Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> reassign 393997 libapache2-mod-proxy-html
> thanks
>
> * Hadmut Danisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 22:51]:
>> Package: libapache2-mod-proxy
>
> There's no such package. Did you mean libapache2-mod-proxy-html?
Ahm, yeah, sorry, cut-and-paste-error. Was too late, wa
Can you try starting ivman with "ivman --nofork --debug" and post the output?
It looks from the strace that it is having trouble reading
/etc/ivman/IvmConfigBase.xml. Can you also post the contents of this file?
thanks,
stew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:18:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393690: fixed in einstein 2.0.dfsg.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: asterisk-app-fax
Version: 0.0.20060218-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I was troubleshooting why another AGI script wasn't working, when I
discovered that whilst /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin is where receive_fax is
installed, /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf has
astagi
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Your help will be definitely appreciated.
>
> At first, I wanted to replace GPS 2.1.0 with the newest version, 4.0.0.
> I had some trouble compiling it but finally succeeded and found that it
> would crash with a Storage_Error whenever opening a project, or a
I wrote:
> Why can't I run gnatgdb against this?
Turns out that the version of gnat-gdb in -testing is rather old: from
2003! Upgrading to the version in -unstable fixed this problem, and
it's now able to attach to the LWP.
Not that it helped a whole lot. The stack trace looks like it's
smashed
Package: kdebase-data
Version: 4:3.5.5a-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
/usr/share/icons/crystalsvg/32x32/apps/thunderbird.png is a non-free
Thunderbird logo, which should be replaced by IceDove's logo similarly
to what was done for the Firefox logo.
Sorry for the new report. FWIW
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393660: fixed in php-imlib 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:02:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376017: fixed in axiom 20050901-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393874: fixed in kiwi 1.9.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
Followup-For: Bug #394021
sorry
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ia64
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
Followup-For: Bug #394021
Hi,
I think this is more a bug in jack; personally I think it's a really
bad idea to be carrying around all that clagged atomic operations
code, as it is likely to break. I'm not all that up on it, but IIRC
part of that code got moved
Em Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:21:43 +0200
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> When building 'kiwi' in a clean unstable chroot,
> I get the following error:
Hey there! Thanks for the bug report! I am very unhappy having to use
this Xvfb solution, but it was the only feasible one for the momen
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 03:39, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> ghdl_0.24+gcc4.1.1-1 can be compiled with a current version of sid.
>
> So it seems pretty clear this bug is due to a change from 0.24 to
> 0.25.
Hmmm... I'll see if upstream can help with this, but it can almost guarantee
it won't be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ghdl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ghdl
> forwarded 393831 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#393831: FTBFS on ia64: fails with ld assertion failure
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tag 393831 upstream help
Bug#39383
Package: chiark-tcl
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of chiark-tcl_1.0.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20061018-1956
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367983: fixed in gnuserv 3.12.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367983: fixed in gnuserv 3.12.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363277: fixed in gnuserv 3.12.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 17:12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: ghdl
> Version: 0.25+gcc4.1.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> ghdl no longer builds on IA64. The assertion failure in ld should be
> fixed (and I reported a bug upstream already), but apparently this is
> still a bug in the package.
>
tags 390169 +pending
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Maybe you misread the report? It's -dbg conflicting, not -dev.
indeed, thanks for insisting on it.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390169 +pending
Bug#390169: file conflict
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
-
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:47:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391234: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:47:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393053: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Mario,
> Did xawtv ever work for you? And if so: can you trace back when it
> stopped to do so?
It did not work for me, but I haven't tried it a longer time ago. I can
do a binary search with some packages from snapshot.debian.net if you
think that's useful.
> Oh, and what exactly do you mean
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392987: fixed in slang2 2.0.6-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392413: fixed in ttf2pt1 3.4.4-1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392386: fixed in texmaker 1.4-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:49:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392077: fixed in joe 3.5-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:51:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393581: fixed in qm 2.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Hello Michael,
I see you added this "rm -rf docs/html" call to debian/rules in the
previous upload which seems to be the culprit. If I remove it, everything
works fine again. Even building twice. So I wonder why exactly you added
it...? I'm of course a bit wary to just revert it.
Thijs
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:49:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393287: fixed in kernel-patch-kdb 4.4-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:48:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385732: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.48
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388993: fixed in rest2web 0.5.0.svn-r224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:51:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392140: fixed in prj2make-sharp 0.95-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: asterisk
Version: 1.0.7.dfsg.1-2sarge3
Severity: Critical
Tags: Security
Asterisk 1.0 and 1.2 versions up to and including 1.2.12.1 and 1.0.11 are
vulnerable to a remote, unauthenticated heap overflow leading to arbitrary
code execution as root.
New upstream releases 1.0.12 and 1.2.
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:51:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393797: fixed in pan 0.117-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:49:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392419: fixed in httrack 3.40.4-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:51:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392140: fixed in prj2make-sharp 0.95-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:49:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392077: fixed in joe 3.5-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392942: fixed in slang2 2.0.6-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # whoops, tbm a toute la raison
> reopen 393997
Bug#393997: libapache2-mod-proxy: Uninstallable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:52:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391938: fixed in sirc 2.211-9.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 393995 important
Bug#393995: Library under /usr/lib/libexscalibar1/plugins/ must not be
executable
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390169 serious
Bug#390169: file conflict
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tag 390169 - unreproducible
Bug#390169: file conflict
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Hi!
> Just for record, gecko-sharp should not enter testing.
> gecko-sharp2 is the replacement for it which is in testing and uses
> xulrunner instead of obsolete mozilla.
Shouldn't you be filing a removal bug then, to get the package removed
from Debian altogether?
Thijs
Disregard my last message. I set up a test environemtn with nullmailer
installed. nullmailer does in fact sends its error output to stdout
(apparently already filed as #329970, if I had but looked. Sigh).
I have patched the build scripts to handle this by testing for numeric
output, and will upl
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393997: libapache2-mod-proxy: Uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 393992 important
Bug#393992: /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so MUST not be
executable
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping pro
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-18
Severity: serious
On both a newly installed and an existing AMD64 system:
$ ls -1 /usr/sbin/grub*
/usr/sbin/grub
/usr/sbin/grub-floppy
/usr/sbin/grub-install.real
/usr/sbin/grub-md5-crypt
/usr/sbin/grub-reboot
/usr/sbin/grub-set-default
/usr/sbin/grub-terminfo
AFAIK
Thanks a lot. I am sorry I have been slow about this bug. I have been away from my debian machine this week. I really appreciate it.-- -
Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit
Version: 0.101.1-1
Severity: serious
jack-audio-connection-kit fails to build with gcc 4.1 and 4.2 with an
undefined reference to `__sync_fetch_and_add_si' error. This doesn't
happen when you use gcc 4.0. Since I have no idea whether this is a
bug in your packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391577 grave
Bug#391577: dvb-driver-source: Obsolete, Etch will be 2.6 only
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 393997 libapache2-mod-proxy-html
Bug#393997: libapache2-mod-proxy: Uninstallable
Warning: Unknown package 'libapache2-mod-proxy'
Bug reassigned from package `libapache2-mod-proxy' to
`libapache2-mod-proxy-html'.
> thanks
Stopping processing h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> package rest2web rest2web-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rest2web-doc rest2web
> tags 384054 + pending
Bug#384054: r2w has no manpage
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
retitle 390126 initscripts: chrooted() is not performing a valid check for
chroot
reopen 390126 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
Hi,
+chrooted() {
+ if [ -r /proc/1/root ]; then
+return 1
+ fi
+ return 0
+}
This check, which tests if the real '/' of PID1 is readable, is not a
va
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 390126 initscripts: chrooted() is not performing a valid check for
> chroot
Bug#390126: initscripts: breaks chroots and vservers
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> reopen 390126 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROT
reassign 393997 libapache2-mod-proxy-html
thanks
* Hadmut Danisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 22:51]:
> Package: libapache2-mod-proxy
There's no such package. Did you mean libapache2-mod-proxy-html?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 393983 important
Bug#393983: /usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-sysv.so is executable
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> On 17/10/06 at 19:27 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > > On 17/10/06 at 14:37 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > > Great. What is the output of
> > > > /usr/sbin/sendmail -d0 < /dev/null | head -1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # old kernel patches should not ship with the release, this *is* serious
> severity 393287 serious
Bug#393287: kernel-patch-kdb: Doesn't apply against 2.6.18
Severity set to `serious'
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:00:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Uninstallable due to unavailable gaim (<1:2.0)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:07:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing non-issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Package: libapache2-mod-proxy
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I can't install the package anymore, I guess it has to do with the
apache2 -> apach2.2 transition.
regards
Hadmut
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers uns
Package: pyracerz
Followup-For: Bug #393566
Apparently, this bug has been fixed in version 0.2-3.
FYI: I managed to remove the broken package (0.2-2) by inserting an
"exit 0" before the non-working call of "update-python-modules" in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/pyracerz.postrm and then running
"aptitude pu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 393996 important
Bug#393996: spl-core: files /usr/lib/spl_modules/*.so MUST not be executable
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processi
Hi!
I've uploaded an NMU for httrack to fix #392419.
The diff to the previous version is:
diff -Naurb httrack-3.40.4.eerst/debian/changelog
httrack-3.40.4/debian/changelog
--- httrack-3.40.4.eerst/debian/changelog 2006-10-18 22:29:25.0
+0200
+++ httrack-3.40.4/debian/changelog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 388527 normal
Bug#388527: viewvc: Version 1.0.1 is out
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Package: libexscalibar1
Severity: serious
Justification: executable `.so' files in subdirectories of /usr/lib (policy
10.2)
Hi, files under /usr/lib/ subdirectories must not be executable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/lib/libexscalibar1/plugins/*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 74216 2006-10-14 00:13
Hi!
I just uploaded an NMU for texmaker to fix #392386. A full diff
follows.
diff -Nabur texmaker-1.4.eerst/debian/changelog texmaker-1.4/debian/changelog
--- texmaker-1.4.eerst/debian/changelog 2006-10-18 22:16:38.0 +0200
+++ texmaker-1.4/debian/changelog 2006-10-18 22:33:06.5644
FWIW, one more data point: same crash with libgl1-mesa-glx, but
libgl1-mesa-glide3 on this old machine with 3dfx Voodoo3 works fine.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/grea
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.68.0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: executable `.so' files in subdirectories of /usr/lib (policy
10.2)
Hi,
flashplugin-nonfree installs /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so
with bad permission.
Policy says that .so files in subdirectories
Hi,
>Hi,
>
>Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> sorry - I meant both.
>
>Anthony, can you confirm? I can still reproduce the databse things with
>2.0.4-1, though (on sid/ppc), but that hopefully will be fixed in 2.0.4-2
>(at least works here with with the version I just built for testing)
I have too sid/pp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 393971 by 341486
Bug#393971: gchempaint - FTBFS: Build depends against unavailable package
libgcu-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 393971 added: 341486
> merge 393971 393038
Bug#393038: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgcu0
Package: spl-core
Version: 1.0~pre2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: executable `.so' files in subdirectories of /usr/lib (policy
10.2)
Hi,
Policy explains that files under subdirectories of /usr/lib must not be
executable. It appears that files of spl-core do not follow the policy.
[EMAIL
[ please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC so
this information also reaches whoever fixes the bug ]
Hi,
Thanks for your input.
Op wo, 18-10-2006 te 18:46 +, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Arjan,
>
> I am the developer of HSFFIG: here is a followup to what has come to my
> attention:
>
> Ar
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:06:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line python-vobject: #393892 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # this does not qualify as grave
> severity 393287 important
Bug#393287: kernel-patch-kdb: Doesn't apply against 2.6.18
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, sto
Package: gecko-sharp
Severity: serious
Just for record, gecko-sharp should not enter testing.
gecko-sharp2 is the replacement for it which is in testing and uses
xulrunner instead of obsolete mozilla.
--
Regards,
Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&sear
Package: quilt
Version: 0.45-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
when building 'quilt' on in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
[14] $ ls patches/ > series -- ok
[15] $ quilt mail --mbox mbox --prefix "test" --subject "This is a test" -m
"Message" -- failed
Could not determine the enve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Hi Josip!
You wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
>
> Didn't you notice that I was discussing it with the patch submitter?
> I realize it's NMU season, but there's also that little thing c
Arjan,
On 10/18/06, Arjan Oosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well there really is a Debian package :) It is maintained by John
Goerzen and for the package details see
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=hsffig
I am really wondering
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:33:23 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gettext 0.15 causes build failures in multiple packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: fakeroot
Version: 1.5.10
Severity: serious
Justification: executable `.so' files in subdirectories of /usr/lib (policy
10.2)
Fakeroot contains an executable .so. It does not follow our policy.
ls -l /usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot-sysv.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22728 2006-07-23 01:08
tags 386220 -sid
thanks
Hi,
> The new upstream version of gettext has improved checking of .po file
> syntax, which unfortunately is causing a number of build failures in
> unstable now. I'm filing this dummy bug to keep this version of gettext
> from propagating to etch until we have a handle o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386220 -sid
Bug#386220: gchangepass: FTBFS due to gettext 0.15
Tags were: pending sid patch
Tags removed: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
Didn't you notice that I was discussing it with the patch submitter?
I realize it's NMU season, but there's also that little thing called
politeness. >:(
--
2
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:50:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj: command not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
i think there should be a bugzilla dependency on a specific version of
dbconfig-common, so that bugzilla won't get promoted to testing
without a working dbconfig-common.
--jayen
--
Jayen Ashar
Verification Engineer, IBM
ECE+CS+robotics+languages, CMU '02
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
merge 393971 393038
thanks
Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> Automatic build of gchempaint_0.6.6-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
>> sbuild/s390 85
[...]
>> E: Couldn't find package libgcu-dev
Thanks. This has been already reported. The necessary
gno
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 389126 + moreinfo
Bug#389126: gnome-session: hangs at login with xorg 7.1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 393901 smart-notifier
Bug#393901: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (2)
Bug reassigned from package `hal' to `smart-notifier'.
> forcemerge 383099 393901
Bug#
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:18:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389633: fixed in smart 0.41+svn727-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi!
I just uploaded an NMU of joe, to fix #392077. A diff is attached.
--
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL
18 жовтня 2006 о 16:33 +0200 Frans Pop написав(-ла):
> Eugeniy: are you by any chance still working on this?
No, I am not going to work on that piece of crap called slang2. I was
able to read code of slang1 but not slang2.
--
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've fixed this bug in an NMU in order to keep etch progressing. I've used
the patch supplied by Bill Allombert. The final patch is attached.
Thijsdiff -u sirc-2.211/debian/control sirc-2.211/debian/control
--- sirc-2.211/debian/control
+++ sirc-2.211/debian/control
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
Source:
e[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/chiark-tcl-1.0.1'
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20061018-1845
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 393962 important
Bug#393962: Upgrade blows away configuration files if stored in
/etc/mediawiki1.7
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Package: gchempaint
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gchempaint_0.6.6-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotool
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
