control: notfixed -1 android-udev-rules/20250314+ds-4
control: fixed -1 android-udev-rules/0~20250314+ds-4
sorry for the previous typo. and this email should fix them all.
-Roger
Processing control commands:
> notfixed -1 android-udev-rules/20250314+ds-4
Bug #1102442 [android-udev-rules] android-udev-rules has an undeclared file
conflict on /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/51-android.rules
The source android-udev-rules and version 20250314+ds-4 do not appear to match
any binary pac
Processing control commands:
> notfixed -1 20250314+ds-4
Bug #1102322 [android-udev-rules] android-udev-rules ineffectively Replaces
android-sdk-platform-tools-common due to the /usr-move transition (DEP17 P1)
There is no source info for the package 'android-udev-rules' at version
'20250314+ds-4
control: notfixed -1 20250314+ds-4
control: fixed -1 android-udev-rules/0~20250314+ds-4
sorry for the previous typo. and this email should fix them all.
Your message dated Tue, 29 Apr 2025 02:34:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104323: fixed in ptpython 3.0.30-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104323,
regarding ptpython: /usr/bin files got lost
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
RC bug as an attention grubber is OK but let's not use it until it is proven to
be so. Let's continue discussion first.
Also, before making noise on d-devel@l.d.o to discuss this package and the use
of Pre-Depends, let's distill issues. I still need more clari
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #1100677
[debian-reference-de,debian-reference-en,debian-reference-es,debian-reference-fr,debian-reference-id,debian-reference-it,debian-reference-ja,debian-reference-pt,debian-reference-pt-br,debian-reference-zh-cn,debian-reference-zh-tw]
Control: severity -1 normal
I am going to lower the severity of this bug report to normal
until we hear back from the original submitter as to if this is the
general trixie mDNS firewall issue.
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1103636 [kdeconnect] kdeconnect does not work anymore after upgrade to
trixie
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
1103636: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103636
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Source: esys-particle
Version: 2.3.5+dfsg2-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: sanv...@debian.org
(CCing Santiago as the last Uploader.)
esys-particle previously built on all archs, but now cannot build on
armel, armhf, i386, as its Build-Depends are not satisfiable:
∙ ∙ esys-parti
* Étienne Mollier [250428 23:09]:
About the point of policy violation, the package has d/t/control
restriction "needs-internet" as described below from autopkgtest
documentation README.package-tests.rst:
| needs-internet
| The test needs unrestricted internet access, e.g. to download test d
* Étienne Mollier [250428 23:09]:
About the point of policy violation, the package has d/t/control
restriction "needs-internet" as described below from autopkgtest
documentation README.package-tests.rst:
| needs-internet
| The test needs unrestricted internet access, e.g. to download test d
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1102988 [src:dillo] 10 year old browser is unsafe to use on the web
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1102988: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:24:12 +0200
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Source: dillo
> Version: 3.0.5-7
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
>
> Following the recent discussion on debian-devel, I'm concerned that
> this package is still in stable and testing.
>
> There has be
Package: ptpython
Version: 3.0.30-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hey.
It seems that after 3.0.29-3 all files in /usr/bin went missing from the
package.
Cheers,
Chris.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 22:07:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103250: fixed in yasm 1.3.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103250,
regarding yasm: FTBFS on amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el, ppc64,
powerpc, riscv64
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
Quoting Santiago Vila (2025-04-28 21:18:07)
> Version 0.6.1-1 uploaded yesterday builds ok in both my setup and the
> official buildds.
>
> I'm not sure where the bug is/was, but if you consider this to be a bug in
> img2pdf, then the bug is fixed in 0.6.1-1.
no, the changelog of my last upl
It's r-base 4.5 that's blocking r-cran-fansi, not the other way round.
It looks like the reason is that r-cran-fansi's tests (possibly
unintentionally) assert that it doesn't produce warnings, while loading
a package built in R 4.5 into R 4.4 triggers a warning.
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104158: fixed in r-cran-hdf5r 1.3.12+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104158,
regarding autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:35:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104160: fixed in r-cran-s2 1.1.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104160,
regarding autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:35:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104159: fixed in r-cran-rcmdcheck 1.4.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104159,
regarding autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:34:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103227: fixed in r-bioc-grohmm 1.40.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103227,
regarding r-bioc-grohmm: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:34:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103227: fixed in r-bioc-grohmm 1.40.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103227,
regarding r-bioc-grohmm: FTBFS: DecayAlgorithm.c:94:15: error: expected
identifier or '(' before 'false'
to be marked as done
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:20:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104012: fixed in valkey 8.1.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104012,
regarding valkey: CVE-2025-21605
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #1103981 [proftpd-core] proftpd-core: Does not start with default
configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
1103981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103981
De
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:19:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103087: fixed in cppnumericalsolvers 1.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103087,
regarding cppnumericalsolvers: FTBFS in testing/i386: E: Build killed with
signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
t
Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/tony-travis/PIQUE/issues/4
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your report, I have informed upstream on their
issue tracker.
About the point of policy violation, the package has d/t/control
restriction "needs-internet" as describ
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed upstream
Bug #1104275 [src:pique] pique: autopkgtest failure, possibly not allowed in
main
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/tony-travis/PIQUE/issues/4
Bug #1104275 [src:pique] pique: autopkgtest failure, poss
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1103087 [src:cppnumericalsolvers] cppnumericalsolvers: FTBFS in
testing/i386: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1103087: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103087
Debian Bu
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103087 in cppnumericalsolvers reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/cppnumericalsolvers/-/commit/52a
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 20:49:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104047: fixed in dovecot 1:2.4.1+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104047,
regarding dovecot-ldap: uninstallable due to missing ucf input file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 03:36:54PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Thanks, and I agree with the above analysis: the buildd logs confirm that
> r-cran-svglite was binNMUd recently on armhf only, and debci says
> r-cran-svglite/armhf is currently broken in testing but working in testing +
> R 4.5.0
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1100677
[debian-reference-de,debian-reference-en,debian-reference-es,debian-reference-fr,debian-reference-id,debian-reference-it,debian-reference-ja,debian-reference-pt,debian-reference-pt-br,debian-reference-zh-cn,debian-reference-zh-tw]
un
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Kurt,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 09:06:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > $ apt-cache show gnat-13-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 | grep ^Conflicts
> > Conflicts: gnat-10-arm-linux-gnueabihf, gnat-11-arm-linux-gnueabihf,
> > gnat-12-arm-linux-gnueabihf, gnat-4.9, gnat-5-arm-l
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1063664
[gnat-13-aarch64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-arm-linux-gnueabihf,gnat-13-i686-linux-gnu,gnat-13-powerpc64le-linux-gnu,gnat-13-riscv64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-s390x-linux-gnu]
gcc-13-cross: file conflicts between gnat-13- and
gnat-{9,10}-
Ignoring requ
Package: wine
Version: 10.0~repack-3
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
Running current version of wine32 apparently leads to some bug that starts
winedbg. The problem is, windbg also fails and starts another copy of
winedbg process, which fails, starts an
On 2025-04-26 15:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> tags 994510 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I've attached a patch that does the same difference as the glibc change.
>
> An alternative is that we also create a setcontext.
>
> I can't reproduce the original issue, so I can't check if this fixed
> anything
Hello.
Version 0.6.1-1 uploaded yesterday builds ok in both
my setup and the official buildds.
I'm not sure where the bug is/was, but if you consider this
to be a bug in img2pdf, then the bug is fixed in 0.6.1-1.
Thanks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1104108 24.11.2-2
Bug #1104108 [dpdk-doc] dpdk-doc: File conflict with manpages-dev:
/usr/share/man/man3/encrypt.3.gz
Marked as fixed in versions dpdk/24.11.2-2.
Bug #1104108 [dpdk-doc] dpdk-doc: File conflict with manpages-dev:
/usr/share
Hi Sébastien,
Thank you for having identified and resolved the issue despite
your tight schedule, I will keep an eye on the leftover test on
riscv64. As far as I understand the situation and barring any
unexpected problem, everything will be able to migrate in ten
days without further manual acti
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1104158 [src:r-cran-testthat, src:r-cran-hdf5r] autopkgtest fails on a
32-bit architecture
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1104158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1104158 in r-cran-hdf5r reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-hdf5r/-/commit/860d2c7a305e515d963
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:valkey
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Sett
Hi,
On 28-04-2025 16:59, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
is there anything more to be done with this bug report? I assumed the
bug was fixed on March 20, by updating the dependencies? I got an e-mail
"rsplib is marked for autoremoval from testing" today. Is there anything
missing?
Quote from the rep
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:49:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1104063: fixed in mercurial 7.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104063,
regarding mercurial: FTBFS on riscv64: Failed test-sparse-revlog.t: timed out
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1104063 [src:mercurial] mercurial: FTBFS on riscv64: Failed
test-sparse-revlog.t: timed out
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1104063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1104063 in mercurial reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial/-/commit/6c3ae223e64b0d2
Hi,
Am Sonntag, dem 27.04.2025 um 16:18 +0200 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> So it seems like this problem may be specific to PackageKit.
>
> Sven and Laurent, do your affected systems have PackageKit installed?
My affected system has PackageKit installed, though PK was relatively
recently installed o
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
thanks
Hi,
It took me some time to set up my private apt repository to test next upload in
advance without using the real Debian repository ;-) That leads me to the
following conclusion.
1. There were a bug in version 2.125
2. Your test
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1100677
[debian-reference-de,debian-reference-en,debian-reference-es,debian-reference-fr,debian-reference-id,debian-reference-it,debian-reference-ja,debian-reference-pt,debian-reference-pt-br,debian-reference-zh-cn,debian-reference-zh-tw]
unde
On 28/04/2025 17:01, Christian Göttsche wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 21:54, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
On 12/04/2025 10:07, Russell Coker wrote:
Here are the results of running valgrind with a debugging build of every
relevant package installed:
==241689== Invalid read of size 8
==241689
On 28/04/2025 16:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
It turns out that it is possible to do this from the slf4j side, by
replacing the Slf4jLogFactory class. See the attached patch. With
the patch applied and libsurefire-java downgraded, the tests pass.
Slf4jLogFactory is called from LogFactory which i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1104298 broadcom-sta-dkms
Bug #1104298 [linux-image-amd64] linux-image-6.12.12: DKMS compilation error in
broadcom-sta: missing asm/unaligned.h
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-amd64' to 'broadcom-sta-dkms'.
No longer marked as f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1101411 1104298
Bug #1101411 [broadcom-sta-dkms] broadcom-sta-dkms: Fails to build with kernel
6.12.12+bpo-amd64 due to missing asm/unaligned.h
Bug #1104298 [broadcom-sta-dkms] linux-image-6.12.12: DKMS compilation error in
broadcom-s
On 4/28/25 14:58, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I am sorry to tell you that the brittle /usr-move mitigations broke
again.
no worries, I'm honestly so lucky that you're able and willing to help,
I'll gladly wait for your patch.
Regards,
Daniel
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:12:54 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1104166: dovecot-core: %{user|domain} issue after
upgrade to 2.4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1104166,
regarding dovecot-core: %{user|domain} issue after upgrade to 2.4.1
to be marked as done.
This
Hi Dirk,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:46:12AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 28 April 2025 at 06:00, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> | Package: sm
> | Version: 0.29-1
> You once again filed against the wrong (source) package sm with binary
> package r-cran-sm.
I fear this still is a problem with bugs
Processing control commands:
> owner -1 !
Bug #1104306 [zutils] zutils: broken upgrade from bookworm due to /usr-move
mitigations
Owner recorded as Helmut Grohne .
--
1104306: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: zutils
Version: 1.14-3
Severity: serious
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17
Control: owner -1 !
X-Debbugs-Cc: hol...@debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org
Hi Daniel,
I am sorry to tell you that the brittle /usr-move mitigations broke
again. Holger made me aware of a bookworm to trixie
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 21:54, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 12/04/2025 10:07, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Here are the results of running valgrind with a debugging build of every
> > relevant package installed:
> >
> > ==241689== Invalid read of size 8
> > ==241689==at 0x53A92E: UnknownInlined
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 05:07:46 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
This needs an upload by someone in the Java team if the package should
stay in trixie.
Hi,
As I'm a member of the Java Team without upload rights configured for
that package I've submitted a request for sponsorship:
https://bugs.debian.o
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/etc/britney.conf
Thanks. (The britney-in-general documentation giving the name of the
setting was easier to find than the britney-in-Debian configuration, and
I'd probably mistaken it for a conf.d directory where all the files are
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
Bug #1104159 [src:r-cran-testthat, src:r-cran-rcmdcheck] r-cran-testthat breaks
r-cran-rcmdcheck autopkgtest
Changed Bug title to 'autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture' from
'r-cran-testthat breaks r-cran-
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
Bug #1104160 [src:r-cran-testthat, src:r-cran-s2] r-cran-testthat breaks
r-cran-s2 autopkgtest on i386
Changed Bug title to 'autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture' from
'r-cran-testthat breaks r-cran-s2 aut
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
As discussed in #1099927, the new r-cran-testthat didn't break these, it
just started noticing that they were already broken. As only 32-bit
architectures are affected, we intend to remove/ignore them.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture
Bug #1104158 [src:r-cran-testthat, src:r-cran-hdf5r] r-cran-testthat breaks
r-cran-hdf5r autopkgtest
Changed Bug title to 'autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture' from
'r-cran-testthat breaks r-cran-hdf5r au
Thanks, and I agree with the above analysis: the buildd logs confirm
that r-cran-svglite was binNMUd recently on armhf only, and debci says
r-cran-svglite/armhf is currently broken in testing but working in
testing + R 4.5.0,
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-svglite/testing/armhf/
r-bas
On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 15:49 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 08:31 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
> > * the test freeze is surprising, the test threads seem to be idling for
> > an unknown reason. maven-surefire-report-plugin 2.22.3 isn't compatible
> > with maven-reporting
Hi Joost,
I've been woking on simplesmalphp yesterday, and the current status of my
backport of the patch for CVE-2025-27773 is in the lts team repo [1]
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/packages/simplesamlphp/-/tree/debian/bullseye/
Help in testing the changes would be very helpful, so
On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 08:31 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 27/04/2025 21:31, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > So then I compared the build dependency versions in the last good and
> > first bad snapshots, and tried upgrading the Java packages one by one.
> > The result was that libsurefire-java (= 2.
On 28 April 2025 at 06:00, Helmut Grohne wrote:
| Package: sm
| Version: 0.29-1
| Severity: serious
| User: debian...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: fileconflict
| Control: affects -1 + inn2
|
| sm has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error
| from dpkg.
|
| The file /usr/
Hi Lucas, thanks for this report.
I took a look and it seems to me that the failure happens when running
the testsuite, and seems to be scoped to 32bit architectures such as armhf or
i386.
The relevant test code appears to be here:
https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-mongodb-mongo-driver/1.1
Hi there,
missed your earlier email.
I've had another look and couldn't reproduce the issue. Might have been
in another package that got update, but now it works as intended. Maybe
a side effect of many updates coming in because of the freeze..?
I think this should be closed now.
Thank you!
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 6.12.12-1~bpo12+1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1090...@bugs.debian.org, billiardmar...@snarkjaeger.ch
This is the same as bug 1090964 except for kernel version and hardware.
Environment is MX Linux MX-26.3
Your message dated Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:04:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102954: fixed in imlib2 1.12.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102954,
regarding libimage-imlib2-perl: FTBFS in testing: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
t
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:07:51AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you're probably aware, issue
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-27773 has been open since
> March 11, 2025. Is anybody working on fixing this? I could probably help out
> with testing prerelease
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 r-cran-svglite
Bug #1103369 [src:r-cran-webgestaltr] r-cran-webgestaltr: FTBFS in
testing/armhf: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary-arch] Error 25
Bug reassigned from package 'src:r-cran-webgestaltr' to 'r-cran-svglite'.
No longer marked as found in versi
Control: reassign -1 r-cran-svglite
Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-webgestaltr
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:09:33PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:07:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > make[1]: Entering directory
> > > '/build/repro
Package: src:openstructure
Version: 2.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in trixie, your package failed to build:
[ please read notes at the end ]
[...]
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:01:02 + Georg Faerber wrote:
I'll check if [1] fixes the problem.
Where you able to fix this? This is now blocking rails migration to testing.
riscv64: Regression or new test
autopkgtest for schleuder/5.0.0-7: amd64: Failed (not a regression),
arm64: Failed (not a
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:07:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[1]: Entering directory
> > '/build/reproducible-path/r-cran-webgestaltr-0.4.6/src'
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > '/build/reproducible-path/r-cran-webgestaltr-0.4.6/src'
> > installing to
>
Dear Étienne,
For future reference, I managed to identify the root cause of the
issue by changing the structure of "run-dicom-image-transcode-test" so
as to get the full log of Orthanc [1], which explains the intermediate
release "orthanc-wsi_3.2+dfsg-6" yesterday. Then, inspecting the
detailed lo
On 10/01/2025 14:19, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 10.01.25 13:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Perhaps Matthias can shed some light.
please try building gcc-13 with amdgcn-tools-18 for enlightenment. That's what I
would have to do as well.
Here is some enlightenment :-)
I changed the amd
Hello,
I think they only patched the mitigation in Moodle, not MimeTex itself. [1]
And about the 1.77 source code, I can’t find souce other than Moodle’s this
issue ticket so far.
[1] https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Amoodle%2Fmoodle+MDL-85152&type=commits
Best regards,
TaiYou
> On Apr 27,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1099928
Bug #1099928 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:moarvm] src:moarvm:
fails to migrate to testing for too long
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1104085 + patch
Bug #1104085 [phpwebcounter] phpwebcounter: Does not work on PHP 8.4
Added tag(s) patch.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1104085: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1104178 dh-elpa/2.1.2
Bug #1104178 [dh-elpa] elpa-doom-themes: upgrade fails: cannot overwrite
non-directory ... with directory
Marked as found in versions dh-elpa/2.1.2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Hi,
As you're probably aware, issue
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-27773 has been open since
March 11, 2025. Is anybody working on fixing this? I could probably help out
with testing prereleases for Debian bullseye.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 11:56:41AM
Source: lmod
Version: 8.7.59-2
Severity: serious
lmod's autopkgtests fail on all architectures. Example log from
amd64:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/lmod/testing/amd64/60287917/
...
226s passed R 0.492 rt/versionTest/versionTest/t1
226s passed R 0.48 rt/zsh_to_mf/zsh_to_
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 0.9.1-1
Bug #1103188 [src:golang-github-keltia-archive] golang-github-keltia-archive:
FTBFS: github.com/proglottis/gpgme: exec: "pkg-config": executable file not
found in $PATH
No longer marked as found in versions golang-github-keltia-archive/0.9.1-1.
Control: notfound -1 0.9.1-1
Control: reassign -1 golang-github-proglottis-gpgme-dev
Control: affects 1103514 src:golang-github-keltia-archive
Control: forcemerge 1103514 1103188
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:19:15AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:golang-github-keltia-archive
> Version: 0
Source: pique
Version: 1.0-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package has autopkgtests, however they now fail.
Log on arm64:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/p/pique/60287621/log.gz
66s autopkgtest [17:11:16]: test run-unit-test: [---
66s wget --no-check-cer
92 matches
Mail list logo
