Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 06:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425926: fixed in regina-normal 4.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Luigi,
On 25 May 2007 at 15:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 25 May 2007 at 22:04, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
| |
| | Hi Dirk,
| |
| | On May 25, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > | checking for Boost development files... yes
| | > | checking Boost version... yes
| | > | checking
On Friday 25 May 2007 04:02:18 am you wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:40:57PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > install -s -m 755 mpath_prio_emc
> > /tmp/buildd/multipath-tools-0.4.7/debian/tmp/sbin/mpath_prio_emc install:
> > cannot create regular file
> > `/tmp/buildd/multipath
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 425929 0.99.6-1.1
Bug#425929: smc: FTBFS with new boost libraries
Bug marked as not found in version 0.99.6-1.1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 422722 serious
Bug#422722: gs-gpl: systempapername() implicitly converted to pointer
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 22:51:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425915: r-base-core: [hppa] file /usr/lib/R/bin/INSTALL is
empty
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 20:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425605: fixed in kdegraphics 4:3.5.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On 25 May 2007 at 22:04, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
|
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On May 25, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | checking for Boost development files... yes
| > | checking Boost version... yes
| > | checking for Boost unit-test framework... no
| > | configure: WARNING: Boost unit-test
Hi Dirk,
On May 25, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| checking for Boost development files... yes
| checking Boost version... yes
| checking for Boost unit-test framework... no
| configure: WARNING: Boost unit-test framework not found
| configure: WARNING: The test suite will be disa
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:30 +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> Never mind, I think you have hit bug #402229. Please check that.
I applied the mod to /etc/tomcat5.5/policy.d/50user.policy as indicated
in the bug report there, and admin now works.
Thanks!
Diab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
> > are you able to try the version in sid (5.5.20-5), just to be sure?
>
> I would, if I could convince aptitude not to upgrade so many packages.
>
> aptitude -s -t unstable install tomcat5.5-admin
>
> results in
>
> Upgrade the following packages:
> binutils [2.17-3 (stabl
forcemerge 425680 426002
thanks
Quoting J.L. Fernandez Jambrina ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: winbind
> Version: 3.0.24-6etch2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> After security upgrade to 3.0.24-6etch1 some users fails to authenticate:
Particularly in the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> notfound 425738 1:0.9.3-2
Bug#425738: madwifi: several DOS-able holes
Bug marked as not found in version 1:0.9.3-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> found 425738 1:0.9.3-1
Bug#425738: madwifi: several DOS-able holes
Bug marked as found in version 1:0.9.3-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> notfound 425738 0.9.3
Bug#425738: madwifi: several DOS-able holes
Bug marked as not found in version 0.9.3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 18:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423824: fixed in roundcube 0.1~rc1~dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:23:49PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> basebud:/var/local/cache/apt-proxy/debian/pool/main/b/boost# dpkg -c
> libboost-test1.34.0_1.34.0-1_i386.deb
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-05-14 09:24 ./
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-05-14 09:23 ./usr/
> drwxr
On 25 May 2007 at 20:25, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
| On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:23:49PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > basebud:/var/local/cache/apt-proxy/debian/pool/main/b/boost# dpkg -c
libboost-test1.34.0_1.34.0-1_i386.deb
| > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-05-14 09:24 ./
| > drw
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> decided to purge. After that texlive-base-bin and texlive-base could
> be installed with --force-confmiss and all other TeX-Live packages
> configured fine. JadeTeX however still was not installable, hence the
> bug.
I'm also puzzled by this, and wouldn
On 25.05.07 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > Package fails to configure with TeX Live 2007 installed.
> > fmtutil.log is attached. Relevant error message:
> >
> > (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/tools/longtable.sty)
> > (/usr/share/te
On 25 May 2007 at 12:23, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 25 May 2007 at 11:28, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| |
| | Daniel,
| |
| | On 24 May 2007 at 17:52, Daniel Schepler wrote:
| | | Package: quantlib
| | | Version: 0.4.0-2
| | | Severity: serious
| | | Tags: sid
| | |
| | | From my pbuilder bu
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 17:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424014: fixed in scim-m17n 0.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 25 May 2007 at 11:28, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Daniel,
|
| On 24 May 2007 at 17:52, Daniel Schepler wrote:
| | Package: quantlib
| | Version: 0.4.0-2
| | Severity: serious
| | Tags: sid
| |
| | From my pbuilder build log:
| |
| | ...
| | checking for Boost development files... yes
| | c
Hi,
I can observe the same behaviour here; playground doesn't execute any
action, even if it reacts to mouseover-focus, right-click and so on.
I've attached a strace log of playground to this mail. It basically
continues polling something (I really dunno what) and get "-1 EAGAIN
(Resource temporar
Package: poppler
Version: 0.5.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi poppler developers!
Recently, the library names were renamed like libpoppler1-glib ->
libpoppler-glib1. However, the new packages do not
Conflicts:/Replaces: the old names and they cannot be installed side
by side. This will creat
Daniel,
On 24 May 2007 at 17:52, Daniel Schepler wrote:
| Package: quantlib
| Version: 0.4.0-2
| Severity: serious
| Tags: sid
|
| From my pbuilder build log:
|
| ...
| checking for Boost development files... yes
| checking Boost version... yes
| checking for Boost unit-test framework... no
| c
hi!
I got the bug too.
I do not know if the bug is in the package or in icedove, but purge / install
worked fine for me too (fixed the problem).
some more informations though:
Here are some errors I have in the Error Console when I start icedove.
The first two are upon startup. The third is w
On 24 May 2007 at 17:52, Daniel Schepler wrote:
| Package: quantlib
| Version: 0.4.0-2
| Severity: serious
| Tags: sid
|
| From my pbuilder build log:
|
| ...
| checking for Boost development files... yes
| checking Boost version... yes
| checking for Boost unit-test framework... no
| configure:
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425802: fixed in spampd 2.30-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 425993 texlive-base
Bug#425993: jadetex: fails to configure
Bug reassigned from package `jadetex' to `texlive-base'.
> forcemerge 425813 425993
Bug#425813: texlive-base: upgrade fails with 'fmtutil-sys failed'
Bug#425993: jadetex: fails to con
reassign 425993 texlive-base
forcemerge 425813 425993
thanks
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: jadetex
> Version: 3.13-7.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 3
>
> Package fails to configure with TeX Live 2007 installed. fmtutil.log is
> attached. Relevant error message:
>
>
Package: python-scipy
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to install python-scipy, using apt-get, i had the following
output
sudo apt-get install python-scipy
Reading package lists... Done
Building
I've can reproducibly revert to 1.5 but all attempts to then follow the steps
to install 2.0 through up a popup
saying something to the effect that another version of icedove is running, kill
it or restart your system.
There's nothing to kill, a new x zsession doesn't work, a reboot doesn't work
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 16:00:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425785: glibc_2.6~20070518-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Hi Jonathan,
the attached mail is a bug report we received for our Debian packages,
the TECkit library didn't build any more on 64bit architectures. It was
triggered because we configured texlive with "--enable-shared" to build
libkpathsea.so.4.0.0. The easy solution was to use
"--enable-shared=
Leandro Lucarella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: texlive-base
> Version: 2007-7
> Followup-For: Bug #425813
>
>
> Same problem here.
and, does the same solution work for you, too?
dpkg -i --force-confmiss
/var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base-bin_2007-7_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/tex
Package: winbind
Version: 3.0.24-6etch2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After security upgrade to 3.0.24-6etch1 some users fails to authenticate:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# wbinfo -a lmguest%
plaintext password authentication failed
error code was NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SER
Package: hgsvn
Version: 0.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hgimportsvn svn+ssh://... with a fresh installed hgsvn leads to:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hgimportsvn", line 5, in
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
ImportError: No
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419026: fixed in jadetex 3.13-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419020: fixed in jadetex 3.13-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419020: fixed in jadetex 3.13-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419020: fixed in jadetex 3.13-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable, except that it might be better to use debconf
>> for this. Moreover, for the really mandatory files, like
>> pdftexconfig.tex and modes.mf, we should not just leave it to the user
>>
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 13:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419819: fixed in jadetex 3.13-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> That sounds reasonable, except that it might be better to use debconf
> for this. Moreover, for the really mandatory files, like
> pdftexconfig.tex and modes.mf, we should not just leave it to the user
> and continue. Instead we should either forcibly re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> block 425918 with 425992
Bug#425992: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_thread
Bug#425918: pokerth: FTBFS with new boost libraries
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 425918 a
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> But I think this was just stupid; in the long run we want to build it
> from texlive sources, but now, let's just go ahead and upload a working
> version.
>
> Will you do that today?
Done.
Best wishes
Norbert
-
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
> echo "It looks like $cfgfile has been removed."
> echo "If you didn't do this it could be bug #420390."
> echo "If you had tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-5 installed and purged it,"
> echo
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:19 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 22:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 16:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > > retitle 425803 upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We hope to fix this by taking over jadetex soon.
>
>
> Frank: What about uploading jadetex -8 as we have it in svn??? I have
> already worked through all this:
I had completely forgotten about jadetex, and when I noticed it again
yesterday, I thought
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 419617 unreproducible
Bug#419617: uim-common: postinst script fails (in init.scm?)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Dear Kohda-san,
nice to hear you again, it was quite some time we didn't get into
contact!
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > This bug is solved now, but for those who already did purge, the only
> > solution is to reinstall the texlive packages (in particular
> > texlive-base and tex
Package: libgd2
Version: 2.0.33
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
Justification: breaks the whole system
This patch fixes all known issues since 2.0.33 (upstream) in the gif loader.
The tests are available in gd-2.0.34, 35RC4 or cvs (upstream), in
tests/gif/
The issues fixed are segfaults,
On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:28:48 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I think you all got bitten by #420390, "Purging tetex transition
> packages removes texlive configuration files".
>
> This bug is solved now, but for those who already did purge, the only
> solution is to reinstall the texlive packages (in
tags 425968 +upstream
found 425968 1.2.11-1
severity 425968 important
thanks
Hi,
This loss of data is not in the sense that it will actually make existing
data disappear and break your existing collection, rather it doesn't
export them in the expected format. So I'm lowering priority to non-RC.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not as serious as the others, but
'journal' should be better translated as 'Zeitschrift' rather than
'Zeitung'.
Thanks,
Johannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGVrVUC1NzPRl9qEURApDOAJwKs+iTdiNswaaO5wJbLF3XkgMA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425968 +upstream
Bug#425968: tellico: wrong translation to German
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> found 425968 1.2.11-1
Bug#425968: tellico: wrong translation to German
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.11-1.
> severity 425968 imp
Package: dpatch
Version: 2.0.23
Severity: serious
Since you use set -o pipefail in /usr/bin/dpatch, which is
a bashism, you must execute the script with /bin/bash, rather than
/bin/sh.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, '
Package: tellico
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
The German translation is errenous.
'Editor' is translated as 'Verfasser', but 'Verfasser' means author. Correct
translation would be 'Herausgeber'.
'Publisher' is translated as 'Herausgeber', but 'Her
# docbook-utils is not installable due to jadetex
block 425933 with 419020
retitle 425933 FTBFS due to broken build-deps
thanks
Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: svn-buildpackage
> Version: 0.6.19
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> debiandoc2pdf HOWTO.sgml
> debiandoc2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # docbook-utils is not installable due to jadetex
> block 425933 with 419020
Bug#419020: jadetex/texlive-lang-cyrillic: Conflicts with each other (install
fails)
Bug#425933: svn-buildpackage: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Bl
The suggested workaround (export LIBXCB_SLOPPY_LOCK=1) no longer works
for me.. I remember it used to work like 2 weeks ago..
m.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored
Hi,
> Package: tomcat5.5-admin
> Version: 5.5.20-2
are you able to try the version in sid (5.5.20-5), just to be sure?
Which JDK are you using?
Regards,
Marcus
pgpNxvXzct4Pu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 09:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424775: fixed in libexif 0.6.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2007 09:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425324: fixed in dkim-milter 1.0.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 425784 + experimental
Bug#425784: glibc_2.6~20070518-2(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: "Lowlevel
primitives for ld.so not implemented"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimenta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 425785 + experimental
Bug#425785: glibc_2.6~20070518-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 425910 + moreinfo
Bug#425910: multipath-tools: FTBFS: Installation failure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:40:57PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> install -s -m 755 mpath_prio_emc
> /tmp/buildd/multipath-tools-0.4.7/debian/tmp/sbin/mpath_prio_emc
> install: cannot create regular file
> `/tmp/buildd/multipath-tools-0.4.7/debian/tmp/sbin/mpath_prio_emc': No such
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425888 + patch
Bug#425888: gnash: FTBFS [i386]: implicit declaration of function
'SWFMovie_writeExports'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 425888 + patch
thanks
A quick search indicate that the symbol in question belong to the ming
package (libming0 and libming-dev), and there is no header file for
it. Looking in the ming source, I find the symbol in the movie.h
file:
void SWFMovie_writeExports(SWFMovie movie);
Perhaps the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423289 normal
Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 423289 wnpp
Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `hsffig' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 4
severity 423289 normal
reassign 423289 wnpp
retitle 423289 O: hsffig -- Haskell Binding Auto-Generation Utility
thanks
Orphaning hsffig ...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: airsnort
version: 0.2.7e-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/airsnort-0.2.7e'
/usr/bin/make all-recursive
make[2]: Enter
Package: ace
version: 5.4.7-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ace'
GNUmakefile: /build/user/ace-5.4.7/ACE_wrappers/ac
On Mit, 23 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> It has this home made "mv 40xmltex.cnf 40xmltex.cnf.disable" thing in
Right.
> I'm not sure what's the receipe to reproduce the bug, therefore I'm
> unsure what we need to do. If we need to take action, and given the sad
So for now we let it rest in pe
76 matches
Mail list logo
