On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:56:55PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: oprofile > Severity: serious > > oprofile seems like a candidate for removal: > > - Last maintainer upload in 2009 > - No followup to security or RC bugs from the maintainers > - Low popcon > - Alternatives exist (perf) > - Depends on legacy libs (604366) > - Broken wih current kernels (615964) > > Unless there're objections/fixes, I'll file a removal bug in a month. >
Moritz, I have no objection. I become co-maintainer of oprofile a little over two years ago because one of my clients was using it and needed some work done on the package. The maintainer was not especially responsive at that time, so I did what needed to be done. However, my client has since moved away from using oprofile and when I asked to be removed as co-maintainer I heard nothing at all. Based on that, I think that the maintainer is probably MIA, and removal seems like the right thing. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
