In years of
using Debian I've never seen the stable distribution be broken like this
and it would be a shame if it wouldn't be fixed very quickly.
Br,
-Roberto
x86_64 as having the
same data model, I came up with the attached patch. It allows the build
to succeed on both mips64el and mipsel. I am preparing to test (using
the libmongocrypt tests as a proxy) and I will report back with the
results of those tests.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
nd ensure that package is not removed is something that should be done
soon. The introduction of the new package could also be pursued in
parallel and once it is accepted into the archive, then bibledit could
be updated to depend on the package and remove the duplicate components.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
t; If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
> issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
>
> Paul
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
> [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?pac
t;
Hi Sascha,
I cannot attend to this at the moment, so I give you my blessing to
proceed with the NMU.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Package: mongo-cxx-driver
Severity: serious
Justification: keep package out of testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This package should not enter testing.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.10
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 06:52:35PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Am 20.03.21 um 17:49 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
> > Could you request from the release team an exception for this
> > bug so that we can deal with it in the next release cycle without
> > completely expelli
m the next
release. Could you request from the release team an exception for this
bug so that we can deal with it in the next release cycle without
completely expelling the package in the meantime?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
xt
release. Could you request from the release team an exception for this
bug so that we can deal with it in the next release cycle without
completely expelling the package in the meantime?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
t;
I read the thread (and looked at your changes). This seems to a bit of
a tangled mess. It will be a few days before I can take a closer look
and provide my thoughts.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Package: musl
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for musl.
CVE-2020-28928[0]:
wcsnrtombs destination buffer overflow
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common Vulnerabi
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 02:00:05PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> The fix from Adrian is now applied on salsa. Who wants to upload
> bibletime 3.0-3?
>
I have just built and uploaded the package.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 02:35:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: found -1 3.0-1
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:45:45PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >...
> > I spent some time on this today and thanks t
seError"
>
Thanks for the report. An update to fix this is being prepared and
should be published later today.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Hi Sudip,
Well done, thank you!
Regards,
Roberto
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:45 PM Sudip Mukherjee
wrote:
> Control: tags 957620 + patch
> Control: tags 957620 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for nvtv (versioned as 0.4.7-8.1) and
> uploaded it
Bonding doesn't work. Same behavior here.
Debian bullseye/sid 5.6.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.6.7-1 (2020-04-29) x86_64
GNU/Linux
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave: 67: Maximum function recursion depth
(1000) reached
the Git repository.
I have pushed tags for each of the above versions as well (except the
jessie version, as noted).
I include all of this information so that the cyrus-sasl2 in particular
is made aware of all the changes I have pushed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 08:36:00AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:06:19PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:19:19PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > >
> > > The following vuln
he upload then let the security team handle the DSA
publication?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:20:30PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Control: tags 936338 + patch
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for cpuset (versioned as 1.6-3.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
>
Hi Sandro,
Many thanks for taking care
close 849428 1.15.1+dfsg-2
thanks
Yes, go ahead.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:30 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 10:09:21 +0100, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> > You can reschedule it to unstable without delay.
>
> Thanks, rescheduled.
>
> My changes to libdmtx are waiting in the NEW queue. W
t; to go into unstable without delay.
>
> Regards,
> smcv
>
--
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
Debian developer
sie update? If not, I will wait until
you have patch ready and I can build/upload for jessie and release the
corresponding advisory.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
gt;
> Please make sure that the version inside the file matches before
> uploading.
>
> Kind regards,
> Reiner
>
--
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
Debian developer
Package: src:firefox-esr
Version: 60.2.0esr
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi all,
trying to build firefox-esr on PowerPc64 (ppc64) arch i obtain the following
error:
DEBUG: Executing: `/usr/bin/rustc --print target-list`
DEBUG: Creating `/tmp/conftest8qrTCp.rs` with
Transcript written on refman.log.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:6: refman.pdf] Error 1
>
Thanks for the report. This has just been fixed with the
following commit.
commit addd0535f36e4a2734b9b5321e2e0ad398c5e20c
Author: Roberto Bagnara
Date: Fri May 4 09:26:25 2018 +0200
Disable Kp
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
cbrpager is unmaintained, obsolete and replaced by others. It depends on
obsolete libraries (gconf) so it should be removed from Debian.
--
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
Debian developer
the package for upload, but I will
wait a couple of days to allow for any objections and/or suggestions.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
>From 1d31a0cf1712d3eb001a686c06fe1225ba48fd04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Andrews
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 14:56:33 +1000
Subj
eems to affect debian wheezy too.
>
> Please check if it is possible to apply the same fixes as RedHat did.
> Or at leas update the bind package in wheezy-backports to match the version
> and security fixes from debian jesssie.
>
I am taking a look at this now.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
de archive mirror network. The stretch
packages have all been built for a few hours now and should show up in
the archive mirrors within a few hours.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Apologies for the long delay. The package looks good, so I have
uploaded it. Also, there was no tag in Git for 2.11.1-1, so I also
tagged it and pushed the tag.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:03:06PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Thank you for the report. There was a recent security update of Tomcat 7
> which is the likely cause for this issue.
>
> Roberto can you take a look please?
>
Hi Markus & others,
I was able to identi
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:03:06PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Thank you for the report. There was a recent security update of Tomcat 7
> which is the likely cause for this issue.
>
> Roberto can you take a look please?
>
Hi Markus,
I also received a direct email from an
anisms are available. You can also issue the same commands
using the reportbug command-line utility.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#forwarded
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:56:20PM +, Teus Benschop wrote:
>This bug report has been forwarded to the upstr
Package: pd-xsample
Version: 0.3.2~git20161105.1.d16761a1-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pd-xsample&arch=ppc64el&ver=0.3.2%7Egit20161105.1.d16761a1-1&stamp=1486228622&raw=0
...
make[2]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
info: using Makefile.pdlibbuilder
It also breaks in asn1c master branch, so I opened a bug upstream at:
https://github.com/vlm/asn1c/issues/179
(assuming that you have otherwise built/tested in a wheezy environment).
>
> How do I upload, i.e. to what queue do I dput, and do I use -sa?
>
You can dput to security-master like a normal security update and -sa
would likely get the upload rejected as the .orig.tar.gz is
Here are the upstream commits that fix CVE-2017-11352:
ImageMagick-6:
https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/7f1f01b695e869c410ee10e2176f8fd764f09373
ImageMagick-7:
https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/86cb33143c5b21912187403860a7c26761a3cd23
Regards,
-Roberto
Hello.
Samba announced an update a few hours ago to address this problem:
* BUG 12721: Fix regression with "follow symlinks = no".
That appears to correspond to #858564. I am not sure if the fix has any
effect on #858590.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.co
on.
>
> Thanks,
> Tobias
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "ppl";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libppl13v5" | .depends ~ "libppl14";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libppl14";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libppl13v5";
Just to say that u
the
problem will be solved very quickly.
Kind regards,
Roberto
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 14:34:14 +0200 Roberto Bagnara
> wrote:
>> The new version upstream (PPL 1.2, released in February 2016) solves
>> all problems wrt GCC 6. If upgrading to the latest upstream release
&g
he wheezy packages using the same debdiff,
save for an appropriately tweaked changelog entry, to security-master.
Once your regression announcement is out for the DSA, I will follow-up
with one for the DLA.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:43:01PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 18:17:20 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:02AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > Is your plan to release this as a -2 regression update t
regression update to the previous
DSA? I assume that is what you plan to do, but I wanted to confirm to
be certain.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
,,.forceput’’ made evince
> display PostScript again.
Thanks for the info. That gives me more confidence that this is
appropriate for wheezy.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
et me know if you need help with the regression
test.
> @Roberto: note, +deb8u1 -> +deb8u3 to see the regression, not the
> intermittent +deb8u2.
>
Of course, I was able to confirm it between +deb8u1 and +deb8u3 on
Jessie.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://peop
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:31:43AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:54:39AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Salvatore mentioned that the same bug o
ript upstream? I guess that with seeing the
evince problem in Jessie with both ghostscript 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u2 and
9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u3 I wasn't certain that the fault is completely with
ghostscript.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
> Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
> actu
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:54:01PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
> Could you double-check/confirm if you see the same
> https://bugs.debian.org/840691 in wheezy? Note although the bug is
> still assigned to ghostscript I think the problem uncovered is
> actu
compilation of unrelated files.
I did not investigate further, and just removed all of free pascal: you might
want to look at why such a file is present, and find a way to reach the same
objectives without breaking the rest of the LaTeX distribution
Cheers
--
Roberto
*** Reporter, please consider
On 08/06/2016 03:50 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Quoting Roberto Bagnara (2016-08-06 14:34:14)
>> On 08/06/2016 02:27 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Quoting Dmitry Tsarkov (2016-08-04 22:09:56)
>>>> I'm the implementer of the origina
GCC 6. If upgrading to the latest upstream release
is not wanted (why?), then patches have been provided in this very issue.
Kind regards,
Roberto
--
Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Applied Formal Methods Laboratory - University of Parma, Italy
mailto:bagn...@cs.unipr.it
On 07/02/2016 10:37 AM, u wrote:
> Here's a debdiff which fixes this bug.
> I've tested building in a chroot using gcc-6.
>
> One might want to consider setting up a Git repository for this package :)
Thanks!
Indeed the best of all would be to upgrade to PPL 1.
Package: nautilus
Version: 3.20.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Using Wayland nautilus works fine, but using xorg nautilus closes on every
start.
On console it is showed the following message:
(nautilus:5984): Gtk-WARNING **: Theme parsing error: :1:0: Failed
to impo
Package: konqueror
Version: 4:15.08.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
the current version of Konqueror only offers the File Size view, Cervisia
View and File Search view.
The usual file view/icon view/compact view modes have disappeared.
This makes
em without success.
Anyway, to accommodate SWI-Prolog version 7.x the attached
patches should be applied. Please mail ppl-de...@cs.unipr.it
if you have further details to allow us reproduce the problem.
Kind regards,
Roberto
--
Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Applied Formal Methods Laboratory - U
message.
For the little I understand, I am in favor of the resolutions
you propose, but I don't know how to implement them (I mean,
without changing upstream code). If you can send more detailed
instructions, we will be glad to try and implement them.
Kind regards,
Roberto
--
Prof. R
Daniel,
I've been meaning to help out with this for some time, but I have been
extrememly busy the last few months. Let me at least help by making the
upload. Can you point me to the source package?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:07:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
.0
> APT prefers stable
> APT policy: (900, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /
so.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
h work, but I will have a look at this
tonight.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I do use it. I was planning on trying to update the package this
weekend.
Regards,
-Roberto
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:55:59AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 8 October 2014 15:54, wrote:
> > retitle 758121 bibletime: New upstream release fixes display problem in
&
Add dependency on gnome-online-miners closes #734187, but the package
gnome-online-miners does not exist, is imposible install
gnome-documents 3.12.1-1
--
Saludos,
Roberto De Oliveira
Hi Klaus,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:22:57AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
>
> thanks for investigating the probem.
>
> Am So den 2. M�r 2014 um 1:30 schrieb Roberto C. S�nchez:
> > I have to admit that made quite a mistake here. I did not thoroughly
> &g
sl2
itself (line 535 of lib/dlopen.c).
I apologize for incorrectly pushing the problem off to mutt. I will
restore the missing directory and upload an updated package as soon as I
possibly can.
Regards,
-Roberto
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:12:54AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> severity
therefore not useful
- With multi-arch, all the libsasl2-modules-* binary packages are
shipping their files in /usr/lib//sasl2
It appears that this is causing mutt to fail ungracefully. The
existence of the directory should be tested for.
Regards,
-Roberto
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:22:08PM +0100
Hello Gabriele, sorry for delay in answer,
Today I installed 20130613+svn660+dfsg-1 and works fine. Thank you.
2013/8/27 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:40:54AM -0430, Roberto De Oliveira wrote:
> > Package: pidgin-skype
> > Version: 2
Package: pidgin-skype
Version: 20121110+svn645+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
After install pidgin-skype, pidgin freeze on startup, appears contact
list window with nothing on. I have pidgin 2.10.7-2 and skype
4.2.0.11-1
If I uninstall pidgin-skype
Package: ocamldsort
Version: 0.15.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the 4.00 release of OCaml comes with a version of ocamldep that outputs
dependency lines of the
form
foo : bar baz
instead of the old
foo: bar baz
Since the parser in ocamldsort is not expecting
Package: mount
Version: 2.20.1-5.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
I attached an external disk via USB. The disk is paritioned into
sdc1 primary partition
sdc2 extended partition
sdc5 - ext3 partition
I wanted to mount sdc5, but called
mount /dev/sdc
t.cgi?bug=669479#22.
Just wondering: do you have a strong reason to stick with PPL 0.11.2
and not to upgrade to PPL 1.0? PPL 0.11.2 is an old release and PPL 1.0
has lots of improvements over it, including important bug fixes.
Just my 2 cents.
Kind regards,
Roberto Bagnara
(PPL project l
Package: openvas-server
Version: 2.0.3-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Here is the exact error that occurred upon a fresh install:
[snip]
Setting up openvas-server (2.0.3-4.1) ...
dpkg: error processing openvas-server (--configure):
subprocess instal
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:29:42PM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
Yeah, it is true, the packet it is listed in the control file, and a simple
apt-get build-dep binutils-z80 installs the packet and all the stuff works
without any problem. Sorry for the noise.
Roberto.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: binutils-z80
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Running apt-get source in a directory different of /usr/src meaning fails
getting the source packet:
k0ga@hal9000:~/tt/binutils-z80-2.22$ ls
0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 k0ga k0ga 38 dic 20
*** [test_tbb_plain] Terminated
> > Build killed with signal TERM after 15 minutes of inactivity
> >
I just rebuilt this on my amd64 system (in a sid pbuilder chroot) and
the build completed fine. Can you offer any suggestions as to where I
should start t
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote:
> > Hi,
> > with the following patches the package builds fine.
>
> Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly helpful.
>
> Roberto, can you
ard nothing at all. Based on that, I think that the
maintainer is probably MIA, and removal seems like the right thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Simon,
I completely forgot about this bug, and I could prepare a release with your
patch, but I don't have much time and the patch seems ok, so go ahead with
the NMU.
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
Debian developer
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Simon Paillard wrote:
> tags 643408
I don't get it ready in time.
Thank you for your work.
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
Debian developer
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:36 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tags 641156 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for tv-fonts (versioned as 1.1-
Date: 2011 05 20
Hi,
I can confirm the same problem on our prod server after upgrade to
libapr1-1.2.12-5+lenny3:
the problem is triggered by some configuration directive in apache.conf;
package details:
ii apache2
2.2.9-10+lenny9Apache HTTP Server metapackage
ii apache2-mpm-prefork
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:31:41PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez , 2011-04-09, 20:27:
> >Here is an excerpt from the i386 build log:
> >
> >checking for pkg-config... no
> >
> >However, on mipsel here is what we see:
> >
> >c
s at least version 0.9.0... yes
If you look at the build dependencies for coinor-ipopt, pkg-config is
not listed there. That seems to indicate that this is a problem with
the chroot on the mipsel build host not being clean.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~ro
Package: advi
Version: 1.9.0-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On a freshly installe Debian squeeze, installing advi does
not bring in ghostscript-x.
As a consequence, just typing advi starts with the following warnings:
Warning: Unknown device: x11
Warning: Unrecov
test it, and all symbols matched...
Could you please address them?
>
I hope so
> Thanks!
>
> BTW, alpha's an early 64-bit architecture, even if its name doesn't
> indicate so explicitly.
>
yes I know, It was my first 64-bit box some years ago, and I remember
perfectly it was a pain in the neck when I had to compile something :)
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:31:46PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Please disregard the second diff, as it is already part of the package
> in squeeze (just a bit of forgetfulness on my part, not remembering it
> was already there). So, I only require approval for the init script
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:35:49AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Release Team,
>
> It has just recently been reported that the shorewall-lite package in
> testing (and likewise, the shorewall6-lite package in testing) contains
> a bug which renders the package largely
vering=
+g_logread=
finished=0
As with the first fix, this would have to be applied once to each of
shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite. As I will be updating to correct
the two RC bugs, I'd also like permission to include this additional
fix.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
king at the Makefile now and will either fix that or add
appropriate documentation to the README.Debian file.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I am curious as to whether the release team thinks that #608347 (quoted
below) is really RC. Do I need to target the fix for this to go into
Squeeze?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 06:20:45PM -0800, Jorge Moraleda wrote:
> Package: libtbb2-dbg
> Version: 3.0+r035-1
> Just
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:03:10PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:29:01 +0100, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >> > created by dh_strip, excerpted from debian/rules below:
> >> >
> >> > dh_strip -s -psasl2-bin -plib
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:14:50PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > >
> > I'd be interested to know if anyone has a recommendation on how to
> > handle this. The two packages in questi
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >
> I'd be interested to know if anyone has a recommendation on how to
> handle this. The two packages in question are -dbg packages that are
> created by dh_strip, excerpted from debian/rules below:
>
Sorry, I wrote:
# aptitude safe-upgrade
instead of,
# aptitude dist-upgrade
with dist-upgrade it upgrades smoothly. I'm sorry,
Roberto.
aded temporally space, please check it.
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~yabuki/tmp/
>
I think that changing the source format in an NMU is probably too
intrusive a change. The urgency right now is to fix #537744 and
#573905.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.c
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:19:50AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Roberto C.Sánchez:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:25:08PM +0700, Yukiharu YABUKI wrote:
> > > Tags: 573905 + patch
> > >
> > > Sorry guys.
really solve this.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
se read the whole log for #537744 and then also for
#558412.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that this problem is also discussed in #537744, and in
#558412. The solution is non-trivial.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
