Bug#1095202: nfs-common: file loss in upgrade due to /usr-move (DEP17 P1)

2025-02-04 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:2.8.2-2~exp1 Severity: serious Justification: file loss in upgrade scenario Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: dep17p1 Hi Salvatore, thanks for raising nfs-common ahead of upload and going via experimental. Indeed, dumat flags /usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs

Bug#1095150: fp-compiler-3.2.2: fpc aborts compilation

2025-02-04 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi Reinhard, On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 13:40 +0100, Reinhard Karcher wrote: > Package: fp-compiler-3.2.2 > Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-43 > Severity: serious > Justification: unnown > > Dear Maintainer, > > Upgrade to version 3.2.2+dfsg-43 from -40 produced compilation errors. > > I used the lazarus comman

Bug#1091024: marked as done (rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 05 Feb 2025 07:20:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091024: fixed in dojo 1.17.3+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091024, regarding rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1091973: src:dnspython: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-02-04 Thread Berli Gayathri
Hi Paul Gevers, I just received the bug list notification; please allow me some time to look over it. Meanwhile, could you please offer any more information, such as logs or reproduction steps? Thanks, Gayathri.

Processed: Bug#1091024 marked as pending in dojo

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1091024 [src:dojo] rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest Added tag(s) pending. -- 1091024: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091024 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1091024: marked as pending in dojo

2025-02-04 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1091024 in dojo reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/dojo/-/commit/5ad46dd265931d6b308b1e91adba8434533ce8

Processed: Re: dojo needs a rebuild against the new rhino

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:dojo 1.17.2+dfsg1-2.1 Bug #1091024 [src:rhino, src:dojo] rhino breaks dojo autopkgtest Bug reassigned from package 'src:rhino, src:dojo' to 'src:dojo'. No longer marked as found in versions dojo/1.17.2+dfsg1-2.1 and rhino/1.7.15-1. Ignoring request to

Bug#1091973: src:dnspython: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-02-04 Thread Paul Gevers
user: debian-s...@lists.debian.org usertags: s390x thanks Hi, Maybe the s390x porters can help? I have the suspicion that there is endianess involved in the autopkgtest failure of dnspython. dnspython is key package. Original message for context in full below. Paul On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 21:37

Processed: Re: ruby-redis: causes autopkgtest regressions for ruby-fakeredis

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1093118 [src:ruby-redis] ruby-redis: causes autopkgtest regressions for ruby-fakeredis Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1093118: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093118 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1093118: ruby-redis: causes autopkgtest regressions for ruby-fakeredis

2025-02-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:27:43 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Your package is causing autopkgtest regressions on ruby-fakeredis [1], preventing it from migrating to testing. If the issue is in ruby-fakeredis, then feel free to add the necessary informatio

Bug#1095129: Upstream issue solved - tag removal warning moreinfo

2025-02-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: block -1 by 512231 Thanks Hi, since bug #512231 was fixed upstream pretty quickly after a Git issue was opened I'm positive that the issue will be solved quickly in Debian. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1091024: dojo needs a rebuild against the new rhino

2025-02-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: reassign -1 src:dojo 1.17.2+dfsg1-2.1 Control: affects -1 src:rhino Hi, On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 21:54:31 +0100 Adrien Nader wrote: After some trial and error, I found out that if dojo is rebuilt, the tests pass. I don't know what changed in rhino and the upstream changelog for the new ver

Bug#1094984: python-meshplex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: python3-meshplex Followup-For: Bug #1094984 Control: tags -1 ftbfs Control: block -1 by 1094985 The bug is effectively in meshio, meshplex is simply accessing a mesh returned by meshio. The problem is that the 2D cell type ("triangle") has no dtype attached to the cell array. Evidently

Processed: Re: python-meshplex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 ftbfs Bug #1094984 [src:python-meshplex] python-meshplex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1094984 to the same tags previously set > block -1 by 1094985 Bug #1094984 [src:python-meshplex] python-meshplex: FTBFS with numpy 2.x 109498

Processed: Upstream issue solved - tag removal warning moreinfo

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1095129 [src:chewmail] chewmail: Should chewmail be removed from unstable? Added tag(s) moreinfo. > block -1 by 512231 Bug #1095129 [src:chewmail] chewmail: Should chewmail be removed from unstable? 1095129 was not blocked by any bugs. 1095129 w

Processed: Fixed upstream

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #512231 [chewmail] If all mail is archived, it deletes the source mailbox before being done writing the archive files Added tag(s) pending. > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug #512231 [chewmail] If all mail is archived, it deletes the source mailbox be

Bug#512231: Fixed upstream

2025-02-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Thanks Hi Eric, thanks a lot for fixing this bug upstream[1]. I would volunteer to move the package to Salsa in the debian/ team and upload the fix as team upload in case this might help you. Please let me know what you think. In case it

Bug#1095148: Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-02-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:41:57 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Regarding redmine, #1094049 was fixed in 5.1.3+ds-6, but now there's > > #1095148 (related to the nokogiri update). So it would still be better > > to remove redmine from testing for now (together with its reverse > > dependencie

Bug#1095194: hurd_no_setfsuid patch breaks pam_modutil_regain_priv

2025-02-04 Thread Sam Hartman
I'm not convinced this is critical, but it is some varient of RC. Proposed solution is to rebase the hurd patch (gbp pq import; git rebase -i; edit the commit) to modify the top level meson.build to include the header test. Then gbp pq export and commit the modified patches. If someone gets to t

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-04 Thread Damir Islamov
Hello Hilmar, Statically linked luametatex solves the issue: $ sudo apt-get install context ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... done. Running updmap-sys. This may take some time... done. Running mktexlsr /var/lib/texmf ... do

Bug#1095194: hurd_no_setfsuid patch breaks pam_modutil_regain_priv

2025-02-04 Thread Ned T. Crigler
Package: libpam0g Version: 1.7.0-2 Severity: critical Upstream removed the check for the sys/fsuid.h header, which means HAVE_SYS_FSUID_H is never defined anymore. The debian hurd_no_setfsuid patch now always uses the fallback code, and pam_modutil_regain_priv now fails with a: pam_modutil_rega

Processed: rust-atk-sys-0.18: autopkgtest failing with at-spi2-core 2.55.2

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:at-spi2-core Bug #1095192 [src:rust-atk-sys-0.18] rust-atk-sys-0.18: autopkgtest failing with at-spi2-core 2.55.2 Added indication that 1095192 affects src:at-spi2-core -- 1095192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095192 Debian Bug

Bug#1095192: rust-atk-sys-0.18: autopkgtest failing with at-spi2-core 2.55.2

2025-02-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-atk-sys-0.18 Version: 0.18.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: aferra...@debian.org Control: affects -1 src:at-spi2-core The autopkgtests for rust-atk-sys-0.18 are failing with at-spi2-core 2.55.2 currently in Unstable. rust-atk-sys-0.18 does not fail to build from source though. I r

Bug#1095190: rust-glib-0.18: Fails to build with glib 2.83

2025-02-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-glib-0.18 Version: 0.18.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie X-Debbugs-CC: aferra...@debian.org rust-gio-0.18 fails to build with glib 2.83 which is now in Unstable. It looks like you might only need to extend Cargo.toml-add-missing-features.patch/ for v2_84 Build log excerp

Bug#1095189: rust-gio-0.18: Fails to build with glib 2.83

2025-02-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: rust-gio-0.18 Version: 0.18.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid trixie X-Debbugs-CC: aferra...@debian.org rust-gio-0.18 fails to build with glib 2.83 which is now in Unstable. It looks like you only need to extend 0001-Cargo.toml-add-missing-features.patch for v2_84 Build log excerpt =

Processed: Re: Bug#1088864: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'trapz' from 'scipy.integrate'

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 6.0.0-1 Bug #1088864 {Done: Stuart Prescott } [src:sasview] FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'trapz' from 'scipy.integrate' The source 'sasview' and version '6.0.0-1' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions sasview/6.0.

Bug#1088864: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'trapz' from 'scipy.integrate'

2025-02-04 Thread Stuart Prescott
Control: fixed -1 6.0.0-1 The patch for 5.0.6-5 was backported from upstream 6.0.0; marking the 6.x branch that is now in unstable as also having this bug fixed. -- Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@deb

Processed: fixed 1092699 in 7.0.5-1

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1092699 7.0.5-1 Bug #1092699 [src:ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper] ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'puppet-syntax/tasks/puppet-syntax' Marked as fixed in versions ruby-puppe

Bug#1092699: marked as done (ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'puppet-syntax/tasks/puppet-syntax')

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:06:11 + with message-id and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#1092699: ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'puppet-syntax/tasks/puppet-syntax' has caused the Debian Bug report #1092699, reg

Bug#1094312: marked as done (paje.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard codes path in debian/rules)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:54:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094312: fixed in paje.app 1.98-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094312, regarding paje.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard codes path in debian/rules to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, Le 04/02/2025 à 16:58, Yavor Doganov a écrit : Vincent Danjean wrote: Do you think it would be better to move the git repo to the gnustep-team group? Or do I put it in the plain debian group? This entirely depends on you; you are the maintainer. You are welcome to join the GNUstep tea

Bug#1092698: marked as done (ruby-puppet-syntax: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1477:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:32:17 + with message-id and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#1092698: ruby-puppet-syntax: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1477:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not

Bug#1094556: marked as done (yard: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rack/server)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:33:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094556: fixed in yard 0.9.37-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094556, regarding yard: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed:cannot load such file -- rack/server to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed: fixed 1092698 in 4.1.1-1

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1092698 4.1.1-1 Bug #1092698 [src:ruby-puppet-syntax] ruby-puppet-syntax: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1477:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not

Bug#1085090: marked as done ("KeyError: material_name" crash on cura startup)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:05:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1085090: fixed in cura 5.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1085090, regarding "KeyError: material_name" crash on cura startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1076871: marked as done (cura: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'called_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'called_with' is meant to be an attribute.)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:05:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1076871: fixed in cura 5.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1076871, regarding cura: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'called_with' is not a valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'called_with' is meant to be

Bug#1095148: Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-02-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 6:18:04 AM MST Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 31/01/25 at 07:05 -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Could we also remove redmine from testing for now? We have this RC bug: > > #1094049. > > > > It is right now blocked by the ruby-rack 3 transition, which should take > > some

Bug#1092471: marked as done (pyqso: Type Error: takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:35:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092471: fixed in pyqso 1.1.0-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092471, regarding pyqso: Type Error: takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1095183: pcs: autopkgtest fails in unstable

2025-02-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: pcs Version: 0.11.7-2 Severity: serious Hi, See https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pcs/ It fails with: test setup: test run 113s autopkgtest [13:34:07]: test setup: [--- 113s Warning: Unable to read the known-hosts file: No such file or directory: '/var/lib/pcsd/known

Bug#1093353: python-mne: FTBFS: Segmentation fault

2025-02-04 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Control: retitle -1 python-mne: FTBFS: NumPy 2.0 AttributeError and other issues The original error looks to have gone away when #1092354 affecting python3-vtk9 has been resolved: > mne/commands/tests/test_commands.py::test_sys_info Fatal Python error: > Segmentation

Processed: Re: Bug#1093353: python-mne: FTBFS: Segmentation fault

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1093353 [src:python-mne] python-mne: FTBFS: Segmentation fault Added tag(s) confirmed. > retitle -1 python-mne: FTBFS: NumPy 2.0 AttributeError and other issues Bug #1093353 [src:python-mne] python-mne: FTBFS: Segmentation fault Changed Bug t

Bug#1095176: pcs: FTBFS in unstable: tests failures

2025-02-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: pcs Version: 0.11.7-2 Severity: serious Hi The first test failure is: === Failure: test_parse_empty(TestCfgKnownHosts) /build/reproducible-path/pcs-0.11.7/pcsd/test/test_config.rb:687:in `assert_empty_data' /bui

Processed: forcibly merging 1093414 1094052

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1093414 1094052 Bug #1093414 [src:postgresql-17] postgresql-17: FTBFS/autopkgtest failure with tzdata 2025a due to minor changes of historical data Bug #1094052 [src:postgresql-17] postgresql-17: FTBFS: ./build/./build/conftest.c:62:(

Processed: tagging 1093414

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1093414 + fixed-upstream Bug #1093414 [src:postgresql-17] postgresql-17: FTBFS/autopkgtest failure with tzdata 2025a due to minor changes of historical data Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Processed: fixed

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1078621 1.2.1-3 Bug #1078621 [src:golang-refraction-networking-utls] golang-refraction-networking-utls: FTBFS in bookworm and trixie because of expired certificate The source 'golang-refraction-networking-utls' and version '1.2.1-3' do not

Bug#1092386: marked as done (golang-refraction-networking-utls: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 -short github.com/refraction-networking/utls github.com/

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 19:20:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092386: fixed in golang-refraction-networking-utls 1.2.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092386, regarding golang-refraction-networking-utls: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go tes

Processed: Bug#1092386 marked as pending in golang-refraction-networking-utls

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1092386 [src:golang-refraction-networking-utls] golang-refraction-networking-utls: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 -short github.com/refraction-networking/utls github.com/refraction-networking/utl

Bug#1092386: marked as pending in golang-refraction-networking-utls

2025-02-04 Thread Nilesh Patra
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1092386 in golang-refraction-networking-utls reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-refrac

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: gtk4: 4.17.3 fails to build on armel & armhf: memorytexture & scaling test failures

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1094844 [src:gtk4] gtk4: 4.17.3 fails to build on armel & armhf: memorytexture & scaling test failures Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > unblock 1094845 by -1 Bug #1094845 [src:gtk4] gtk4: Upload 4.17/4.18 to Unstable 1094845 wa

Processed: Re: Bug#1085142: Produces PPD files with invalid hash character in size names.

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/2097381 Bug #1085142 [printer-driver-hpcups] Produces PPD files with invalid hash character in size names. Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/2097381'. -- 1085142: https://bugs.

Bug#1085142: Produces PPD files with invalid hash character in size names.

2025-02-04 Thread Agustin Martin
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/2097381 On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 11:30:18PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > [resending to hplip 1085142, where it was supposed to go, instead of cups] > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 01:46:55PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > I reported this

Bug#1094844: gtk4: 4.17.3 fails to build on armel & armhf: memorytexture & scaling test failures

2025-02-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: severity -1 important Control: unblock 1094845 by -1 Control: user debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: usertags -1 armel This build failure was a result of a packaging change where we now install mesa-vulkan-drivers which enabled running additional tests. Since there is no regression her

Bug#1094844: marked as pending in gtk4

2025-02-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1094844 in gtk4 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk4/-/commit/77aeaeef450357ba98601ca87dca9c0df17

Processed: Bug#1094844 marked as pending in gtk4

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1094844 [src:gtk4] gtk4: 4.17.3 fails to build on armel & armhf: memorytexture & scaling test failures Added tag(s) pending. -- 1094844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094844 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Bug#1075227: marked as done (linuxtv-dvb-apps: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:06:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075227: fixed in linuxtv-dvb-apps 1.1.1+rev1500-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075227, regarding linuxtv-dvb-apps: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Vincent Danjean wrote: > Do you think it would be better to move the git repo to the > gnustep-team group? Or do I put it in the plain debian group? This entirely depends on you; you are the maintainer. You are welcome to join the GNUstep team even if you don't have interest in other GNUstep pac

Bug#1095150: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1095150: Bug#1095150: fp-compiler-3.2.2: fpc aborts compilation

2025-02-04 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Hi, On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 13:23 +, Peter B wrote: > On 04/02/2025 12:40, Reinhard Karcher wrote: > > Package: fp-compiler-3.2.2 > > Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-43 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: unnown > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > Upgrade to version 3.2.2+dfsg-43 from -40 produced compi

Bug#1095004: marked as done (lomiri-online-accounts-plugins: Unsatisfiable Depends: libaccount-plugin-generic-oauth)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:44:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095004: fixed in lomiri-online-accounts-plugins 0.19-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095004, regarding lomiri-online-accounts-plugins: Unsatisfiable Depends: libaccount-plugin-generic-oauth to be marked

Bug#1095114: fixed in libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 3.010

2025-02-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:19:40 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Closes: 1095114 > Changes: > libconfig-model-dpkg-perl (3.010) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Remove failing test, which is no longer needed (Closes: 1095114) Merci ! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -

Bug#1093726: marked as done (qviaggiatreno: Depends on QtWebKit)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 15:06:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093726: fixed in qviaggiatreno 2013.7.3-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093726, regarding qviaggiatreno: Depends on QtWebKit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 04/02/2025 à 15:32, Yavor Doganov a écrit : Vincent Danjean wrote: I will upload the package with a refresh (move package to salsa, ...) I will include your patch, thanks That's great, thanks! I deleted the package from mentors.d.n and also closed the bug I filed against the sponsorship-re

Processed: Re: Bug#1094115: check-postgres: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:19: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible Bug #1094115 [src:check-postgres] check-postgres: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:19: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1 Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 1094115: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094115 Debian Bug Tracking Sys

Bug#1094115: check-postgres: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:19: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

2025-02-04 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Re: Lucas Nussbaum > > # Failed test 'Action 'autovac_freeze' self-identifies correctly' > > # at t/02_autovac_freeze.t line 40. > > # 'uid=65534 topuid=10 euid=104 path='/tmp' at > > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base/File/Temp.pm line 686.

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Vincent Danjean wrote: > I will upload the package with a refresh (move package to salsa, ...) > I will include your patch, thanks That's great, thanks! I deleted the package from mentors.d.n and also closed the bug I filed against the sponsorship-requests pseudo package (#1095154) so consider it

Processed: Re: Bug#1094373: pyferret: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1094373 [src:pyferret] pyferret: FTBFS with numpy 2.x Added tag(s) patch. -- 1094373: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094373 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1094373: pyferret: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

2025-02-04 Thread Stuart Prescott
Control: tags -1 + patch The build system is looking at the old (numpy 1.x) location for the include files. The attached patch asks numpy directly where its include file is located and so is portable across versions and installation methods. An alternative is to use `/usr/bin/numpy-config --c

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 04/02/2025 à 14:26, Yavor Doganov a écrit : Control: tags -1 + pending I've prepared an NMU for paje.app (versioned as 1.98-1.3). The diff is attached to this message. It will be uploaded as soon as I find a sponsor. I will upload the package with a refresh (move package to salsa, ...) I w

Bug#1094312: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
Control: tags -1 + pending I've prepared an NMU for paje.app (versioned as 1.98-1.3). The diff is attached to this message. It will be uploaded as soon as I find a sponsor. diff -Nru paje.app-1.98/debian/changelog paje.app-1.98/debian/changelog --- paje.app-1.98/debian/changelog 2024-08-30 09:36:

Processed: paje.app: diff for NMU version 1.98-1.3

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1094312 [src:paje.app] paje.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard codes path in debian/rules Added tag(s) pending. -- 1094312: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094312 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bu

Bug#1095150: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1095150: fp-compiler-3.2.2: fpc aborts compilation

2025-02-04 Thread Peter B
On 04/02/2025 12:40, Reinhard Karcher wrote: Package: fp-compiler-3.2.2 Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-43 Severity: serious Justification: unnown Dear Maintainer, Upgrade to version 3.2.2+dfsg-43 from -40 produced compilation errors. I used the lazarus command compilation. The compilation aborted with th

Bug#1094118: marked as done (ruby-childprocess: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rubygems/mock_gem_ui)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:20:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094118: fixed in ruby-childprocess 4.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094118, regarding ruby-childprocess: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rubygems/mock_gem_ui to be ma

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Control: block -1 by 1094881 On 02.02.25 Kip Warner (k...@thevertigo.com) wrote: > On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 23:54 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hello, > > My one was just a a try too. The luametatex package (as it is) is now > > in the Debian archive for about 0,5 years and seems to be working. I > >

Processed: Re: Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1094881 Bug #1094898 [context] context: mtxrun running fails 1094898 was not blocked by any bugs. 1094898 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1094898: 1094881 -- 1094898: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094898 Debian B

Bug#1094704: r-cran-fastcluster: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: tests failed

2025-02-04 Thread s3v
Dear Maintainer, After Build-Depending on dh-sequence-numpy, I get this error during build: [...] == ERROR: test_nan (tests.fastcluster_test.test_nan) -- Traceba

Bug#1094003: marked as done (gworkspace: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: configure error)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:04:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094003: fixed in gworkspace 1.0.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094003, regarding gworkspace: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: configure error to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1094001: marked as done (gnustep-dl2: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lTrading: No such file or directory)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 13:04:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094001: fixed in gnustep-dl2 0.12.0+git20171224-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094001, regarding gnustep-dl2: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lTrading: No such file or

Bug#1095150: fp-compiler-3.2.2: fpc aborts compilation

2025-02-04 Thread Reinhard Karcher
Package: fp-compiler-3.2.2 Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-43 Severity: serious Justification: unnown Dear Maintainer, Upgrade to version 3.2.2+dfsg-43 from -40 produced compilation errors. I used the lazarus command compilation. The compilation aborted with the following messassages: Kompiliere Package fre

Bug#1077429: marked as done (yad: FTBFS: main.c:673:73: error: passing argument 2 of ‘gtk_style_context_add_provider’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types])

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:13:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077429: fixed in yad 0.40.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077429, regarding yad: FTBFS: main.c:673:73: error: passing argument 2 of ‘gtk_style_context_add_provider’ from incompatible pointer type [-

Bug#1075695: marked as done (yad: ftbfs with GCC-14)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:13:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1075695: fixed in yad 0.40.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1075695, regarding yad: ftbfs with GCC-14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1094049: marked as done (redmine: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:20: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 18)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2025 12:59:59 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1094049: redmine: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:20: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 18 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094049, regarding redmine: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:20: override_dh_

Bug#1095148: redmine: FTBFS: Could not find gem 'nokogiri (~> 1.16.4)' in locally installed gems.

2025-02-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: redmine Version: 5.1.3+ds-6 Severity: serious Hi, > dh binary --with ruby >dh_update_autotools_config >dh_autoreconf >debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure > make[1]: Entering directory '/build/reproducible-path/redmine-5.1.3+ds' > ./debian/check-locales > bundle install --l

Bug#1095093: marked as done (sasdata: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 11:06:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095093: fixed in sasdata 0.9.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095093, regarding sasdata: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1095094: marked as done (sasmodels: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 11:06:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095094: fixed in sasmodels 1.0.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095094, regarding sasmodels: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#1095142: jmeter: Unable to start: Provider org.xbill.DNS.spi.DnsjavaInetAddressResolverProvider not found

2025-02-04 Thread Yadd
Package: jmeter Version: 2.13-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: y...@debian.org Hi, I just install jmeter. It is unable to start: $ jmeter An error occurred: java.net.spi.InetAddressResolverProvider: Provider org.xbill.DNS.spi.DnsjavaInetAddressResolverProv

Bug#1095095: marked as done (sasview: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:48:33 +1100 with message-id <7d8ab523-c8ab-4707-b265-c1dae75d8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1095095: sasview: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x has caused the Debian Bug report #1095095, regarding sasview: autopkgtests fail with numpy 2.x to be marked

Processed: block 1094637 with 1095055

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1094637 with 1095055 Bug #1094637 [uwsgi-plugin-ruby] Rack plugin not compatible with Rack 3 1094637 was not blocked by any bugs. 1094637 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1094637: 1095055 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: RC bug #1091947: forward to upstream issue

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1091947 > https://github.com/click-contrib/click-option-group/issues/65 Bug #1091947 [src:python-click-option-group] python-click-option-group: FTBFS: FAILED tests/test_click_option_group.py::test_missing_group_decl_first_api Set Bug f

Bug#1095019: marked as done (dask: autopkgtest failures with numpy 2.x)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 10:34:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095019: fixed in dask 2024.12.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095019, regarding dask: autopkgtest failures with numpy 2.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1094700: marked as done (openmm: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: error: cannot convert ‘PyObject*’ {aka ‘_object*’} to ‘const PyArrayObject*’ {aka ‘const tagPyArrayObject_fields*’})

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 10:20:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094700: fixed in openmm 8.1.2+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094700, regarding openmm: FTBFS with numpy 2.x: error: cannot convert ‘PyObject*’ {aka ‘_object*’} to ‘const PyArrayObject*’ {aka ‘const

Processed: Bug#1095019 marked as pending in dask

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1095019 [src:dask] dask: autopkgtest failures with numpy 2.x Added tag(s) pending. -- 1095019: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095019 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1095019: marked as pending in dask

2025-02-04 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1095019 in dask reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/dask/-/commit/28c21fd1a6cd52ebd6308f47e

Processed: found 1094637 in 2.0.28+1+0.0.2

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1094637 2.0.28+1+0.0.2 Bug #1094637 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [uwsgi-plugin-ruby] Rack plugin not compatible with Rack 3 Did not alter found versions and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#1092703: marked as done (ruby-roo: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_not include(:@memoized_data))

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:50:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092703: fixed in ruby-roo 2.10.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092703, regarding ruby-roo: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_no

Bug#1094051: marked as done (thin-provisioning-tools: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 101)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:50:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1094051: fixed in thin-provisioning-tools 1.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1094051, regarding thin-provisioning-tools: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo build returned exit code 1

Bug#1077766: marked as done (certmonger FTBFS with gcc 14)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:49:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1077766: fixed in certmonger 0.79.20-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1077766, regarding certmonger FTBFS with gcc 14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: reassign 1094637 to uwsgi-plugin-ruby

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1094637 uwsgi-plugin-ruby 2.0.28+1+0.0.2 Bug #1094637 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:uwsgi-plugin-ruby] Rack plugin not compatible with Rack 3 Bug reassigned from package 'src:uwsgi-plugin-ruby' to 'uwsgi-plugin-ruby'. No longer marked a

Bug#1095019: dask: autopkgtest failures with numpy 2.x

2025-02-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 11:40:35PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dask/testing/amd64/57321986/ > > E AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'product' Apparently fixed upstream by removing the test along with the legacy DataFrame implementation,

Bug#1095114: marked as done (libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: FTBFS: test failure with YAML::PP 0.38.1)

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:19:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1095114: fixed in libconfig-model-dpkg-perl 3.010 has caused the Debian Bug report #1095114, regarding libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: FTBFS: test failure with YAML::PP 0.38.1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1093357: marked as done (seqan3: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 8356 - utility/views/enforce_random_access_test::enforce_random_access_test.adaptor (Failed

2025-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 08:58:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1093357: fixed in seqan3 3.4.0~rc.3+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1093357, regarding seqan3: FTBFS: The following tests FAILED: 8356 - utility/views/enforce_random_access_test::enforce_random_access_t

Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds

2025-02-04 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi! On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:45 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > I agree this looks like the kernel is at least involved in this problem. > Is someone able to do a bisect to help the kernel team to pinpoint the > issue? > > Or does someone has a reproducer that also works for someone w

  1   2   >