Jérémy Lal writes:
>> > 2) However I realized I was wrong in my comment in
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/1100967#10 about which package name is the
>> > "proper" one. Upstream's go.mod namespace is still go.step.sm/crypto
>> > even in latest upstream master:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/smallstep
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2025-04-12):
> Package: flash-kernel
> Version: 3.109+reform1
> This problem occurred with a patched flash-kernel but you know that we only
> patch the machines file with more entries and do not patch the scripts:
> https://source.mnt.re/reform/reform-debian-pack
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2025-04-11):
> Control: forwarded 1102621 https://dev.gnupg.org/T7603
> Control: tags 1102621 + patch
>
> On Fri 2025-04-11 19:27:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > npth was added in
> > ce9906b008c94c2aa4ac770a981d1e1e0b8aea47
> > gpg: First rough implementation of keyboxd
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.109+reform1
Severity: serious
Hi Vagrant,
sorry for another RC bug but had I not seen this message it would've rendered
my system unbootable. The summary is, that I installed a newer kernel, then
rebooted, then removed the old kernel. Had I not paid attention, my
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:13:37 +0530
with message-id
and subject line fixed in last upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100311,
regarding ruby-openid-connect: Runtime dependency must be updated from
ruby-validate-email to ruby-email-validator
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2025 05:34:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101865: fixed in python-psutil 7.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101865,
regarding python-psutil: FTBFS: FAILED
psutil/tests/test_system.py::TestSensorsAPIs::test_sensors_temperatures
to be marked as
Hi all,
It seems to me that porting to gimp 3 is too large.
Actually I only use one plugin called "gimp-mask" often.
I ported it, but the changes are large.
And there are a lot of plugins in this package. All of them are broken.
I think we might need to drop this package.
For any plugins t
forcemerge 1090879 1100315
thanks
#1100315 is about the same issue as #1090879, merging.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1090879 1100315
Bug #1090879 {Done: Vivek K J } [src:ruby-test-construct]
ruby-test-construct: FTBFS with ruby-mocha 2: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:
:86:in
`require': cannot load such file -- mocha/setup (LoadError)
Bug #1090879 {Do
See also #1102618: ruby-pry-byebug: Does not install in unstable
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2025 00:36:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102621: fixed in gnupg2 2.4.7-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102621,
regarding gpgv-udeb can't be installed: depend on non-udeb libassuan9 and
libnpth0t64
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 23:07:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102681: fixed in fltk1.4 1.4.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102681,
regarding libfltk1.4-compat-headers has an undeclared file conflict with
libfltk1.3-compat-headers
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1099898 [src:ruby-maxitest] src:ruby-maxitest: unsatisfied build
dependency in testing: ruby-minitest (< 5.25.0)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1099898: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099898
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:35:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101186: fixed in editorconfig-core 0.12.9+~0.17.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101186,
regarding editorconfig-core: Fails to build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 22:07:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102605: fixed in gnome-mahjongg 1:48.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102605,
regarding gnome-mahjongg FTBFS with the nocheck build profile: ERROR: Program
'update-desktop-database' not found or not exe
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1102605 [src:gnome-mahjongg] gnome-mahjongg FTBFS with the nocheck build
profile: ERROR: Program 'update-desktop-database' not found or not executable
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1102605: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102605
D
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1102605 in gnome-mahjongg reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-mahjongg/-/commit/1f3550d5b386110
Processing control commands:
> forwarded 1102621 https://dev.gnupg.org/T7603
Bug #1102621 [gpgv-udeb] gpgv-udeb can't be installed: depend on non-udeb
libassuan9 and libnpth0t64
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://dev.gnupg.org/T7603'.
> tags 1102621 + patch
Bug #1102621 [gpgv-udeb] gpgv-ude
Control: forwarded 1102621 https://dev.gnupg.org/T7603
Control: tags 1102621 + patch
On Fri 2025-04-11 19:27:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> npth was added in
> ce9906b008c94c2aa4ac770a981d1e1e0b8aea47
> gpg: First rough implementation of keyboxd access for key lookup.
>
> and libassuan in aba8
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1102677 src:ckeditor
Bug #1102677 [src:ckeditor4] ckeditor4: EOL upstream commercial support only
Warning: Unknown package 'src:ckeditor4'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ckeditor4' to 'src:ckeditor'.
Ignoring request to alter found vers
> It has the same problem:
> dpkg: warning: while removing binutils-arm-none-eabi, directory
> '/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi' not empty so not removed
Yup, but that's just a warning and not an install failure. Thanks for
the fix for this; I'll figure out how to get that into another version
at some p
Control: reopen -1
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 06:51:02PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #1101749: ga68-15 and ga68-15-doc have undefined unpack behavior due to
> filesystem aliasing
>
> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters
> (reply to Matthias Klose ).
I fear whatever you did, wa
Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2025 02:02:05 +0530
with message-id
and subject line fixed in gitlab 17.6.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102092,
regarding Terser::Error: Unexpected token: punc (.) (Terser::Error)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libfltk1.3-compat-headers
Bug #1102681 [libfltk1.4-compat-headers] libfltk1.4-compat-headers has an
undeclared file conflict with libfltk1.3-compat-headers
Added indication that 1102681 affects libfltk1.3-compat-headers
--
1102681: https://bugs.debian
Package: lomiri-content-hub-common
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + content-hub
The file /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/com.lomiri.content.hub.gschema.xml
is installed by both lomiri-content-hub-common/unstable and
conten
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1101749 {Done: Matthias Klose } [ga68-15,ga68-15-doc]
ga68-15 and ga68-15-doc have undefined unpack behavior due to filesystem
aliasing
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and y
Control: reopen -1
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:21:01AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> no feedback, closing this issue.
I can still reproduce it in quite some variety.
gnat-13- as built from src:gcc-13 still contains unversioned
tools. There are declared conflicts for var
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1100822 cairomm1.16/1.16.2-3
Bug #1100822 {Done: Jeremy Bícha } [libcairomm-1.16-doc]
libcairomm-1.0-doc and libcairomm-1.16-doc have an undeclared symlink conflict
on /usr/share/doc/cairomm-1.0 -> libcairomm-1.0-doc
Bug #1040561 {Done: Je
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1063664 {Done: Matthias Klose }
[gnat-13-aarch64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-arm-linux-gnueabihf,gnat-13-i686-linux-gnu,gnat-13-powerpc64le-linux-gnu,gnat-13-riscv64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-s390x-linux-gnu]
gcc-13-cross: file conflicts between gnat-13- and
gnat-{9,
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + golang-github-humanlogio-humanlog-dev
Bug #1102683 [golang-github-humanlogio-api-dev]
golang-github-humanlogio-api-dev undeclared symlink vs directory conflict with
golang-github-humanlogio-humanlog-dev
Added indication that 1102683 affects golang-gith
Package: golang-github-humanlogio-api-dev
Version: 0.0~git20250305.fa41d14-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + golang-github-humanlogio-humanlog-dev
$ for f in *.deb; do echo $f; dpkg-deb -c $f | grep
'src/github.com/humanlogio/api\(/$
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + content-hub
Bug #1102682 [lomiri-content-hub-common] lomiri-content-hub-common has an
undeclared file conflict with content-hub/1.0.2-1 from bookworm
Added indication that 1102682 affects content-hub
--
1102682: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Package: libfltk1.4-compat-headers
Version: 1.4.2-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libfltk1.3-compat-headers
libfltk1.4-compat-headers and libfltk1.3-compat-headers have lots of
files in common. Yet they don't declare any Replaces no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 1063664
Bug #1063664 {Done: Matthias Klose }
[gnat-13-aarch64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-arm-linux-gnueabihf,gnat-13-i686-linux-gnu,gnat-13-powerpc64le-linux-gnu,gnat-13-riscv64-linux-gnu,gnat-13-s390x-linux-gnu]
gcc-13-cross: file conflicts be
On 4/11/25 20:58, Jonas Nothhelfer wrote:
I tried to build to compile the nvidia cuda toolkit 12.2.2-2 by just
changing the DEFAULT_GCC_VERSION in the rules.defs from 12 to 13 and it
ran through without any issues. Is there a particular reason why it has
not been done yet. Am I missing somethin
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:07:41 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2025 04:05:22 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Package: gitlab
> Version: 17.5.5-6
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When installing gitlab 17.5.5-6
gitlab 17.6.5 moves further a
On 4/12/25 1:39 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Trying with ROOT_PATH set to /var/lib/gitlab in config/pdfjs.constants.js
This actually fixed webpack build!
OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-rack-rewrite (versioned as 1.5.1-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for ruby-rack-rewrite-1.5.1 ruby-rack-rewrite-1.5.1
changelog |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(
On 4/12/25 1:36 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:07:41 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2025 04:05:22 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Package: gitlab
> Version: 17.5.5-6
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc: prav...@debian.org
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > When installing git
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:17:03 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 1/10/25 17:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc depends on g++-12, which is likely not
going to be
> > a part of trixie. Please update to g++-13 or preferably g++-14.
>
> This will need more time as it requi
Le ven. 11 avr. 2025 à 21:09, Shengjing Zhu a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:26 PM Simon Josefsson
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you! Some observations - tl;dr: I suggest to remove
> > golang-step-crypto-dev from the archive as discussed in 1) below, and
> > for us to ignore issue 2) + 3) below, ev
Control: tags 1077629 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for safeeyes (versioned as 2.1.9-1.2).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for safeeyes-2.1.9 safeeyes-2.1.9
changelog |8 +
control|3 +-
patches/r
Hello,
Here's a patch that adds the missing includes, function declarations,
and the return value for main().
Best Regards,
MarekDescription: Fix build on GCC-14
Fix several warnings that were turned into errors in GCC-14:
* Implicit declaration of functions
* Implicit return type for mai
Source: reflect-cpp
Version: 0.18.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Dear maintainer,
reflect-cpp fails to build on armel, armhf, and i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.p
Source: ckeditor4
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: security issue
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
ckeditor4 is end of lifed
since June 2023: https://ckeditor.com/blog/ckeditor-4-end-of-life/
ckeditor4 LTS is commercial
see https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor4/blob/master/LICEN
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 07:45:56 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote:
Source: ruby-pry-byebug
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Does not install
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Team
, 1054...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
$ sudo apt install ruby-pry-byebug
Solving dependencies... Error!
Some packages co
On 11/04/25 08:58, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 11/04/25 at 20:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:02 -0300, Sérgio Cipriano wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > The fix is available at:
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-haml/-/merge_requests/4
> >
> > Apparently this M
Source: sctk
Version: 2.4.12+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Dear maintainer,
sctk currently FTBFS on i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sctk&arch=i386&ver=2.4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1089433 src:shim
Bug #1089433 [src:shim-helpers-arm64-signed] shim-helpers-arm64-signed:
Supporting rootless builds by default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:shim-helpers-arm64-signed' to 'src:shim'.
No longer marked as found in versio
Hello Niels,
On 2024-12-28 01:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please review attached as an example of how to fix this problem.
>
> Note: Untested, since I was doing my testing on amd64.
LGTM. I applied your patch and built the package with a regular user as
follows:
$ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b -r
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:26 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thank you! Some observations - tl;dr: I suggest to remove
> golang-step-crypto-dev from the archive as discussed in 1) below, and
> for us to ignore issue 2) + 3) below, even though they warrant more
> consideration.
>
> 1) Now there are n
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:06:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102601: fixed in janus 1.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102601,
regarding janus: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:08:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100308: fixed in ruby-haml 6.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100308,
regarding ruby-haml: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:58:06 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/04/25 at 20:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:02 -0300, Sérgio Cipriano wrote:
> The fix is available at:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-haml/-/merge_requests/4
Apparently this MR is merged; is t
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:43:39AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > The prerm fix is needed in any case.
>
> Hrm. I haven't seen this issue with the arm package equivalent
> (libstdc++-arm-none-eabi)
>...
It has the same problem:
...
Removing libstdc++-arm-none-eabi-dev (15:14.2.rel1-1+28) ...
On 11/04/25 at 20:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:02 -0300, Sérgio Cipriano wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > The fix is available at:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-haml/-/merge_requests/4
>
> Apparently this MR is merged; is the package uploaded and can this bug be
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:47:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1094113: fixed in xdotool 1:3.20160805.1-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094113,
regarding xdotool: FTBFS: test_basic.rb:7:in `': uninitialized constant
MiniTest (NameError)
to be marked as done.
This
> The prerm fix is needed in any case.
Hrm. I haven't seen this issue with the arm package equivalent
(libstdc++-arm-none-eabi)
> Not sure I'd call it a "special hack" to create the directory you use.
It's not necessary if binutils is already installed, which it should be
as you can't use libst
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:35:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102609: fixed in electrum 4.5.8+ds-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102609,
regarding electrum: Electrum 4.5.8 does not run with python3-aiorpcx >= 24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1093859 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg
needs resolving for trixie
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1093859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:11:02 -0300, Sérgio Cipriano wrote:
Hi,
The fix is available at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-haml/-/merge_requests/4
Apparently this MR is merged; is the package uploaded and can this
bug be closes?
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:48:54 +0200
with message-id <20250411144854.ge2...@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1057355: libmpfr6: major formatted output function
bugs with %c and the value 0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057355,
regarding libmpfr6: major formatted
On Fri 2025-04-11 08:45:47 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> The upload of the 2.4.7 series to unstable just broke gpgv-udeb, which
> bootstrap-base and net-retriever rely on:
>
> Depends: libassuan9 (>= 3.0.2), libc6-udeb (>= 2.41), libgcrypt20-udeb
> (>= 1.11.0), libgpg-error0-udeb (>= 1.51),
Package: linphone-desktop
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
I've been using linphone-desktop for years, so i have an existing
linphone configuration.
When i recently upgraded from 5.0.2-4+b5 to 5.2.6+dfsg-1, linphone
declined to start at all with this complaint:
```
0 dkg@bob:~$ linphone
li
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:12:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075379: fixed in pesign 116-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075379,
regarding pesign: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1100316 in ruby-typhoeus reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-typhoeus/-/commit/24f30055904ede6eb3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1100255 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #1100255 [src:pyopencl] pyopencl: FTBFS: ../pyopencl/__init__.py:580:
RuntimeError
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> reassign 1100255 src:pocl
Bug #1100255 [src:pyopencl] pyopencl: FTBFS: ../
tags 1100255 - moreinfo unreproducible
reassign 1100255 src:pocl
affects 1100255 src:pyopencl
found 1100255 6.0-5
close 1100255 6.0-6
thanks
Hi. debbisect told me when exactly this started to work again:
bisection finished successfully
last bad timestamp: 20250408T090504Z
first good timesta
Processing control commands:
> tags 1099272 + patch
Bug #1099272 [src:python-bimmer-connected] python-bimmer-connected: FTBFS: E
AttributeError: module 'httpx._types' has no attribute 'VerifyTypes'.
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1099272 + pending
Bug #1099272 [src:python-bimmer-connected] python-b
Please use patch from upstream:
https://git.gnunet.org/libmicrohttpd.git/patch/?id=036f8fdec2802e48e2555b2caf381bb1c565ab82
See also: https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/17029
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
There were a couple more build failures with GCC-14, I'm attaching a patch
that takes care of them.
The first diff is from https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/10/msg0.html
from the linked Ubuntu patch:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/commit/?h=applied/ubuntu/noble
merge 1092391 1081879
thanks
These two bugs are caused by the same issue. When rustdoc is trying to
test the code based on the doctests, it fails to find the source code.
--
Regards,
Marga
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1092391 1081879
Bug #1092391 [src:rust-safe-arch] rust-safe-arch: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/share/dh-rust/bin/cargo test returned exit code 101
Bug #1092391 [src:rust-safe-arch] rust-safe-arch: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/share
On 2025-04-11 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: gpgv-udeb
> Version: 2.4.7-13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: broken package
> Hi,
> The upload of the 2.4.7 series to unstable just broke gpgv-udeb, which
> bootstrap-base and net-retriever rely on:
> Depends: libassuan9 (>=
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1095915 [src:python-datapoint] python-datapoint: please patch-out the
dependency on to-bo-removed appdirs
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1095915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:24:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095862: fixed in rustc 1.85.0+dfsg2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095862,
regarding rustc unsoundness/miscompilations on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing control commands:
> close -1 3.22.5+dfsg1-1
Bug #1102664 [src:petsc] src:petsc: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Marked as fixed in versions petsc/3.22.5+dfsg1-1.
Bug #1102664 [src:petsc] src:petsc: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Marked Bug as done
--
1102664: https:
Source: petsc
Version: 3.22.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.22.5+dfsg1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:11:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075313: fixed in netris 0.52-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075313,
regarding netris: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:09:26 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed with +b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091577,
regarding rdfind: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check
"TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 17:11:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102539: fixed in libstdc++-riscv64-unknown-elf 5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102539,
regarding libstdc++-riscv64-unknown-elf-dev fails to install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 02:16:24AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Source: oci-seccomp-bpf-hook
> Version: 1.2.10+ds-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid trixie
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi
Hi Simon :)
> This package FTBFS with this d
Control: tags 1099272 + patch
Control: tags 1099272 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-bimmer-connected (versioned as
0.16.3-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to
tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for python-bimmer-connected-0.16.3 pytho
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 09:18:23AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:39:51 +0300
>
> Control: tags 1102539 + patch
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> > I've uploaded an NMU for libstdc++-riscv64-unknown-elf (versioned as
> > 4+nmu1).
> > The diff is attached to
Processing control commands:
> tags 1101130 + patch
Bug #1101130 [src:mat2] FTBFS: test failures
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1101130 + pending
Bug #1101130 [src:mat2] FTBFS: test failures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1101130: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101130
Debian Bug Tracki
Control: tags 1101130 + patch
Control: tags 1101130 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mat2 (versioned as 0.13.5-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should cancel it.
Regards.
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 21:35:20 +0100 VA wrote:
> Package: javascript-common
> Version: 12
> Severity: serious
>
> For some reason, javascript-common fails to upgrade, and it also fails
> to be reinstalled, which prevents from upgrading dependents.
>
> ```
> # dpkg --configure --pending
> Set
Last build I did was on 20250402.
I'm going to try again now. Stay tuned.
Thanks.
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:26:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101143: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050754,
regarding tolua: Suggestion to remove
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:19:15 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing bug that was fixed a year ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #1050676,
regarding enblend-enfuse: FTBFS: dot: maze.c:311: chkSgraph: Assertion
`np->cells[0]' failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that
Version: 2.42.4-1
As Paul mentioned, enblend-enfuse was able to build by mid 2024. We
don't know exactly what graphviz change fixed the bug, but the version
in unstable when enblend-enfuse successfully built was 2.42.4-1, so
marking this bug as fixed with that version.
--
Regards,
Marga
Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi Santiago,
On 3/12/25 17:32, Santiago Vila wrote:
Package: src:pyopencl
Version: 2024.1-3
Build on :
Device cpu-skylake-avx512-AMD EPYC 9R14 failed to build the program
If you could not reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
am willi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #1100255 [src:pyopencl] pyopencl: FTBFS: ../pyopencl/__init__.py:580:
RuntimeError
Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible.
--
1100255: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1091577 https://github.com/pauldreik/rdfind/issues/186
Bug #1091577 [src:rdfind] rdfind: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8
check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1090874 serious
Bug #1090874 {Done: Vivek K J } [src:ruby-rack-rewrite]
ruby-rack-rewrite: FTBFS with ruby-mocha 2: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed:
:86:in
`require': cannot load such file -- mocha/setup (LoadError)
Bug #1100314 {Done: Vi
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:39:51 +0300
Control: tags 1102539 + patch
Dear maintainer,
> I've uploaded an NMU for libstdc++-riscv64-unknown-elf (versioned as 4+nmu1).
> The diff is attached to this message.
I've prepared an alternate upload which adjusts the dependencies to
inc
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:20:51 +0200
with message-id <174438845158.670356.3071974523415593...@cairon.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1086384: sdml: FTBFS: error: 1 target failed: `-p
sdml-parse --test test_examples`
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086384,
regarding sdml: FTBFS:
Hi!
I'm attaching the diff for the changes uploaded in 1.64.0-1.1. I've
uploaded this with a 5 days delay. I'll also prepare a merge request in
salsa.
Happy hacking,
--
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/diff -Nru nghttp2-1.64.0/debian/changelog nghttp2-1.64.0/debian/changelog
--- nghttp2-1.64.0/debian/cha
Control: tags -1 forky
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 05:00:21PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
>...
> llvm-defaults says that the default llvm-toolchain for Trixie is
> llvm-toolchain-19. The Debian Release Team strongly prefers that there
> be as few llvm-toolchain versions in Debian as possible.
>
> open
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:40:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102014: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073370,
regarding ruby-premailer: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
