS doesn't remotely have this information available to it, and it's not even easy to arrange for it to be available. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
