Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 338638 - sarge
Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only
Tags were: sarge help
Tags removed: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Package: libc6-i386
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello!
I'm not sure if this should be considered as libc6-i386 bug or
lib32gfortran0 bug, but anyway:
Preparing to replace libc6-i386 2.3.6.ds1-4 (using
.../libc6-i386_2.3.6.ds1-7_amd64.deb) ...
Unp
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:02:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397147: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.13~dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
> Could not init font path element /usr/local/share/fonts, removing from list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts, removing from list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/truetype, removing from
> list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/type1, re
I was having the same problem under 2.6.17-2-xen-k7 as reported by
Markus Ingalsuo.
I have upgraded all xen packages to the unstable versions (using
hypervisor 3.0.3 not 3.0-unstable), and I can now run two XenU at the
same time:
# xm list
Name ID Mem(MiB) VC
I tried building this on a fast arm machine and it hung at the
cd . && $REAL_BLDDIR/mtn --root=. automate get_base_revision_id) 2>/dev/null
>package_revision_raw.txt \
|| (cd . && mtn --root=. automate get_base_revision_id)
2>/dev/null >package_revision_raw.txt \
|| rm -f
Package: sylpheed-gtk1
Version: 1.0.6-4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
...found this in my email box:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ cat ~/Mail/z-inbox/9
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 06 00:52:27 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 396158 patch
Bug#396158: Package config fails: "pycentral pkginstall: duplicity needs
unavailable runtime (2.3)"
There were no tags set.
Bug#396366: duplicity: fails to install
Package: python-tunepimp
Version: 0.4.2-3.2
Severity: grave
This package do not work at all. Even the included example does not run:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/python-tunepimp/examples$ ./trm.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./trm.py", line 35, in ?
from tunepimp import tu
Package: k3b
Version: 0.12.17-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
...I had k3b et al set up with root.root and hit the apply
button intentionally to use root.burning, this "is ok" in
k3b but shoots these warnings down the xterm:
a45:~# dpkg-statoverride: --add needs four ar
Trying to get a working duplicity again (sigh), I rebuilt it to use
python2.4. Contrary to what I reported in #386607 before, this seems to
work ok; I can restore my old backups, and make new ones.
So I'd suggest reassigning this back to duplicity, maybe leaving a
normal severity bug cloned to pyt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 292231 etch-ignore
Bug#292231: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] making the entire manpage invariant is not
consistent with the DFSG
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: etch-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
tags 292231 etch-ignore
thanks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:22:50AM -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
> Hasciicam 1.0 was released by upstream with manpage under GFDL without
> invariant sections.
> This is not very announced in the webpage, the no-changelog policy
> doesn't help either, but downloading
I'm also seeing this bug, on two machines. A third machine had the same
versions of duplicity, python2.3, and python-central, but did not have
the problem; duplicity was installed and working. Then I tried
reinstalling it, and reproduced the problem there too:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>sudo apt-get --re
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:25:11AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: librrd2
> > Version: 1.2.11-0.6
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm noticing a peculiar problem with rrd.cgi (from
> > http://haroon.sis.utoronto.ca/rrd
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 01:56:28PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18-4
> Severity: serious
> -- snipp alpha
> CC arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.o
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:250: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in
I'm seeing nearly the same thing:
Setting up irda-utils (0.9.18-3) ...
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
Starting IrDA service: irattachinvoke-rc.d: initscript irda-utils, action
"start" failed.
dpkg: erro
Lets Face a simple Factthe ladies don't like a small (c)ock.
Some may say size doesn't matter, but they are just being nice.
Check out our proven product, and lets resolve your "little" problem.
Product domain: www.spruced.net
*Cut and Paste product domain into browser
Don't have a "little"
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:35:55 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396204: fixed in xsupplicant 1.2.4.dfsg.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391291: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309e-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: xoscope
Version: 1.12-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
When xoscope is rebuilt, the /usr/bin/oscope file disappears from the
package.
This means that when the security team will rebuild the packages (if
needed), the file will disappear, and users will be confused.
On some non-i386 architecture
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 397238 libqthreads-12
Bug#397238: libqhread-12: package is empty
Warning: Unknown package 'libqhread-12'
Bug reassigned from package `libqhread-12' to `libqthreads-12'.
> found 397238 1.6.8-6
Bug#397238: libqhread-12: package is empty
Bug mark
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397027 important
Bug#397027: nvidia-glx: Can't start Xorg - wrong version of NVIDIA X driver
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:39:12AM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:25:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And like the libperl5.8 case, I can't find anything broken by this bug --
> > libqthreads-12 has multiple reverse-deps on i386 and alpha, but none on
> > amd64, so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397238 important
Bug#397238: libqhread-12: package is empty
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391291: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20061019~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:25:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> And like the libperl5.8 case, I can't find anything broken by this bug --
> libqthreads-12 has multiple reverse-deps on i386 and alpha, but none on
> amd64, so it appears the emptiness is not a problem.
Hmmm... I guess I should s
severity 397238 important
thanks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> As strange as it may sound, the libqthread-12 package is empty for all
> non-i386 architectures.
And like the libperl5.8 case, I can't find anything broken by this bug --
libqthreads-12 has multip
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388082: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20061019~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: freeloader
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of freeloader_0.3-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006110
reassign 397238 libqthreads-12
found 397238 1.6.8-6
thanks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Package: libqhread-12
> Version: 1.6.8-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> As strange as it may sound, the libqthread-12 package is empty for a
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388082: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309e-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387974: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20061019~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387972: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20061019~rc3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
This one time, at band camp, Torsten Marek wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi,
>
>so how to circumvent that error? setup.py needs to be patched when cleaning,
>since otherwise it tries to load Tk, which fails because X cannot be accessed.
>On way would certainly be to drop
severity 397027 important
thanks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:51:43PM +0100, Johannes Bittner wrote:
> > Well I don't quite buy that yet.
> >> As you can see, everything got updated to the current version. But Xorg
> >> fails to start. What follows is a cut-out of Xorg.0.log:
> >> --start--
> >>
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:32:00PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Can you try adding "CFLAGS=-g -Wall -ffunction-sections" at the bottom
> of debian/rules? It works fine on merulo at least.
-ffunction-sections stands a good chance
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387972: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309e-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: librrd2
> Version: 1.2.11-0.6
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm noticing a peculiar problem with rrd.cgi (from
> http://haroon.sis.utoronto.ca/rrd/scripts/ ) on Debian etch, with RRDtool
> 1.2.11. Apparently, something makes
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:33:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387974: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309e-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
severity 397237 important
thanks
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:43:11PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Package: libperl5.8
> Version: 5.8.8-6.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> As strange as it may sound, the libperl5.8 package is empty for all
> non-i386 architectures.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:00:26PM +0200, Armin Berres wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > I would need a trace following forks then, yours is useless as it
> >traces the father. please run
> > strace -f -F -s 256 -o trace whitelister
> >as root and send it as an attachement to the bug report ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397237 important
Bug#397237: libperl5.8: package is empty
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 378346 = fixed-upstream patch
Bug#378346: libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha
Tags were: confirmed upstream help
Tags set to: fixed-upstream, patch
>
End of message
Package: libqhread-12
Version: 1.6.8-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
As strange as it may sound, the libqthread-12 package is empty for all
non-i386 architectures.
Cheers,
Nicolas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 22:54:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 22:54:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 22:54:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Package: libperl5.8
Version: 5.8.8-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
As strange as it may sound, the libperl5.8 package is empty for all
non-i386 architectures. Fortunately, the actual library is in the
perl-base package (at least for powerpc).
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:48:38PM +0100, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Quoting Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 0.6.46.2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 2.5
> >
> > apt is of priority "important" and depends on debian-a
Package: libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl
Version: 1.05-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
The libastro-fits-cfitsio-perl package version 1.05-1 fails
to build from source on the mipsel [1] and arm [2] architectures
because some of the tests fail:
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
forcemerge 397139 397207
stop and over
can you please look for duplicates, before reporting!
Hmm... For some strange reason http://bugs.debian.org/src:linux-2.6
redirects to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=linux-2.6;dist=unstable,
Hi Andree,
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> I have made a Vista partition 1MB smaller as per your instructions. I
> can confirm that Vista does not boot anymore after this. Rather it hangs
> on the black screen with the 'golden' progress bar with 'C 2006
> Microsoft Corporation. A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 393606 =
Bug#393606: mail-notification-evolution: Fails to contact evolution
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> quit
Stoppi
On 05/11/2006 Anibal Avelar wrote:
>
> Do you have some directory inside of .idesktop directory? or Did you
> define the Background.Source tag with some directory inside of
> .idesktop directory? because the program has a bug with this. Please
> move the directory to other location.
> I don't know
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
i had locally modified my /etc/uswsusp.conf to use a different "resume
device", but on a recent upgrade, it over-wrote my configuration file
changes without asking.
this also results in my resume partition
forcemerge 397139 397207
stop and over
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:11:03PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.18
> Version: 2.6.18-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
can you please look for duplicates, before reporting!
> debian/patches/bu
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
debian/patches/bugfix/copy-user-highpage.patch adds fourth argument to
copy_user_highpage(), but fails to update function call in mm/hugetlb.c
accordingly:
CC mm/hugetlb.o
mm/hugetl
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:47:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395915: fixed in libselinux 1.32-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Randall Donald wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 15:10 +0100, Johannes Bittner wrote:
>> Package: nvidia-glx
>> Version: 1.0.8776-1
>> Severity: grave
>
> Well I don't quite buy that yet.
>
>> As you can see, everything got updated to the current version. But Xorg
>> fails to start. What follows is
Philippe Cloutier wrote:
>> What do you mean with "what you're doing with such an x11-common
>> version"? I simply installed xserver-xorg, which I think somehow depends
>> on x11-common.
>>
>>
> I mean "what are you doing with such an x11-common version", not "what
> are you doing with x11-commo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 389950 [Waiting for submitter] ieee80211-source: FTBFS with kernel
> 2.4.27
Bug#389950: ieee80211-source: FTBFS with kernel 2.4.27
Changed Bug title.
> severity 389950 important
Bug#389950: [Waiting for submitter] ieee80211-source: FTBFS with
retitle 389950 [Waiting for submitter] ieee80211-source: FTBFS with kernel
2.4.27
severity 389950 important
thanks
Hi, Fabrizio
Did you make any progress on this issue?
Daniel told me that he is working on ipw* this weekend and I would like
you to look at bug http://bugs.debian.org/384558
If
block 393273 by 396528
thanks
Hi,
It would be preferrable to fix hunspell to be compilable
on arm. Since it compiles and fails only a few tests, it's
probably doable. Usually arm-specific porting issues
are related either to the arm's mixed-endian double, or
struct packing.
I can provide an ac
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:17:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397156: fixed in geekast 0.1.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
This bug has been resolved
and is only active if you load chan_skinny by default
this does NOT affect asterisk business edition
If you dont want to mess around with the modules.conf and no load
update to 1.2.13
all the "security fixes" are applied on that release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 393273 by 396528
Bug#393273: FTBFSes on arm because of libhunspell-dev not available
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 393273 added: 396528
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
severity 397027 important #submitter doesn't support severity justification
thanks
Johannes Bittner a écrit :
Philippe Cloutier wrote:
Justification: renders package unusable
What evidence do you have that nvidia-glx is unusable?
Before we get into this, explain what you're doing
Hi.
I saw the information. I feel the problem is an old bug.
Do you have some directory inside of .idesktop directory? or Did you
define the Background.Source tag with some directory inside of
.idesktop directory? because the program has a bug with this. Please
move the directory to other locati
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:17:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396818: fixed in opensync 0.19-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:17:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396006: fixed in opensync 0.19-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So far, I'm not aware of any regressions
>> yet. I am aware that an updated ffmpeg could introduce regression.
>> Therefore I rely that Sam will bump the SONAME of the libraries when he
>> updates an incompatible version of ffmpeg in debian.
>
> (disclaime
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:47:37 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378346: fixed in gail 1.8.11-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 15:10 +0100, Johannes Bittner wrote:
> Package: nvidia-glx
> Version: 1.0.8776-1
> Severity: grave
Well I don't quite buy that yet.
> As you can see, everything got updated to the current version. But Xorg
> fails to start. What follows is a cut-out of Xorg.0.log:
>
> --sta
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:02:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394172: fixed in mopac7 1.11-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: opensync
Version: 0.19-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my opensync 0.19-1.2 NMU.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u opensync-0.19/debian/changelog
[Executive summary: This discussion is about mplayer using an embedded
copy of libavcodec instead of using the shared one from Debian]
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:24:24AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> BTW: I have been assuming that Moritz is report
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I currently see no way to achieve building of gst-ffmpeg in a sane and
> maintainable way, and it seems we are very far from that. Very very
> far.
>
> I don't consider the case of gst-ffmpeg to be in any way similar to
> mplayer's case; xine-lib would be closer. Conside
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354544 -wontfix
Bug#354544: ISAM trap in package upgrade
Tags were: upstream confirmed
Bug#354850: mysql-server: upgrade 4.1->5.0 may break installation
Tags removed: wontfix
> tags 354544 +pending
Bug#354544: ISAM trap in package upgrade
Tags wer
Justification: renders package unusable
What evidence do you have that xserver-xorg is unusable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 378346 + upstream confirmed pending
Bug#378346: libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha
Tags were: help
Tags added: upstream, confirmed, pending
>
End of message, stopp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Tartler ha scritto:
> xine is able to build against an out of tree ffmpeg. This is what the
> current xine in etch is doing.
(I was aware of this; I hope I made it clear in previous emails )
> So far, I'm not aware of any regressions
> yet.
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:02:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396762: fixed in dmraid 1.0.0.rc13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 395525 + confirmed
Bug#395525: rhino: FTBFS: fails to build if no network access is available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> forwarded 396762 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396880 pending
Bug#396880: dblatex: error in file dblatex/xsl/docbook.xsl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 395207 pending
Bug#395207: dblatex: Lots of non-configuration files in /etc/dblatex/contrib
There were no tags set.
Tags a
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:47:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395512: fixed in sg3-utils 1.21-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 395525 + confirmed
thanks
On 10/27/06, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
get-swing-ex:
This is needed for the debugger tool. A solution could be to drop the
deb
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394216: fixed in jfbterm 0.4.7-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi grace maintainers,
I ran into the above-mentioned bug as well. I realise it is now fixed
by adding a dependency to gconf2. However, with this, you are forcing
people to install 7.2 MB of stuff, with, as far as I could judge, the
only purpose being that a configuration script runs properly. T
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006, Paul Brook wrote:
> Package also FTBFS on arm and i386.
> The problem seems to be GalagoList.
> Google suggests this should be defined in galago-list.h. However this
> header does not exist in the libgalago-dev package.
I think gnome-presence-applet is pending removal; see
Package: sg3-utils
Version: 1.21-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my sg3-utils 1.21-2.1 NMU.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u sg3-utils-1.21/debian/changelo
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:32:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396323: fixed in rpncalc 1.36.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:17:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397095: fixed in hat 2.05-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 391238 - patch
Bug#391238: xmms-wma: please link against libavcodec and libavformat
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: cvsnt
Version: 2.5.03.2382-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
When cvsnt is rebuilt, the files in /usr/lib/cvsnt/database/ disappear
from the package.
This means that when the security team will rebuild the packages (if
needed), the file will disappear, and users will be confused.
Adding unixodb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> package dmraid dmraid-udeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dmraid dmraid-udeb
> tags 396762 + pending
Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Tags were: pending patch
T
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:45:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394955: fixed in libpfm3-3.2 3.2.060926-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> package dmraid dmraid-udeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dmraid dmraid-udeb
> tags 396762 + pending
Bug#396762: /sbin/dmraid depends on /usr/lib/libz.so.1
Tags were: patch
Tags adde
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395808: fixed in coco-doc 20060919-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
