Hi, Le 30/01/2015 06:30, Daniel Beyer a écrit : > Am Montag, den 26.01.2015, 14:41 -0400 schrieb David Prévot:
>> Maybe the people behind the bug report or ci.d.n will be able to offer a
>> shell to reproduce the issue we’ve not managed to reproduce so far…
>
> A shell would be really great. I think something in Process/Process.php
> start() [1] is slow on that machine (and if I put a delay in there, I
> get those errors). However I have no idea what it could be.
> Who do we need to ask for a shell on ci.d.n?
Looks like debian-qa is the expected point of contact:
http://ci.debian.net/doc/#label-Contact
Antonio is usually responsive for ci.d.n, and I guess Lucas will be able
to help giving a shell on aws (that was used for this bug report).
> I would like to try one more thing and increased the timeout in the test
> from 0.1s to 0.5s. This is just an other wild guess and still we will
> not know what really is causing the problem. But it might prevent us
> from an other FTBFS in BTS. I've already added a new patch in the jessie
> branch, but did not update d/changelog. If you agree to try this out, it
> would be great if you could upload a 2.3.21+dfsg-3 to the archives.
I’ll take care of the upload later today, thanks for your work on this
issue.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
