Bug#1035782: nuitka: Nuitka should hard-depend on an earlier python version and thus be uninstallable

2024-07-31 Thread Kay Hayen
check this weekend what the status is and get back to you, mostly likely with an upload to at least mentors. Yours, Kay Am Mi., 31. Juli 2024 um 14:07 Uhr schrieb Stuart Prescott < stu...@debian.org>: > Hi Kay > > I see that an updated nuitka has still not made it to Debian and so &

Bug#1035782: nuitka: Nuitka should hard-depend on an earlier python version and thus be uninstallable

2023-05-09 Thread Kay Hayen
The later versions of Nuitka with less problems didn't make it to unstable yet, they would only give an error. However, I expect to make an upload in the next 2 weeks that will then close this bug. Yours, Kay

Bug#1022400: nuitka: FTBFS: make[1]: python2: No such file or directory

2022-10-23 Thread Kay Hayen
-// -e 's/\..*//'` -ge 11 ] && echo true) This is handling "unstable" only, and I am assuming Debian Sid changed to provide a "n/a" value there instead now. I will produce an upload later this coming week to address it. Yours, Kay

Bug#937166: Bug#961896: nuitka: diff for NMU version 0.6.11.3+ds-1.1

2021-02-06 Thread Kay Hayen
NMU, but I am not Yaroslav, so I don't know for certain. Yours, Kay

Bug#937166: Python2 is not really depended on

2020-05-04 Thread Kay Hayen
kages even of old distributions like jessie, so Py2 doesn't > seem needed in any suite. > That is true. The package will build, but it will not be usable with Python2 then. It also would mean that it could not be used to compile Python2 programs of users that are otherwise executable on their system. Yours, Kay

Bug#937166: Python2 is not really depended on

2020-02-22 Thread Kay Hayen
ifferent order, e.g. "base-files (>= 11) | ..." and your checker tools (which I assume found this) will be happier? As I said, in the past, I have used this approach to disallow tools that were not usable. Recommending python-xml will be replaced with python3-xml or simply removed, but lxml will later become a dependency, where similar problems will appear. Please advise. Yours, Kay

Bug#947573: Nuitka and scons

2020-01-14 Thread Kay Hayen
open points of Python 3.8 compatibility? Otherwise I could also (ask my sponsor to) upload in 2-3 days. Best regards, Kay

Bug#912116: nuitka FTBFS: test failures

2018-10-29 Thread Kay Hayen
e. These now might be actual bugs become visible only with 3.7.1, which I need to look at, and fix it. Yours, Kay

Bug#868353: samba-libs dependencies broken in jessie debian-security repo

2017-07-14 Thread Kay
I have the problem after apt-get upgrade samba is removed and reinstall is not possible!   sources.list deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security jessie/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security jessie/updates main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.deb

Bug#827502: hunspell integration Consts obsolete?

2016-06-17 Thread Aaron Madlon-Kay
Hi. I’m a core contributor to OmegaT. The entire package is years out of date. Those constants haven’t existed since 2011 as best I can tell. If this package isn’t going to be updated, I would suggest removing it entirely. -Aaron On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 09:36:30 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > Pac

Bug#761530: Confirmation

2014-09-16 Thread Kay Hayen
ith extra fixes included. This was really helpful to tell that it's not a baseline version. In the concrete case, I can make a run time check to see if the new behaviour is needed or not. But that is not generally the case. In terms of solution, I am not so sure yet, how f2 and f3 can be made to differ, it is going to need a new upstream release. I hope to find a solution during the week though. Yours, Kay

Bug#761530: nuitka: FTBFS: Tests failures

2014-09-15 Thread Kay Hayen
is no longer used to determine if locals is a dictionary, and therefore writable, or not. Apparently in f3 it is not, and in f2 it is. I wonder, if this is really an upstream change, or maybe a Debian specific change. Unfortunately, this will need more investigation and has no obvious fix. I am going to check against baseline 2.7.8 now and report on that. Yours, Kay

Bug#567210: doc-available always returns false without network

2014-01-29 Thread Michael Kay
the other hand, if you can identify where this was referenced from, I can take a look and see if it ought to be included. It looks as if it comes from one of the XHTML variants, but there seem to be many of these in use. Michael Kay Saxonica -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@

Bug#567210: doc-available always returns false without network

2014-01-29 Thread Michael Kay
/issues/1813 which I think is fixed in the 9.5 branch but not in 9.4. The underlying cause is inconsistent use of system IDs and public IDs in the W3C-published DTDs. Michael Kay Saxonica On 29 Jan 2014, at 12:41, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Michael Kay wrote: &g

Bug#567210: doc-available always returns false without network

2014-01-29 Thread Michael Kay
3c-dtds and the corresponding list for 9.4 is at: http://www.saxonica.com/documentation9.4-demo/index.html#!sourcedocs/w3c-dtds Michael Kay Saxonica On 29 Jan 2014, at 08:28, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Michael Kay wrote: >> Saxon-B 9.1 does not include co

Bug#567210: doc-available always returns false without network

2014-01-28 Thread Michael Kay
he problem. The current release is 9.5. We have no plans to issue further maintenance releases for 9.1, although we do appreciate that some users have been sticking with that release because of the discontinuities introduced between 9.1 and 9.2. Michael Kay Saxonica On 28 Jan 2014, at 13:28, Eugen

Bug#567210: doc-available always returns false without network

2014-01-09 Thread Michael Kay
, not from Saxon. So Saxon doesn't actually know what files are being requested. Regards, Michael Kay Saxonica On 9 Jan 2014, at 08:17, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Dear Mike, > > I am trying to solve issue reported against debian: saxonb 9.1.0.8 > package. The full report

Bug#726368: (no subject)

2013-12-23 Thread Benjamin Kay
Could you please post the contents of ~/.xsession-errors? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#725714: udev firmware loading does not work in the Debian installer

2013-12-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 00:28 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > [...] >> >> Such an explicit message would probably use printk_emit() and pass >> >> structured data with the filename and the ides from the kernel to &

Bug#725714: udev firmware loading does not work in the Debian installer

2013-12-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 13.12.2013 00:34, schrieb Michael Biebl: > See also > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-November/014771.html > > But that thread just echoes what Kay already said, that user-space > firmware loa

Bug#725714: udev firmware loading does not work in the Debian installer

2013-12-12 Thread Kay Sievers
e information about *missing* firmware would be to add explicit messages to the kernel when things are really *missing*. Blindly tracing firmware requests and guessing around never really made sense. Also: That all this is gone now is a side-effect of moving firmware loading into the kernel where

Bug#725714: udev firmware loading does not work in the Debian installer

2013-12-12 Thread Kay Sievers
i and install > necessary (firmware) packages based on the modalias information? > > Especially [2] looks like it could be a replacement. > That said, isenkram-autoinstall-firmware doesn't seem to use the > modalias info and instead greps through the modinfo output which looks >

Bug#725714: udev firmware loading does not work in the Debian installer

2013-12-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 12.12.2013 23:19, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Michael Biebl >> wrote: >>> This was removed upstream [1] and is highly unlikely to be added back. >>> Especially conside

Bug#730956: nuitka: FTBFS: Tests failed

2013-11-30 Thread Kay Hayen
new version of Nuitka to be released soon will address the issue by treating ">=2.7.6" the same as "2.7.5+". Best regards, Kay Hayen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#682146: nuitka: broken if g++ is not installed: TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

2012-07-19 Thread Kay Hayen
ither depended on nor recommended by nuitka. Truly so. Thanks for your report. I will prepare an upload in the next days that will address the "g++" bug, and also the "CXX" environment bug. I think I have only tested "CXX" for setting to "clang", which has no check on "CXXVERSION" currently. Yours, Kay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#665021: nuitka: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: base-files (< 6.0) but 6.7 is to be installed

2012-03-23 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello Lucas, Am 23.03.2012 10:27, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: So it's much easier to fix that problem in your package, for example by build-depending on B | A. I totally agree and prepare an upload with this for my sponsor Yaroslav Halchenko at the next opportunity. Yours, Kay Hayen

Bug#665021: nuitka: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: base-files (< 6.0) but 6.7 is to be installed

2012-03-23 Thread Kay Hayen
talled, it will change the result. Yours, Kay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#665021: nuitka: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: base-files (< 6.0) but 6.7 is to be installed

2012-03-23 Thread Kay Hayen
u implying that the choice is not made in a deterministic way? It probably is just that somebody or something hates it when not all choices are valid. Best regards, Kay Hayen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#665021: nuitka: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: base-files (< 6.0) but 6.7 is to be installed

2012-03-22 Thread Kay Hayen
-dbg (>= 2.6.6-2), python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-2), rst2pdf (>= 0.14-2), scons (>= 2.0.0), base-files (<< 6.0) | python3-all-dev (>= 3.2), base-files (<< 6.0) | python3-all-dbg (>= 3.2) I am assuming a bug in an underlying package and ask to reassign this bug. Yours, Kay Hayen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#557103: upgraded uw-imapd to dovecot

2011-10-27 Thread Richard Kay
I should have reported this in May when I did the Lenny-> Squeeze upgrade. I couldn't get Uw-imapd working at all after the dist-upgrade, despite it having worked relatively trouble-free for many years through a few Debian releases. As I was fighting other fires at the time following the dist-upg

Bug#553533: ftp.debian.org too

2009-11-01 Thread Kay Hayen
Hello, this is just to confirm that ftp.debian.org is also affected. I didn't yet find a workaround that makes apt-get ignore signatures. Is there one? Yours, Kay Hayen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#398962: [2.6.18] Platform devices incorrectly provide $MODALIAS?

2006-11-28 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 08:12 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > >For now you can just > > blacklist all platform events like Marco already suggested. > > Nope. modprobe don

Bug#398962: [2.6.18] Platform devices incorrectly provide $MODALIAS?

2006-11-27 Thread Kay Sievers
that, but we hope to get that fixed. For now you can just blacklist all platform events like Marco already suggested. Kay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#378839: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#378839: bluez-pcmcia-support: udev support broken

2006-07-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 15:43 +0200, Felix Homann wrote: > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:18, Kay Sievers wrote: > > PHYSDEVPATH and the 'device' link are both deprecated and will go away > > some day in the future, you better pass the values you want to use in > > your sc

Bug#378839: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Bug#378839: bluez-pcmcia-support: udev support broken

2006-07-25 Thread Kay Sievers
tter since it's simpler: > > $DEVPATH -> /class/tty/ttyS2 > $PHYSDEVPATH -> /devices/pci:00/:00:1e.0/:06:01.0/0.0 PHYSDEVPATH and the 'device' link are both deprecated and will go away some day in the future, you better pass the values you want to use in your s

Bug#378839: bluez-pcmcia-support: udev support broken

2006-07-21 Thread Kay Sievers
ld better not be used. They will not go away soon, but if that can be solved without them, it would be nice. PHYSDEVBUS is just the subsystem of the parent device, which can probably be matched with BUS=="pcmcia". Kay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323236: nut: reinstalling nut breaks if user cyrus is not there

2005-08-15 Thread Kay Martinen
Package: nut Version: N/A; reported 2005-08-15 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Before this i tried to change from uw-imap to courier and then to cyrus. Both did not work so i returned to uw-imap and deleted user cyrus. Newer nut-versions (2.x) did not install and while dei