Subject: gphoto2: Olympus SP510-UZ "Could not read file Error writing to the
port."
Package: gphoto2
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Error connecting Olympus SP510-UZ to Debian Etch KDE.
On plugging the came
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:43:36 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
>
> Automatically? without any decent or reasonable explanation
> at all?
>
>> # Its a RC issue by definition as its a Release Mana
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458844: fixed in libflickrnet 25277-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 458957 -1
Bug#458957: kwin segfaults with symbol lookup error
Bug 458957 cloned as bug 459005.
> reassign -1 kdelibs4c2a
Bug#459005: kwin segfaults with symbol lookup error
Bug reassigned from package `kwin' to `kdelibs4c2a'.
> severity -1 serio
clone 458957 -1
reassign -1 kdelibs4c2a
severity -1 serious
retitle -1 kdelibs4c2a: shlibs version too low
found -1 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-5
thanks
On 2008-01-03 23:11 +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Thursday 03 January 2008, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
>> Package: kwin
>> Version: 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-5
>> Severi
Thanks for this update, I hope someone can test this.
--
Niv Sardi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:53:04 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458685: texmacs segfaults on i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: digikam
Version: 2:0.9.2-5+b1
Followup-For: Bug #458434
I'm seeing the red tint with my TIFF images too.
thanks,
Hamish
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linu
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:32:35 -0430
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cegui-mk2: FTBFS: /usr/include/IL/il.h:497: error:
'' has
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hello,
Here's stacktrace:
0x0ff1a87c in __xstat32_conv () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0ff1a87c in __xstat32_conv () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x0ff123f0 in _fxstat () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x0f7f8c90 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1
#3 0x0f7f9328 in FcDirCacheLoadFile () from /us
Hi all,
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:43:36 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
Automatically? without any decent or reasonable explanation
at all?
> # Its a RC issue by definition as its a Release Manager
> who decided that it is...
So I'd
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:39:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:39:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:39:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in mono-addins 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 01:16 +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Mirco,
>
> On Thu, 03 Jan, 2008 at 11:52:00PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> [snip]
> > Okay, I shall move the package to pkg-cli-libs svn repo.
>
> I have just now uploaded all the files to pkg-cli-libs repo with the
> required chang
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458942 + fixed-upstream
Bug#458942: Fails to work with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> tags 452440 + fixed-upstream
Bug#452440: transmission-cli: Man Page mentions missing -s, --scrape option
Tags were: upstr
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
# unversioned close for binNMUs
reopen 457018
close 457018
close 457018
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> # unversioned close for binNMUs
> reopen 457018
Bug#457018: Can not be installed on latest OpenOffice.org
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you
Your message dated Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:13:49 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#458909: cupsys: foomatic is not in
dependency list - my laserjet wont print
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Same error here... Jack
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: haskell-http
version: 30010004-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: haskell-uulib
version: 0.9.3~snapshot20071230-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: haskell-http
version: 30010004-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455263: fixed in atftp 0.7.dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: haskell-uulib
version: 0.9.3~snapshot20071230-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid
Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2007-09-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Hi,
does this bug still apply? The blocking bug has been closed.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Package: kwin
> Version: 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-5
> Severity: grave
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Versions of packages kwin depends on:
> ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-4 core libraries and binaries
How did you do this?
From the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> reassign 458872 haskell-devscripts 0.6.1
Bug#458872: haskell-uulib: FTBFS: cp: target `/usr/share/doc/haskell-uulib-doc'
is not a directory
Bug reassigned from package `haskell-uuli
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444360: fixed in ocamlnet 2.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: kwin
Version: 4:3.5.8.dfsg.1-5
Severity: grave
Justification:
kwin fails with this error message:
kwin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libkdeinit_kwin.so: undefined symbol:
_ZNK16KStartupInfoData8xineramaEv
Greetings
Winnie
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefe
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443150: fixed in ocamlnet 2.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443150: fixed in ocamlnet 2.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:17:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444360: fixed in ocamlnet 2.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 21:49 +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > OK, the good news is, upstream reacted very positively to my suggestion to
> > switch to libcurl.
>
> That's great! TBH, I'm not too surprised, libwww _is_ difficult to get to
> work at times.
I was more referring to issues I have wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 458708 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351172
Bug#458708: nemerle: FTBFS: internal compiler error: got some unknown exception
of type System.Exception: field not found
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://b
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:52:17PM -, Regis Boudin wrote:
> On Sat, December 15, 2007 11:42, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > Having tried to create a program using both libwww and libcurl, I can
> > say that libcurl is _much_ better in every aspect. These days, libcurl
> > can even do HTTP pipelin
Hi Christophe,
* Christophe Mutricy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 21:37]:
> > retitle 458318 "Five security issues in vlc"
>
> Please don't group the bugs but create new ones.
>
> The BTS doesn't know about "fix #1242 but only the first bit"
Since there are patches for all I don't think an inc
In order to investigate why Octave 3.0 is failing to work on arm
(Bug#458852, severity grave), I would need octave3.0_3.0.0-1 installed on a
sid chroot on one of the arm project machines.
Thanks,
--
Rafael Laboissiere
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:12:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458952: asterisk: remote denial of service vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: asterisk
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following advisory by the asterisk people was published for asterisk.
AST-2008-001[0]:
| The handling of the BYE with Also transfer method was broken during the
| development of Asterisk 1.4. If a transfer attempt is made using this m
can you send me the output of "uname -a" and "dpkg-architecture"
please. I'm trying to build a detection routine to decide which
nv-kernel.o to include.
thanks
randy
Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: twinkle
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Applies to (as shown by "apt-cache show"):
Version: 1:1.1-2+b1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SM
> According to
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485488/30/0/threaded , there
> are two more unfixed security issues in vlc:
>
> A] buffer-overflow in the handling of the subtitles
Fixed upstream in http://trac.videolan.org/vlc/changeset/23855
> B] format string in the web interface
Fixed
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458655: fixed in cowbell 0.2.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:32:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458695: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.51-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
> retitle 458318 "Five security issues in vlc"
Please don't group the bugs but create new ones.
The BTS doesn't know about "fix #1242 but only the first bit"
Thanks
--
Xtophe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458318 + patch
Bug#458318: "Four security issues in vlc"
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
tags 458318 + patch
thanks
Hi,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 20:46]:
> * Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-30 12:56]:
> [...]
> > According to http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485488/30/0/threaded ,
> > there
> > are two more unfixed security issues in vlc:
> >
>
Package: transmission
Version: 0.96.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
If LANG is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED], transmission doesn't work at all as the
torrent hashes aren't encoded correctly.
(Symptom: Tracker response "Invalid Request")
Fixed upstream in svn re
Package: gajim
Followup-For: Bug #458738
Bug fixed, thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap
Hi Mirco,
On Thu, 03 Jan, 2008 at 11:52:00PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
[snip]
> Okay, I shall move the package to pkg-cli-libs svn repo.
I have just now uploaded all the files to pkg-cli-libs repo with the
required changes to fix the ABI breakage. The package is also
available here:
http://p
retitle 458318 "Four security issues in vlc"
thanks
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-30 12:56]:
> http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/2007-December/037726.html
> https://trac.videolan.org/vlc/ticket/1371
>
> describe a security issue which allows to write to ar
retitle 458318 "Five security issues in vlc"
thanks
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-30 12:56]:
[...]
> According to http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485488/30/0/threaded ,
> there
> are two more unfixed security issues in vlc:
>
> A] buffer-overflow in the handlin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 458318 "Four security issues in vlc"
Bug#458318: Three security issues in vlc
Changed Bug title to `"Four security issues in vlc"' from `Three security
issues in vlc'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 457062 exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Bug#457062: exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title to `exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> retitle 457062 exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Bug#457062: exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title to `exiftags: CVE-2007-635{5,
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#450478: fixed in agenda.app 0.28-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Mirco,
Sorry, I didn't see this bug report.
On Thu, 03 Jan, 2008 at 02:42:00PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> severity 458844 grave
> reassign 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
> retitle 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil: broke ABI (breaking other applications
> like f-spot) and violates the Debian CLI Po
Hi. One more thing, I made a fixed package and it's now available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/imlib/imlib_1.9.15-6.dsc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno 02/gen/08, alle ore 11:49, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
Package: drapes
version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
build on i386.
[.
retitle 423646 generating the WWWOFFLE root CA private key file takes ages
(half an hour)
severity 423646 normal
stop
On 03.01.08 Claudia Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Claudia,
> Yes, waiting a long time solved the problem. I don't know any more
> how long it took, but it could have bee
Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Correct, it uses gnustep-make and I pass -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed
> > in the new version of the package.
>
> Ok, so it's not a blocker other than the fact that you've chosen to
> modify the package in a way that it fails to build given the current
> state of the arc
Sorry, it totally slipped my mind that I should have cut a release
soon after fixing these. I will do so for tomorrow.
--
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 423646 generating the WWWOFFLE root CA private key file takes ages
> (half an hour)
Bug#423646: wwwoffle: The WWWOFFLE root CA private key file
'certificates/root/root-key.pem' cannot be loaded.
Changed Bug title to `generating the WWWOFFLE ro
On Thu 03 Jan 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> Starting HTTP cache proxy server: wwwoffled
>
>
>
> wwwoffled[12054] Warning: The WWWOFFLE root CA private key file
> 'certificates/root/root-key.pem' does not exist; creating it.
>
> Paul, if this is really the point in time, when wwwoffle creates
>
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:26:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458334: fixed in kde4libs 4:3.98.0~svn755919-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On 15.09.07 Andreas Putzo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On May 12, Dr. Claudia Neumann wrote:
Hi Claudia,
> > Package: wwwoffle
> > Version: 2.9a-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
This bug actually keeps wwwoffle from migrating into testing
(http://ftp-master.d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422729 - help
Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF
Tags were: help
Tags removed: help
> merge 422729 449135
Bug#422729: [ppc] recent snapshot doesn't work at all and drops me to OF
Bug#449135: Booting fails with
tags 422729 - help
merge 422729 449135
severity 422729 important
reassign 422729 grub-ieee1275
thanks
This does only affect Apple hardware, and I don't consider it RC.
Nevertheless, note that it's being worked on in upstream. I expect there
will be a fix soon.
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:23:48PM
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458644: fixed in hdbc-odbc 1.1.3.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448454: fixed in a2ps 1:4.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi, submitters:
According to the changelog for python2.4,
python2.4 (2.4.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Rename all exported symbols to avoid conflicts with similarly named
symbols in other libraries (Robert Edmonds). Closes: #440272.
[...]
Can you please try to replicate #411487 (
You may skip my ramblings to find the actual fix, to imlib, in the
bottom. I'm just including some of the stuff I wrote for completeness
sake, and since I spent many hours debugging before finding the actual
problem.
I compiled nethack with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip noopt"
dpkg-buildpackage -rfak
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458666: fixed in hdbc-postgresql 1.1.3.0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
tags 458644 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 275
Thu Jan 3 09:42:03 CST 2008 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Removed HsBase.h import
fixes deb#458644
More details are available at:
http://software.complete.org/hdbc-odbc/changeset/275
--
To
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.7-4etch2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
CUPS does not depend on foomatic filters package that is needed to print.
My HP LaserJet could be installed and set-up with config but didnt want to
print, except it blinked LED once.
I got the solutio
tags 458666 pending
thanks
A commit relevant to this bug has occurred.
Revision: 218
Thu Jan 3 09:27:31 CST 2008 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Added build-dep on libhugs-parsec
fixes deb#458666
More details are available at:
http://software.complete.org/hdbc-postgresql/changese
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:48:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line amule: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 445914 imlib should limit itself to 24-bit to prevent crashes in
Bug#445914: nethack-gnome: fails to run.
Changed Bug title to `imlib should limit itself to 24-bit to prevent crashes
in' from `nethack-gnome: fails to run.'.
> various applicati
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458644 pending
Bug#458644: hdbc-odbc: FTBFS: hdbc-odbc-helper.c:1:20: error: HsBase.h: No such
file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Hello
Le Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:56:37 -0700,
Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> OK, can you try one more thing? Can you install
> libgnustep-ba/usr/share/GNUstep/Makefiles/filesystem.shse1.14,
> gnustep-base-common, and gnustep-base-runtime from the experimental
> distribution ("deb http:
severity 458900 normal
thanks
On Thu Jan 03 14:23, Darren Salt wrote:
> woundup, by default, tries to open a window covering the entire desktop
> (2560x1024), and doesn't get much further before reliably causing a system
> hang. (I recognise that the hang isn't really wound-up's fault, but it *is*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458900 normal
Bug#458900: wound-up: doesn't understand multiple monitors
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458666 pending
Bug#458666: hdbc-postgresql: FTBFS: ./setup build files: 256 at
/usr/share/haskell-devscripts//Dh_Haskell.pm line 145, line 1.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Package: wound-up
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: triggers system hang via bugginess elsewhere
woundup, by default, tries to open a window covering the entire desktop
(2560x1024), and doesn't get much further before reliably causing a system
hang. (I recognise that the hang isn't
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 12:19 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> In #457589, the maintainer of sdcc said that he thinks that sdcc really
> belongs to non-free. Until this is clarified, I'm setting the severity
> back to serious, and marking this bug as blocked by #457589.
Sadly, most of the discussion
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458844 grave
Bug#458844: f-spot: Extensions broken
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> reassign 458844 libflickrnet2.1.5-cil
Bug#458844: f-spot: Extensions broken
Bug reassigned from package `f-spot' to `libflickrnet2.1.5-cil'.
> retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 458884 by 458558
Bug#458558: libqt4-dev: qmake adds --no-undefined to Makefile for LIB template
- causes linker errors
Bug#458884: packagesearch: FTBFS: aptplugincontainer.cpp:(.text+0xb1):
undefined reference to `NPlugin::BasePluginContainer::~
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 229700 serious
Bug#229700: lprfax: Should use Debconf for its configuration
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 229700 + patch
Bug#229700: lprfax: Should use Debconf for its configuration
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458633: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458279: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 429127 normal
Bug#429127: please update/request removal of your package
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 429127 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429127: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-m
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458633: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458642: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
severity 429127 normal
reassign 429127 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429127 RM: libapache-mod-mp3 -- RoQA; obsolete
thanks
On 03/01/08 at 14:12 +0100, Andreas Wenning wrote:
> Hi Lucas
>
> You missed one package:
> libapache-mod-mp3
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=429127
Indeed. done.
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458279: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458642: fixed in torus-trooper 0.22.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
r: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
> > | Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> > |
> > | Hi,
> > |
> > | During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> > |
> > | Releva
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458280: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458280: fixed in tumiki-fighters 0.2.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
