user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 421082 + depends-on-tetex-base
thanks
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:38:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line "notfound" is not "done"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 432033 cdd-common
Bug#432033: dpkg: error processing med-tools (--configure)
Bug reassigned from package `med-tools' to `cdd-common'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tag 427447 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/06/2007):
>> Obviously not a ttf-opensymbol bug.
>
> FWIW, no problem with ttf-opensymbol/2.2.1-5 and fontconfig/2.4.2-1.2.
>
>> This suppposedly was fixed long ago in font
Dear Richard,
sorry for answering that late - it seems this bug report didn't make it
to the maintainer address (a list).
Richard Salts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: jadetex
> Version: 3.13-8
> Severity: serious
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> Running mktexlsr. Thi
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:43:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400494 grave
Bug#400494: LIRC kernel modules do not compile with kernel 2.6.19
Bug#399135: lirc-modules-source build failed on 2.6.19
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 433245 important
Bug#433245: linux-image-2.6.22-1-4kc-malta: wrong configuration file
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421204: fixed in matanza 0.13-3.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:25:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.4.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433274 + sid
Bug#433274: eagle-usb: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tags 433273 + sid
Bug#433273: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers
There were no tags set.
Tags
Package: xsupplicant
Version: 1.2.4.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schep
Package: wavemon
Version: 0.4.0b-11
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
Package: silo
Version: 1.4.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To
Package: palo
Version: 1.14
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSU
Package: vls
Version: 0.5.4+cvs20031028-7
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
Package: toshset
Version: 1.72-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To
Package: libdvb
Version: 0.5.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
Package: inotify-tools
Version: 3.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
Package: hotkey-setup
Version: 0.1-17
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
-
Package: iputils
Version: 3:20070202-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
Package: gem
Version: 1:0.90.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: bogl
Version: 0.1.18-1.5
Severity: serious
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBSCR
Package: eagle-usb
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Your package has a versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers. However,
this package has been removed from sid, which makes the Build-Depends
unsatisfiable. Please upload a new version removing this.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
To UNSUBS
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 22:48 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> It's been a while since the patch was provided. I've tested at this end
> and the patch appears fine. It actually results in a much smaller .diff
> via interdiff (attached).
>
> Are you willing to do an NMU if Thomas does not respond?
>
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # trivial patch, tagging accordingly to ease RC bug tracking
> tags 427781 patch
Bug#427781: Postrm broken due to missing whitespace before ]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (08/06/2007):
> > If someone would like to contact me in more detail, reach me at this
> > address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Laszlo,
looks like you didn't use the appropriate address to ask for more info.
I guess you could bounce your previous mail to the above
Tom Epperly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (06/07/2007):
> I am wondering if I can just build SciPy by hand.
I'd rather advise to figure out why a Conflicts: is declared in the
first place. It seems needed, given the changelog of python-numpy (the
version gets upgraded), but undocumented there. You probably
Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24/06/2007):
> it looks like matplotlib 0.90.1 has been released, it is my
> understanding that this release won't conflict with numpy. is that
> correct? if so please update the package to 0.90.1
It is available in experimental.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 423993 Keep out of testing [was: FTBFS: epsf.tex not found]
Bug#423993: octave2.9-forge: FTBFS: epsf.tex not found
Changed Bug title to `Keep out of testing [was: FTBFS: epsf.tex not found]'
from `octave2.9-forge: FTBFS: epsf.tex not found'.
>
retitle 423993 Keep out of testing [was: FTBFS: epsf.tex not found]
thanks
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/05/2007):
> I am marking this bug wontfix because the octave2.9-forge package will
> be eventually deprecated. [...]
Retitling so as to reflect this. By browsing the RC bug list,
tag 428937 patch
thanks
Petr Vandrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/06/2007):
> Fix below should fix problem.
Indeed, just checked, tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpnKEirfabuE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 428937 patch
Bug#428937: ncpfs: FTBFS: ncpm_common.c:1229: error: expected expression before
'struct'
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 432182 nvidia-kernel-source: System unexpected freezes
Bug#432182: linux-image-2.6.21-2-amd64: Random hangs with 2.6.21-2-amd64 for a
system that used to be stable
Changed Bug title to `nvidia-kernel-source: System unexpected freezes' from
`li
Amit Aronovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/06/2007):
> The minimalistic patch attached simply loops over a single version
> (the current one), which makes the package build OK.
Hi,
now that pyversions outputs 2.4 and 2.5, that's no longer true.
(BTW, the correct way to tag was to send a mail to the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 431585 patch
Bug#431585: mono-apache-server misses dependency on perl-modules
There were no tags set.
Bug#431587: piuparts test: fails to install: Can't locate Digest/MD5.pm in @
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 431585 patch
# the solution to these problems have been given by abi, tagging accordingly
tags 431587 patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/06/2007):
> 1.4.15 is vulnerable too.
Hi,
I'm unable to reproduce this, but FWIW, it looks like upstream has fixed
this problem, see [1]. The patch on src/request.c applies cleanly on
1.4.15-1.
1. http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/1232
Cheers,
--
Hey there. The correct behaviour is that the test will SKIP if a simple
GET does not find the web available. I'll make the change Monday or
Tuesday.
-Jay
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 09:20 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Package: libwww-mechanize-perl
> Version: 1.30-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:16:02PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> Package: vcdimager
> Version: 0.7.23-3
> Severity: serious
>
>The debian/copyright file states the following:
>
> | This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> | it under the terms of the GNU Gene
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # as announced on IRC, having a look very soon on this one
> tags 430750 pending
Bug#430750: labplot_1.5.1.6-1: FTBFS: autoconf: command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:06:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423773: gtk2hs: FTBFS:
usr/share/doc/ghc6-doc/html/libraries/base/base.haddock.gz: No such file or
directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On 7/15/07, Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I crudely measured, using top(1) and a sampling period of 0.5 s, that
g++ uses as much as 474 Mb of virtual memory when compiling the
largest file in monotone (revision.cc). That might explain why g++
seems to have run out of memory on two di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 432546 patch
Bug#432546: gem: FTBFS: should switch to linux-libc-dev instead of
linux-kernel-headers
Tags were: lenny sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
tag 432546 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/07/2007):
> You are currently using a build-dep on linux-kernel-headers.
> Buildds are switching to linux-libc-dev. So you should simply drop
> linux-kernel-headers from your build depends. (linux-libc-dev is
> build-essential, so no
tag 431579 patch
thanks
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/07/2007):
> while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
> because of /usr/sbin/update-gtk-immodules beeing unavailable during postrm:
>
> Removing iiimf-client-gtk ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/iiimf-cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 431579 patch
Bug#431579: depends on non-essential binary /usr/sbin/update-gtk-immodules in
postrm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (19/04/2007):
> Yes, unfortunately a new upload is currently blocked on bug #418201
> being fixed. I may get time to look at sorting out a patch for that
> this weekend.
Hi Mark,
since #418201 is now fixed, could you please upload your package and fix
this RC bug?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> # An upload is under review, and should address this
> tags 429392 pending
Bug#429392: FTBFS on sparc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processin
tag 427447 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (04/06/2007):
> Obviously not a ttf-opensymbol bug.
FWIW, no problem with ttf-opensymbol/2.2.1-5 and fontconfig/2.4.2-1.2.
> This suppposedly was fixed long ago in fontconfig (see the fontconfig
> bugs: [...]).
Obsolete bug? Tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 427447 moreinfo
Bug#427447: ttf-opensymbol: postinst script fail
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433253: fixed in gtk+1.2 1.2.10-18.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:03:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
> Ok, I could solve the problem.
> By the way, anyone knows why the diff showed no difference before and
> after?
Probably the erroneous file was in /var/cache/apt; killing /var/lib/apt
has a side-effect of causing th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 431887 patch
Bug#431887: bluez-hcidump: FTBFS: sniff_subrate_cp undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tag 431887 patch
thanks
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/07/2007):
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c hci.c
> hci.c: In function 'sniff_subrate_dump':
> hci.c:778: error: 'sniff_subrate_cp' undeclared (first use in this function)
> hci.c:778: error: (E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380943 important
Bug#380943: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: gdm
Version: 2.18.2-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
When loged user make a "switch user" and other user log on. After new user
finish his work
and want to log off he immediately get access to previous loged in user without
need to type a password!
severity 380943 important
thanks
Hi,
Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (22/10/2006):
> Hi,
> I have been working on this bug and i got some problems trying to build
> scigraphica with Python 2.4
> Searching for arrayobject.h
> ./configure: line 22052: test: too many arguments
> arrayobject.h locat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 422047 patch
Bug#422047: FTBFS: No package 'gconf-sharp-2.0' found
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tag 422047 patch
thanks
Hi,
Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/05/2007):
> Bug #422047 is caused by changes in the packaging of cil bindings to
> the gnome libraries. The following patch fixes the build dependencies.
> Unfortunately, that only allows the compile to proceed forward
It's been a while since the patch was provided. I've tested at this end
and the patch appears fine. It actually results in a much smaller .diff
via interdiff (attached).
Are you willing to do an NMU if Thomas does not respond?
If not, I'm happy to do an NMU - let me know.
--
Neil Williams
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 424442 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#424442: slide-webdavclient - FTBFS: cannot stat
`/build/user/slide-webdavclient-2.1+dfsg/debian/libslide-webdavclient-java/usr/share/doc/libslide-webdavclient-java/clientjavadoc
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: un
Package: libgtk1.2
Version: 1.2.10-18
Severity: serious
Tags: sid patch
Dear GNOME maintainers,
libgtk1.2 is currently uninstallable in unstable on all archs -- on some
because it depends on libglib1.2, which has been renamed to libglib1.2ldbl
for the gcc long-double ABI change; on the rest becau
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 427312 -1
Bug#427312: python-bibtex: FTBFS: python2.5: free(): invalid pointer: 0x5574b0e0
Bug 427312 cloned as bug 433254.
> reassign -1 python2.5
Bug#433254: python-bibtex: FTBFS: python2.5: free(): invalid pointer: 0x5574b0e0
Bug reassigned fr
It's been nearly two weeks since the patch became available. I've
tested at this end and your patch does work.
Are you willing to do an NMU if Thomas does not respond?
If not, let me know - I'm happy to do an NMU to close this bug.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
ht
clone 427312 -1
reassign -1 python2.5
retitle -1 [python2.5]: glibc detected/free(): invalid pointer
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (03/06/2007):
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on i386.
>
> Relevant part:
> running install
> running check
> ru
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/07/2007):
> while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to
> build from source for the following reason:
>
> > t/live/wikipedia.
> > # Failed test 'Got http://en.wikipedia.org/'
> > # in t/live/wikipedia.t at line 22.
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424466: fixed in rhino 1.6.R5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.21-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The configuration of the 4kc-malta flavour is broken on mipsel (half of
the file is missing). This makes the system unbootable.
A correct configuration file has been posted on the debian-kernel
mailing
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428996: fixed in rt2400 1.2.2+cvs20070219-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:47:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432365: fixed in monodevelop 0.14+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
> Upgrading the kernel to 2.6.21 seems to have fixed this.
Hmm. That's an interesting data point, but it does not really help for all
the cases where aptitude is run in for example a sid chroot on an Etch
system (which is my situation).
pgpUG5FTWKbxQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:19:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433149: Funnyboat music is not free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> unblock 413429 with 431940
Bug#431940: rpc.mountd eats CPU, issues tons of ioctls
Bug#413429: mountd in nfs-kernel-server still broken
Was blocked by: 413661
Blocking bugs of 413429 r
Ok, I could solve the problem.
Anyway the solution and the cause of the bug are still mysterious to
me...
Here is what I did:
1) cp /var/lib/apt /var/lib/apt_org [backup]
2) rm /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.* [remove the lists]
Now "apt-get update" works perfectly.
I thought there was a corruption in
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432369: fixed in xml-crimson 1:1.1.3-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429019: fixed in rt2500 1:1.1.0-b4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
A similar description, and a workaround are presented here:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=85884&sid=a6fc79f42fe51951ccc6bd77f6a74882
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 429130 + pending
Bug#429130: please update/request removal of your package
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: pending
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Yup, that fixes things again. Had to be something simple,
> I guess it's a missing dependency - and probably not even
> of totem but of xine?
I've added a dependency in totem-xine SVN; thanks!
--
Loïc Minier
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392397: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/07/2007):
> please: 1/ fix the .pc file with the attached patch [...]
Attached this time, sorry for the noise.
--
Cyril Brulebois
--- silgraphite.pc.orig 2007-07-15 19:06:18.0 +0200
+++ silgraphite.pc 2007-07-15 19:06:26.0 +0200
@@ -8,5 +8,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 431382 -1
Bug#431382: pango-graphite_0.9.0-1: FTBFS: wrong include search path?
Bug 431382 cloned as bug 433225.
> reassign -1 libgraphite-dev
Bug#433225: pango-graphite_0.9.0-1: FTBFS: wrong include search path?
Bug reassigned from package `pang
clone 431382 -1
reassign -1 libgraphite-dev
retitle -1 [libgraphivz-dev] broken .pc file: wrong include path
tag -1 patch
retitle 431382 [pango-graphite] broken B-D: libgraphite-dev
block 431382 by -1
tag 431382 patch
thanks
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/07/2007):
> Hi Daniel,
>
> pango-
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 04:25:42PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> What version of dpkg and its depends do you have installed?
This happened on a buildd. The unstable chroot has 1.14.5 in it, and
that's what I tested this. The host system is still using sarge, so that
would be 1.10.28. Afaik, dur
tag 414702 patch
thanks
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/03/2007):
> your package failed to build from source because libpng-dev was needed
> but not build-depend upon. Feel free to clone this bug and reassign it
> to libvtk5-dev if you feel that this package should depend on
> libpng-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 414702 patch
Bug#414702: therion_0.5.0-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing png.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Sunday 15 July 2007 17:52, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> No problem. I will remove it. As you said my intention is not to use it
> with the official Debian installer, but with the one we customize at
> LinEx (www.gnulinex.org). I didn't know about
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324803: fixed in cdw 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: saods9
Version: 4.0b7-1.4
Followup-For: Bug #429332
Creating a symlink to the file libtifftcl3.8.2.so seems to make ds9 able
to continue the loading process. It also asks for the missing
lib{png,zlib}tcl1.0.so files: symlinking to libpngtcl1.2.6.so and
libzlibtcl1.2.1.so seems to make ha
tag 424442 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/05/2007):
> > Package: slide-webdavclient
> > Version: 2.1+dfsg-1
>
>
> > > dh_installdocs
> > > mv
> > /build/user/slide-webdavclient-2.1+d
El dom, 15-07-2007 a las 17:27 +0200, Frans Pop escribió:
> Package: gambas2
> Version: 1.9.49-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: unauthorized udeb
>
> With your latest upload you have added a udeb to your package without
> any justification and without any discussion with the Debi
tag 432768 patch
thanks
Martin Peylo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/07/2007):
> It would be nice if you could test it (attached) and give me some
> feedback.
Hi,
tagging this bugreport with patch, so as to ease RC bug tracking.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgptxxAgjRpvx.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 432768 patch
Bug#432768: bashisms in sh scripts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/05/2007):
> Package: slide-webdavclient
> Version: 2.1+dfsg-1
> > dh_installdocs
> > mv
> /build/user/slide-webdavclient-2.1+dfsg/debian/libslide-webdavclient-java/usr/share/doc/libslide-webdavclient-java/clientjavadoc
> \
> >
> /build/user/
Hi,
Nice to see you back!
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest we remove the wontfix tag and add a block on the dpkg bug
> requesting the trigger, what do you think?
Fine, feel free to do so.
Regards,
--
Florent
Package: gambas2
Version: 1.9.49-3
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: unauthorized udeb
With your latest upload you have added a udeb to your package without
any justification and without any discussion with the Debian Installer
team on debian-boot at lists.debian.org.
Recently the Techni
"A. Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2007-12
> Followup-For: Bug #425803
>
>
> Though I've tried the fixing advice here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425803
>
> ...the package won't install:
>
> % cd /var/cache/apt/archives
>
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not opposed to that, because this is clean. But do you realize that
> if go that route, when a package containing .tex files is upgraded to a
> version that also contains .tex files, then mktexlsr would be run *twice
> in a row*? Once by "old-postrm
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Luis Peñaranda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Could you try to execute the following binaries and send me the output?
> Here we go:
>
...
> >Also I have noticed that you have built your kernel manually, have you
> >enabled 32-bit emulation (CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
