Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:49:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556625: fixed in boost1.40 1.40.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #556625,
regarding fails to rtupdate in postinst
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Michael Biebl wrote:
> since the update of dpkg-dev from 1.15.4 to 1.15.5, my packages fail to
> build with the following message:
>
> Can't call method "epoch" on an undefined value at
> /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Version.pm line 132.
> dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps returned exit c
oblems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: iceape
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakero
Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:08:41 +0100
with message-id <20091118070841.ga22...@glandium.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#556545: Iceweasel 3.0.14-1 is configured to use a
proxy server and it's impossible to modify the network settings
has caused the Debian Bug report #556545,
regarding Ic
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
tags 540493 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libcgi-application-basic-plugin-bundle-perl
(versioned as 0.4+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2, according to
devref §5.11.1. The patch uses a better version predicate f
n/bugreport.cgi?bug=556828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Version: 0.10.16-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebu
On 11/11/09 at 22:34 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 14:13 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > Let's fix the only really broken thing: the mpiexec/mpirun problem in
> > openmpi and mpich2. After that, we can downgrade this bug and discuss
> > the rest of it.
>
> I uploaded
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 544588 important
Bug #544588 [dovecot-antispam] dovecot-antispam: should have a versioned
dovecot dependency
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 556884 src:eglibc
Bug #556884 [src:glibc] locale/C-time.c erroneously lists the first day of the
week as Monday
Bug reassigned from package 'src:glibc' to 'src:eglibc'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions glibc/2.7-1.
> found 55688
For some reason the BTS forwarded but didn't save this, so let's give it
another go...
Ben.
Forwarded Message
From: Hynek Vychodil
Reply-to: Hynek Vychodil , 556...@bugs.debian.org
To: 556...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#556046: It works now
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:46:44 +010
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 556816 boinc-dev
Bug #556816 [src:boinc-app-milkyway] boinc-app-milkyway: FTBFS:
../astronomy/boinc_astronomy.C:29:21: error: config.h: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package 'src:boinc-app-milkyway' to 'boinc-dev'.
Bug No
reassign 556816 boinc-dev
retitle 556816 boinc-dev is not longer shipping config.h file
thanks
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:53:38PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this is my package's fault.
> boinc-dev doesn't provide /usr/include/boinc/config.h anymore. I'd
> like to know if this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 551689
Bug #551689 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [atlas] atlas
(experimental) - packaging error
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> severity 551689 nor
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Recommended resolution: remove libclass-xsaccessor-array-perl from
> unstable (and thus testing). It does not exist in stable or oldstable.
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> Package: libclass-xsaccessor-pe
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:16:37AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 12:37:55 +1030, Ron wrote:
> > This is a known issue, yeah. But I don't really think it's a bug in the
> > plugin per-se.
>
> I'm not going to get into BTS severity ping-pong, but I don't see how this can
> n
Hi:
Recommended resolution: remove libclass-xsaccessor-array-perl from
unstable (and thus testing). It does not exist in stable or oldstable.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:20 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Package: libclass-xsaccessor-perl
> Version: 1.05-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: upgrad
Package: atlas
Version: 3.8.3-6
Severity: normal
Hi,
As new atlas 3.8.3-6 source has been accepted in experimental, I managed to
build
the atlas packages on amd64 environment (on Intel Xeon E5335).
This time all the packages can be installed properly, but I found weird
dependencies
upon binary
tag 556842 confirmed
thanks
This is actually due to a bug in libc6's C locale (which is now filed
and marked as blocking this bug.)
As such, if it gets fixed there first, I'll just close this bug.
[However, if it doesn't, I'll make an upload which sets
LANG=en_US.UTF-8 or similar before calling c
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:05:37AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
was heard to say:
> 0.4.11.11-1+b2 -> 0.6.0.1-1
>
> during install:
>
> update-alternatives: using /usr/bin/aptitude-curses to
> provide /usr/bin/aptitude (aptitude) in auto mode.
> update-alternatives: warning: not replacing /usr/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 556842 confirmed
Bug #556842 [src:libhtml-calendarmonth-perl] libhtml-calendarmonth-perl: FTBFS:
tests failed
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
retitle 556799 readahead is uninstallable with current dependencies resolvers
block 556799 with 556869,556881
tag 556799 confirmed
thanks
2009/11/17 Sven Joachim :
> Package: readahead-fedora
> Version: 2:1.5.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Thank you for providing a transitional readahead package, but
e: gitmagic
Version: 20091107-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 556799 readahead is uninstallable with current dependencies resolvers
Bug #556799 [readahead-fedora] readahead-fedora: Unversioned conflict with
readahead
Changed Bug title to 'readahead is uninstallable with current dependencies
resolve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 516338 patch
Bug #516338 [pornview] Segmentation fault while clicking Preference
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity 516338 serious
Bug #516338 [pornview] Segmentation fault while clicking Preference
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> thank
Martijn, FYI there's now a patch for #516338 as well, which should be
included if you end up doing an NMU.
Regards,
--
Tim Retout
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 556808 mplayerplug-in
Bug #556808 [src:mplayerplug-in] mplayerplug-in: FTBFS: configure: error: xpidl
compiler not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:mplayerplug-in' to 'mplayerplug-in'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mpla
tags 516338 patch
severity 516338 serious
thanks
(This doesn't break unrelated software, so is merely 'serious'.)
The bug is in the Debian fix for #485820. Here is a patch to fix it:
--- pornview-0.2pre1/src/prefs_ui/prefs_win.c
+++ pornview-0.2pre1/src/prefs_ui/prefs_win.c
@@ -320,12 +320,12 @@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 556788 grave
Bug #556788 [libsnmp-base] libsnmp-base: Please provide a more clear warning
that downloading MIBs can take hours
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:34:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552961: fixed in zimpl 3.0.0+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #552961,
regarding zimpl: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
tags 553107 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libsigc++ (versioned as 1.0.4-9.4) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/2, according to devref §5.11.1. The patch is attached, it
simply switch the relative order of dh_installdeb and dh_makeshlibs, so
that the ldconfig snippet fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 553107 + patch pending
Bug #553107 [libsigc++0c2] libsigc++0c2: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
/usr/lib/libsigc-1.0.so.0.0.0 by the dynamic library loader.
Therefore, the package must call "ldconfig" in its postinst
Due to a bug in the makefile, the package was accidentally build as
debug version (-DNDEBUG missing). In a debug build errors (incl.
triggered by errors in the input) call abort() instead of exit() to get
a stack trace. Since abort() causes "Aborted" to be in the output, the
expected output is diff
I can reproduce this on amd64. (I'm actually working on a lenny system
right now, but it's the same version; I reckon the fix will be the
same.)
Kartik, you need to rebuild pornview with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip (and
I've added 'noopt' for good measure) to get debugging symbols. Then you
can also
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 556627 556860
Bug#556627: should conflict/replace/whatever a list of packages
Bug#556860: qemu: same files in several packages without replace/conflict
Bug#556655: [qemu] Cannot update from 0.10.6-1
Bug#556737: trying to overwrite '/usr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 556844 wontfix
Bug #556844 [src:gnat-4.3] gnat-4.3: FTBFS:ali.adb:1825:41: (style) bad casing
of "NUL" declared in Standard
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
tags 556844 wontfix
thanks
I think this bug is triggered by the switch to gnat-4.4 as the default
(i.e. bootstrap) compiler. When bootstrapping gnat-4.3 with itself
there is no problem; gnat-4.4 is simply a little more pedantic.
I am now busy with the transition of all Ada packages to gnat-4.4.
Package: qemu
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: several packages can not have same files without conflict
Hi,
As you split the package, you need that the new binary packages conflicts
with the old qemu package AND the new binary packages replaces qemu.
Else, depending on the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:19:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#550316: fixed in devicekit-disks 009-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #550316,
regarding broken cd-rom polling/detection with (legacy) ide-cd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:19:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#544679: fixed in dhcpcd 1:3.2.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #544679,
regarding dhcpcd_1:3.2.3-3(ia64/unstable): conflicting basic types
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 516338 confirmed
Bug #516338 [pornview] Segmentation fault while clicking Preference
Added tag(s) confirmed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:51:29 +0100
with message-id <20091117215129.ga29...@kelgar.0x539.de>
and subject line gnu-smalltalk 3.1-1 built successfully
has caused the Debian Bug report #496484,
regarding gnu-smalltalk_3.1~rc3-1(experimental/alpha/ds10): Testsuite failure
(118: ROE)
to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # alpha is no longer a release architecture
> severity 541402 important
Bug #541402 [kdebase-workspace-bin] alpha: plasma segfault on kde4 startup
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> severity 532447 important
Bug #532447 [xulrunner] xulrun
PM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
>
> Source: boinc-app-milkyway
> Version: 0.18d-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pa
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:47:31 +
with message-id <1258494451.4100.7.ca...@castor.retout.co.uk>
and subject line Re: smart: FTBFS: debian/tmp does not exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #527838,
regarding smart: FTBFS: debian/tmp does not exist
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:00:11 -0600
with message-id <20091117200011.gb26...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: luma: FTBFS: RuntimeError: the sip module implements API
v5.0 but
has caused the Debian Bug report #533985,
regarding luma: FTBFS: RuntimeError: the sip module implemen
Package: pitivi
Version: 0.13.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've just installed pitivi and right away, it simply does
not work:
$ pitivi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line 118, in
_run_pitivi()
File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line 111,
Source: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20091101-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> checking CAIRO_CFL
Package: perl-suid
Version: 5.10.1-7
Severity: serious
Although 5.10.1-7 fixed the missing libc6 dependency (#553259),
I still managed to miss this:
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libperl.so.5.10 needed by
debian/build/perl-suid/usr/bin/sperl5.10.1 (ELF format: 'elf32-i386'; RPATH
Source: haskell-regex-base
Version: 0.93.1-3.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot deb
Source: haskell-filepath
Version: 1.1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/ru
Source: haskell-regex-posix
Version: 0.93.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot deb
Source: libfsotransport
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> DC-Build-Header: libfsotransp
Source: iceape
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules cl
Source: jack-audio-connection-kit
Version: 0.116.2+svn3592-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /bin/b
Source: adasockets
Version: 1.8.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `
Source: haskell-hsh
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Source: missingh
Version: 1.1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Source: meshlab
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
&
Source: cameleon
Version: 1.9.18.svn20090908+703-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
Source: gst-plugins-bad0.10
Version: 0.10.16-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: icedtea-gcjwebplugin
Version: 1.0+dak1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -g -O2 -DXP_UNIX -D
Source: fai
Version: 3.3.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/u
Source: ecamegapedal
Version: 0.4.4-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
Source: libpadre-plugin-vi-perl
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: java-access-bridge
Version: 1.26.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: ftphs
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Source: fluxbox
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules cl
Source: ilisp
Version: 5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.26-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot deb
Source: abraca
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -o build/data/abraca_images.o -c -W
Source: hslogger
Version: 1.0.8-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
Source: gitmagic
Version: 20091107-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `
Source: haskell-pcre-light
Version: 0.3.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/ru
Source: generatorrunner
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/ru
Source: bibletime
Version: 2.3.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
Source: nfqueue-bindings
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: haskell-configfile
Version: 1.0.5-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/ru
Source: mplayerplug-in
Version: 3.55-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cecil-flowanalysis
Version: 0.1~svn.68457-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/faker
Source: dvr
Version: 3.2-9.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -O2 -Wall -g `avifile-config --cflags`
Source: djview4
Version: 4.5-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Source: f-spot
Version: 0.6.1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering directory
> `
Source: onscripter
Version: 0.0.20091011-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -O3 -Wall -fomit-fr
Source: boinc-app-milkyway
Version: 0.18d-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> g++ -DGMLE_BO
Source: gtk-vnc
Version: 0.3.10-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
Source: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.4-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[5]: Entering directory
> `
Source: haskell-convertible
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/ru
Source: boinc-app-seti
Version: 5.13+cvs20060510-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: magic-haskell
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Package: readahead-fedora
Version: 2:1.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Thank you for providing a transitional readahead package, but there is a
little problem with it. Namely, it is not actually installable:
,
| % aptitude -s install readahead
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 542265
Bug #542265 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/sendmail
conflicts with sendmail-base
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #542265 to the same values
previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 509367 chicken-bin/4.2.0-1
Bug #509367 [chicken-bin,mono-devel] chicken-bin: /usr/bin/csc conflicts with
mono-devel
The source chicken-bin and version 4.2.0-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Bug Marked as found in versions chick
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 542265 logcheck-database/1.3.3
Bug #542265 [logcheck-database] logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/sendmail
conflicts with sendmail-base
The source logcheck-database and version 1.3.3 do not appear to match any
binary packages
Bug Marked as
Le lundi 16 novembre 2009, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> Python appears to convert "GL" to "libGL.so.1" on my system by running
> "/sbin/ldconfig -p" and parsing its output. Would you please run that
> command on your system and send any lines containing "GL" to the bug
> report?
Sure:
% /sbin/ldconfig
* Guido Trotter wrote:
> Package: cgroup-bin
> Version: 0.34-2
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi,
Hi Guido, thanks for the bug report.
> I installed cgroup-bin on my system, and when its system services
> (cgconfig and cgred) are started my system cannot suspend, hibernate
> just hangs. After that ev
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.5.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
since the update of dpkg-dev from 1.15.4 to 1.15.5, my packages fail to
build with the following message:
Can't call method "epoch" on an undefined value at
/usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Version.pm line 132.
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:18:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#00: fixed in autogen 1:5.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #00,
regarding autogen: FTBFS: usr/share/info/dir exists in debian/tmp but is not
installed to anywhere
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debia
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 01:51 +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> Package: nvidia-glx-dev
> Version: 190.42-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Wanted to install the nevest version and cannot do it because it depends and
> conflicts with the same version of nvidia-glx.
>
> From the control file:
> Depends: nv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Nov 17 19:03:11 UTC 2009
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: jruby
> tags 551618 + pending
Bug #551618 [jruby] jruby: contains non-free mater
Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:46:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#556594: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 190.42-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #556594,
regarding [nvidia-glx-dev] Depends on and conflicts with >= nvidia-glx_190.42
to be marked as done.
This means that y
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
