Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:06:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2003 08:16:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 15 03:16:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cKzK-000222-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:16:42 -0500
Received: from tc218-187-83-227.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw ([218.187.83.227]
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 19cKzI-0004kG-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 04:16:42 -0400
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19cD8a-0004BC-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:53:44 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: general: users able to underreport disk usage
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.16
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:53:44 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: general
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-15
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Users are able to underreport disk usage, thus cheating usage fees,
when
* the administrator uses df(1) to assess disk usage
* the disk in question is as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 201352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2003 03:07:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 29 22:06:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hhIZ-0008Ro-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:06:43 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 19hhIZ-00036e-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:06:43 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19hhIV-0002Qb-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:06:39 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:06:38 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
df(1) works as designed and documented. In the example scenario, the
'administrator' is not understanding the information provided by the tool.
--
- mdz
