Hi Marc, On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:48:38AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > > tags 325564 + wontfix > Bug#325564: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k > Tags were: sid > Tags added: wontfix
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:48:40AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > > tags 325563 + wontfix > Bug#325563: pyopenal_0.1.5-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k > Tags were: sid > Tags added: wontfix So, I wonder what exactly your intent is here. Do you mean to say that you don't care about being able to get new versions of pyopenal and soya into testing until the toolchain bug is fixed, and that you don't care whether these packages have to be removed from testing in order to get other updates in? That's the only way I can interpret a "wontfix" tag on an RC bug. Since policy does say that you should be using -O2 in most cases, I don't really see why you would wish to ignore the bug when a simple workaround is almost certainly possible. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
