Bug#672208: python-dolfin: Extension module cpp not found/built

2012-05-08 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python-dolfin Version: 1.0.0-4+b2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Here's an example traceback when running the poisson equation demo. $ python demo_poisson.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "demo_poisson.py", line 40, in from dolf

Bug#631589: python-dolfin: python -c "import dolfin" fails with MPI error

2011-08-16 Thread LUK ShunTim
On 08/16/2011 05:30 PM, Johannes Ring wrote: > Hi Luk, > > thanks for the report and sorry for the late reply. > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:57 AM, LUK ShunTim wrote: >> $ python -c "import dolfin" >> *** The MPI_comm_size() function was called before

Bug#631589: python-dolfin: python -c "import dolfin" fails with MPI error

2011-06-24 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python-dolfin Version: 0.9.11-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Here's a transcript. $ python -c "import dolfin" *** The MPI_comm_size() function was called before MPI_INIT was invoked. *** This is disallowed by the MPI standard. *** Your MPI job will now

Bug#575961: crash during startup

2010-04-08 Thread LUK ShunTim
Andrew Lee wrote: > LUK ShunTim wrote: >> It seems that upgrading lxde-common to 0.5.0-3 in sid does not solve the >> problem :-(, I still got a seg fault with lxsession (it's started with >> startx). >> >> Please let me know what further testing/informati

Bug#575961: crash during startup

2010-04-05 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: lxsession Severity: normal Hi, It seems that upgrading lxde-common to 0.5.0-3 in sid does not solve the problem :-(, I still got a seg fault with lxsession (it's started with startx). Please let me know what further testing/information on my side is needed to help to solve it. Regar

Bug#549283: python-getfem cannot be installed

2009-10-01 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python-getfem Severity: serious Hi, Here's the error message during installation: update-python-modules: error: debian/python-getfem++/usr/share/python-support/python-getfem++.public is not a recognized python-support module. dpkg: error processing python-getfem++ (--configure): subp

Bug#541065: python2.6-minimal: fails to install

2009-08-11 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python2.6-minimal Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, While installing python2.6, which depends on python2.6-minimal, I got these error messages Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from .../python2.6-minimal_2.6.2-2_amd64.deb) ... new installation of python2.6-minimal;

Bug#522287: petsc: please fix this bug

2009-05-09 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: petsc Version: 3.0.0 Severity: normal Hi, While it seems that setting PETSC_DIR, PETSC_ARCH and PETSC_LIB_DIR works around the problem when petsc alone is used, slepc is *still unusable* even when SLEPC_DIR and SLEPC_LIB_DIR are set as well. Regards, ST -- System Information: Debian

Bug#520472: python-visual: seg fault on running bounce.cy (and other) example

2009-03-19 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python-visual Version: 5.03~rc-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, I got a seg fault when trying python-visual with several examples. Here's the gdb backtrace when running the bounce.py example. (gdb) run bounce.py Starting program: /usr/bin/python bounce.py

Bug#492683: checkinstall: messes up man pages when doing "Compressing man pages"

2008-08-03 Thread LUK ShunTim
Felipe Sateler wrote: > El 28/07/08 02:48 LUK ShunTim escribió: >> Package: checkinstall >> Version: 1.6.1-8 >> Severity: grave >> Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > I'm not really sure if this is a grave bug... we'll leave it like this for

Bug#492683: checkinstall: messes up man pages when doing "Compressing man pages"

2008-07-27 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: checkinstall Version: 1.6.1-8 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I guess this is result of filesystem translation not working properly with the newer kernels as reported previously. When checkinstall is doing "Compressing man pages", it messes up the real man

Bug#474342: libarpack2: library files missing

2008-04-04 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: libarpack2 Version: 2.1+parpack96-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, The library files (lib*.so) are somehow missing from binary package. The size of the package is only 9460 bytes. You can also see it on http://packages.debian.org/sid/libarpack2 FWIW, apt-

Bug#442959: nvidia-glx uninstallable - conflicts with xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4-2

2007-09-18 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: nvidia-glx Version: 100.14.11-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nvidia-glx provides xserver-xorg-video-1.0 which conflicts with xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4-2 and hence nvidia-glx is not installable, resulting in the loss of hardware acceleration. Regards, ST -- Sys

Bug#435083: libpetsc2.3.3-dev not available making petsc-dev uninstallable

2007-08-05 Thread LUK ShunTim
Adam C Powell IV wrote: > merge 434666 435803 > thanks [snipped] > I believe petsc 2.3.3-1 now builds, since the new suitesparse and > openmpi were uploaded. Can you please try to build it and see if it > installs properly? > > Unfortunately, I can't force the buildds to retry building it, so I

Bug#435799: gdebi does not go well with python-apt 0.7.3.1

2007-08-03 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: python-apt Version: 0.7.3.1 Followup-For: Bug #435799 While upgrading to python-apt 0.7.3.1 fixed the "undefined symbol: pkgCPU" problem, it appears to have introduce another for gdebi. Here's the traceback from running gdebi. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gdebi",

Bug#435083: libpetsc2.3.3-dev not available making petsc-dev uninstallable

2007-07-29 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: libpetsc2.3.3-dev Version: 2.3.3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to install petsc-dev, this error is encountered: The following packages have unmet dependencies: petsc-dev: Depends: libpetsc2.3.3-dev but it is not installable E: Broken packages When

Bug#433180: bug-buddy: Bug buddy error - failed to parse the xml-rpc response

2007-07-17 Thread LUK ShunTim
Fernando Herrera wrote: > Hi Luk, thanks for your answer, it's really useful. It seems that > there is an encoding problem while reading the .xsession-errors file > (that text is inserted onto the GtkTextBuffer, so it should be UTF-8 > valid). Anyway, when getting the text from the buffer to sent i

Bug#433180: bug-buddy: Bug buddy error - failed to parse the xml-rpc response

2007-07-16 Thread LUK ShunTim
Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007, LUK ShunTim wrote: >> While trying to report a bug on natutilus, I got this error with bug-buddy. >> The screen shot of the error messages can be seen here: >> http://www.imagecows.com/uploads/7e91-Sc

Bug#433180: bug-buddy: Bug buddy error - failed to parse the xml-rpc response

2007-07-15 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: bug-buddy Version: 2.18.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable While trying to report a bug on natutilus, I got this error with bug-buddy. The screen shot of the error messages can be seen here: http://www.imagecows.com/uploads/7e91-Screenshot-BugBuddy-crash.png Rega

Bug#368009: apt-src: Apt-src install fails

2006-05-22 Thread LUK ShunTim
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:23:22PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: >> Steve Langasek wrote: [snipped] > >>> Right now, this doesn't really look to me like an apt-src bug. > >> I really can't tell. I'm not well-versed in the in

Bug#368009: apt-src: Apt-src install fails

2006-05-20 Thread LUK ShunTim
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:29:50PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: >> Running "apt-src install package_name" fails with this message >> "Unable to parse package file >> /var/lib/apt/lists/_opt_deb-repo_source_Sources (2)E: No such source&quo

Bug#368009: apt-src: Apt-src install fails

2006-05-19 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: apt-src Version: 0.25.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Running "apt-src install package_name" fails with this message "Unable to parse package file /var/lib/apt/lists/_opt_deb-repo_source_Sources (2)E: No such source" for whatever package. It appears that the f

Bug#356194: octave2.9: Octave-2.9.4 - random crashes

2006-03-10 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: octave2.9 Version: 2.9.4-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I'm experiencing random crashes of octave 2.9.4 on a debian/sid box. I apt-get the source and rebuild with debug on and here is the backtrace. $ gdb octave GNU gdb 6.4-debian Copyright 2005 Free

Bug#350744: gliv aborted

2006-02-24 Thread LUK ShunTim
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:16:59PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > > [snipped] > > Aha. Ok, this is not a bug in gliv. The invalid free happens inside scim, > which is not a dependency of gliv at all. There is a known bug involving > scim,

Bug#350744: gliv aborted

2006-02-23 Thread LUK ShunTim
Steve Langasek wrote: > reopen 350744 > thanks > > Uh... whoops, sent to the wrong address. Let's reopen this... ShunTim, the > request still stands. :) > > Thanks, Here's the backtrace with gdb after re-building with debug enabled. $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug gdb gliv GNU gdb 6.4-debian

Bug#350744: gliv_1.9.4-1

2006-02-08 Thread LUK ShunTim
Remco van de Meent wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 23:09 +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > >>>I just uploaded gliv_1.9.4-1 to the archive. Could you please check if >>>this new version resolves your problem with gliv? >>> >> >>Unfortunately, no. :-( The same

Bug#350744: gliv_1.9.4-1

2006-02-07 Thread LUK ShunTim
Remco van de Meent wrote: > Hi > > I just uploaded gliv_1.9.4-1 to the archive. Could you please check if > this new version resolves your problem with gliv? > > Thanks > > Remco > > Hello Remco, Unfortunately, no. :-( The same "free(): invalid pointer" error. I did try to build it using apt

Bug#350744: gliv aborted

2006-01-31 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: gliv Version: 1.9.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Starting gliv results in the following error *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x080be2d8 *** Aborted and gliv cannot run. Please take a look. Regards, ST -- System Information: Debian Releas

Bug#346338: texinfo: postinst error - typo in script?

2006-01-06 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: texinfo Version: 4.8-3 Severity: serious Justification: serious Here's the error message Setting up texinfo (4.8-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/texinfo.postinst: line 56: update_ls_files: command not founddpkg: error processing texinfo (--configure): subprocess post-installation script retu

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-05 Thread LUK ShunTim
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800 > LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k. > > > Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a stro

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2006-01-04 Thread LUK ShunTim
ou have found a problem, or type 'other' to report a more general problem. > linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 *** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. *** Using 'LUK ShunTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address. Detected character set: ISO-8859-1 Please change

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting, I got errors similar to that reported in bug #343048, that is /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such

Bug#337062: IM provided by scim-tables-zh no longer available in scim 1.4.1

2005-11-02 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: scim-tables-zh Version: 0.4.3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Current scim-tables-zh conflicts with scim >>1.1.0 and hence IM such as Changjie etc for traditional Chinese are lost. When will it be upgrade to work again with scim 1.4.1 and later? Regards, ST --

Bug#333894: dx depends on non-existent libmagick6

2005-10-14 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: dx Version: dx Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Error message when installing dx: dx depends on libmagick6 libmagick6 does not appear to be available Please take a look. Regards, ST -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable

Bug#324808: scim-chinese: sicm-chinese uninstallable with scim 1.4.1

2005-08-24 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: scim-chinese Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # debfoster scim-chinese gives scim-chinese: Depends: scim (>= 1.0.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: scim (< 1.1) but it is not going to be installed Same situations applies to other I

Bug#319215: gksu cannot be installed - depends on non-existent version of libgksu

2005-07-20 Thread LUK ShunTim
Package: gksu Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Here's the installation message gksu: Depends: libgksuui1.0-1 but it is not installable E: Broken packages Regards, ST -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT poli