clone 325564 -1 reassign -1 python2.3-dev thanks On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:41:31PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I don't see any reason to work around plenty of packages when this is > >> for sure an important toolchain bug which cannot be delayed for long and > >> my packages are not important ones and are already available > >> (unaffected) for most architectures. > > I don't see how being unable to use -O3 is "important". As policy > > clearly points out, -O3 is not appropriate as a general-purpose > > optimization flag; there are very few packages that actually need it, > > and I'm pretty sure it's inappropriate to use as a default optimization > > flag for python modules. > Not important for Debian, but still a bad brokeness. Any proof there is > null probability this bug affects other parts of code ? No. When do you ever have proof about a bug's scope in Debian? > > Ok, then it sounds to me like the appropriate thing to do is to reassign > > this bug to python, rather than to "wontfix" it. > Perfect. Ok, cloning/reassigning. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
