Hi,
just to make it clear.
The tar works as expected, it just emits extra warning.
Current tar version expects more than POSIX guarantees.
Even inside the tar source src/misc.c is written:
FIXME: There should be no need to get the absolute file name.
getcwd is slow, it might f
Hi,
thanks for the notice.
I'll prepare a new package upload tonight.
Thanks,
Thomas
Am Freitag, den 09.09.2011 um 0:58 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
> Package: quassel
> Version: 0.6.3-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: security
>
> When people send me
>
> 0010 75 74 61 73 21 7a 7a 40 31
Hi David,
* David Paleino [110909 15:02]:
>
> Uhm, ok, confirmed, seems like an upgrade problem caused by the switch from
> pysupport to dh_python2.
Ahh.
> Reinstalling it fixes the problem -- I'll try to fix the upgrade path as well.
Ok, thanks for the speedy confirmation and workaround.
C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 630517 + patch
Bug #630517 [src:icu] FTBFS: icu: ../lib/libicudata.a: could not read symbols:
Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one
Added tag(s) patch.
> user debian-...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-...@lists.debian.org (was
tags 630517 + patch
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertag 630517 + kfreebsd
--
Hi.
Please apply patch bellow to configure.in
and propagate it into configure.
Petr
--- source/configure.in
+++ source/configure.in
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@
# Check to see if genccode can generate simple assembly.
tags 640969 confirmed
thanks
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:31:12 +0900, Mitsubishi Evo II wrote:
> I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
> it immediatly exits as follows:
>
> % bpython
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/bpython", line 9, in
> lo
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:31:12 +0900, Mitsubishi Evo II wrote:
> Package: bpython
> Version: 0.10.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
> it immediatly exits as follows:
>
> %
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 640960 grave
Bug #640960 [quassel] CVE-?: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the
core
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640960: http://bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 634049 pending
Bug #634049 [src:subversion] FTBFS with current swig:
bindings/swig/ruby/svn_client.c:1383:11: error: 'SWIG_RubyRemoveTracking'
undeclared
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:58:18PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:13:32 +0200, Andreas Noteng wrote:
>
> > > transgui hardcodes a dependency on libssl0.9.8, which is going away.
> > I'm currently on vacation, will have a look at this when I get back, in
> > about 2 weeks.
>
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
>> "r" == rdiezmail-emacs writes:
> r> Now I have to work on a remote server via SSH, and the connection is
> r> not fast enough to tunnel X Windows over it, so I have to switch to
> r> console mode with "emacs -nw".
>
> r> The console mode has been a shock. There
Package: bpython
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
it immediatly exits as follows:
% bpython
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/bpython", line 9, in
It got rid of the unreadable error messages, now I get:
blarson@tramp:~$ xpdf /tmp/DN060-02v02.pdf
Error: Missing language pack for 'Adobe-GB1' mapping
Error: Unknown font tag 'F1'
Error (315): No font in show
Error: Missing language pack for 'Adobe-GB1' mapping
Error: Unknown font tag 'F1'
Error
Colin Watson wrote:
> * While it's true that make is largely delegating responsibility to
> another program here, it's a common program used by many packages,
> and so serves to consolidate a lot of boring common code which is a
> fairly standard software virtue. I'd be hard-pressed
Package: xpdf
Version: 3.03-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xpdf fails to display most pdf content due to missing fonts. This can
be cured by removing /etc/xpdf/xpdfrc, however purging and
reinstalling the package does not remove this file. As most users will
not be abl
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640028: fixed in bcfg2 0.9.5.7-1.1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640028,
regarding Unescaped shell command vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640028: fixed in bcfg2 1.0.1-3+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640028,
regarding Unescaped shell command vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:57:56 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:06:55PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > The patch for 0.9.8 is also attached, but I haven't tested it yet. It was
> > made based on squeeze's openssl and it seems to apply fine to lenny's
> > openssl (just a f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640559 patch
Bug #640559 [src:ircd-hybrid] ircd-hybrid: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make
target `/usr/lib/libpcre.a', needed by `ircd'. Stop.
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubu
tags 640559 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 640559 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
[...]
> > make[2]: *** No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 625080 patch
Bug #625080 [src:fstrcmp] fstrcmp: FTBFS: ./lib/diffseq.h:461:38: error:
'bxbest' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
Bug #625331 [src:fstrcmp] fstrcmp: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Added tag(s) patc
tags 625080 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625080 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
[...]
> > In file included from l
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> But, to return to the former idea of arguing for flexibility for just one
> moment - that's moot because of another reason - we *already* allow a
> near-infinite amount of abuse through flexibility, because you can make a
> makefile for
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:02:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#616264: fixed in libvdpau 0.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #616264,
regarding libvdpau: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with
doxygen-latex
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 625331 src:fstrcmp 0.3.D001-1
Bug #625331 [fstrcmp] fstrcmp: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Bug reassigned from package 'fstrcmp' to 'src:fstrcmp'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions fstrcmp/0.3.D001-1.
Bug #625331 [src:fstrcmp] fstrcm
Josip Rodin writes:
> It was just an arbitrary conversion of a single "is" to "must be" (in an
> unrelated let's-use-consistent-RFC-like-wording drive) that went
> unchecked.
I wanted to mention here that this didn't just suddenly happen as a result
of the existing Policy wording without any fur
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 635687 + patch
Bug #635687 [src:ecore] ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 635687 + pending
Bug #635687 [src:ecore] ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
Added tag
tags 635687 + patch
tags 635687 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ecore (versioned as 1.0.0-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:35:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640339: fixed in openscenegraph 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640339,
regarding openscenegraph: FTBFS: FFmpegDecoder.cpp:88:26: error: 'AVERROR_IO'
was not declared in this scope
to be marked as do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 634140 + patch
Bug #634140 [src:libgeotiff-dfsg] libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on
libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 634140 + pending
Bug #634140 [src:libgeotiff-dfsg] libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on
tags 634140 + patch
tags 634140 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libgeotiff-dfsg (versioned as 1.2.5-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:18:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640915: fixed in owfs 2.8p13+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640915,
regarding libownet-dev and libow-dev: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:13:32 +0200, Andreas Noteng wrote:
> > transgui hardcodes a dependency on libssl0.9.8, which is going away.
> I'm currently on vacation, will have a look at this when I get back, in
> about 2 weeks.
This bug (and the not-yet-reported FTBFS) seem to be fixed in the
package's
Package: komparator
Version: 1:0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
Your package failed to build from source:
index.docbook:1061: element book: validity error : No declaration for
element book
^
make[3]: *** [doc/index.cache.bz2] Error
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:06:55PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2011 10:57:51 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Monday 05 September 2011 14:55:50 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > So you're basicly saying that X509_verify_cert() should give an
> > > error in case it finds DigiNota
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:47:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#632128: fixed in aqualung 0.9~beta11-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #632128,
regarding FTBFS with Libav 0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:04:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640742: fixed in haskell-language-javascript 0.4.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640742,
regarding haskell-language-javascript: FTBFS: Grammar5.y: invalid character
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:04:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630713: fixed in pandoc 1.8.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630713,
regarding libghc-pandoc-dev: Library does not provide profiling version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:03:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#639084: fixed in libnatpmp 20110808-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #639084,
regarding libnatpmp1: unversioned files in shlib package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Source: cclib-data
> Version: 1.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The package fails to install:
> | # apt-get install cclib-data
> | Reading package lists... Done
> | Building dependency tree
> | Read
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Sep 8 20:03:31 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libnatpmp
> tags 639084 + pending
Bug #639084 [libnatpmp1] libnatpmp1: unversion
No, the symlinks are not broken. Maybe you do maintain a package with broken or
explicit checks for locations of libraries?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:32:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#632038: fixed in icedove-l10n 1:5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #632038,
regarding New upstream (5.0)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:54:09 +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 07 Rugsėjis 2011 15:07:21 Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 09/04/2011 08:17 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > Debian packages should use "RelWithDebInfo" [1] CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE if they
> > > want settings compa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 628529 with 630517
Bug #628529 [release.debian.org] transition: ICU transition (4.4 -> 4.8)
Was blocked by: 628304 631031 625415 556768 634404 625377 624962 556756 628584
554407
Added blocking bug(s) of 628529: 630517
> kthxbye
Stopping pro
On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Stanislav
FYI, I just uploaded the patched version. Thanks again for your
contribution, it's much appreciated, especially that I didn't have time
to fix things over the
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 22:06:55 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2011 10:57:51 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Monday 05 September 2011 14:55:50 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > So you're basicly saying that X509_verify_cert() should give an
> > > error in case it finds DigiNotar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 625756 patch
Bug #625756 [electric-fence] electric-fence: FTBFS due to OOM with gcc-4.5
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was cjwat...@ubuntu.com).
> usertags 625756 ubuntu
tags 625756 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625756 ubuntu-patch oneiric
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:54:35PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> When I build electric-fence from source on amd64/sid with gcc-4.5 or
> gcc-4.6, the ./tstheap 3072 call gets to iteration 100 and then start
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package binutils
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.
Package: tijmp
Version: 0.8+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
tijmp fails to build as it can't find the path to openjdk:
| checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
| checking how to hardcode library paths into
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 564971 patch
Bug #564971 [clamfs] clamfs: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
Added tag(s) patch.
> user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was cjwat...@ubuntu.com).
> usertags 564971 ubuntu-patch oneiric
Bug#564971:
tags 564971 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 564971 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:04:00AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
> gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4.
> Fo
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:18:50 +0200, Josip Rodin
wrote:
> > If you ignore all transitions constraints, sure. At the same time, Debian
> > decided debian/rules must be a Makefile and you're not adjusting to cope.
>
> No, "Debian" did not decide to explicitly ban non-shell rules files at any
> point
Package: java3d
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
java3d fails to build as it can't find the path to openjdk:
| dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2
| dpkg-
Source: cclib-data
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package fails to install:
| # apt-get install cclib-data
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state information... Done
| The following extra packages will be installed:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not installable in unstable
> severity 637399 grave
Bug #637399 [hgsubversion] hgsubversion: Transition to dh_python2
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 635890 + patch
Bug #635890 [src:strongswan] strongswan: obsolete build-dependency:
libopensc2-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 635890 + pending
Bug #635890 [src:strongswan] strongswan: obsolete build-dependency:
libopensc2-dev
Added tag(s) pe
tags 635890 + patch
tags 635890 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for strongswan (versioned as 4.5.2-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru strongswan-4.5.2/debian/changelog strongswan-4.5.2/debian/chang
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The API is not the only thing to take into account. Using anything else
> > than make is unexpected for most other developers (some of them who might
> > have to NMU your package at some point).
>
> I agree, but that argument goes both ways - we already
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 607479 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68380
Bug #607479 [libfcgi-perl] libfcgi-perl: After reloading some environment vars
become constants, that will be used if not overruled by the headers of new
requests.
Set Bug for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 635592 + patch
Bug #635592 [binutils] [regression] "Assertion failure in emit_inc_line_addr at
../../gas/dwarf2dbg.c line 926." on mips(el)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tag 635592 + patch
thanks
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:14:22PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Package: binutils
> Version: 2.21.52.20110707-1
> Severity: serious
> Justifaction: causes other packages to FTBFS on mips/mipsel
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that binutils has regressed on mipsel and mips.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Josip,
>
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
> > its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one specific
> > implementation and
On 09/08/2011 03:54 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Loic Dachary writes:
>
>> On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
>>> to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
>>>
>>> Loic, could you upload the 3.
Loic Dachary writes:
> On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
>> to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
>>
>> Loic, could you upload the 3.0.1-1 version found in the git repository,
>> please?
>>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 640100 mplayer2-dbg/2.0-134-g84d8671-6
Bug #640100 [mplayer-dbg,mplayer2-dbg] mplayer2-dbg and mplayer-dbg: error when
trying to install together
The source mplayer2-dbg and version 2.0-134-g84d8671-6 do not appear to match
any binary pack
Package: libow-dev,libownet-dev
Version: libow-dev/2.8p13+dfsg1-2
Version: libownet-dev/2.8p13+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2011-09-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file an
Hi Josip,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
> its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one specific
> implementation and is instead properly specified in Debian policy, allowing
> developers some co
Package: dicom3tools,dcap
Version: dicom3tools/1.0~20110901-1
Version: dcap/2.47.5-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2011-09-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 629416 pending
Bug #629416 [plymouth] plymouth: breaks wheeze upgrade with initramfs failure
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
629416: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
tag 629416 pending
thanks
will address this in the upper-next upload RSN.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:50:33AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Nevertheless, merely having that doubt in developers' minds is a cost;
> 17058 packages can definitely use this technique, while for 1 package we
> have to think about it ... so I would still want to hear of a clear
> benefit to allowi
On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
> to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
>
> Loic, could you upload the 3.0.1-1 version found in the git repository,
> please?
>
> Regards,
>
> Alberto
>
>
Hi,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # strictly speaking it's serious but I don't think we should
> # block all the build fixes for this. A dist-upgrade would do
> # it correctly. Will be fixed ASAP, though.
> # RT: If you think otherwise, you can set it to *serious*, but that
> # wo
# strictly speaking it's serious but I don't think we should
# block all the build fixes for this. A dist-upgrade would do
# it correctly. Will be fixed ASAP, though.
# RT: If you think otherwise, you can set it to *serious*, but that
# would delay all the other bugfixes for more time...
severity 6
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Would you mind explaining here why you feel it is important to retain the
> flexibility of multiple implementation languages for debian/rules?
Now, I wouldn't actually put it that way - because that would imply that we
could suddenly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 628353 octave3.2
Bug #628353 [src:octave-symbolic] octave-symbolic: FTBFS: Inconsistency
detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 737: _dl_close: Assertion `map->l_init_called'
failed!
Bug reassigned from package 'src:octave-symbolic' to 'octave3
reassign 628353 octave3.2
affects 628353 octave-symbolic
forcemerge 628353 633719
tags 628353 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 628353 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: octave-symbolic
[...]
> During a rebuild of a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 620037 important
Bug #620037 {Done: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl } [nagvis]
nagvis: fails to purge - command in postrm not found
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Am 08.09.2011 13:41, schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> tag 640900 + moreinfo
> thanks
>> Versions of packages libreoffice-report-builder depends on:
> [...]
>> ii libreoffice-report 1:3.3.3-4+b1 LibreOffice extension for
>> building
>
> So you have -report-builder-bin installed from 3.3.3. Does
> This bug just caused a serious security incident for us, and I was able
> to work through the cause and the reason why not everyone sees it. The
> problem was introduced in 0.70 and is still present in 0.73.
>The following change was added in 0.70:
> sub accept() {
> warn "accept called as
Bugreport 633926 is referring to the same problem (which I did overlook
in the first place); would it be feasible to merge it with this report?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633926
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 640900 + moreinfo
Bug #640900 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder is not
usuable
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
tag 640900 + moreinfo
thanks
Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 6.0.2
> APT prefers proposed-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (300,
> 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (
Package: libreoffice-report-builder
Version: 1:1.2.1+LibO3.4.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
If libreoffice-report-builder is not installed, I can create "Berichte" with
"Bericht unter Verwendung des Assistenten erstellen." "Bericht in
Entwurfsansicht ers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 640872 640896
Bug#640872: libc6: upgrade fails to mv /lib64.eglibc-new to /lib64; leaves
system unusable
Bug#640896: Demolition of the dist-upgrades to package libc-bin and Broken
System
Forcibly Merged 640872 640896.
> thanks
Stoppi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 640896 libc6
Bug #640896 [libc-bin] Demolition of the dist-upgrades to package libc-bin and
Broken System
Bug reassigned from package 'libc-bin' to 'libc6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-16.
> thanks
Stopping proc
Package: libc-bin
Version: 2.13-16
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
At the "dist-upgrade" my system (amd64) stops processing package for libc-bin
(tested twice) and no longer causes a bootable system.
Impact of the error:
All commands are no longer found in the path (Exa
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640872: fixed in eglibc 2.13-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #640872,
regarding libc6: upgrade fails to mv /lib64.eglibc-new to /lib64; leaves system
unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I can provide a concrete practical reason for requiring make as the
> implementation language: at least one, probably two, of the options for
> build-arch handling
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629385#93) require
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:59:40AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The policy wording was hardcoded like that basically because Manoj is overly
> attached to make, we had long and unfruitful discussions about it (I forget
> the bug number, search the archives), and no actual practical reason to
> chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 640872 + pending
Bug #640872 [libc6] libc6: upgrade fails to mv /lib64.eglibc-new to /lib64;
leaves system unusable
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640872: http://bugs.d
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:02:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#640862: fixed in gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640862,
regarding gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg: uninstallable on unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Stanislav
Hi Stanislav,
Thanks a lot for your patch. I have applied it to the Git and uploaded
it to alioth since I believe it's quite clean now.
I've been quite busy
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:47:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#634395: fixed in gnomint 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #634395,
regarding gnomint: FTBFS: new_req_window.c:157:8: error: variable
'column_number' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
t
Hi Jose!
deja-dup still has a RC bug in unstable due to the libnotify 0.7
transition. Uploading either the package currently in experimental or a
newer upstream release in unstable would fix this issue.
Could you make a new deja-dup upload to unstable?
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Sep 8 08:03:25 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: icedove-l10n
> tags 632038 + pending
Bug #632038 [icedove-l10n] New upstream (5.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 640874 tech-ctte
Bug #640874 [leave] leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile
Bug reassigned from package 'leave' to 'tech-ctte'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640874: http://bugs.debian.or
reassign 640874 tech-ctte
thanks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: leave
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
> User: lint-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
> debian-rul
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
