Source: globus-authz
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: globus-xio
Version: 2.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: globus-xio-gsi-driver
Version: 0.6-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: globus-gss-assist
Version: 5.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: globus-gsi-callback
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: globus-gsi-cert-utils
Version: 6.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: globus-rsl
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs
Version: 4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: globus-gram-client
Version: 10.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: globus-gass-transfer
Version: 4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: globus-ftp-client
Version: 5.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: cdck
Version: 0.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc: '-V' opt
Source: fuseiso
Version: 20070708-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> if x86_64-linux-
Source: x11vnc
Version: 0.9.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: libapache2-mod-fcgid
Version: 1:2.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/sh
Source: imagemagick
Version: 7:6.6.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> CC cod
Source: pymvpa
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -pthread -shared
Source: libvncserver
Version: 0.9.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: camstream
Version: 0.27+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> if x86_64-linux-
Source: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.7.10+r1453-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -c -p
Source: linbox
Version: 1.1.6~rc0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../../libt
Source: kdebase-runtime
Version: 4:4.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: ctsim
Version: 5.1.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: seed
Version: 2.30.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../../libt
Source: multisync
Version: 0.82-9
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: .l
Source: elmerfem
Version: 5.5.0.svn.4458.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc
Source: vtk
Version: 5.4.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: blitz++
Version: 1:0.9-10
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: dfu-util
Version: 0.0+r4880-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: rofs-fuse
Version: 2006.11.28-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cc `pkg-con
Source: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 0.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -c -Wall -g
Source: python-nids
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/
Source: kdenetwork
Version: 4:4.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/g++
Source: gnustep-dl2
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -shared
Source: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
Version: 1.3.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> m
Source: fim
Version: 0.3-beta-prerelease-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
>
Source: freecraft
Version: 1:1.19-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../libt
Source: gvfs
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Source: pidgin-sipe
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../../libt
Source: slicer
Version: 3.4.0~svn10438-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: wdiff
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -g -Wall -O2
Source: apache2-redirtoservname
Version: 0.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/
Source: mail-notification
Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> cc -c
Source: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:2.1.17-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> mak
Source: modglue
Version: 1.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -c
Source: evolution-mapi
Version: 0.28.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin
Source: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.14-9
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -DBR_PTHREA
Source: libusb-1.0
Version: 2:1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: tagua
Version: 1.0~alpha2-8
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: curlftpfs
Version: 0.9.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: djmount
Version: 0.71-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -I..
Source: gpsshogi
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -pipe -DOSL_
Source: psqlodbc
Version: 1:08.03.0200-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
>
Source: synce-multisync-plugin
Version: 0.9.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> x86
Source: faumachine
Version: 20100421-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[7]: Enter
Source: getfem++
Version: 4.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --
Source: xfburn
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --m
Source: setools
Version: 3.3.6.ds-7.1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -std=gn
There's a patch available, written for Fedora by an Evolution developer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538956
--
Osmo Salomaa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 24/05/10 at 22:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Re the long term perspectives, Jakub Wilk has contacted Lucas Nussbaum
> about testing all our packages in unstable and see which are affected
> by this bug, and then filling bugs as appropriate. Once we know how
> many packages are affected, we th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 572923
Bug #572923 {Done: Iustin Pop } [protobuf] protobuf: FTBFS
on armel (test-suite failure)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> severity 57292
On Di, 25 Mai 2010, Norbert Preining wrote:
> 2010/05/25 14:30:03 :: Usage: dhcpcd [options]
BTW, selecting dhclient in the configuration makes wicd work again,
but the recommended is auto which uses dhcpcd and that is broken.
Best wishes
Norbert
Package: wicd
Version: 1.7.0+ds1-3
Severity: grave
Dear David,
the recent upgrade broke wicd completely. Connection is not possible
anymore to a wireless network. It finds the access points, but connections
always breaks:
2010/05/25 14:30:01 :: Putting interface up...
refreshing...
ESSID : X
[Michael Prokop]
> * Petter Reinholdtsen [Don Feb 25, 2010 at 07:01:43 +0100]:
> > I suspect this issue was solved when portmap version 6.0.0-2, but am
> > unsure if it is true. Please test and see if the issue is solved.
>
> Nope it's not fully solved yet.
>
> Executing "dpkg-reconfigure portm
Greetings,
Gnome-do works again now, after some "aptitude (full-)upgrade". The problem
might have been resolved with the new gtk-sharp2 package, I don't know. I
didn't remember doing anything to my Mono installation and recompiling Gnome-
do with apt-build didn't work.
Anyway, it works now. Tha
Package: perl
Version: 5.10.1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for perl.
CVE-2010-1974[0]:
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Safe (aka Safe.pm) module
| before 2.25 for Perl allow context-dependent attacke
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2010 04:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#571351: fixed in bidiv 1.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #571351,
regarding bidiv: FTBFS: bidiv.c:159: undefined reference to
`fribidi_iso8859_8_to_unicode_c'
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2010 04:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582904: fixed in xiphos 3.1.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #582904,
regarding xiphos: FTBFS on hppa (waf parallel build issues)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2010 02:07:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#572950: fixed in libtheora 1.0~beta3-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #572950,
regarding libtheora: multiple vulnerabilities in lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 01:37:32PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: prophet
> Version: 0.741-2
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libmouse-p...@packages.debian.org
>
> This package fails to build on current sid/amd64. The regression is
> related to libmouse-perl, which is currently at 0.58-1. T
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2010 01:52:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#574418: fixed in barnowl 1.0.1-4+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #574418,
regarding barnowl: CVE-2010-0793 buffer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On Mi, 12 Mai 2010, Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> AMS have updated the license. Is it possible to still get this into Squeeze?
I have added an updated license statement and will ship new packages
hopefully soon.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Package: bogofilter
Severity: serious
All is in the title, fwiw it prevents tokyocabinet to migrate into
testing...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 23:32:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#571518: fixed in zhone 0-git20090610-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #571518,
regarding zhone: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On 24 May 2010 19:21, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 24 May 2010, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 24.05.2010 12:35, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > > Package: gdc-4.3
> > > Version: 1:1.046-4.3.4-5
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > gdc 4.3.4 does not work with gcc-4.3-base 4.3.5:
>
> I think you forg
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:49:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#578424: fixed in python-glpk 0.4.43-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #578424,
regarding [python-glpk] FTBFS: cannot build it due to missing dependency
libglpk-dev (<= 4.38.999)
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:49:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#573696: fixed in python-glpk 0.4.43-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #573696,
regarding python-glpk: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libglpk-dev(inst
4.43-1 ! <= wanted 4.38.999)
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:35:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582425: fixed in pdf2djvu 0.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #582425,
regarding pdf2djvu: --indirect is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Don Feb 25, 2010 at 07:01:43 +0100]:
> I suspect this issue was solved when portmap version 6.0.0-2, but am
> unsure if it is true. Please test and see if the issue is solved.
Nope it's not fully solved yet.
Executing "dpkg-reconfigure portmap" in interactive mode and
ans
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:17:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582922: fixed in scheme2c 1993.3.15.2-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #582922,
regarding scheme2c: Uses -march=native
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:15:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#572923: fixed in protobuf 2.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #572923,
regarding protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Here's some of the healthcare lists we have:
Physicians (34 specialties) - 788k records, 17k emails, 200k fax numbers
Chiropractors - 108,421 total records * 3,414 emails * 6,553 fax numbers
US Surgery Centers - 85k records and 14k emails
Theres many more too, just send me an email here for addi
pam-ssh uses pam-auth-update (from libpam-runtime) in postinst and
prerm, as advocated in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg3.html, so I guess
piuparts is flawed.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE
* Raphael Geissert (geiss...@debian.org) [100524 23:13]:
> I probably won't have time to process the results myself in the next
> two-three weeks.
Sorry, but we need something working within one week. I have lots of
cool ideas how the world should be, but this is not about "how should
it look like
On 24 May 2010 15:27, Andreas Barth wrote:
> However, as sort of work around, I would like to ask you to remove
> this feature from dash in unstable again.
I can't speak for the maintainer, but I'd prefer if this change is not reverted.
LINENO is required by POSIX and was the last, major, missing
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 22:25:26 +0200
with message-id <4bfae0b6.7020...@fobos.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#582946: FATAL: Error inserting vboxnetflt : Invalid
module format
has caused the Debian Bug report #582946,
regarding FATAL: Error inserting vboxnetflt : Invalid module format
to
This one time, at band camp, Gordon Haverland said:
> After the 4 dpkg-reconfigure runs, things seem to be working.
> That was the end result mentioned above. That nothing in
> /etc/clamav changed after the fresh re-install (after purging) was
> interesting.
What it looks like happened was:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.4.3-1
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze sid
Justification: causes serious data loss
Kmail is running with dimap, imap, imap and pop3 accounts. All is well. I run
aptitude safe-upgrade. Upon next login and start of kmail, all the said accounts
are gone from the settings.
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.5.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
recently dash gained support for LINENO (see #540685). This made many
other package FTBFS, see e.g. #582037, #582876, #581884 and #582565.
A change that makes so many packages FTBFS makes release management
hard (or rather impossible), so we
24.05.2010 23:49, Felix Geyer пишет:
It seems like you have installed virtualbox-ose-dkms and
virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms.
Please remove the virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms package and try it again.
In 3.2.0-1 both packages conflict with each other.
Thank you very much!
Now:
DKMS: install Completed.
S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 582941 Impossible boot ordering info in init.d script
Bug #582941 [open-vm-tools] boot order loop between open-vm-tools and mountnfs
Changed Bug title to 'Impossible boot ordering info in init.d script' from
'boot order loop between open-
On 24.05.2010 20:58, nikolay fedosov wrote:
from dmesg:
[ 42.156570] vboxdrv: Trying to deactivate the NMI watchdog permanently...
[ 42.156579] vboxdrv: Warning: 2.6.31+ kernel detected. Most likely the
hardware performance
[ 42.156582] vboxdrv: counter framework which can generate NMIs is
On 24 May 2010 20:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 15:27 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I'm impatient =) considering this is true:
>>
>> > $ python -c "import sys; print sys.platform"
>> > linux2-hppa
>> >
>>
>> Can you please try building ?
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/deb
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 15:27 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I'm impatient =) considering this is true:
>
> > $ python -c "import sys; print sys.platform"
> > linux2-hppa
> >
>
> Can you please try building ?
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xiphos/xiphos_3.1.3-3.dsc
Yes, that b
Hello,
On Wednesday 19 of May 2010, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Ping?
Does the attached patch work?
If not I'd like to have a test case (either a sample program or step-by-step
instructions) in order to reproduce the bug. Just installing heartbeat isn't
enough since IPv6Addr gives:
# ./IPv6addr
Package: src:logilab-common
Version: 0.50.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Test failure, for unittest_date.DateTC and unittest_date.MxDateTC:
| FAIL: test_open_days_now_now (unittest_date.DateTC)
| --
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 19:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#581281: fixed in audex 0.72b1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #581281,
regarding audex: FTBFS: /bin/sh: cmake: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 24 May 2010 19:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582197: fixed in audex 0.72b1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #582197,
regarding FTBFS: utils/upload.h:31:24: error: KIO/MkdirJob: No such file or
directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo