Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431380: fixed in unace 1.2b-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
as you might have noticed I reassigned the bug to cdd-common which
in fact contains the code that leads to the problem below.
Setting up med-tools (0.12) ...
Adding menu for user users of med ...
Unknown id: users
dpkg: error processing med-tools (--configure):
subprocess post-installation
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm open to being persuaded otherwise. Let me know how you feel.
I haven't tried ipe (yet), but I'd rather be able to try it out without
text than not at all. But it's your take, you're the maintainer.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Mo
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433357: fixed in ncurses 5.6+20070716-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425900: fixed in libopkele 0.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 04:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430304: fixed in sigscheme 0.7.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/05/2007):
> > Package: alps-light1
> > Version: 1.2.2-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > From my pbuilder build log:
> > ...
> > checking for Boost include files... yes
> > checking for Boost to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:29:39PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> tag 433283 patch
> thanks
>
> Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007):
> > Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers.
> > However, this package has been removed from sid, which makes the
> > Build-
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:15:34AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:06:07 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >
> >>* debian/control: Add (<< 2007) to dependency on texlive-latex-base,
> >> since ipe can't cope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433309 pending
Bug#433309: ipe: outdated copyright information
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
tags 433309 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:10:45AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> The copyright file says:
>
> It was downloaded from: http://ipe.compgeom.org/
>
> but I cannot reach this site, and Google knows about it that it's been
> moved to
>
> http://tclab.kaist.ac.kr/ipe/
Go
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429006: fixed in reiserfsprogs 1:3.6.19-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:53:59 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing woody bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:47:26 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing woody bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > The nouveau project is deobfuscating the code as they go. Even if their DRI
> > work isn't ready for Lenny, we'll definitely be pulling their deobfusca
Please don't waste time/effort on this experimental package; I've asked
for it to be removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 432003 2.7.0-77
Bug#432003: gclcvs: installation fails
Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-77 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
found 432003 2.7.0-77
thanks
Hi,
I have just tested with the version 2.7.0-77 and this bug still exists.
this time it seems setup correctly gclcvs, tho.
See attached log.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 05:05:07PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks for your report!
>
> I see no such pr
Hi.
Mathias Brodala, 16.07.2007 23:30:
> Trying to build the coreutils from Experimental fails:
>
>> In file included from utimecmp.c:41:
>> utimens.h:2: error: conflicting types for 'futimens'
>> /usr/include/sys/stat.h:370: error: previous declaration of 'futimens' was
>> here
Here’s a fix fo
Package: libgnomeprint15
Version: 0.37-13+b1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that gnome-print is not binNMU safe (see #432960) and it has
been binNMUd now. This results in it currently being uninstallable.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:36:59PM +0100, Rafal Czlonka wrote:
> Package: mpc123
> Version: 0.2.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
> I've tried to play some .mpc file without any success. Neither of the
> options seems to work. All file are OK, I can play them on other
> players.
how do you run mpc123
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433373: fixed in python-boto 0.9b-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
d option.
See
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/5.6/ncurses-5.6-20070716.patch.gz
In restructuring things to make it simpler to support reentrant code,
I got to one of those cases where it was awkward and did not appear
needed. Since it is needed, I repaired it...
--
Thomas E. Dickey
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 432994 serious
Bug#432994: realtimebattle: not a binNMU safe package
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:27:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Some of your Debian packages might need attention
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> #this should be fixed before entering lenny
> severity 416696 serious
Bug#416696: viewvc: Forbids only directories, not files
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of mess
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433373 pending
Bug#433373: python-boto: installs tests, yielding effective file conflicts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tags 433373 pending
thanks
[ Aaron M. Ucko ]
> Package: python-boto
> Version: 0.9a-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.1
>
> python-boto installs its unit tests, complete with an __init__.py, to
> /usr/share/python-support/python-boto/tests and (implicitly) asks
> python-support to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:56:08PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > I find four packages in the archive that are picking up a dependency on
> > 'binutils' by way of shlibs: ggcov, nitpic, skyeye, and sysprof.
> > nitpic needs libbfd-2.16.91.so, that's nice...
> > ggcov, sysprof, and skyeye at leas
Package: coreutils
Version: 6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to build the coreutils from Experimental fails:
> In file included from utimecmp.c:41:
> utimens.h:2: error: conflicting types for 'futimens'
> /us
Sigh. After the partial upgrade, which included linux-image-2.6.21-6
(from -5), and rebooting, the problem is gone. For now, at least. (I
presume this was "partial" due to my interrupting whiptail several
times, which probably derailed some of the packages.)
After this, I did another upgrade, whic
Neil Roeth writes:
> On Jun 23, Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Package: libostyle-dev
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: goal-ldbl128
> >
> > Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html
> >
> > With glibc-2.5 and gcc-
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:07:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:06:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gclcvs: FTBFS: ./tmp_image: No such file or directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:06:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gclcvs: FTBFS: ./tmp_image: No such file or directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated 16 Jul 2007 17:04:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432341: gclcvs: FTBFS: do_init is undefined
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated 16 Jul 2007 17:05:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432003: gclcvs: installation fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433374: fixed in pylons 0.9.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-12
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've just got several buildd logs where I get errors like this:
GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 524288000):
May lead to memory leak and poor performance.
GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning
Hey, Daniel, me too.
Situation: linux console tty1, aptitude 0.4.5.3-1
uname -a: Linux speedy 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP Mon Jun 25 20:53:36 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
Aptitude locks after a few keystrokes - arrow keys, '[]', 'g', whatever.
Removing libc6-686 didn't help. Setting LANG and/or LC_ALL to 'C'
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:47:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433279: fixed in iputils 3:20070202-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:47:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432400: fixed in ggz-gtk-client 0.0.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:47:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427184: fixed in python-kinterbasdb 3.1.2-0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
--
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo,
then Linux is Dolby Digital and all the music is free...
Extracting the package tarball, /usr/src/rt73.tar.gz, please wait...
rm -f debian/install-tree-stamp
rm -rf debian/tmp-* debian/files* debian/substvars debian/shlibs.local debian/uc
* Javier Serrano Polo schrieb am 2007-07-11 um 14:22 Uhr:
> Upgrading the kernel to 2.6.21 seems to have fixed this.
I upgraded today to 2.6.22-rc5 and can agree. The described bug
disappeared.
Besten Gruß
--
Jens Kubieziel http://www.kubieziel.de
Solange man b
* Robert Millan [ackstorm] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070716 12:21]:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > The nouveau project is deobfuscating the code as they go. Even if their DRI
> > work isn't ready for Lenny, we'll definitely be pulling their deobfuscated
> > cod
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:08:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425319: sfs: FTBFS: configure: error: Could not find NFS
mount argument structure!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> I find four packages in the archive that are picking up a dependency on
> 'binutils' by way of shlibs: ggcov, nitpic, skyeye, and sysprof.
>
> nitpic needs libbfd-2.16.91.so, that's nice...
>
> ggcov, sysprof, and skyeye at least manage to have binary packages in st
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Christian Ohm wrote:
I've also encountered this problem (not even having usplash installed
anymore, just a leftover /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh - that's what you get
for not purging packages...). In lsb-base-logging.sh, there are some
tests for terminal width via "tput cols".
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433031 + pending
Bug#433031: qt4-x11: broken threading on alpha, hangs uselessly on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:06:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430262: fixed in hk-classes 0.8.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
> The correct patch should look like this (fetch-and-add is supposed to
> return the original value before the addition):
Yep, this works here.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move th
severity 433351 important
thanks
On Monday 16 July 2007 16.27:27 Plamen Tonev wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
This is certainly not grave.
Yes, it's important. I'll have to check this. But note that there will not
be an update for sarge or even etch for this
Package: python-boto
Version: 0.9a-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
python-boto installs its unit tests, complete with an __init__.py, to
/usr/share/python-support/python-boto/tests and (implicitly) asks
python-support to compile them; not only does this waste (a small
amount) of res
Package: python-pylons
Version: 0.9.5-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1
python-pylons installs its unit tests, complete with an __init__.py, to
/usr/share/python-support/python-pylons/tests and (implicitly) asks
python-support to compile them; not only does this waste (a small
amount)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 433351 important
Bug#433351: postgrey: Hangs after changing of server's IP address
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 433351 sarge
Bug#433351: postgrey: Hangs after changing of server's IP address
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: rt73-source
Version: 1.0.4.0.dfsg1-1~experimental1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I cant build binary package with command
# LANG= m-a -t build rt73
but when I trying to build it manually everything works fine :)
# LANG= dpkg -l linux-* | grep ^ii
ii linux-doc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> found 420456 1.0.2-12
Bug#420456: php4-sqlite: sqlite_udf_decode_binary() Buffer Overflow
Vulnerability
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.2-12 and reopened.
>
End of message, stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> severity 402510 serious
Bug#402510: gaim-xmms-remote
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Dear Ken,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:33:23PM -0700, ken restivo wrote:
> the http.us.debian.org mirror is completely broken for stable (etch).
> packages are required but not installable, etc.
Actually, http.us.debian.org exists in the Debian DNS but is not
proposed as a mirror during the isntall
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:46:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug not closed in the changelog
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
I've also encountered this problem (not even having usplash installed
anymore, just a leftover /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh - that's what you get
for not purging packages...). In lsb-base-logging.sh, there are some
tests for terminal width via "tput cols". For some reason, the result of
that is "-1",
Le lundi 16 juillet 2007, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Florent Bayle wrote:
>
> > Package: ncurses-bin
> > Version: 5.6+20070714-1
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since I've upgraded ncurses-bin (and other ncurses packages) to the l
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433133: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.1.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:31:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:30:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:28:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:26:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:26:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:26:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:26:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:23:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:23:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:22:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431987: fixed in agg 2.5+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Florent Bayle wrote:
Package: ncurses-bin
Version: 5.6+20070714-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
Since I've upgraded ncurses-bin (and other ncurses packages) to the lastest
version, my whole system is broken.
Lots of init scripts are failing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> severity 431618 serious
Bug#431618: ifstat: depends on deprecated package libsnmp9
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> # still depending on libsnmp9, not binNMUable due to p
Hi Luk, thanks for your answer, it's really useful. It seems that
there is an encoding problem while reading the .xsession-errors file
(that text is inserted onto the GtkTextBuffer, so it should be UTF-8
valid). Anyway, when getting the text from the buffer to sent it to
the server, it should real
Hi, Eric.
On Jul 09 2007, Eric Evans wrote:
> Attached is the patch for the NMU.
Thank you very much for the patch. As it is so small, I modified it by
hand.
Indeed, we should have as little "magic constants" as possible in our
code and this change goes towards that goal, which is a noble goal.
Package: ncurses-bin
Version: 5.6+20070714-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
Since I've upgraded ncurses-bin (and other ncurses packages) to the lastest
version, my whole system is broken.
Lots of init scripts are failing :
# invoke-rc.d networking restart
* Reconfi
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18/05/2007):
> Package: alps-light1
> Version: 1.2.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
> ...
> checking for Boost include files... yes
> checking for Boost toolset abbreviation... none
> checking for pre-compiled Boost library... no
> checki
Hi,
I find some error in dbus and system-tools-backends config script
two slash in path for this script script:
/usr/share/system-tools-backends-2.0/scripts/SystemToolsBackends.pl
and in
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.freedesktop.SystemToolsBackends.UsersConfig.service
/usr/share/dbus-1/s
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>> While trying to report a bug on natutilus, I got this error with bug-buddy.
>> The screen shot of the error messages can be seen here:
>> http://www.imagecows.com/uploads/7e91-Screenshot-BugBuddy-crash.png
>
> Could
On Monday 16 July 2007 04:30:07 am Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #433285: wavemon: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers,
> which was filed against the wavemon package.
>
> It has been closed by Rene Engelhard <[EM
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:03:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428986: fixed in geekast 0.1.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> >The debian/copyright file states the following:
> >
> > | This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > | it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > | the Free Software Foundation; vers
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432546: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433276: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # same bug
> forcemerge 431664 432349
Bug#431664: apt-howto: FTBFS: cannot find apt-howto.de.sgml
Bug#432349: apt-howto: FTBFS: E: cannot find "apt-howto.de.sgml"
Forcibly Merged 4316
Package: postgrey
Version: 1.21-1sarge1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After changing the IP address of our mailserver the postgrey daemon
started to hangs on incoming mail. It responds to them with:
450 Server configuration problem;
The process hangs and timeouts on co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 433279 patch
Bug#433279: iputils: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: pending sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433279 +pending
Bug#433279: iputils: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 433273 patch
Bug#433273: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 433273 patch
thanks
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007):
> Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers.
> However, this package has been removed from sid, which makes the
> Build-Depends unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing
> this.
Builds OK
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 433274 patch
Bug#433274: eagle-usb: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007):
> Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers.
> However, this package has been removed from sid, which makes the
> Build-Depends unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing
> this.
Builds fine once that B-D dropped;
tag 433277 patch
thanks
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007):
> Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers.
> However, this package has been removed from sid, which makes the
> Build-Depends unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing
> this.
Builds fi
tag 433274 patch
thanks
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/07/2007):
> Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers.
> However, this package has been removed from sid, which makes the
> Build-Depends unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing
> this.
Builds fi
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
