On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:31:59PM +0000, benfoley wrote: > On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700 > > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by > > > design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely > > > stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings. > > > > Oddly enough Spamassassin doesn't exasperate the problem. TDMA does. > > exacerbate is probably what you meant here.
Actually, I think exasperate is perfectly valid as well.
From WordNet (r) 1.7 [wn]:
exasperate
v 1: exasperate or irritate [syn: {exacerbate}, {aggravate}]
2: make furious [syn: {outrage}, {infuriate}, {incense}]
3: make worse; "This drug aggravates the pain" [syn: {worsen},
{aggravate}, {exacerbate}] [ant: {better}]
- Keegan
pgpkdhOOQymzr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
