Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:51:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bug is bogus
has caused the Debian Bug report #493555,
regarding freepops DNS server error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: digikam
Version: 2:0.10.0~beta1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
digkam 0.10.0 should be kept out of testing & unstable(?) until final
release ~ 20 Dec 08:
http://www.digikam.org/drupal/about/releaseplan
digiKam 0.10.0 Release Plan (KDE4)
2008-07-07: Beta 1
2008-07-31: Beta 2
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:21:46AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
>
> I've been talking to Miriam (who maintains the gnash plugin) and she has
> sugested to use alternatives for this, like having
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/mozilla-flash.so linked to
> /etc/alternatives/mozill
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:59:23AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
>
> > So I guess just disabling that plugin, and keeping anotherone installed
> > should solve the problem.
>
> Unfortunately that doesn't work.
You're right, I hadn't tested right before commenting. Same here too :(
> Even after d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> merge 489838 490331
Bug#489838: mm3d_1.3.7-1(sparc/unstable): configure: error: Failed to link Qt
with OpenGL support.
Bug#490331: mm3d: FTBFS: checking Qt OpenGL... failure
Merged 4
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:52:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > By "small chunk", you mean 64 bytes of data. That's not a program; that's
> > almost certainly register initialization values, which are data, and there
> > is no requirement in the DFSG that arbitrary bits of data (which are too
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Does it work if you are root and don't use the -u option (which I must
admit I didn't even know existed before now)?
Using root the build problem is gone, but now signing the package
fails. I cannot use fakeroot either, because then m-a complains
early about no write p
Your message dated Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493992: fixed in jcc 1.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #493992,
regarding jcc FTBFS on everything except amd64 due to wrong paths.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # via tagpending
> #
> # linuxtv-dvb-apps (1.1.1+rev1207-2) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Package: dvb-utils - Tranistional dummy package
> #- No transitional package for dvb-
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# via tagpending
#
# linuxtv-dvb-apps (1.1.1+rev1207-2) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Package: dvb-utils - Tranistional dummy package
#- No transitional package for dvb-utils (Closes: #494012)
#
package dvb-utils dvb-apps lin
Package: dibbler-client
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
installing dibbler-client hangs calling /usr/bin/ucf to copy the finished
configuration file. It's not eating u p CPU time, so it's probably waiting
for user input that never arrives.
-- System Infor
Your message dated Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:23:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493995: fixed in dwm-tools 28-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493995,
regarding dwm-tools_28-1(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Steve Cotton wrote:
> severity 493363 grave
> tags 493363 + patch
> quit
>
> Severity justification: This bug allocates memory in an infinite
> loop, which leads to the system near-freezing while thrashing,
> until the Xserver crashes.
> >From o
Package: postgresql-tablelog
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Long standing RC bugs with no activity
* Never i
Package: ghc-cvs
Version: 20060905-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* long standing RC bugs with no activity
* was not released
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> # perl 5.10 is now in testing/unstable
> severity 482131 serious
Bug#482131: ghc-cvs: FTBFS with perl 5.10
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 494219 important
Bug#494219: openldap: FTBFS: test failed - master and R2 slave databases differ
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 494219 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#494219: openldap: FTBFS: test failed - master and R2 slave da
severity 494219 important
tags 494219 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:54:55PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> i386.
> > > Starting test019-syncreplication-cascade ...
> > running defines.sh
> >
s
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kdeartwork
Version: 4:3.5.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_install -pkscree
file-roller
Version: 2.22.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-file-roll
On 07/08/2008 Sebastian Moster wrote:
> there still seems to be a problem concerning the key-file parameter when
> read from /etc/crypttab.
> With 2:1.0.6-5, the script produces now the command
>
> cat keyfile | cryptsetup -c -s --key-file=- create
>
> which seems to be correct. However, th
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:59:40PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> i386.
I believe this is essentially the same issue as this one affecting
xapian-core, reported here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493390
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> reopen 493848
Bug#493848: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] crypttab problem]
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version
> 2.10.11ubuntu5.8.04.1
> package file-roller
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: file-roller
> tags 494237 + pending
Bug#494237: file-roller: FTBFS: configure.in:10: warning: macro
`AM_PROG_LIB
This should fix the bug reported here. It can be fetched from:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/poldi/
Thanks,
moritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Breaking all the rules by copying 2.6.25 updates from other drivers on a
"monkey see, monkey do" basis, I came up with three patches which let
unicorn-0.9.3 build on 2.6.24. The modules even insert OK but I haven't
tested more with them because 2.6.24-etchnhalf seems buggy on my network card.
The
On 7 August 2008 at 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Package: rquantlib
| Version: 0.2.8-1
| Severity: serious
| User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on i386
I need to update rquantlib for Quantlib 0.9.6 which is currently in NEW.
The libquantlib
On 7 August 2008 at 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Package: quantlib-swig
| Version: 0.9.0-1
| Severity: serious
| User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
| Justification: FTBFS on i386
Yes, but a rebuild is pending the move of libquantlib 0.9.6 from NEW to
unstable.
Dirk
Package: matplotlib
Version: 0.98.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Package: file-roller
Version: 2.22.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/use
Package: libgdamm1.3
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> i486-linux-gnu-g++ -shared -nostdlib
> /u
Package: solfege
Version: 3.11.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: ogmtools
Version: 1:1.5-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by pack
Package: asterisk-oh323
Version: 0.7.3+cvs20070811-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Wall -felide-constructors
Package: xsupplicant
Version: 1.2.4.dfsg.1-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules cl
Package: dvdauthor
Version: 0.6.14-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by pack
Package: gerris
Version: 0.6.0-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: pyclutter
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by pack
Package: kdeartwork
Version: 4:3.5.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> dh_install -pkscreensaver-xsavers
> cp:
Package: unifont
Version: 1:5.1.20080706-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: perlipq
Version: 1.25-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> cc -c -I/usr/include/libipq -D_REENTR
Package: gmpc
Version: 0.15.5.0-2.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> Multimedia keys support is: enab
Package: openldap
Version: 2.4.10-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: sugar-hulahop
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> cc -shared .libs/hulahop.o .l
Package: xapian-bindings
Version: 1.0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: php5
Version: 5.2.6-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
Package: libthreads-shared-perl
Version: 1.22-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
On 06/08/08 at 15:13 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: dwm-tools
> Version: 28-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of dwm-tools_28-1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> > Build started at 20080803-2009
>
> [...]
>
Package: robocode
Version: 1.6.1~beta2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Package: asm3
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_t
Package: quantlib-swig
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwr
Package: rquantlib
Version: 0.2.8-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -g
Package: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Version: 5.0.51a-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Package: josm-plugins
Version: 0.0.0.20080413-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
Package: netmrg
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-netmr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 485054 serious
Bug#485054: parsedatetime: FTBFS: Test failure
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> # reproduced.
> tags 485054 - unreproducible
Bug#485054: parsedateti
Package: bzr
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user-bzr_1.5-1-am
Package: dbus-java
Version: 2.5-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/use
Package: gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-7
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> cc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -o ppm-new-executa
Package: shaperd
Version: 0.2.1-5.2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -Wall -O2 -I/usr/src/linux/include -I/
Package: refpolicy
Version: 2:0.0.20080702-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `
Package: hildon-icons
Version: 2.1.debian-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules bin
Package: mrwtoppm
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DORBIT
Package: xorp
Version: 1.5~cvs.20080519-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Package: lprof
Version: 1.11.4.dfsg+1.11.4.1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> g++ -o build/linux/lpro
Package: refcard
Version: 5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/buil
Hi,
please use CVE-2008-3546 as the CVE id.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpHWTNzPtQ3W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The qhull package currently FTBFS on hppa [1]. I investigated the issue
closely and found that the culprit is the eperl package [2] which hangs on
hppa. It seems that problems with eperl started to happen after version
2.2.14-15.1+b1 was uploaded, which was built against perl 5.10 (according to
t
Hi guys!
I'm the maintainer of swfdec-mozila which has recently received this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493307
The thing is that if you install swfdec-mozilla (which happens when you
install for example gnome, which depends on it) you cannot use any of the
other packa
Packaging them raises a few problems, namely
1) our current architecture isn't designed to support this
2) we can't distribute updates to plugins quickly if, for example, the
API for a particular web service is changed
in discussion of this bug in launchpad, we came up with the following
possible
[ Aren Olson ]
> Hi I'm an exaile dev. I do agree that this is a severe flaw that needs
> to be fixed, though I am not sure what the most sane way to do so
> would be. I am open to any suggestions as to the best way to resolve
> this issue.
Hello Aren,
My personal preference would be for what Ste
Sounds good to me. Will apply and upload your patch today.
Thanks for the hard work.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#487038: fixed in zeroc-icee 1.2.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #487038,
regarding zeroc-icee: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: slice2cppe:
Depends: icecpp but it is not installa
Hi Jonas,
there still seems to be a problem concerning the key-file parameter when
read from /etc/crypttab.
With 2:1.0.6-5, the script produces now the command
cat keyfile | cryptsetup -c -s --key-file=- create
which seems to be correct. However, this does somehow not produce the
same resu
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:35:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #494201,
regarding [nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx] Not installable because of unmet dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#487027: fixed in zeroc-icee-java 1.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #487027,
regarding zeroc-icee-java: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: slice2javae:
Depends: icecpp but it is n
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 22:34 +0200, Gerhard Wondrak wrote:
> Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
> Version: 96.43.05+1-1
> Severity: serious
>
>From the package description:
Please see the nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-source package for building
the kernel module required by this package.
--
--
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492731: fixed in rubber 1.1-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492731,
regarding does ship bytecompiled Python files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#484716: fixed in planet-venus 0~bzr95-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #484716,
regarding planet-venus: tries to overwrite file owned by drscheme
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: sympa
Version: 5.2.3-1.2+etch1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Upgrading to latest stable sympa package has overwritten my sympa.conf
(and maybe other files as well). 10.7.3 indicates upgrade should not
alter local changes and configuration files must be preserved.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 394465 grave
Bug#394465: unicorn-source: Module fails to compile with kernel 2.6.17/18
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> retitle 394465 fails to compile with Lenny kernel
Bug#394465: unicorn-source: Module fails to compile with kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 477140 grave
Bug#477140: nozomi-source: Oops loading the module
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
> I've noticed that the copyright file for manpages-de doesn't include
> any information about who the copyright holders are and under which
> license each file is released (beside the "look at the files"),
> although the Debian policy says that "Every package must be
> accompanied by a verbatim co
NMU Diff attached.
diff -u rubber-1.1/debian/control rubber-1.1/debian/control
--- rubber-1.1/debian/control
+++ rubber-1.1/debian/control
@@ -4,13 +4,16 @@
Maintainer: Emmanuel Beffara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uploaders: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2)
-Build-D
Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
Version: 96.43.05+1-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
While installing nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx I got the following error.
Is there some workaround?
Kind regards
Gerhard
sudo apt-get -s install nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
Reading packag
Hi Lamont,
Domenico Andreoli made available his sid hppa box for me to try to test
this with. I made my attempt, but could not get it to segfault. It
seemed to work just fine.
Can you think of anything different environmentally between your setup
and his? Alternatively, can you re-queue this f
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494117: fixed in libsyncml 0.4.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #494117,
regarding libsyncml_0.4.7-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): testsuite fails in
nokia_6230
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494173: fixed in libsyncml 0.4.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #494173,
regarding libsyncml_0.4.7-1(experimental/powerpc/anakreon): Error: Unrecognized
opcode: `int'
to be marked as do
Your message dated Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#492519: fixed in vim 2:7.2c.000-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #492519,
regarding vim-runtime: netrw explorer potentially deletes wrong files
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:02:33PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> Feel free to discuss this in -legal, though that doesn't change the fact
> that we currently don't expect textual source for arbitrary bits of data.
Okay, I will (eventually). I don't expect you consider this corner-case
release cri
On Aug 07 20:02, Luk Claes wrote:
> Andreas Putzo wrote:
> >On Aug 07 16:28, Luk Claes wrote:
> >>>When upgrading my sid chroot just now, I noticed this message about a
> >>>conflict between gpsdrive-data and gpsdrive:
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>> Unpacking gpsdrive-data (from .../gpsdrive-data_2.10~p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> fixed 493247 1.2.3-4.2
Bug#493247: FTBFS on armel - uses -fshort-wchar option
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.2.3-4.2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:34:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda10021.c (licensed under GPLv2+) contains a
small chunk of binary code:
static u8 tda10021_inittab[0x40]=
{
0x73, 0x6a, 0x23, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x37, 0x77, 0x1a,
0x37, 0x6
Package: eperl
Version: 2.2.14-15.1+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: renders package unusable on hppa
eperl hangs on hppa, even for this trivial case:
eperl /dev/null
which should return immediatly in the normal case. Running through strace,
the program loops forever in this way:
[
Andreas Putzo wrote:
Hi,
On Aug 07 16:28, Luk Claes wrote:
When upgrading my sid chroot just now, I noticed this message about a
conflict between gpsdrive-data and gpsdrive:
[...]
Unpacking gpsdrive-data (from .../gpsdrive-data_2.10~pre4-4_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/a
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:34:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda10021.c (licensed under GPLv2+) contains a
> > small chunk of binary code:
>
> > static u8 tda10021_inittab[0x40]=
> > {
> > 0x73, 0x6a, 0x23, 0x0a, 0x02, 0x37, 0x77, 0x1a,
> > 0x37,
I'm surprised you got PyLucene to build; I wonder if it runs (there is
a simple test in
the PyLucene README.Debian)
From my i386 chroot with jcc built with my patch and pylucene built
using the jcc built with my patch and unmodified source.
debian:/# python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 3
On Aug 07, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda10021.c (licensed under GPLv2+) contains a
> small chunk of binary code:
What makes you believe this is code instead of data to be loaded in
the card registers?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
What library is that?
libjvm.so
Specifically /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
As found here:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/openjdk-6-jre-headless/filelist
checking packages.debian.org it seems that file is in the server
director
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
