TreeBoy wrote:
> I have now tried commenting out the "xf86XInputSetScreen" call which I found
> on line 259.
>
> I tried it with the unadulterated Debian source which caused X to hang: I
> could only restart the machine by holding down the power button.
>
> I then tried it both with the "is_core_
Hi,
I've pushed the patch upstream, but there are some problems with
ldap-host which only takes a URI now. I'll try to fix that.
Regards,
Matthijs Mohlmann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: uuid-dev
Version: 1.2-1.40.5-1
Severity: grave
Your package is not installable, since it depends on
libuuid1 (= 1.2-1.40.5-1), but only libuuid1 1.40.5-1 is available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i
Package: xfmail
Version: 1.5.5-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi Florian,
xfmail now fails to build in unstable and testing, because libldap2-dev has
been updated to the openldap 2.4 version and various ldap_*() functions are
deprecated:
[...]
alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12
> forcemerge 462966 462858
Bug#462966: pdns_2.9.21-4: FTBFS: error: 'ldap_init' was not declared in this
scope
Bug#462858: pdns - FTBFS: Ignores build errors
Forcibly Merged 462858 46
Package: octave3.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu
Hi,
The octave3.0 package in unstable has the following provides line:
Provides: octave, octave2.9
I don't see any possible way that this can be correct. Either octave3.0 is
100% compatible
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463027: fixed in man-db 2.5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:04:31AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: man-db
> Version: 2.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: upgrade fails
>
> The upgrade of man-db fails as there is a file conflict with manpages-de
>
> Preparing to replace man-db 2.5.0-4 (using .../man-db_2.5.1-1_i38
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> reassign 463027 man-db,manpages-de
Bug#463027: man-db: File conflict with manpages-de
Bug reassigned from package `man-db' to `man-db,manpages-de'.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 411454 pending
Bug#411454: ITP: pfstmo -- set of tone mapping operators
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 447348 pending
Bug#447348: gnat-4.2 build failure on mips/mipsel
Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 456578 installation-reports
Bug#456578: debian-installer: after first reboot, grub says: "unknown
filesystem type" and then hangs
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
> severity 456578 normal
Bug#456578: d
Package: man-db
Version: 2.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: upgrade fails
The upgrade of man-db fails as there is a file conflict with manpages-de
Preparing to replace man-db 2.5.0-4 (using .../man-db_2.5.1-1_i386.deb) ...
Ignoring nonregistered document `man-db'
Unpacking replacement man-d
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460372: fixed in python-imaging 1.1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:04:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>Note that the mipsel buildd failed in the exact same way.
>
> Yeah, same theory holds. Until it can be duplicated with a manual
> build or we get the build logs it ain't gonna be easy to fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 436321 0.8.1-1
Bug#436321: rake: FTBFS: test_load_rakefile_from_subdir(TestApplication) fails
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.1-1, send any further explanations to Lucas
they always say that size doesnt matter and i believed them, but they say it
just not to hurt your ego, which i learned
later on... after getting dumped over a dozen times. now that I increased the
size of my tool they have no reason not to
like me anymore, and i always enjoy watching their facia
they always say that size doesnt matter and i believed them, but they say it
just not to hurt your ego, which i learned
later on... after getting dumped over a dozen times. now that I increased the
size of my tool they have no reason not to
like me anymore, and i always enjoy watching their facia
Hi,
On Mon Jan 28, 2008 at 21:50:21 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> reassign 462793 jetty
> thanks
>
> Hi,
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-28 15:05]:
> > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-27 16:25]:
> > > Source: jetty5
> >
> > There's no such package?
>
> Thanks for the h
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 12:39 -0800, Cameron Dale wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: python-debian
> Version: 0.1.8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: violates policy 7.2 regarding Recommends
>
> In trying to use python-debian in one of my packages, I am going
Package: seahorse
Version: 2.20.3-1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #462889
> Do you have a big (really BIG) public keyring? Do you have Debian
> keyring added in gpg.options file?
I am not sure what you consider a BIG public keyring, but mine is around
12 MB and would be surprised if that qualifies as on
reassign 462793 jetty
thanks
Hi,
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-28 15:05]:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-27 16:25]:
> > Source: jetty5
>
> There's no such package?
Thanks for the hint. How did you notice it?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462793 jetty
Bug#462793: jetty5: CVE-2007-6672 unauthorized disclosure of information
Warning: Unknown package 'jetty5'
Bug reassigned from package `jetty5' to `jetty'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: ardour-i686
Version: 1:2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/lib/ardour2/ardour-2.2: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0: undefined symbol: art_alloc
I had this problem when I compiled ardour myself as well. This may be a gtk
problem, has been
I have now tried commenting out the "xf86XInputSetScreen" call which I found
on line 259.
I tried it with the unadulterated Debian source which caused X to hang: I
could only restart the machine by holding down the power button.
I then tried it both with the "is_core_pointer=0" and
with "is_co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 462017 0.5.22+removed+from+sid
Bug#462017: f-prot-installer postinst script fails
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.5.22+removed+from+sid.
> fixed 461863 0.5.22+removed+from+sid
Bug#461863: dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von f-prot-installer (--conf
I also saw this problem today but after upgrading to 1.12.3-1 of
evolution-data-server and evolution-data-server-common (from 1.12.2-1+b1
and 1.12.2-1 respectively) everything was working as expected again
--
-- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
De
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:52:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#437148: fixed in scponly 4.0-1sarge2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:52:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460551: fixed in xine-lib 1.0.1-1sarge6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:32:48PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> wrapper can be done? :
>
> # mv /usr/bin/update-menus /usr/bin/update-menus.dist
> # echo '#!/bin/sh' > /usr/bin/update-menus
> # echo /usr/bin/update-menus.dist -d '"$@"' >> /usr/bin/update-menus
> # chmod 755 /usr/bin/update-m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> severity 360610 important
Bug#360610: wine: Recommends package from contrib section
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> reassign 411070 libsieve2-1,libmailutils1
Bug#411070: libsieve2-1: Duplicate file with libmailutils1
Bug reassigned from package `libsieve2-1' to `libsieve2-1,libmailutils1'.
>
End
> I will see if I can do a unixcw build on a ia64 box to find what is wrong.
> libcw.pc is generated by using awk from config.h. Could it be a bug in mawk?
I just checked a unixcw package build on merkel, which is ia64.
libcw.pc is created correctly, so I have no clue why the unixcw ia64
package i
Hi, Javier
Thanks a lot. I will update VBA with this patch.
Regards
2008/1/28, Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> tags 452796 patch
> thanks
>
> I should point out that the GTK+ interface's even more discontinued than
> the SDL one. This affects the available features in each front end.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458879 important
Bug#458879: debian-edu-doc: FTBFS: Invalid table entry row=1/column=1
(@colstart)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> retitle 458879 FTBFS in sid, builds fine in etch
Bug#458879: debian-edu-doc: FTBFS: Invalid table
severity 458879 important
retitle 458879 FTBFS in sid, builds fine in etch
thanks
Hi Lucas,
thanks for your bugreport! :-) I'm downgrading it, because the package is
arch:all (and thus will never be autobuild) and because it builds fine in
etch, which is what the package is about. During the de
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416768: fixed in hunglish 1.13-1.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
# As there is a mix of GPLv2 and GPLv2+ licenses on clamav upstream source code,
seems the intention was not to make this GPLv2 only per se, and maybe
upstream is willing to have this fixed.
tags 462963 confirmed
--
To UNSUBS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> # As there is a mix of GPLv2 and GPLv2+ licenses on clamav upstream source
> code,
> seems the intention was not to make this GPLv2 only per se, and maybe
Unknown command or malform
tags 452796 patch
thanks
I should point out that the GTK+ interface's even more discontinued than
the SDL one. This affects the available features in each front end.
08_gvba_load_gb_rom.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 452796 patch
Bug#452796: visualboyadvance-gtk: Segmentation fault with every ROM
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # "grave" because this makes for example Gwenview totally unusable
> severity 462450 grave
Bug#462450: exiv2 update causes gwenview to crash for some images
Severity set to `grave' fr
Package: apache2-mpm-event
Version: 2.2.3-4+etch3
Severity: grave
Tags: wontfix
The event MPM is broken in Debian Etch. The following message appears in
the error.log:
[crit] (70023)This function has not been implemented on this platform:
Couldn't create a Thread Safe Pollset. Is it supported on
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:02:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462817: fixed in rake 0.8.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459614: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.40.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459403: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.40.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
Can someone from the debian-ruby list help? Due this bug debian/armel
port remains without a subversion built from pristine debian sources..
The moment we got java for armel swig/ruby on subversion broke in
general :(
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 12:30:00AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> So, I kn
2008/1/28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: cwdaemon
> Version: 0.9.4-3
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of cwdaemon_0.9.4-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> > Build started at 20080127-2123
>
> [...]
>
> > **
Package: evolution
Version: 2.12.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Package: pdns
Version: 2.9.21-4
Severity: serious
Hi guys,
pdns now fails to build in unstable and testing, because libldap2-dev has
been updated to the openldap 2.4 version and several functions are
deprecated:
[...]
alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -pthread -D_GNU_SOURCE
-W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> package aptitude
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: aptitude
> reassign 462923 libcwidget1
Bug#462923: aptitude interface stops responding after install
Bug reassigned from package `apt
Package: claws-mail-clamav
Version: 3.2.0-2
Severity: serious
I noticed that recent releases of claws-mail-clamav, released under GPLv3 or
later, as well the claws-mail package, links against libclamav3 which is under
a GPLv2 *only* licence.
The two licences are incompatible, and such software
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-16
Followup-For: Bug #462958
Configuration files:
* /etc/default/saslauthd:
START=yes
DESC="SASL Authentication Daemon"
NAME="saslauthd"
MECHANISMS="pam"
MECH_OPTIONS=""
THREADS=5
OPTIONS="-c -m /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd"
A few additional
Package: evolution
Version: 2.12.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After evolution got updated in Lenny accessing SSL IMAP servers doesn't
work at all for me anymore.
All I get is a dialog saying:
"Couldn't connect to : SSL is not available"
I have not done any reconfig
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# testsaslauthd -u -p -f
/var/spool/postfix/var/runn/saslauthd/mux
size read failed
0:
saslauthd was working correctly up until yesterday, at which time I
performed a upgrad
Il giorno lun, 28/01/2008 alle 14.15 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez ha
scritto:
> > I got an upgrade that, for some local pinning, has not complained about
> > upgrading just my evolution to 2.12.3-1, leaving EDS to your 1.12.2-1,
> > leaving the system *non working*.
>
> Well, as Loic said, upgrade
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:25:07PM +, oggei wrote:
>
> Il giorno lun, 28/01/2008 alle 12.06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> ha scritto:
>
> > > > EVO crash with this message, with evolution-data-server 1.12.2-1 :
> > > >
> > > > evolution: symbol lookup error:
> > > > /usr/lib/evolution-
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.12.2.dfsg-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
when starting evolution outputs:
(evolution:9574): e-utils-WARNING **: can't load plugin
'/usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so: undefined
symbol: camel_smime_context_n
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:47:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462550: fixed in plone3 3.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462947: fixed in members 20080128-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 462550 pending
Bug#462550: zope-plone3: Configuration fails due to unbackported
zope-externaleditor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Package: members
Version: 20080128-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBCFS
Hi,
the “C” above means “Correctly”. You're using “`pwd`”, which breaks (not
in the usual FTBFS sense but in the “the binary isn't installed at all”
sense) when sudo is used instead of fakeroot.
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:17:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462849: fixed in libdisasm 0.23-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 462648 grave
thanks
>> I can't explain this phenomenon so I write this bug-report.
>>
>> PS: I set severity level into serious to this bug because I can't
>> provide the correct functioning of the other package (fluxbox, twm, etc).
BA> Technically, the severity serious cannot be correct
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 462648 grave
Bug#462648: update-menu not working correctly
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Package: cgilib, libcgi-dev
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
hi,
both cgilib and libcgi-dev ship `/usr/lib/libcgi.a' but do neither
conflict nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the
same environment:
> Unpacking libcgi-dev (from .../libcgi-dev_1.0-6_amd64.deb) ...
Il giorno lun, 28/01/2008 alle 12.06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System
ha scritto:
> > > EVO crash with this message, with evolution-data-server 1.12.2-1 :
> > >
> > > evolution: symbol lookup error:
> > > /usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/camel-providers-10/libcamelpop3.so:
> > > undefined sym
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:04:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462815: Should Depends: evolution-data-server >=
1.12.2-1+b1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 454143 important
Bug#454143: rapidsvn: Rapidsvn crashs when diff'ing on remote server.
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> merge 454143 306284
Bug#306284: rapidsvn: diff against different remote version does not work
Bug#454143: rapidsv
severity 454143 important
merge 454143 306284
thanks
works for me; which server version do you use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 460380 linux-modules-extra-2.6
Bug#460380: linux-modules-extra-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
linux-headers-2.6.22-3-all-i386
Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to
`linux-modules-extra-2.6'.
> reassign 456647 linux-modules-extra-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13~bpo40+1
> notfound 456411 latest
Bug#456411: missrepresented license in debian/copyright
Bug no longer marked as found in version latest.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 460380 456647
Bug#460380: linux-modules-extra-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
linux-headers-2.6.22-3-all-i386
Bug#456647: needs update for 2.6.23-1
Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged:
Bug 456647 is not in the same packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13~bpo40+1
> found 456411 5.4.2-1.2
Bug#456411: missrepresented license in debian/copyright
Bug marked as found in version 5.4.2-1.2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 421948 pending
Bug#421948: wvstreams: build against newer Berkeley DB
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 425056 pending
Bug#425056: linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7: vmlinuz/initrd.im
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:17:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462008: fixed in pypy 1.0.0-svn51091-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 370349
Bug#370349: Make etc/syslog.conf automatically configurable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> unblock 311188 by 370349
Bug#370349: Make etc/syslog.conf automatically configurable
Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatical
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 12:36:21PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Steve,
> According to ldap.h, ldap_get_values is superseded by ldap_get_values_len(),
> which returns struct berval ** instead of char **. So cpu needs to either
> be ported to use ldap_get_values_len(), or updated to build with
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:52:19PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: menu
> Version: 2.1.36
> Severity: serious
>
> Many fluxbox users complain that after its first installation its menu
> doesn't work. And they can solve this problem only by calling
> update-menus command by hand.
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 441537 serious
Bug#441537: ftbfs with g++-4.3/gcc-snapshot
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> severity 456971 serious
Bug#456971: libsigc++-2.0-dev: causes FTBFS: declaration changes meaning
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
Do you have a big (really BIG) public keyring? Do you have Debian keyring
added in gpg.options file?
Could you try with a clean public keyring? And if the error still happens to
you, with a clean private keyring? (please make backup copies of your
keyrings, specially private one before testing)
T
80 matches
Mail list logo
