Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 642784 network-manager 0.9.0 breaks trinity/knetworkmanager Bug #642784 [network-manager] network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional Changed Bug title to 'network-manager 0.9.0 breaks trinity/knetworkmanager' from 'network-manager 0.9.0-2 non

Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-26 Thread Philip Ashmore
On 26/09/11 21:41, Michael Biebl wrote: Unless you can provide further information regarding this issue, I don't see another way but closing the bug report. I reported this to Trinity "Trinity networking breaks with network-manager 0.9" http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=521 It's

Bug#642784: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 25.09.2011 15:44, schrieb Michael Biebl: > notfound 642784 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 > found 642784 0.9.0-2 > thanks > Am 25.09.2011 15:26, schrieb Philip Ashmore: >> On 25/09/11 13:11, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> Which desktop environment and NM frontend do you use: >> I'm running KDE trinity 2.5.12 - k

Bug#642784: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 25.09.2011 15:44, schrieb Michael Biebl: > notfound 642784 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 > found 642784 0.9.0-2 > thanks > Am 25.09.2011 15:26, schrieb Philip Ashmore: >> On 25/09/11 13:11, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> Which desktop environment and NM frontend do you use: >> I'm running KDE trinity 2.5.12 - k

Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 642784 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 Bug #642784 [network-manager] network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional There is no source info for the package 'network-manager' at version '0.8.1-6+squeeze1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for

Bug#642784: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Michael Biebl
notfound 642784 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 found 642784 0.9.0-2 thanks Am 25.09.2011 15:26, schrieb Philip Ashmore: > On 25/09/11 13:11, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Which desktop environment and NM frontend do you use: > I'm running KDE trinity 2.5.12 - knetworkmanager. knetworkmanager is no longer developed

Bug#642784: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Philip Ashmore
On 25/09/11 13:11, Michael Biebl wrote: tags 642784 moreinfo thanks Am 25.09.2011 02:42, schrieb Philip Ashmore: Package: network-manager Version: 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there. * What led up to the situation? I ran synaptic and updated

Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 642784 moreinfo Bug #642784 [network-manager] network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 642784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#642784: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-25 Thread Michael Biebl
tags 642784 moreinfo thanks Am 25.09.2011 02:42, schrieb Philip Ashmore: > Package: network-manager > Version: 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi there. > >* What led up to the situation? > > I ran synaptic and updated my system. > >* Wha

Bug#642784: network-manager 0.9.0-2 non-functional

2011-09-24 Thread Philip Ashmore
Package: network-manager Version: 0.8.1-6+squeeze1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there. * What led up to the situation? I ran synaptic and updated my system. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? 1. I booted Ubuntu 2.