Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not opposed to that, because this is clean. But do you realize that > if go that route, when a package containing .tex files is upgraded to a > version that also contains .tex files, then mktexlsr would be run *twice > in a row*? Once by "old-postrm upgrade" and once by > "new-postinst configure". > > I can very well imagine the gazillion bug reports we would get if we did > that.
I guess we should actually go that route, but only once dpkg-triggers are available. Then it's no harm to request the trigger multiple times. > new version contains .tex files, you're proposing a system where > mktexlsr is run twice in a row in most cases. Doesn't look like an > improvement to the current system to me. Not at the moment, indeed. I suggest we remove the wontfix tag and add a block on the dpkg bug requesting the trigger, what do you think? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
