On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:23:44AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [ I did a search for AH_OUTPUT, but found no matches. This error
> > has me stuck. ]
>
> AH_OUTPUT is new in autoconf 2.5x [in autoheader], it isn't in 2.13;
> perhaps this is at least partly a compatiblity problem? (autoco
> [ I did a search for AH_OUTPUT, but found no matches. This error
> has me stuck. ]
AH_OUTPUT is new in autoconf 2.5x [in autoheader], it isn't in 2.13;
perhaps this is at least partly a compatiblity problem? (autoconf
2.5x has been shown before to be enough of a compatiblity disaster
that we'v
Hi,
From reviewing the bug report, Ian Jackson sided with the
maintainer, with the opinion that not all binaries shipped with a
package need work when the dependencies are satisfied. Dale Scheetz,
Jason Gunthorpe, and I disagreed.
The suggestion was to either:
a) split off ca
And the SUM of the numbers in the version number is also
an even number!!!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:52:57PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:52:57 +1000
> From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again
> Mail-Followup
Hello,
I am getting into all sorts of problems trying to keep kerberos4kth
support in Heimdal.
If I keep it, I get grave bug reports that the package cannot get built
because of a build loop with kerberos4kth.
If I remove it, I get grave bug reports complaining that kerberos4kth is
no longer sup
Brian May wrote:
> Dumb question of the day: how do you put it in a seperate file?
>
> What should this seperate file be called, etc?
>
> (I always have used the same file, because I thought this was
> the only thing supported).
man debconf-devel, LOCALIZATION
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:21, Brian May wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:29:24PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Another possibility is bug 142916. This resulted in one of my machines
> > becoming non-bootable.
>
> Interesting.
>
> I complained loudly about a similar problem ages ago, when
> I ins
Hi,
Before woody is released, please test depends issues for
task-x-window-system. I remember for potato there was a problem
with libc6-dev. It would be good if task-kde also had no problems.
I am referring to a new woody install not an upgrade.
I only have a dialup connection, to long to get ISO
Hi,
One of my packages (libboost-dev) has a lot of documentation as HTML
files, complete with inlined graphics and the like. However, these
files are all mixed in with the source code.
I need a maintainable way to get a list of these files.
There must be some tool that will parse a set of html
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 19.04.02 um 00:05:14 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> > Would anybody weep if we deprecated putting all the translations in
> > one file?
>
> I wouldn't weep. Seperate files is a very reasonable thing to do.
Dumb question of the day:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:29:24PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> Another possibility is bug 142916. This resulted in one of my machines
> becoming non-bootable.
Interesting.
I complained loudly about a similar problem ages ago, when
I installed a broken version of libc6 without ldconfig,
and it
Hello,
I received both these emails.
Did my package get accepted or not?
If not, what was wrong with it?
Did my package get installed or not?
(normally "NEW" packages means it needs to be manually approved).
Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Rejected: heimdal-cli
I demand that Carlos Sousa may or may not have written...
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
> "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
>> 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
>> should not have lef
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-20
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: kimagemapeditor
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Jan Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kimagemapeditor.sourceforge.net/
* License
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
> "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
> > 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
> > should not ha
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
> 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
> should not have left the remote server without a qualified domain, but
> this is a bu
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other
> > > >> mta's filled in their own name for some reason...
> > > >
> > > > That's the default beh
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> The gcompris package is *big* (15MB), and I won't be able to upload a
> binary version before monday.
>
> 1.0.3-1 does not build from source. I've uploaded signed .dsc + diff
> for 1.0.3-2 in [EMAIL PROTECTED], upstream source already
Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report.
Hi Andreas,
Sorry for the delay in replying. But I didn't receive your response directly
(by default the BTS doesn't send followup messages to the bug submitter) .
> I just want to know which window manager you are using. I did not found
> an
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gronk
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Jamie Zawinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.jwz.org/gronk/
* License :
# Gronk, Copyright (c) 2000, 2001, 2002 by Jamie Zawinski <
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:19:45PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other mta's
> > >> filled in their own name for some reason...
> > >
> > > That's the default behavior of all MTA's I'm familiar with.
> >
> > Some MTAs do indeed q
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > The reason is so the you can type mail and have it end up
> > at the right place. i.e. you don't need to know the mail domain to
> > send a mail to the local user
The gcompris package is *big* (15MB), and I won't be able to upload a
binary version before monday.
1.0.3-1 does not build from source. I've uploaded signed .dsc + diff
for 1.0.3-2 in [EMAIL PROTECTED], upstream source already in sid.
I someone could please build and upload it quickly, it will b
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:19:12 +1000
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > at the right place. i.e. you don't need to know the mail domain to
> > > send a mail to the local user.
> >
> > In that case, the mail message should *never* leave the local
> > domain.
>
> And if the target user has a .forwa
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other
> > >> mta's filled in their own name for some reason...
> > >
> > > That's the default behavior of all MTA's I'm familiar with.
> >
> > Some MTAs do indeed qualify
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-nonlinear (?)
Version : 0.9.20020417
Upstream Author : Jim Lindsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alpha.luc.ac.be/~lucp0753/rcode.html
* License : GPL
Description : GN
Matthew Woodcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have a question: whydo we have to keep .adb files in the package
>> since .ads files are meant to contain the interface? (well, indeed
>> except from generics).
>
> I don't know that we 'have to', but one reason to do
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡
°üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼
ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
*¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä.
*Ens'21 ÁÖ°¡ ¿¹Ãø ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
http://b006.ens21.co.kr"; title="ÁÖ°¡¿¹ÃøÇÁ·Î±×·¥ Ens21
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡
°üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼
ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
*¾È³ç Çϼ¼¿ä.
*Ens'21 ÁÖ°¡ ¿¹Ãø ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
http://b006.ens21.co.kr"; title="ÁÖ°¡¿¹ÃøÇÁ·Î±×·¥ Ens21
ÀþÀº ¿©ÇàÀÚµéÀÇ ²Þ - (ÁÖ)´ÚÅÍÆ®·¡ºí