On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:14:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > The upstream tag doesn't help with filtering out uninteresting > > > bugs from the default bug list. > > > Add '&exclude=upstream' to the URL? > > Not really. The reason it doesn't help is that the semantics of the > upstream tag aren't those that are needed for filtering out bugs that > have been dealt with (which is the kind of uninteresting we're talking > about here).
Yeah, I know, but let's pretend I mean 'fixed-upstream' or some yet-to-be-added tag. > Besides, that doesn't help the default bug list :) . I'm not *overly* bothered about that, to be honest ... Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
