Yes, let’s remove it. I’ll fill the removal bug next week if nobody is faster
than me.
Thanks for caring…
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
> On 3. 9. 2024, at 14:39, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Source: sysrepo
> Severity: serious
> Justification: grab attention of maintainer
> User: helm...@debia
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 06:39:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080139: fixed in sogo 5.11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080139,
regarding sogo: FTBFS: NSData+ActiveSync.m:39:10: fatal error: wbxml/wbxml.h:
No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing control commands:
> found -1 2.4.10-1
Bug #1079457 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [cups] cups:
Dependencies prevent installation
Marked as found in versions cups/2.4.10-1 and reopened.
--
1079457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
Control: found -1 2.4.10-1
Hello,
Can reproduce:
# apt install cups
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1079850 [src:openrocket] Should openrocket be removed from unstable?
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle -1 RM: openrocket -- RoM; rc-buggy
Bug #1079850 [src:openrocket] Should openrocket be removed from unstable?
Changed Bug tit
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: openrocket -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openrocket
Hi Bdale,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:56:05AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Helmut Grohne writes:
> > I suggest removing openrocket from Debian
>
Source: devpi-common
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing devpi-common from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1030453: devpi-common: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: e
Source: adacontrol
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing adacontrol from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1008982: adacontrol: depends on unavailable asis
Source: anki
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing anki from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated 3 RC-bugs:
+ #958853: anki: old version beginning to fail with newer Python
Source: cycle-quotes
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing cycle-quotes from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1020192: cycle-quotes: FTBFS with emacs 28: 1
Source: crazydiskinfo
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing crazydiskinfo from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #997156: crazydiskinfo: FTBFS: main.cpp:217:
Source: binutils-msp430
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing binutils-msp430 from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1042343: binutils-msp430: FTBFS: make[1
Source: backdoor-factory
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing backdoor-factory from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1027037: backdoor-factory: Backdoor-f
Source: breezy-loom
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing breezy-loom from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #988156: breezy breaks breezy-loom autopkgtest:
Source: cpl-plugin-xshoo
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing cpl-plugin-xshoo from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #1035786: cpl-plugin-xshoo-calib: xsho
Source: airport-utils
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing airport-utils from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #414092: airport-utils: Tools start and quit
Hi Andrea and Guido,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:23:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> This has now been accepted, and the package uploaded to experimental.
>
> Please let me know how dumat feels about it :)
Thanks. It reached dumat and the libvirt report entirely disappeared.
Green light for
Package: gnome-metronome
Version: 1.3.0-4
Severity: serious
gnome-metronome's build-dependencies are unsatisfiable due to the recent
rust gtk stack update.
After bumping the build-dependencies and cargo dependencies I was able
to build the package and run it's (superficial) autopkgtest succesful
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:49:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080366: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #906340,
regarding bookkeeper: FTBFS in buster/sid (Could not resolve dependencies for
project org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-server
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:48:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080346: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #981713,
regarding graftcp: Not ready for stable release
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080365: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875358,
regarding Fails with Java 9, >2.0.0 required to work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080365: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053077,
regarding powermock: FTBFS:
core/src/main/java/org/powermock/core/ClassReplicaCreator.java:[99,36]
incompatible types: java
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:47:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080294: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026543,
regarding flask-testing: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Failed to start the server after
5 seconds.
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080365: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053077,
regarding powermock: FTBFS with default Java 21 in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:43:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080130,
regarding python-funcsigs: FTBFS: ERROR: test_readme
(tests.test_funcsigs.TestFunctionSignatures)
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:39:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080057: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075101,
regarding jeex: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2024 03:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078247: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078241,
regarding reiser4progs: FTBFS with GCC 14: error: initialization of ... from
incompatible pointer type ...
to be marked as d
Package: sonic-visualiser
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi.
When starting the program it crashes immediately:
$ sonic-visualiser
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Dataquay::RDFIncompleteURI'
what(): Uri::Uri: Given string is not a complete
Package: puppet-agent
Severity: serious
Version: 8.4.0-1
Control: affects -1 puppetserver
In bug #1078911 [0], a user reported that a cron job responbile for
cleaning up old reports previously shipped in puppet-master was no
longer shipped in puppetserver. The consequence was an accumulation of
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 puppetserver
Bug #1080489 [puppet-agent] Reports causing unbounded filesystem usage growth
Added indication that 1080489 affects puppetserver
--
1080489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1075294 in mplayer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/mplayer/-/commit/757b83e7904499eed1ca7170
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1075294 [src:mplayer] mplayer: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1075294: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:38:46PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Looking forward to your update.
>
> MR here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/merge_requests/232
>
> Please take a look.
This has now been
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rust-merge/testing/amd64/ appears to
> have always failed; it looks as though rust-merge:@ and
> librust-merge-dev:default succeed but everything else fails.
>
> librust-merge-dev:derive fails with:
>
Your message dated Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:17:37 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: librsvg: FTBFS on ppc64el in buster
has caused the Debian Bug report #982123,
regarding librsvg: FTBFS on ppc64el in buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Source: rust-merge
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt 6(a)
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/rust-merge/testing/amd64/ appears to
have always failed; it looks as though rust-merge:@ and
librust-merge-dev:default succeed but everything
On Wed, 2024-09-04 at 18:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I'm doing a gtk4 build on the mips64el porterbox eberlin to assess whether
> we can use the new ORCJIT llvmpipe and remove the workaround for #1010838,
> but it's taking a while (mips64el machines are not fast). So far it's
> looking as tho
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1080395 + pending
Bug #1080395 [src:python-cryptography] python-cryptography: FTBFS:
unsatisfiable build-depends
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1080395: https://bugs.de
I have removed support for isc-dhcp-client from network-manager in
1.49.90-1. So this issue has become moot.
Feel free to close it.
Regards,
Michael
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Helmut Grohne writes:
> Source: openrocket
> Severity: serious
> Justification: grab attention of maintainer
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: sidremove
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I suggest removing openrocket from Debian
I agree.
Upstream now offers for download a 'fat' jar file that can be
On 2024-09-01 22:02:27 [+0200], Santiago Vila wrote:
> Could we please fix it in bookworm as well?
> (packages in stable must build in stable)
I plan to prepare 1.0.7 as pu this weekend.
> Thanks.
Sebastian
Source: gtk4
Version: 4.14.4+ds-8
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@packages.debian.org, debian-m...@lists.debian.org,
debian-powe...@lists.debian.org, debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-m...@list
Hello Michael,
Thanks for the NMU
Kind regards,
Laurent
Le 4/09/24 à 15:28, Michael Biebl a écrit :
Hi,
I've incorporated the suggestions from Helmut and also added a
strictly versioned dependency on libnutscan2 to nut-server, to ensure
that the t64 variant is replaced on upgrades (I notic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1079538 by 108
Bug #1079538 [src:gjs] gjs: Upload gjs 1.82 to Unstable
1079538 was blocked by: 1079077 1079499
1079538 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1079538: 108
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear maintainer,
attached is a patch to fix the mentioned FTBFS issue.
--
Athos Ribeiro
>From 58b3994f8716c3e200dd36d719a1647ce63c0cc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Weimer
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:47:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] C type error in the ov_rest plugin
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1075341 [src:openhpi] openhpi: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075341: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Étienne Mollier writes:
> I had a quick look some time ago at what would be needed to port
> from pcre to pcre2, but this is not something I am particularly
> confortable doing.
Unless I've missed something, there should be no need for any porting
here, just a small build system change, either t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1080096 patch
Bug #1080096 [nvidia-kernel-dkms] fail to build with kernel 6.10.6+bpo-amd64 -
implicit declaration of function ‘follow_pfn’
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 108 serious
Bug #108 [src:mozjs128] mozjs128: SharedArrayBuffer feature unavailable on
armel
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
108: ht
tags 1080096 patch
thanks
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:35:06PM +0200, fr.hame...@gmail.com wrote:
> To solve it have applied the patches given by nvidia the 21 of July
> here :
> https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/gpl-only-symbols-follow-pte-and-rcu-read-unlock-prevent-470-256-02-to-build-with-ke
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:04:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073696: fixed in etbemon 1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073696,
regarding mon: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 13:50:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075317: fixed in nipy 0.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075317,
regarding nipy: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi,
I've incorporated the suggestions from Helmut and also added a strictly
versioned dependency on libnutscan2 to nut-server, to ensure that the
t64 variant is replaced on upgrades (I noticed that apt didn't do that
otherwise when doing a test upgrade).
The changes have been uploaded to DELA
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1075317 in nipy reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/nipy/-/commit/aa237b6d2af8f6c92c8e0871801fa8bce88c3
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1075317 [src:nipy] nipy: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1075317: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 12:04:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075034: fixed in goocanvas-2.0 2.0.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075034,
regarding goocanvas-2.0: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:02:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line FTBFS on armel
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079078,
regarding gambas3: FTBFS on armel: /usr/include/poppler/goo/GooString.h:241:24:
error: no member named 'starts_with' in 'std::basic_string'
to be marked as
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2024-09-04 11:15:26 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:15:19AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: render
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 11:34:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080424: fixed in libpod 5.2.1+ds1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080424,
regarding podman: /etc/profile.d/podman-docker.sh breaks docker, should not be
shipped in the podman binary package
to be marked
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 11:34:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080443: fixed in libpam-ssh 2.3+ds-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080443,
regarding libpam-ssh: reverted NMU 2.3+ds-6.1, reintroduces aliased files
(DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1080401 important
Bug #1080401 [src:nbd] "make check" is flaky, regularly FTBFS
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1080401: https://bugs.debian.org/
El 4/9/24 a las 8:38, Pierre Gruet escribió:
I tried to build the package with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="nr_cpus=1" as you
suggested, and I got an error I had not met before:
[ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.134 s
<<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.sshd.common.forw
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:09:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075563: fixed in testdisk 7.2-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075563,
regarding testdisk: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
I reduce the severity of this ftbfs bug on arm64, as the
libmaus2 and it's reverse dependency biobambam2 have been
removed from this architecture. See #1079718 and #1079456.
Have a nice day, :)
--
.''`. Étienne Mollier
: :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1069691 [src:libmaus2] libmaus2: FTBFS on arm64: what():
AutoArray failed to allocate
1398102 elements (11184816 bytes)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1069691: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069691
Debian
On 2024-09-04 11:15:26 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:15:19AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > That's a ridiculous severity/rat
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:15:19AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> That's a ridiculous severity/rationale
Ack.
I'll also note that for *currently* logged in sessions
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
Build logs are missing information that gets stored in /tmp (and
cleaned up on non-persistent build environments. I attach the
missing output for reference. The tail of the log file does not
look very helpful, but the below seems to be more relevant:
Trac
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1078315 [src:rdflib] rdflib: FTBFS: raise ValueError from exc
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1078315: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed help
Hi,
I had a quick look some time ago at what would be needed to port
from pcre to pcre2, but this is not something I am particularly
confortable doing.
At least in the Debian Med team, there are a bunch of tools that
(transitively) depend on the ncbi-tools6, so
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed help
Bug #1078825 [src:ncbi-tools6] src:ncbi-tools6: unsatisfied build dependency in
testing: libpcre3-dev
Added tag(s) confirmed and help.
--
1078825: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1079746 {Done: Étienne Mollier } [src:isodate]
setuptools test command is removed
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1079746 to the same values
previously set
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1079746 [src:isodate] setuptools test com
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi again,
Étienne Mollier, on 2024-09-04:
> The test suite is run, and the build goes through, so I close
> the bug.
Reopening, the issue is not affecting the build process, however
it does affect its autopkgtest:
autopkgtest [10:13:17]: test
Your message dated Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:12:43 +0200
with message-id
and subject line isodate: setuptools test command is removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079746,
regarding setuptools test command is removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
74 matches
Mail list logo
