Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the package claims in its copyright file: > These fonts were converted from the LaTeX .pfb forms, > and are under the respective licenses of the sources. > > In this case, it would be good if it would be created from the > .pfb-forms "on the fly" during compilation - bugs like 388795 could be > fixed by that way better.
fontforge can probably do that (even automatable, it can be called on the commandline). > (I'm even wondering if #388795 is not a license violation, as I'm quite > sure without looking the original fonts include "]".) You might be right, because ,---- | [...] the AMS does require that the AMS copyright notice be removed | from any derivative versions of the fonts which have been altered in | any way. `---- However, I don't know whether forgetting one character qualifies as a derivative version, instead of just being a bug... Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
