Quoting James Cowgill (james...@cowgill.org.uk):
> Source: geneweb
> Version: 6.06-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> geneweb has FTBFS on various arches (arm64, mips, mipsel, ppc64el,
> s390x) since 6.06-1 all with errors similar to:
>
> >make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/gui'
> > Plea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 775564 emacs24-lucid emacs24-nox
Bug #775564 [emacs24] emacs24: emacs fails to byte-compile apel and org-mode
Added indication that 775564 affects emacs24-lucid and emacs24-nox
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 evolution
Bug #776686 [libwebkitgtk-3.0-0] libwebkitgtk-3.0-0: Crash with SIGBUS in
`WebCore::WidthIterator::advanceInternal`
Added indication that 776686 affects evolution
> forwarded -1 https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141093
Bug #776686 [libwebk
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.7.2.1~dfsg-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I have VPS form OVH running Debian Jessie. Few hours ago I've installed snmpd
to monitor my network interfaces but snmpd
can't start. When I try starting it with /etc/init.d/snmpd star
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 772567 + patch
Bug #772567 [brasero] brasero: Brasero ejects blank CD before even starting
burning audio CD
Bug #734517 [brasero] brasero: suggest brasero-cdrkit
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Package: shorewall
Version: 4.6.4.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #776680
The issue appears to be with debconf settings as dpkg-reconfigure shorewall and
then
/etc/init.d/shorewall restart works even dpkg-reconfigure doesn't actually do
any
prompts.
Perhaps it is because shorewall packaging labels the co
Package: shorewall
Version: 4.6.4.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #776680
Despite the debconf setting of invalid_config the config is in fact correct as
evidenced
by the fact that the shorewall compile and shorewall safe-restart commands
compile and
restart the firewall with no complaints or issues.
-- S
Dear Eric,
I noticed that there was this reply to your bug report, directed at you
but apparently not sent to you (only to the bug). So, would it be
possible to share this file?
Best,
Tobias
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:14:07 +0100 Thomas Girard
wrote:
> tag 767423 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hello,
Package: shorewall
Version: 4.6.4.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A firewall that is never applied is useless hence a bug that stops shorewall
from being applied
under the default init system (systemd) is RC.
In this case the issue is that /etc/init.d/shorewall restar
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #769728 [systemd] Logind does not start properly on freshly installed
minimal systems
Bug #772700 [systemd] systemd-logind.service fails to start if dbus is missing
Bug #775971 [systemd] systemd-logind is installed on minimal install, but dbu
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 30.01.2015, 10:58 + schrieb Jurica Stanojkovic:
> I have tried them both on mips.
> Both packages do resolve issue on mips.
thanks.
>
> Could someone please upload new source from upstream.
A new upstream release would not be accepted to enter jessie, as it
contains unre
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:18:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#775896: fixed in libdumbnet 1.12-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #775896,
regarding libdumbnet-dev: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775896 + pending
Bug #775896 [libdumbnet-dev] libdumbnet-dev: copyright file missing after
upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
775896: http://bugs.debi
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 22:45:00 +0100
with message-id <54cbfb5c.5000...@debian.org>
and subject line Done !
has caused the Debian Bug report #775637,
regarding openstack-trove: FTBFS in jessie: Tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
also sprach Andreas B. Mundt [2015-01-30 18:48 +0100]:
> * Jonas provided patches in https://bugs.debian.org/759424#57
> * I had to modify Jonas' patch slightly to make it work here:
>https://bugs.debian.org/759424#33
> * Jonas disagrees with that modification, the diffence is diskussed in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 775640 src:libarchive-zip-perl
Bug #775640 [unzip] libarchive-zip-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
(unzip/CVE-2014-8139 regression?)
Added indication that 775640 affects src:libarchive-zip-perl
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:33:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#775640: fixed in unzip 6.0-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #775640,
regarding libarchive-zip-perl: FTBFS: Test failure (unzip/CVE-2014-8139
regression?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:18:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776653: fixed in heirloom-mailx 12.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #776653,
regarding Does not default to sendmail location /usr/sbin/sendmail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: rabbitmq-server
Version: 3.4.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From
reassign 775640 unzip
thanks
This is really a bug in unzip, so I'm reassigning.
Will fix it in unstable as soon as I can and will leave the stable
version to the security team, as usual.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 775640 unzip
Bug #775640 [src:libarchive-zip-perl] libarchive-zip-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
(unzip/CVE-2014-8139 regression?)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libarchive-zip-perl' to 'unzip'.
No longer marked as found in versions libarch
The author says that the patch to fix CVE-2014-8139 was wrong indeed
and he has provided a fixed patch.
Security team: I fixed CVE-2014-9636 (a different problem) yesterday,
but since the fix for CVE-2014-8139 was incomplete, you might want
to wait just a little bit for my next unstable upload (wh
Hi,
I confirm isc-dhcp-server fails to start if there in not at least one
valid subnet :
root@niel-3:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get install isc-dhcp-server
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
isc-dhcp-server is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0
Hi Martin, KiBi,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:57:22 +0100 martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2015-01-29 18:58 +0100]:
> > I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect fixing di-n-a at this point of
> > the release cycle, frankly.
>
> Of course, but maybe the fix is trivial⦠on the othe
Control: unarchive 771989
Control: reopen 771989
Control: tags 771989 = confirmed
On 30/01/15 14:44, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:45:10AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Or if dropping it down to interest-noawait would help, that isn't
>> really semantically correct, but
Processing control commands:
> unarchive 771989
Bug #771989 {Done: Niels Thykier } [dbus] dbus: Please
(consider) switch(ing) to no-await triggers
Unarchived Bug 771989
> reopen 771989
Bug #771989 {Done: Niels Thykier } [dbus] dbus: Please
(consider) switch(ing) to no-await triggers
Bug reopened
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:34:09PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > > I think it's sufficient if we fix this in a point update, can you take
> > > > care of th
Package: heirloom-mailx
Version: 12.5-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Debian Policy §11.6 states that:
Debian packages which process electronic mail, whether mail user
agents (MUAs) or mail transport agents (MTAs), must ensure that they
are compatible with the configuration decision
Hi,
> On which MIPS machine did you build it ?
As I mentioned before
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=770009#45
I had tested it on Cavium board without FPU.
Unfortunately, I do not have more info.
I deleted old imagemagic chroots,
but I just had started builds
on
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 08:11:24PM +0100, Thomas Vincent wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Damien 'drazzib' Raude-Morvan and I tried to reproduce this bug in
> chroots (with sbuild) in both jessie and sid:
>
> * using the current stumpwm package from sid and setting clisp as the
>compiler
> * creating a co
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Dejan Latinovic
wrote:
> did anyone tried to wait some longer time to see if command will execute?
No, but the build machines wait for a pretty long time before
killing (5 hours), and I've checked that it uses the proc at 200%. We
can't burden the build machines
(sry about leaving you guys hanging… I am not exactly blessed with free
time at the moment and this stuff requires the exact opposite… anyway,
more a problem description/comment than a solution. Far from the later…)
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:45:10AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Is the fix for
Hi,
did anyone tried to wait some longer time to see if command will execute?
> ./magick.sh convert
> /home/fourmond/tmp/imagemagick-6.8.9.9/debian/display-im6.svg \
>-background none -define filter:blur=0.75 -filter
> Gaussian -resize $SIZE \
>-gravity
Hi,
Le 30/01/2015 06:30, Daniel Beyer a écrit :
> Am Montag, den 26.01.2015, 14:41 -0400 schrieb David Prévot:
>> Maybe the people behind the bug report or ci.d.n will be able to offer a
>> shell to reproduce the issue we’ve not managed to reproduce so far…
>
> A shell would be really great. I t
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:52:15 +0100
with message-id <1422622335.5377.19.ca...@krishna.villemot.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#776634: alternative liblapack.so.3gf can't be slave of
liblapack.so.3: it is a master alternative
has caused the Debian Bug report #776634,
regarding alterna
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:51:45 +0100
with message-id <1422622305.5377.18.ca...@krishna.villemot.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#776633: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of
libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
has caused the Debian Bug report #776633,
regarding alternative
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:49:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776260: fixed in tecnoballz 0.93.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #776260,
regarding tecnoballz: Version dependancy to libsdl-mixer1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Hi Peter,
I just noticed you have ITA'ed[0] libdumbnet back in June.
libdumbnet has currently an RC bug[1] which may cause a bunch of
packages, including three packages managed by the Debian Perl Group
(Cc'ed), to be autoremoved, too.
Do you intend to take care of that RC bug, too?
[0] https:
Hi,
Version 1.3-1 [1] of the package fixes #749714 but I lack the upload to
NEW privileges (not sure of the translation from french).
Cheers, xavier
[1] 4d757b0bf01daa8e9938933a6a3eaabbf370a139 of
mtn://monotone.ada-france.org?org.debian.liblog4ada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
Hello,
There is a solution for this problem upstream.
Solution is available in upstream package versions 0.7.5 and 0.7.6
https://github.com/patperry/hs-ieee754/issues/5
I have tried them both on mips.
Both packages do resolve issue on mips.
Could someone please upload new source from upstream.
Package: liblapack3
Version: 3.5.0-4
Severity: grave
Updating liblapack3 fails with:
Setting up liblapack3 (3.5.0-4) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative liblapack.so.3gf can't be slave of
liblapack.so.3: it is a master alternative
dpkg: error processing package liblapack3 (--configure):
I asked the author here:
http://www.info-zip.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=454
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
On Jan 15, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
> file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
OTOH this is a dummy empty package, so I hope that nobody minds if
I downgrade it to prevent the
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #775417 [inn2-lfs] inn2-lfs: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy
12.5)
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
775417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Package: libblas3
Version: 1.2.20110419-10
Severity: grave
Updating libblas3 fails with:
Setting up libblas3 (1.2.20110419-10) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative libblas.so.3gf can't be slave of
libblas.so.3: it is a master alternative
dpkg: error processing package libblas3 (--configur
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776494: fixed in mariadb-10.0 10.0.16-1~exp2
has caused the Debian Bug report #776494,
regarding mariadb-server-10.0: fails to install: preinst: line 49:
this_version: command not found
to be marked as done.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.01.2015, 14:41 -0400 schrieb David Prévot:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/01/2015 14:23, David Prévot a écrit :
> > Le 19/01/2015 13:34, Daniel Beyer a écrit :
>
> >> I'm not 100% sure if it really fixes the problem, since I'm not able to
> >> reproduce those errors on my local system (ne
Hi Moritz,
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:34:09PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > I think it's sufficient if we fix this in a point update, can you take
> > > care of that?
> >
> > Do you think of Jessie or Wheezy? As far as I can see, Wheezy i
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Niko Tyni wrote:
> [...]
> I note that this is Debian specific as we add jar.zip in our patch for
> #654899. Upstream Archive-Zip doesn't have a jar file in their test
> suite at all.
>
> Andrew Gallagher's comment in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174844
> i
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:49:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776007: fixed in xymon 4.3.17-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #776007,
regarding buffer overrun in acknowledge.c(gi)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - patch
Bug #776137 [sudo] sudo: fails to switch between sudo and sudo-ldap: chown:
cannot access '/etc/sudoers': No such file or directory
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
776137: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776137
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2015-01-30 00:19, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-01-29 23:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Which is erroneously moved aside by sudo-ldap.preinst, thereafter dpkg
> unpacks sudo-ldap, takes over file ownership (incl. conffiles) from sudo
> and once it gets around to ins
52 matches
Mail list logo
