Cardenas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Some people were talking me into proposing Mexico for a future
> > Debconf, but I don't think it would be that good an idea until we
> > had some more developers in the country, but... Maybe for 2006? :-)
>
> Is thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 144046 debtags
Bug#144046: general: Sections are not finely grained
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `debtags'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 195481 Centralized configuration for location settings?
Bug#195481: fragmented location info: hassle for users especially mobile ones
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 173231 sysvinit
Bug#173231: qa.debian.org: some messages flitting past on rebooting are not
also seen in /var/log
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `sysvinit'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 177135 kernel
Bug#177135: File browsers browsing SGI served NFS directories don't display all
directories.
Bug#177136: File browsers browsing SGI served NFS directories don't display all
directories.
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 192831 bash
Bug#192831: general: bash expansion failure
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `bash'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 159385 normal
Bug#159385: general: install a package but don't have it's magic funcionality
on by default
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 159385 107862
Bug#107862: newly installed services start automatically
Bug#159385: general: install a
reassign 144046 debtags
thanks
If there are ideas here which could be useful for package tags, great. If
not, and debtags addresses everything here, I think it can be closed, either
now or when package tags are more widely supported by tools.
--
- mdz
FWIW, this domain does not seem to be registered anymore. I personally do
not believe in registering multiple domains in order to try to use the DNS
to perform spelling correction, and think that this bug should be closed.
--
- mdz
Jonathan Walther dijo [Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:51:12PM -0700]:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:36:15PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >Tijuana?!
> >Being curious... What would you expect to find in Tijuana?
>
> Cheap hotels, cheap booze, cheap food, and cheap whores. :-)
More or less like here... In fa
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:54:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Hardware/kernel bug, fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 169356 binutils
Bug#169356: hppa toolchain causes binary-compiled-with-profiling-enabled on
everything
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `binutils'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 179070 No PCMCIA modules for kernel-image-2.2.20 in woody
Bug#179070: general: Troublesome pcmcia-modules placement
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 179070 pcmcia-cs
Bug#179070: No PCMCIA modules for kernel-image-2.2.20 in woody
Bug reassigned fro
reassign 192831 bash
thanks
This doesn't look like a bug, but I'll reassign it for the bash maintainer
to close if appropriate.
--
- mdz
reassign 173231 sysvinit
thanks
I believe this is addressed by the inclusion of bootlogd. Please close if
appropriate.
--
- mdz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 169328 gimp
Bug#169328: general: some graphics program is leaving .xvpics turds all over
the place
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `gimp'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 154817 wishlist
Bug#154817: general: bugs should not be closed by uploads to experimental
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> reassign 154817 ftp.debian.org
Bug#154817: general: bugs should not be closed by uploads to experimental
Bug reassigned fro
Hi. When is this debconf that will be held in Vancouver? I can provide
free accomodations and organic homebrew beer for up to two developers,
preferably ones who are on a tight budget and could not otherwise make
it here.
Jonathan
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
severity 154817 wishlist
reassign 154817 ftp.debian.org
thanks
I believe this is handled by katie; if there is a more appropriate place
than ftp.debian.org, please reassign, close, whatever.
--
- mdz
This bug is silly. If there are packages for which it is not clear how
configuration should be handled by the administrator, bugs should be filed
against those packages. This bug is not doing anyone any good here against
'general'.
--
- mdz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:36:15PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Tijuana?!
Being curious... What would you expect to find in Tijuana?
Cheap hotels, cheap booze, cheap food, and cheap whores. :-)
Jonathan
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:00:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Please, let's decide based on facts rather than some hopelessly obsolete
sympathy for the so-called Eastern Europe(TM).
What sympathy? The Slavic nations should form their own union, and
Canada, the USA, Australia, and New Zealand should
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Feh, we need one in the States... I'm totally raring to go to a debconf
> in the states, but there is a severe lack of $ (and parental permission)
> with regards to going to one in europe :(
Don't worry; as far as I know, the proposed conference in DC nex
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada.
That would be excellent. Who is organizing it?
--
- mdz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:37:49PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Another good argument for Vienna : being central in Europe, it is
> close to the most eastern countries of the continent...which could
> help our friends from Eastern Europe to attend the conference more
> conveniently
Being
> > I have coordinated some Free Software conferences in Mexico, and I know
> > I can easily get some universities to host us. Mexico is quite a cheap
> > country, so that would be a very good point for us.
>
> Oh, by the sounds of how DebConf 3 went, I figured Tijuana would be the
> first choice
Hi, Adam Heath wrote:
> What if bugs filed against older versions get cloned to the newer package, the
> newer package closes the cloned bugs, and when the old package is removed, the
> bugs get closed?
Whatever for?
Status before this: We have a bunch of open bugs against OLD_VERSION.
Status af
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:36:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Joshua Kwan dijo [Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:35:51PM -0700]:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada. Some people
> > > were talking me into proposing
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich beabsichtige in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Kreisbehindertenring im Kreis
Göppingen, eine Homepage für Menschen mit Behinderung Ihrer Familie, Freunde
wie Interessierte zu erstellen. Für die Gestaltung der Homepage ist Ihre
Mithilfe von unschätzbaren Wert. Deshalb
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada. Some people
> were talking me into proposing Mexico for a future Debconf, but I don't
> think it would be that good an idea until we had some more developers in
> the country, b
Joshua Kwan dijo [Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:35:51PM -0700]:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada. Some people
> > were talking me into proposing Mexico for a future Debconf, but I don't
> > think it would be that
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada. Some people
> were talking me into proposing Mexico for a future Debconf, but I don't
> think it would be that good an idea until we had some more developers in
> the country, b
Joshua Kwan dijo [Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:51:03AM -0700]:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Why Vienna, Austria? Because it is a quite central place in europe,
> > it isn't that expensive like Oslo, and I also want to be able to visit
> > a debconf myself, of c
also sprach Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.17.2107 +0200]:
> Package: gradm
> Version: 1.9.11-1
> Severity: serious
>
>
> buildd.debian.org lists the following build error on ia64:
gradm doesn't support ia64 yet. What are the implications that
result from this. I don't think we should
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:02:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Yeah, I know, but let's pretend I mean 'fixed-upstream' or some
> yet-to-be-added tag.
What, you mean like the way the pending tag often seems to get used :) .
> > Besides, that doesn't help the default bug list :) .
> I'm not *ove
merge 203402 161325
thanks
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0100, Phil Armstrong wrote:
> Here's the output of apt-listchanges for the last update I did, it's
> ok until after the output for flac, then it seems to have the wrong
> changelog. It certainly isn't giving the contents of changelog.
Adam Heath writes:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > well, you can still get the version, when the bug was closed from the
> > changelog. If we do not close the bug, nobody will get a note that the
> > bug has been fixed (in the new default version). Bugs reported for 3.2
> > have
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:59:33PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> what interest does Debian have in keeping these bugs open?
The obvious reason is so that there's a list of known issues with the
package. Users might find this a valuable resource.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffi
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:59, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jamin W. Collins writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > > I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
> > > removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
> well, you can still get the version, when the bug was closed from the
> changelog. If we do not close the bug, nobody will get a note that the
> bug has been fixed (in the new default version). Bugs reported for 3.2
> have been closed when 3.3 became th
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:43:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Even if you are stepping in our idea of making it in Madrid, Vienna is
> cool...
I hope it's more cool than Oslo this summer was ;)
--
Riku Voipio|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
kirkkonummentie 33
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > As gcc changelog.Debian states, bugs filed against earlier versions
> > of gcc (e.g. gcc-3.2 or gcc-2.95) are closed when they are fixed in
> > later version (e.g. gcc 3.3).
> >
> > Is that really correct?
> > gcc-3.2 package is still in Debi
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 16:59, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:08:54 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> (2) Since all people say that having an account on the Debian machines
> >> is the major reason tha
Andrew Lau writes:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:52:07PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > This is just a small helper, some real integration of debbugs with
> > bugzilla would be cool, like debbugs subscribing to the upstream bug
> > and automatically tagging the bug "pending" when fixed upstream?
>
Jamin W. Collins writes:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
> > removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense.
>
> Could tag them with the release name that affected rele
Rene Engelhard writes:
> You shouldn't forget that gcc 3.2 is still default on sparc...
s/still/again/ now, s/3.2/3.3/ soon.
On Monday 28 July 2003 22:31, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
> WNPP and one about RC bugs.
>
> I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will
> be "broadcasted" by BTS:
[...]
> - Packages with more
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 13:32]:
| I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
| Austria.
cool. Is the registration page already online? :-)
Bye
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Is there life aft
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense.
Could tag them with the release name that affected release name (woody,
Hi,
Adam Heath wrote:
> These bugs won't be fixed in gcc-3.2. gcc-3.3 is a newer upstream version.
> Just because it's made as a separate package doesn't mean a newer upstream
> hasn't been uploaded(3.3).
You shouldn't forget that gcc 3.2 is still default on sparc...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:39, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > So we found a location for DebConf 7, too? :)
>
> Or 2 Debconfs a year ?
I don't think that would be a good idea. It will split the whole thing,
because especially people that attend from
Quoting Sebastian D.B. Krause ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > July in Vienna! More power to you!
>
> Well, but then try not to be on the same date as LinuxTag 2005. :)
But close to it would be a good idea also. Dunno whether LinuxTag
happens on a week-end or during the week, but it would be ideal to
h
Quoting Alexander Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So we found a location for DebConf 7, too? :)
Or 2 Debconfs a year ?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
> removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense.
Could tag them with the release name that affected release name (woody,
sarge, sid, etc...).
The submitter address recorded for your Bug report
#191870: O: arpd -- User-space ARP daemon
has been changed.
The new submitter address for this report is
Elie Rosenblum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
This change was made by
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
If it was incorrect, please contact them directl
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:29:59AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
> > As gcc changelog.Debian states, bugs filed against earlier versions of gcc
> > (e.g. gcc-3.2 or gcc-2.95) are closed when they are fixed in later version
> > (e.g. gcc 3.3).
> >
>
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
Great idea!
--
CYa,
Mario
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 13:32, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Why Vienna, Austria?
Why not :) Vienna isn't bad at all.
Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk
--
But in our enthusiasm, we could not resist a radical overhaul of the
system, in which all of its major weaknesses ha
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:52:07PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> This is just a small helper, some real integration of debbugs with
> bugzilla would be cool, like debbugs subscribing to the upstream bug and
> automatically tagging the bug "pending" when fixed upstream?
Probably not a good idea; A
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:52:07PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> This is just a small helper, some real integration of debbugs with
> bugzilla would be cool, like debbugs subscribing to the upstream bug
> and automatically tagging the bug "pending" when fixed upstream?
Unfortunately, I've noticed
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:35:01AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > In my particular case (gforge), I'll have to hack around the
> > no-binary-in-diff limitation of dpkg-source. I work in the same
> > repository as upstream, and some images were changed.
>
> Ugly. The best idea I have about tha
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Why Vienna, Austria? Because it is a quite central place in europe,
> it isn't that expensive like Oslo, and I also want to be able to visit
> a debconf myself, of course ,-)
Feh, we need one in the States... I'm totally raring to
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> As gcc changelog.Debian states, bugs filed against earlier versions of gcc
> (e.g. gcc-3.2 or gcc-2.95) are closed when they are fixed in later version
> (e.g. gcc 3.3).
>
> Is that really correct?
> gcc-3.2 package is still in Debian and still c
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:14:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > The upstream tag doesn't help with filtering out uninteresting
> > > bugs from the default bug list.
>
>
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:08:54 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> (2) Since all people say that having an account on the Debian machines
>> is the major reason that everybody and his brother want to be DD.
>> Why shou
Hi,
I've written a small perl script that queries the debian bug tracking
system for bugs forwarded to bugzilla (gnome in my script; it needs to
have a XML interface) and makes a list of them and their status in
bugzilla.
Example output (galeon):
http://people.debian.org/~erich/debugzilla-galeon.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The upstream tag doesn't help with filtering out uninteresting bugs from
> > the default bug list.
> Add '&exclude=upstream' to the URL?
Not really. The reason it does
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Actually, when I was stuck in the DAM queue for half a year without
> getting a single word of feedback, I wouldn't have dreamt to ask for
> an account for two reasons:
How long would it take for you to ask questions? 1 year? 2 years?
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-07-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: popfile
Version : 0.19.1
Upstream Author : John Graham-Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : POPFile is an email
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Of course the date hasn't been decided yet, but I guess it will be
>> around the same time like the last two: in july, with no conflict
>> with other important events.
>
> July in V
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Because it is fixed in upstream CVS and I have not merged the patch into
> > > the Debian package,
>
> > If it's fixed in the next ups
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > or because I have other changes pending which are incomplete.
>
> Personally, I deal with that by cvs-or-whatever-ing a new working
> tree, or (for more complex changes) there's branching.
That reall
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:24:11PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > - it is impossible to tell which bugs are new, and which are crusty old bugs
> > that I cannot help with
> That's obvious from the bug numbers. ;-)
Some bugs get crusty and old before their time.
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
- it is not in any useful order
So what would be a useful order? Offhand I can't think of one.
Maybe put bugs tagged help first, patch and pending (or some such) last, and
everything else in the middle? Then within these three categories order by
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> - it is impossible to tell which bugs are new, and which are crusty old bugs
> that I cannot help with
>
That's obvious from the bug numbers. ;-)
> - it is ridiculously long
Perhaps the list should be filtered by, for example, bugs >=28 and <35 days old?
(With an
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030729 14:43]:
> > I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
> > Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
> (...)
> Even if you are stepping in our idea of making it in Madrid, Vienna is
>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Because it is fixed in upstream CVS and I have not merged the patch into
> > the Debian package,
> If it's fixed in the next upstream release I would also set the Upstream
> tag.
The upstream tag do
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > Because it is fixed in upstream CVS and I have not merged the patch into
> > the Debian package,
>
> If it's fixed in the next upstream release I would also set the Upstream
> tag.
The upstream t
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Because it is fixed in upstream CVS and I have not merged the patch into
> the Debian package,
If it's fixed in the next upstream release I would also set the Upstream
tag.
> or because I have other changes pending which are incomplete.
Personally, I deal with that b
Gerfried Fuchs (2003-07-29 13:32:39 +0200) :
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in
> Vienna, Austria.
Cool :-)
> P.S.: It would be more than helpful if someone can write a report
> about this years debconf for the events page that we can take a look
> at to see how to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> has been in europe and 2004 should be on a different continent (Asia,
> America, Australia -- there are many nice places that start with A :-)
I would love to see another debconf in North America because I was unable to
make it to
Gerfried Fuchs, on 2003-07-29, 13:32, you wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
Yeah, great!
Joerg
--
Joerg "joergland" Wendland
GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417
pgpeYxNbqoJy1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:14:26AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:31:53AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
> > WNPP and one about RC bugs.
> >
> > I think it will help to improve Debian qual
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
> Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
(...)
Even if you are stepping in our idea of making it in Madrid, Vienna is
cool...
Regard
Hi Alfie,
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
> Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
cool.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > I have done this as well, as I want these bugs out of my face because the
> > are already fixed. 'pending' is my standard "make it go away because it
> > has already been dealt with" tag.
>
> OK, but IMHO it's a good idea to g
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Of course the date hasn't been decided yet, but I guess it will be
> around the same time like the last two: in july, with no conflict
> with other important events.
July in Vienna! More power to you!
--
Marcelo
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:32:39PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
> Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
> sponsors, get the location fixed and find the time to raise the money
> needed for the trave
Hi!
I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
sponsors, get the location fixed and find the time to raise the money
needed for the travels and such. And 2005 because this years debconf
has been
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I have done this as well, as I want these bugs out of my face
> > because the are already fixed. 'pending' is my standard "make it go
> > away because it has already been dealt with" tag.
>
> OK, but
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030729 08:57]:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:58:02 -0700, David Nusinow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Even the most
> >knowledgable people will appreciate hardware detection.
>
> As long as it can be reliably turned off.
Another thing is the ease to switch it off. I
Colin Watson, on 2003-07-29, 09:14, you wrote:
> I think it's better for interested parties to look at this information
> themselves:
So what about adding a small paragraph to the RC bugs mail reading
something like: "If you want to help in improving Debian's quality please
consider having a look
Hi, Roland Mas wrote:
> In my particular case (gforge), I'll have to hack around the
> no-binary-in-diff limitation of dpkg-source. I work in the same
> repository as upstream, and some images were changed.
Ugly. The best idea I have about that is to affix a .0.1 to the upstream
version number a
Matthias Urlichs (2003-07-29 10:06:54 +0200) :
> OK, but IMHO it's a good idea to get bugfixes out to the users
> reasonably fast so that they can check if the bug really is
> fixed. To that end, if you really have dealt with the bug, why not
> upload the package?
In my particular case (gforge),
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:10:57AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> And why not those with 'help'? (Or it does already exist?)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=help (or
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:help), linked among other things from
http://qa.debian.org/.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:31:53AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Currently, BTS sends weekly two mails to debian-devel-announce - one about
> WNPP and one about RC bugs.
>
> I think it will help to improve Debian quality if several more lists will be
> "broadcasted" by BTS:
I'm rather con
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> (2) Since all people say that having an account on the Debian machines
> is the major reason that everybody and his brother want to be DD.
> Why should simply asking for that have a positive result?
Surely that's not "having an
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I have done this as well, as I want these bugs out of my face because the
> are already fixed. 'pending' is my standard "make it go away because it
> has already been dealt with" tag.
OK, but IMHO it's a good idea to get bugfixes out to the users reasonably
fast so th
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
