Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325564
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
0.10.1-3 built with gcc 4.0.2 fixed the problem (see [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgp5WBtvZ7Ly9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 325564 -1
Bug#325564: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Bug 325564 cloned as bug 327835.
> reassign -1 python2.3-dev
Bug#327835: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Bug reassigned from package `so
clone 325564 -1
reassign -1 python2.3-dev
thanks
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:41:31PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I don't see any reason to work around plenty of packages when this is
> >> for sure an important toolchain bug which cannot be delayed
Coin,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't see any reason to work around plenty of packages when this is
>> for sure an important toolchain bug which cannot be delayed for long and
>> my packages are not important ones and are already available
>> (unaffected) for most architect
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:30:29AM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, I wonder what exactly your intent is here. Do you mean to say that
> > you don't care about being able to get new versions of pyopenal and soya
> > into testing until the toolchain
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Marc,
Coin Vorlon,
> So, I wonder what exactly your intent is here. Do you mean to say that
> you don't care about being able to get new versions of pyopenal and soya
> into testing until the toolchain bug is fixed, and that you don't care
> wheth
You have inadvertently CC'd this message that seems applicable only to
bug #325564 to bug #325565 against my package, gtypist. Please omit
325565 from any followup messages.
Thanks,
Ben Armstrong
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hi Marc,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:48:38AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> > tags 325564 + wontfix
> Bug#325564: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
> Tags were: sid
> Tags a
Package: soya
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
soya fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4.
A full
10 matches
Mail list logo
