On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 12:08:39AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > In addition, since there are no file overlaps between subsequent versions of
> > libgeda, this breaks co-installability of packages built against different
> > versions of libgeda for no apparent reason. If there *were* file confl
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 03:52:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package libtorrent9
severity 401006 important
thanks
This problem isn't confirmed and is unreproducible so I downgrade the
severity.
If anyone can confirm this issue, please let me know.
Thanks and Cheers!!
- --
ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package libtorrent9
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtorrent9
> severity 401006 important
Bug#401006: libtorrent9: safe_sync errors
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--- "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 17:07:24 +0100
> From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ramana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Hanno G. Steinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Au
Hm, reading through the entire bug report again (I only subscribed to it
sometime yesterday, so didn't get the messages, sorry) I now understand
that:
- Anton thinks it is safe to not set the VOLUME_MOUNTED_ON_NT4 ever in
ntfsresize.
- Szaka believes it might not be safe and wants confirmation
In any case, 0.96.3 is out and is signifcantly more stable than the current
offering. Stable enough for testing, rather than unstable.
Why aren't recent gtk-gnutella packages being built and moved downstream?
Torrance (gtk-gnutella user, on Debian Etch)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369542: fixed in ssmtp 2.61-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402220: fixed in portmap 5-24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401030: fixed in jacal 1b7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: usbmount
Version: 0.0.14-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Seems that usbmount stoped to work. I cannot use it with my camera.
After removing, everything works just fine.
As I can see it tries to mount /dev/sda instead of /dev/sda1
usb 5-2: new high speed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> unblock 377790 with 368795
Bug#377790: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tktable
Was blocked by: 368795
Blocking bugs of 377790 removed: 368795
>
End of message, stopping processing
I've prepared an updated fix for this (and other) problems. I split
the previous patch into 2, and created 2 other new ones to fix other
problems. All 4 are attached, and my repository contains the updated
packages. Here's a description of the patches:
11_missed_security_fixes.dpatch:
This patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377790 + patch
Bug#377790: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tktable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 320842 + patch
Bug#320842: Description says that the package is not in Debian
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 3
tags 377790 + patch
tags 320842 + patch
tags 341875 + patch
thanks
Hi!
Attached is a patch that I would NMU, but I won't. Let me explain.
The package is building and installing OK. But I am unable to test if
it's working because I have TCL/TK 8.5 installed on my system (and
trying to run moodss
Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:13:26 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rpm #397400
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401569: fixed in democracyplayer 0.9.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Dec 9, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Hmmm Bug#401586 seems to indicate that this may not be limited
to the powerpc port. Bug#401586 is for x86.
Not sure what you see in that report that makes you say that. I
only see
unrelated issues.
Well... the first few lines of this em
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:37:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD "Invalid Release File"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Hi,
* Alan Woodland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061202 15:42]:
> I'm onto it - I should be able to make an upload to correct this
> tomorrow evening.
I don't want to hurry you, but we need to fix this (or remove the
package from testing) to allow the current version of icedove in.
Cheers,
Andi
--
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401077: fixed in rss2email 1:2.60-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 402267 debian-cd
Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD "Invalid Release File"
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.
> severity 402267 critical
Bug#402267: PowerPC Netinst CD "Invalid Release File"
Severity set to `critica
Hi,
I prepared an NMU of your package, and at it in 48 hours.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur
../apache2-2.2.3~/apache2-2.2.3/debian/patches/043_ajp_connection_reuse
../apache2-2.2.3/ap
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur ../rss2email-2.60~/debian/changelog ../rss2email-2.60/debian/changelog
--- ../rss2email-2.60~/debian/changelog 2006-1
Tags: fixed-upstream
Should be fixed in version 2.6, available at
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=131204
>From denyhosts changelog:
2.6 (Dec 7, 2006)
==
- security fix: malicious users can cause a DoS of ssh.
for more info: http://nvd.nist
Hi,
I prepared an NMU of your package, and told at to upload it in 48 hours.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below (the real patch is from your svn
anyways).
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur ../apr-1.2.7~/debian/changelog ../ap
* Stefan Fritsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061202 04:55]:
> LHA seems to be affected by
> CVE-2006-4335
> CVE-2006-4337
> CVE-2006-4338
All these bugs seem to be in gzip, not in lha?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402326: fixed in bookmarksftp 1.0.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:47:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401573: mailutils - FTBFS: # of unexpected failures 14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 374489 gibraltar-bootcd
Bug#374489: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: `debian/tmp-build/discover': No such file
or directory
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables /
Bug reassigned from package `uclibc-toolchain' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 334028
Bug#334028: Unable to locale [sic] crtbegin.o provided by gcc
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables /
Bug#374489: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: `debian/tmp-build/discover': No such file
or directory
Discon
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:13:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402290: azureus: does not start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:23:32PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> apt-listchanges doesn't work with sid. I'm using version 2.72.
> apt-listchanges --apt is a neverending story without any
> output.
> apt-listchanges file.deb says me, that he reads out the changelog and
> then, that is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 374489 uclibc-toolchain
Bug#374489: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: `debian/tmp-build/discover': No such file
or directory
Warning: Unknown package '334028'
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables /
Warning: Unknown
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 396132 patch
Bug#396132: gtk-gnutella: stable upstream version is out
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 374489 334028
Bug#374489: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: `debian/tmp-build/discover': No such file
or directory
Warning: Unknown package '334028'
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables /
Warning: Unknown package '
tag 396132 patch
thanks
I was able to build a package of 0.96.3 using the new upstream tarball
and the attached patch against the .diff.gz.
--
Matt http://ftbfs.org/
--- - 2006-12-09 11:11:15.317009300 -0800
+++ /tmp/gtknutella_0.96.3-0.diff.gz
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402323: fixed in diggler 0.9-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402325: fixed in ctxextensions 4.0.2006011301-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382911: fixed in cascades 0.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:32:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402321: fixed in tabextensions 2.1.2006031301-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
I think I found the problem.
The package uclibc-toolchain depends on gcc | c-compiler.
But in the compilation of the package its only using gcc-3.3.
strace /usr/bin/i386-uclibc-linux-gcc -o hello hello.c > output
cat output | grep crtbegin
access("/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux-gnu/3.3.6/crtbegin.o"
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402327: fixed in checky 2.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
found 334028 0.9.27
merge 334028 339859 374489
thanks
strace /usr/bin/i386-uclibc-linux-gcc -o hello hello.c > output
cat output | grep crtbegin
access("/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux-gnu/3.3.6/crtbegin.o", F_OK) = 0
I think you need to put in Depends: gcc-3.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399885: fixed in ocsigen 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 334028 0.9.27
Bug#334028: Unable to locale [sic] crtbegin.o provided by gcc
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.27.
> merge 334028 339859 374489
Bug#334028: Unable to locale [sic] crtbegin.o provided by gcc
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402326 serious
Bug#402326: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402322 serious
Bug#402322: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402321 serious
Bug#402321: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402325 serious
Bug#402325: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402327 serious
Bug#402327: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402323 serious
Bug#402323: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402322: fixed in sylpheed-claws-themes 20060615-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402324: fixed in hunspell 1.1.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 402324 serious
thanks
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: hunspell
> Severity: grave
serious, not grave.
> hunspell's copyright file points to
> /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
> for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
> the archive.
>
> Pe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 339859 374489
Bug#339859: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables /
Bug#374489: gibraltar-bootcd: FTBFS: `debian/tmp-build/discover': No such file
or directory
Merged 339859 374489.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:01:01AM +0100, you wrote:
(Summary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] says patch in #318123 is insufficient)
No shit; I said that when I first saw the patch. The best solution for
now is probably just to conflict with libpam-opensc; there's some work
on rearchitecting the pam suppo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 402324 serious
Bug#402324: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 402324 serious
Bug#402324: Copyright file: /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
doesn't exist anymore
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399454: fixed in autodir 0.99.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: gaim-data
Version: 1:2.0.0+beta5-3
Followup-For: Bug #401836
This happens often. I already downloaded gaim-data with a higher version
dependency (thus unstalling gaim itself) about three times already. I
suggest not releasing a newer gaim-data unless the gaim package is published
as well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package libtorrent9
tags 401006 upstream unreproducible
thanks
Hi, this is a problem on a Debian system, I can't confirmed and I have a
2.6.18-3-686 kernel. Could anyone confirmed it?
- Mensaje original
Asunto: Bug#401006: libtorren
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package libtorrent9
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtorrent9
> tags 401006 upstream unreproducible
Bug#401006: libtorrent9: safe_sync errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: qmail
Version: 1.03-40
Severity: serious
Using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
[...]
( ./auto-uid auto_uida `head -1 conf-users` \
&&./auto-uid auto_uidd `head -2 conf-users | tail -1` \
&&./auto-uid auto_uidl `head -3 conf-users | tail -1` \
&&./auto-uid auto_uido `h
I just tried to reproduce this error, and gnus started fine for me
(emacs, M-x gnus). This was installed clean onto etch i386, not
upgraded.
--
Matthew Johnson
http://www.matthew.ath.cx/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Package: tabextensions
Severity: grave
tabextensions's copyright file points to
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note t
Package: sylpheed-claws-themes
Severity: grave
sylpheed-claws-themes's copyright file points to
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyri
On 五, 12月 08, 2006 at 01:52:53下午 -0300, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
> Sorry!
> The correct patch is this.
>
I've fixed this bug, just waitint for my sposor's upload now.
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: checky
Severity: grave
checky's copyright file points to /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note that it is commo
Package: bookmarksftp
Severity: grave
bookmarksftp's copyright file points to
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note tha
Package: diggler
Severity: grave
diggler's copyright file points to /usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note that it is com
I've tested flightgear on my 933MHz P3M and it starts in under a minute
with no heavy disc activity. It's not really usable since it runs so
slowly, but I suspect that this machine isn't powerful enough (and the
i810 graphics not good enough) to run any sort of flight simulator at a
sensible speed
Package: hunspell
Severity: grave
hunspell's copyright file points to
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note that it is
Package: ctxextensions
Severity: grave
ctxextensions's copyright file points to
/usr/share/doc/mozilla-browser/MPL-1.1.txt.gz
for the MPL license, while this file disappeared due to mozilla removal from
the archive.
Per policy, the license should be written verbatim in the copyright file.
Note t
Hi Frank!
From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended
> >
> >> ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essenti
On Saturday 09 December 2006 08:00, Matt Brown wrote:
> The fix described in the third post is incorrect. The backported patches
> applied in -3 have already reordered this part of the code so that it
> works correctly with madwifi.
>
> Unfortunately that backport missed the final component of the
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402260: fixed in gossip 0.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: udev
Version: 0.103-1
Severity: serious
Seeing the following messages on my laptop very early during boot:
INIT: version 2.86 booting
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd.
Synthesyzing the initial hotplu events...done.
Waiting for /dev to be fully populated...
udevb-event[]:
On 2006-12-02 "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> audacious-dev can't depends on audacious because it will create a circular
> dependency that woud render audacious unusable and audacious-plugins not
> buildable.
Hello,
I do not get that. Where is the loop? Currently I can insta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 402309 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138584
Bug#402309: Multiple credit-card charges for single Magnatunes purchase
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138584.
>
End of message, stopp
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382642: fixed in gmime2.2 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402309 + upstream
Bug#402309: Multiple credit-card charges for single Magnatunes purchase
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386902: fixed in gmime2.2 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387094: fixed in gmime2.2 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:51:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line compiz: Compiz crashes the X server.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the package claims in its copyright file:
> These fonts were converted from the LaTeX .pfb forms,
> and are under the respective licenses of the sources.
>
> In this case, it would be good if it would be created from the
> .pfb-forms "on the fly" d
Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank!
>
> From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> texlive-latex-extra texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-recommended
>
>> ii texlive-base 2005.dfsg.2-4 TeX Live: Essential programs
>> and files
>> ii texlive-base-bin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 402194 libooc-x11-dev
Bug#402194: libocc-x11: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after
`oo2crc.tmp'
Bug reassigned from package `libooc-x11' to `libooc-x11-dev'.
> merge 402194 394638
Bug#394638: uninstallable, /usr/lib/oo2c/ooconfig
> I'm glad it's working again. Did you by any chance see exactly
> why it broke the nvidia driver? Perhaps this could be a bug in
> either the xserver package or the nvidia driver package?
I'm not sure of what happened exactly, but it seems that the X server update
has broken the nvidia driver.
Package: amarok
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
When you make a purchase using the Magnatunes integrated store, Amarok
issues the payment instruction multiple times, resulting in overcharging.
While Magnatunes are very good at picking up on this (it seems it's an
upstream bug that's happen
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.72
Severity: important
Hi, I can reproduce the same problem here on my etch system.
A simple "apt-listchanges
/var/cache/apt/archives/icedove_1.5.0.8-1_i386.deb" is printing out:
"Reading changelogs... Done"
nothing more.
dpkg-reconfigure didn't help either.
-
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:16:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2006 13:16:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:59:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libnotify-dev: Missing depedancies on libgtk2.0-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401258 + patch
Bug#401258: heimdal-kdc: destroys hprop inetd config on upgrades
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: azureus
Version: 2.5.0.0+0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
does not start and displays message:
"/usr/bin/azureus: line 3: /usr/share/java-config/libswt-3.2-java: Aucun
fichier ou répertoire de ce type"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers
tags 401258 + patch
thanks
Hi,
this patch seems to solve it for me. Comments?
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur ../heimdal-0.7.2.dfsg.1~/debian/changelog
../heimdal-0.7.2.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
--- ../heimdal-0.7.2.dfsg.1~/debian/changelog 2006-12-09 09:04:02.0
+
+++ ../heimdal-0.7.2.dfs
Hi,
apt-listchanges doesn't work with sid. I'm using version 2.72.
apt-listchanges --apt is a neverending story without any output.
apt-listchanges file.deb says me, that he reads out the changelog and
then, that is done, but not more.
(german output):
the-me:~# apt-listchanges
/var/cache/ap
Le samedi 09 décembre 2006 à 12:12 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> Joss, one question:
> You wrote in your changelog entry some time ago:
> libpng (1.2.8rel-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * drop_pass_width.patch: don't export png_pass_width, it's absolutely
> unnecessary.
>
> -- Josselin Mo
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 12:07]:
> Le samedi 09 décembre 2006 à 11:35 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > | * Fixed "Incorrect shlibs information". Closes: #401465.
> > --- libpng-1.2.15~beta5.orig/debian/libpng12-0.shlibs
> > +++ libpng-1.2.15~beta5/debian/libpng
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
