On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600 > "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC > > 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message > > should not have left the remote server without a qualified domain, but > > this is a bug in *their* implementation, *not* in the receiving MTA. > > > > Please do more research into the standards before making such a claim > > next > > Have you done yours? Quoting from RFC 2822: > "In all cases, the "From:" field SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that > does not belong to the author(s) of the message."
Are we talking about From:, or From_? Only the former is specified in 2822, the latter is from 2821 (which has no such specification, AFAICT). Rewriting the From: header is, indeed, not good; I was under the impression that we were, however, seeing From_ rewritten. -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
