I demand that Carlos Sousa may or may not have written... > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600 > "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC >> 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message >> should not have left the remote server without a qualified domain, but >> this is a bug in *their* implementation, *not* in the receiving MTA.
>> Please do more research into the standards before making such a claim next > Have you done yours? Quoting from RFC 2822: > "In all cases, the "From:" field SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that > does not belong to the author(s) of the message." Why is it that your attention is directed at the From header instead of the lack of a Sender header? -- | Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington, | Linux PC, Risc PC | youmustbejoking | Northumberland | No Wodniws here | demon co uk | Toon Army | <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/> (PGP 2.6, GPG keys) Tagline of Borg: "Your tagline has been assimilated." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
