Package: google-mock
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: unstable
google-mock version 1.5 is incompatible with libgtest-dev version 1.6
(currently in Debian): attempting to compile the attached program (which
does nothing but include mock.h) results in screenfuls of errors along
the lines o
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:53:54PM -0800, Kees Cook was heard
to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.6.3-3.2ubuntu1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty
>
> This bug report was also filed in
The immediate problem should be fixed with
4a021fb5d4963d4e0756fcc182223b05939062d6.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure that I can cut a security release before
the weekend (it'll take some time and I'm still decobwebbing my dev
box). Anyone who wants to cut a security NMU that cherry-picks the
abov
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 05:06:54PM +0930, Ron was heard to
say:
> Serious as per policy 2.5
Guess we'd better increase the priority of iostreams, then.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
I looked into this a bit today and I don't see how it can be happening.
The code in question is basically doing this, if you rip out some STL
and de-factor it:
int where = idx;
try
{
if(isspace(s[idx]))
++idx;
else
throw ParseException();
}
catch(ParseException &)
I'm preparing an upload for this now.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
>
> > Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
> >> I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Benjamin Cama was
heard to say:
> Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:54 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
> > - The submitter of #575137 uses btrfs which reportedly may cause severe
> > corruption of dpkg's database and other data:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cg
So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've
mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure:
1) On some people's systems, /usr/bin/aptitude isn't being restored
after the upgrade.
2) On other people's systems, it is.
3) I don't know why.
4) Even if
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Benjamin Cama was
heard to say:
> I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and
> lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg -L aptitude'
> too.
Have you ever had aptitude version 0.5+ installed on this system
be
I have an upload prepared to fix these bugs, but I can't upload it
because the apt includes are broken (just filed a bug about it).
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
The attached patch should fix this problem. In addition to installing
system.h in apt-pkg, it's necessary to update all the #includes to refer
to it as instead of just .
Daniel
diff -Nru --exclude configure --exclude changelog --exclude '*.pot' --exclude '*.po' apt-0.7.25.2/apt-inst/contrib/
Package: libapt-pkg-dev
Version: 0.7.25.2
Severity: serious
Since the latest apt upload, no source file that includes
will compile:
In file included from temp.cc:30:
/usr/include/apt-pkg/error.h:56:20: error: system.h: No such file or directory
In file included from temp.cc:30:
/usr/include/ap
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:44:08AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows (18/01/2010):
> > It looks like the build succeeded on all the release
> > architectures, so I think I might downgrade this so that aptitude
> > can get into testing. (the versi
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:32:36AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois was
heard to say:
> Only keeping the #include line is sufficient, I can't reproduce this
> issue double free issue.
Weird.
It looks like the build succeeded on all the release architectures, so
I think I might downgrade this so that
OK, I can't see any sign of a double-free in either valgrind or
libefence, which are usually pretty good about catching this sort of
thing. Can you run something similar on FreeBSD and see what it says?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Ah, I got fooled by some garbage printed by the cppunit test. The
actual problem is the double-free in the Boost tester. D'oh.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Weird thing is: I get the same failure, but it doesn't kill the build.
It should. So by my count that's two bugs here :-/.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 07:56:01PM +, peter green
was heard to say:
> The attatched patch resolves the FTBFS by taking the simple approach
> of building with -fno-strict-aliasing .
That obviously avoids this, but I'd rather fix the bug directly
(besides, doesn't disabling strict aliasing l
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Petr Salinger
was heard to say:
> IMHO, yet better would be patch below, some library might use some
> other signal internally, you really want to only block SIGWINCH.
Sounds good to me.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:46:16PM +0200, George Danchev
was heard to say:
> Hi, the following patch fixes that crash on amd64.
>
> --- src/gtk/gui.cc.orig 2009-12-05 22:43:21.0 +0200
> +++ src/gtk/gui.cc 2009-12-05 22:43:40.0 +0200
> @@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@
> if(!gtk_ini
I can't reproduce this with the latest cwidget and g++ versions
(0.5.16 and 4.4.2 respectively). Can anyone else?
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
This is a bug about apt-get (and, IMO, specifically its delayed
handling of autoremove -- it looks like the reporter got a lot of
cruft on his system without noticing until he ran "autoremove").
It's true that aptitude won't let you remove a package without also
removing packages that depend o
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau
was heard to say:
> reopen 557982
> kthxbye
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:28:31 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > With any luck, this is fixed in 0.5.16-1 in unstable. I addressed the
> > problem by hav
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau
was heard to say:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:28:31 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > With any luck, this is fixed in 0.5.16-1 in unstable. I addressed the
> > problem by having the tests query for the system limi
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:45:26AM -0800, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau
> was heard to say:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 16:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > See e.g. bug#554218, which also corresponds to
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau
was heard to say:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 16:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> See e.g. bug#554218, which also corresponds to EAGAIN returned by
> pthread_create.
So apparently hppa has trouble running thread stress tests, even for
Since basically nothing changed between the last version and this
one, that's (more than) a little weird, particularly since this built
and passed its unit tests on every other architecture. In particular,
none of the code invoked by testBox has changed at all since 0.5.13.
Daniel
--
To U
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:55:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-11-18 12:25 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > According to packages.debian.org, ia32-apt-get doesn't exist. I guess
> > this is some local package you built?
>
> No, ia32-apt-get had
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:54:32AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
was heard to say:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:45:26 -0800
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > update-alternatives runs in the postinst of aptitude 0.6.0.1-1.
> > That package doesn't provide /usr/bin/aptitude
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:54:32AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
was heard to say:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:45:26 -0800
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > update-alternatives runs in the postinst of aptitude 0.6.0.1-1.
> > That package doesn't provide /usr/bin/aptitude
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:05:37AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
was heard to say:
> 0.4.11.11-1+b2 -> 0.6.0.1-1
>
> during install:
>
> update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/aptitude-curses to
> provide /usr/bin/aptitude (aptitude) in auto mode.
> update-alternatives: warning: not replacing /usr/
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 08:11:39PM +0530, Kartik Mistry was
heard to say:
> As shown below. I tried to read README/README.Debian provided with package but
> it doesn't provide help about gtk frondend startup etc
>
> 20:02:24-kar...@olive:~$ aptitude-gtk
>
> GThread-ERROR **: GThread system may
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:36:02AM +0200, Felix Zielcke was
heard to say:
> Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2009, 20:06 -0700 schrieb Daniel Burrows:
> Is your /dev/mapper/emurlahn-root a symlink to some /dev/dm-X device?
> If so you need to run `update-initramfs -c -t -k all' and if yo
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.97~beta4-1
Severity: serious
The error I get is:
Setting up grub-pc (1.97~beta4-1) ...
grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for /.
My / is just a normal LVM partition on this machine.
Daniel
-- Package-specific info:
*** BEGIN /proc/mou
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:36:37PM +0100, ael was
heard to say:
> 1) An entry in /var/log/messages:
>
> Oct 2 10:48:44 conquest3 kernel: cdrom[4987]: segfault at 200 ip b807b71d sp
> bf
> a34890 error 4 in ld-2.9.so[b8068000+1c000]
> Oct 2 10:48:56 conquest3 kernel: cdrom[5028]: segfault at 2
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:50:31PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli
was heard to say:
> In data mercoledì 9 settembre 2009 16:06:17, Daniel Burrows ha scritto:
> : > Have you seen this at all since you reported it?
>
> No
OK. Well, I'm going to reassign this to apt, since it
Have you seen this at all since you reported it?
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 06:58:24PM +0200, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> It is libapt that is segfaulting, and reportedly this happens also with
> apt-get.
Thanks for all the triage, Sven. :-)
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:44:19PM +0400, Andrey was heard
to say:
> I've just installed the latest experimental version of aptitude, and
> it crashes when I'm trying to examine a conflict.
>
> Backtrace is attached.
>
> I'm ready to provide any additional info,
I believe this is fixed in th
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 01:49:36PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what's causing these symptoms. A backtrace from an
> > affected system (or maybe a state snapshot generated by
> > aptitude-create-state-bundle)
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:57:41PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer
was heard to say:
> I'm running several intrusion detection systems, e.g. rkhunter
> (which in turn uses unhide). For quite some time now, unhide gave me
> false positives (I'm quite sure, that my system is not compromised),
> say
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 02:51:06PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> Any ideas on how I got into this situation? The only unusual thing I did
> was "uninstall" some packages that were recommended after selecting
> blueman for installation in aptitude. This was mostly just
> python-all-dev, I
I've had a discussion in private email with Henry about this bug.
It's not entirely clear what bit him, but it sounds like the problem is
something I've seen scattered reports of on emailing lists and on the
Web. Here it is: since aptitude removes unused packages by default and
apt-get does not,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:26:33PM -0700, Henry was heard
to say:
> Aptitude is so similar to apt-get, newbies assume the syntax is the same.
> Yet, the obvious choice, "upgrade" is not safe. It tries to remove all
> kinds of needed packages.
Could you please post a transcript (input and ou
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre
was heard to say:
> On 2009-02-26 07:25:43 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > But of course the dependencies of the new coq are already installed,
> > and apparently these don't supply what's needed for the old
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre
was heard to say:
> On 2009-02-25 19:34:02 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > The problem is that the new version of coq that you were trying to
> > install has an undeclared conflict with coq-libs. I'll reassign th
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:50:44PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre
was heard to say:
> Unpacking replacement coq ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/coq_8.2~rc2+dfsg-3_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/coq/contrib/interface/vernacrc', which is also
> in package co
I just had a realization. We don't need to mess around with bisect
and recompiling; you can just grab old versions from
snapshot.debian.net and see whether the bug shows up in them.
Once we have a tighter range of versions, it might be worth trying
bisect out, but it'll be easier too.
Here
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:47:34PM -0800, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> Something that would be even better if you can manage it would be to
> use "hg bisect". This will be time-consuming, but has the potential to
> track down exactly what's happening, or at lea
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:23:55AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
was heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows a scris:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
> > was heard to say:
> >> I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch
> >
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
was heard to say:
> I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch
> and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks
> after any set of operations that is done with dpkg. When the operation
> fi
Just FYI, I've committed a patch to bzr that restores the old ABI.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:12:21AM +, Jisakiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> In fact aptitude dist-upgrade also dies for me with segfault on amd64...
Michael,
I'd like to take a look at fixing this ABI issue. It looks like you
aren't working in the debian-sid tree; could you
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:23:22PM -0400, Jason Riedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> And Sven Joachim writes:
> > They are not necessary since the problem is in apt, see #499322.
>
> Thanks! Should I file a wishlist for aptitude's lack of diagnostic
> output? It'd be nice if aptitude p
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 03:24:28PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> It turns out non-starting part of the bug only appears when using using
> a $HOME that had GNOME on it at one time, then XFCE and doing a fresh
> install of the system (e.g. only $HOME is the same).
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 06:22:27AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> It appears that selecting the task (+ on the task) selects gdm before
> xfce4-terminal, therefore gdm's dependencies pull on
> gnome-session-manager before xfce4-terminal is selected in the gui.
I
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> severity 495954 critical
> thanks
>
> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
> aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
>
> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:41:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Other comments:
> As for the claim that this is an apt bug instead of an aptitude bug:
>
> > I think it pretty much confirms this: particularly the fact that
> > aptitude believes that it's installi
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:30:14PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2. A typescript of the upgrade with "-o Debug::pkgDpkgPM=true"
> >added (both to get more
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> severity 495954 critical
> thanks
>
> This bug "makes unrelated software on the system break". Well,
> aptitude is a package manager, so most of its bugs do...
>
> Are you interested in a dpkg.log or
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
> > *does* have a real maintainer (Martin
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-ucs
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the
.tukw.qwest.net ([71.217.92.155]:62499
helo=[127.0.1.1])
by algebraicthunk.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1KGDh9-0007WX-9q; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:27 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMA
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:43:10AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
[snip]
> dpkg: latex-ucs: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
> latex-ucs-contrib depends on latex-ucs.
> Removing latex-ucs ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/latex-ucs.postrm: line 12:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:13:50PM +0100, peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> tags 488132 +patch
> thanks
>
> DO NOT SEND THIS MESSAGE YET
>
>> I'd like to verify the
>> fix, but there doesn't seem to be an amd64 emulator in the archive...
>
>
> I have added int casts to all the pr
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 08:32:34AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 07:33:40PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Which architectures besides amd64 are failing? I'd like to verify the
> > fix, but there doesn't seem
Which architectures besides amd64 are failing? I'd like to verify the
fix, but there doesn't seem to be an amd64 emulator in the archive...
and it looks like everything else succeeded.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 06:53:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.11.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build on some arches with the following
> error:
> cmdline_resolver.cc:239: error: format '%d' expects
Package: compiz-gtk
Version: 0.7.6-2
Severity: serious
I saw this while upgrading today:
Preparing to replace compiz-gtk 0.7.4-1 (using .../compiz-gtk_0.7.6-2_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement compiz-gtk ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/compiz-gtk_0.7.6-2_i386.deb
(--unpac
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > cp ./build/scripts/dselect/* debian/apt/usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/
> > cp -r ./build/locale debian/apt/usr/share/
> > cp debian/bugscript debian/apt/usr/share/bug/apt/script
> > cp debian/apt.logr
These bugs should be fixed by apt 0.7.12, which I've just uploaded to
the archive. Once it migrates to testing I'll close them.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:16:48AM -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Obviously the prompt should happen up-front, but it's not the case
> that aptitude will happily remove mktemp without a prompt.
...of course, I mean "not the case in my t
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:21:39AM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Le jeudi 24 avril 2008 à 00:48 +0100, Tom Parker a écrit :
> > Installed from Etch 4.0r2 DVDs a little while back. Using a mix of
> > stable,testing,unstable and experimental packages. Been upgrading
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:32:03AM +0400, Aleksey Midenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Monday 07 April 2008 20:21:20 you wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:06:50PM +0400, Aleksey Midenkov
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > > Package: aptitude
> > > Version: 0.4.11.1-1
>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:06:50PM +0400, Aleksey Midenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.11.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> The program get terminated at very start.
I don't think it's grave for aptitude to break when its database is
corrupt, so I'm downgra
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:24:03AM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.11.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> Today's "aptitude safe-upgrade" failed, apparently aptitude gets into an
> endless loop resolving the dependencies:
I was wondering i
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:51:26PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.4.11-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
>
> Missing dependency for package debtags
> $ dpkg -s debtags
> Package: debtags
> Status: install ok installe
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:34:13PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 06:02:03AM +0000, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Changes:
> > libsigc++-2.0 (2.0.18-1) experimental; urgency=low
> > .
> >* New
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce this bug and so I can't see exactly
what's happening. But according to screenshots the submitter sent me in
private email, the dependency in question isn't being marked as "broken"
by apt. I suspect some sort of consistency violation is happening at
that level,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:56:55AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On 2008-02-12 08:27:18 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Could you please tell me:
> >
> > (a) what command you used to upgrade bibtex2html,
>
> I don't
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:23:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> reassign 465241 aptitude
> kthxbye
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 17:12:09 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > reopen 465241
> > thanks
> >
> > On 2008-02-11 15:41:43 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:33:46PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-09 21:01]:
> > I tried to fix this today, but quickly discovered that #456971 on
> > libsigc++-2.0-dev is blocking this further down the path. As I cur
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:09:03AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
>
> The "markauto" and "unmarkauto" commands work in reverse as specified in
> the manual, and in reverse as common sense would say they should.
>
> I have a manually installed package, libdirectfb-1.0
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> > (cd . && ikiwiki --setup ikiwiki.setup)
> > ikiwiki.setup: Can't locate HTML/Scrubber.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8
> /usr/lib/perl5
Package: libghc6-hunit-doc
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: grave
The only documentation files contained in the libghc6-hunit-doc
package are some index files and an empty documentation page for the
module Main. The module itself is completely undocumented, unless a
link to the JUnit page counts.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
> which is only available in experimental.
Ow. So, release team, is the correct way of handling this without
making everyone even more angry at m
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 06:18:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> > reopen 451400
> Bug#451400: cwidget: FTBFS: /bin/sh: -c: line 0: s
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:07:55AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> reopen 451400
> found 451400 0.5.5-3
> thanks
Is it failing with the same error? I tested building this release on
a real system without doxygen.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Grrr. I even tested an arch-only build in pbuilder (or at
least I thought I did, apparently not).
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package apt
reassign 452377 synaptic
thanks
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:53:02AM +, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.7.9
> Severity: grave
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> Today, in sid, I marked for upgrade xserver-xorg-core (2:1
Package: hyperestraier
Version: 1.4.9-1.1
Severity: grave
Hyperestraier can't be installed in unstable because it depends on
libfcgi0c2, which has been removed from unstable. I note that
libfcgi0ldbl conflicts and replaces libfcgi0c2; maybe hyperestraier
should depend on that instead?
Daniel
It looks to me like the problem is a missing "break" statement at
line 181 of offlineimap/folder/Maildir.py. In an installed offlineimap,
the file is:
/usr/share/python-support/offlineimap/offlineimap/folder/Maildir.py
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:07:12PM -0500, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
>
> On 26-Jul-07, 08:42 (CDT), Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does the new .deb in unstable fix this for you?
>
> Yes and no. It works in
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 04:07:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but applying this patch to 0.4.5.4-1
> did not make my lockups go away.
>
> I did the following on my sid system:
>
> apt-get source aptitude
> apt-get build-dep
Excellent! Thanks for hunting this down.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> You will no doubt be delighted to know that the lock up is still
> happening, despite my previous report.
>
> It's definitely not tied to the particular 'g,g' sequence; I can trigger
> it just by sta
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 10:56:27PM +0200, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> tags 432323 -unreproducible
> thanks
>
> These bugs are also easily reproducible. Just try to run aptitude, attach
> debugger, stop, and continue. This will fairly likely interrupt the select
> which wil
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:03:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> Ok, I could solve the problem.
> By the way, anyone knows why the diff showed no difference before and
> after?
Probably the erroneous file was in /var/cache/apt; killing /var/lib/apt
has a side-effect of causing th
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 01:32:49PM +1200, Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude
> >aptitude: error while loading shared libraries:
> >libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> >or directory
What version of apt d
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
