Hello,
Now I upload (still to DELAYED) the new version,
diff attached.
I have fixed the problems you pointed in last mail,
and I noticed I forgot one part of the uintXX_t
patch.
BTW:
lintian give two warning (on your and on this NMU)
- policy version
- empty /usr/bin
I see you install the binary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 460706 python-paramiko: CVE-2008-0299 insecure use of RandomPool
Bug#460706: python-paramiko: insecure use of RandomPool
Changed Bug title to `python-paramiko: CVE-2008-0299
Hi,
this bug got CVE-2008-0299 assigned, please reference it in
the changelog.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgphqNkrHwF0V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Muammar,
You wrote:
I forgot to say that this problem is caused when aMSN is using an erroneous
tk's version. Try this, please and tell me what
happens:
$ wish8.5 /usr/bin/amsn
This doesn't help, same error.
Could you tell me which version of aMSN you were using before upgrading?
Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:53:22PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> Greetings, Asheesh (and others following this conversation),
>>
>> I don't know if the mailutils packaged as part of uw-imap is better
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Greetings, Asheesh (and others following this conversation),
I don't know if the mailutils packaged as part of uw-imap is better or
worse than yours.
But uw-imap and alpine is quite similar, even in coding style. How would
you like it we maintain bo
Package: gaphor
Version: 0.12.4-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy
Tags: patch
Gaphor 0.12.4-2 FTBFS in an up-to-date amd64 sid sbuild, although I'm
very happy to report it working properly when built. Thank you very
much for the update.
Build output:
...
r
El dv 11 de 01 del 2008 a les 21:50 +0100, en/na Dario Pilori va
escriure:
> First of all I attach the strace log of visualboyadvance-gtk. The ROM
> I tried (x.gbc) works properly if I use visualboyadvance (the
> command-line version).
> I use KDE with gtk-qt-engine in order to have KDE sty
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460575: fixed in onak 0.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> found 460839 5.5.20-2etch1
Bug#460839: tomcat5.5-webapps: access control exception at startup reading
logging.properties
Bug marked as found in version 5.5.20-2etch1.
>
End of mess
Subject: kopete: No options when adding a new account
Package: kopete
Version: 4:4.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: l10n
When trying to add a new account to kopete, the list of possible options is
in blank so you can't connect to any type of IM service.
This is a
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461127: fixed in qtiplot 0.9.3~rc2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:17:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461099: fixed in wifi-radar 1.9.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Sergio Llorente wrote:
> gnome-panel starts consuming 75% or more of the CPU and becomes
> unresponsive after having worked for a random number of hours.
>
> The problem started when the testing Debian distribution was upgraded one
> week ago.
>
> I do not know how to reprod
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:32:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458678: fixed in lat 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Upstream libofx does not have any immediate ideas about what next steps
should be.
I am in contact with the OFX Consortium about granting a license which
we can work with.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 16 Jan 08 02:04, EAGLE wrote:
> Package: kdebase
> Version: 4:4.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> With kdebase installed, KDE session is missing in kdm and gdm.
> No way to start a KDE session.
> Using KDE 4 packages.
All you need is kdebase-workspace w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> # Only a problem when running a speed test
> severity 459619 important
Bug#459619: openssl speed segfaults for rsa
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> found 454965 2.5.0-2
Bug#454965: ttf-opensymbol: uninstallable
Bug marked as found in version 2.5.0-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> found 452718 2.5.0-2
Bug#452718: ttf-opensymbol non-installable
Bug marked as found in version 2.5.0-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 402014 fontconfig
Bug#402014: defoma, fontconfig: integration is broken, brokes updates of font
packages
Bug reassigned from package `defoma, fontconfig' to `fontconfig'.
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.3~rc2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Bu default 'QTIPLOT_DEMO' is defined in qtiplot/qtiplot.pro, this directs to
showing the message:
qtiplot/src/ApplicationWindow.cpp:
#ifdef QTIPLOT_DEMO
void ApplicationWindow::showDemoVers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 46 normal
Bug#46: cupsys-driver-gutenprint: with the new cupsys and new gutenprint my
epson cx7700 stop working.
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
2008/1/10, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * The python module is built in /usr/lib instead
> of /usr/lib/python2.X/site-packages; this is probably an
> upstream issue but you can work around it without patching.
I guess I can simply move the module to the appropriat
serverity 46 normal
thanks
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:07:25PM -0200, Daniel Norte de Moraes wrote:
> Package: cupsys-driver-gutenprint
> Version: 5.0.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
The severity "grave" is inappropriate here; setting to normal. This
does not c
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in gcj-4.2-4.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
On 16/01/08 at 12:16 -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 3:57 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: piespy
> > version: 0.4.0-2
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
On Jan 16, 2008 3:57 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: piespy
> version: 0.4.0-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460851: fixed in libnss-db 2.2.3pre1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:02:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460963: fixed in libnss-db 2.2.3pre1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: cupsys-driver-gutenprint
Version: 5.0.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My epson cx7700 stop working when I full upgrade from stable
to testing and continue not working while upgrade to unstable.
The sympton are:
1) the printer load papers indefinitely without
The package was broken after last NMU. Please try new fixed package.
2008/1/15, Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: libnss-db
> Version: 2.2.3pre1-2.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Dear all
>
> After upgrding to libnss-db, /var/lib/misc was empty.
>
> Re-i
Package: snmpd
Version: 5.3.1-8
Severity: serious
after "apt-get source snmpd" and "fakeroot debian/rules binary":
# Build python modules manually as the net-snmp Makefile is too limited.
cd python; python2.4 setup.py build --basedir=/tmp/net-snmp-5.4.1~dfsg
running build
running build_py
creatin
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:32:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460967: fixed in nbd 1:2.9.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gnome-panel
Version: 2.20.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gnome-panel starts consuming 75% or more of the CPU and becomes
unresponsive after having worked for a random number of hours.
The problem started when the testing Debian distribution was upgraded one
w
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2008 16:29:12 schrieb David:
> Package: wifi-radar
> Version: 1.9.8-2
> Severity: serious
>
Hello, yes, this is a dupe of another bug... The problem is that wifi-radar
won't shut down properly with device = auto_detect. in the configuration
file. If you replace the auto_d
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:48:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug can be closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> found 461067 0.10.0-2
Bug#461067: ngircd: CVE-2008-0285 remote denial of service via crafted part
message
Bug#461064: ngircd: clients can crash the server with specially crafted PAR
Package: wifi-radar
Version: 1.9.8-2
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When upgrading wifi-radar:
Preparing to replace wifi-radar 1.9.8-2 (using
.../wifi-radar_1.9.8-3_all.deb) ...
Stopping wifi-radar daemon...invoke-rc.d: initscript wifi-radar, action
"stop" fai
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461067: fixed in ngircd 0.10.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461067: fixed in ngircd 0.10.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed at PC=0: invalid signature
> > :0: error: verification failed a
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:49:39AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:30: error: String cannot be resolved to a type
> >public void setLabel(String label_) {
> > ^^
> > antlr/WildcardElement.java:34: error: String cannot be resol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 461024 gcj-4.2
Bug#461024: hsqldb: FTBFS: gcj-4.2: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)
Bug reassigned from package `hsqldb' to `gcj-4.2'.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Starting program: /usr/bin/dirmngr
(no debugging symbols found)
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40defe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40a48d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2 0x
Am Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2008 schrieb Deller, Helge:
> Not sure if this gdb-backtrace helps:
Try installing some debug symbols (libgcrypt11-dbg?).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure if this gdb-backtrace helps:
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x409efe78 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40648d44 in __pth_mctx_set () from /usr/lib/libpth.so.20
#2 0x4064c5bc in pth_spawn () f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 461067 461064
Bug#461067: ngircd: CVE-2008-0285 remote denial of service via crafted part
message
Bug#461064: ngircd: clients can crash the server with specially crafted PART
commands
Forcibly Merged 461064 461067.
> thanks
Stopping proces
Package: python-cherrypy
Version: 2.2.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for python-cherrypy.
CVE-2008-0252[0]:
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the _get_file_path function in
| (1) lib/sessions.py in CherryPy
Forgot the attachment.
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
diff -u ngircd-0.10.3/debian/changelog ngircd-0.10.3/debian/changelog
--- ngircd-0.10.3/debian/changelog
+++ ngircd-0
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461057: fixed in mayavi2 2.0.2a1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:35:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: opt.ads:96:37: violation of implicit
restriction "No_Allocators"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
tags 461067 + patch
thanks
Hi,
in case you have no time to package the new upstream version
or to upload a fixed version, a patch for an NMU including a
patch is attached.
It will be also archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/ngircd-0.10.3-1_0.10.3-1.1.patch
Please ping me in ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 461067 + patch
Bug#461067: ngircd: CVE-2008-0285 remote denial of service via crafted part
message
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: ngircd
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for ngircd.
CVE-2008-0285[0]:
| ngIRCd 0.10.x before 0.10.4 and 0.11.0 before 0.11.0-pre2 allows
| remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted IRC
| PAR
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> Quick workaround: install python-setuptools package
Now it is working correctly. Thanks for the quick response :-)
Best regards,
Torquil Sørensen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 461057 pending
Bug#461057: mayavi2: Doesn't start. Missing module
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Hi Torquil,
On Wed, 16 Jan, 2008 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Package: mayavi2
> Version: 2.0.2a1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hello, mayavi2 doesn't start. It gives the following error message at
> startup:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
Quick workaround: install python-setuptools package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: lasso
> version: 2.1.1-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant part:
>
> > ar
Am Montag, 7. Januar 2008 schrieb Helge Deller:
> dirmngr segfaults at once on hppa architecture
Please get a backtrace to see where it crashes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mayavi2
Version: 2.0.2a1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello, mayavi2 doesn't start. It gives the following error message at
startup:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~$ mayavi2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/mayavi2", line 3, in ?
from enthought.may
Same here, whit Debian lenny/sid as server and windows XP as client in a
laptop.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:06:52AM +0100, Lubomir Host wrote:
>I'm sorry I have created new bugreport. I don't exactly know debian
>bugtracking interface (it was my first attempt to submit bug with this
>interface). Maybe I should read more documenta
Package: libapache-requestnotes-perl
Version: 0.06-7
Severity: serious
Tags: lenny sid
Hi!
apache is removed for quite a while now, your package doesn't work
without it. You had a bugreport against a different package of yours
with the same problem but didn't respond there.
Either fix
Package: libapache-filter-perl
Version: 1.024-2
Severity: serious
Tags: lenny sid
apache is removed for quite a while now, your package doesn't work
without it. You had a bugreport against a different package of yours
with the same problem but didn't respond there.
Either fix this with making
diff -u awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
--- awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
+++ awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+awardeco (0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-Maintainer Upload at BSP in Zurich: fix rc bug
+ * Use the C99 bit length integer, to be sa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> reassign 459209 python-gnome2
Bug#459209: sonata - Dependency on python-gnome2 is not in package
Bug reassigned from package `sonata' to `python-gnome2'.
> forcemerge 457149 459209
On Jan 16, 2008 10:04 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Have pyrexc recently been upgraded? Does the problem persist with DrK
that was released a month ago?
--
Daniel Svensson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:51:48AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> I'm ready for a NMU, attached I put the diff.
> Now I'll upload the package in delayed.
Thanks, feel free to upload, but please see comments below.
> Considering the package pourpose, maybe Architecture: "any"
> is to
Package: prime
Version: 1.0.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
prime: Depends: ruby (< 1.9) but 4 is to be installed
ruby switched to a versioninig scheme which avoids confusing with the
"real" ruby version. Please Depends on ruby1.8 instead of depending on
ruby (<1.9) (which is wrong, btw. You proba
Package: aegis
version: 4.22-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET unset, not running checks
> /usr
Package: system-config-printer
version: 0.7.78-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
>--add-category Settings
Package: swt-gtk
version: 3.3.1-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> mkdir _jar
> cd _jar && for i in swt.jar swt-pi.jar
Package: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput
version: 1.0.0~rc2-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies su
Package: libreadline-java
version: 0.8.0.1-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building libreadline-java in
Package: usermode
version: 1.81-3.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> Found cached translation database
> Merging trans
Package: gtk+2.0
version: 2.12.3-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/build/user/gtk+2.
Package: hsqldb
version: 1.8.0.9-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This should probably be reassigned to gcj-4.2.
Relevant part:
> mak
Package: sacjava
version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This should probably be reassigned to gcj-4.2.
Relevant part:
> make[1
Package: sgml2x
version: 1.0.0-11
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> rm -f bin/docbook-2-pdf
> ln -s sgml2x bin/docbook-
Package: xmms2
version: 0.2DrJekyll-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> [ 4/247] * xsubpp :
> /build/user/xmms2-0.2Dr
Package: antlr
version: 2.7.7-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> gcj --main=antlr.Tool --CLASSPATH="." `find antlr -nam
Package: seda
version: 3.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> dpkg-source: building seda in seda_3.0-3.dsc
> debian/r
Package: hyperestraier
version: 1.4.9-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080115 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> #===
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:26:19 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#461007: libxml2: google-earth fails to
install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: trang
Version: 20030619-5.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It seems that something has been forgotten in the fix for bug 422574:
vin:~> trang
libgcj failure: gcj linkage error.
Incorrect library ABI version detected. Aborting.
zsh: abort (core dumped) trang
-
Hello,
I'm ready for a NMU, attached I put the diff.
Now I'll upload the package in delayed.
the patch contain:
- fix on 64-bit architecture: use C99 "fixed"-bit integer
- fix of undeclared function: a potential bug, which can
give problem on some architectures.
Considering the package pourpo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> tags 438385 patch
Bug#438385: fails on 64-bit platforms
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
95 matches
Mail list logo
