On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:02:19PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 13:09 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > libapache2-mod-php4 has a dependency on apache2-mpm-prefork >> 2.0.52.
> > The ABI is broken with Apache 2.2, so it should either have a dependency
> > on apache2-common (
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Severity: Grave
openoffice.org crashes when opening any file. Have tried with .doc and
.ppt files
Update to openoffice.org-common and openoffice.org-java-common version
2.0.4~rc3-1 did not help! The problem remains.
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:14:13AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > The first one is that it attempts to touch a file in a directory that
> > does not exist. /etc/init.d/libnss-ldap needs /lib/init/rw to exist but
> > does not make sure.
> > Simple fix is to create the dir manually.
> You're
tags 390276 +pending
thanks
Fixed packages are available at http://dlgeek.net/gg/. They have been
approved by the maintainer and are waiting on a sponsor.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 364819 -1
Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu
Bug 364819 cloned as bug 390982.
> severity 364819 serious
Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu
Severity set to `serious' f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390276 +pending
Bug#390276: gaim-guifications: uninstallable with gaim2.0 from sid
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 390893 apache2
Bug#390893: apache2-common pre-removal script error ("undefined symbol:
apr_get_userid")
Bug reassigned from package `apache2-common' to `apache2'.
> found 390893 2.2.3-1
Bug#390893: apache2-common pre-removal script error ("un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 390796 serious
Bug#390796: no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules packages for current
nvidia-glx-legacy
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping proces
Package: libstlport5.1
Version: 5.0.99rc2-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ sudo apt-get install libstlport5.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed
libstlport5.1
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to r
reassign 390893 apache2
found 390893 2.2.3-1
thanks
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:21:02PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> Removing apache2-common ...
> Stopping apache 2.0 web server...apache2:
>Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf:
>Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/us
Oh, I'm sorry it wasn't obvious.
The problem is that
1) apache2-common's prerm runs /etc/init.d/apache2 stop, which
2) runs /usr/sbin/apache2 -t, which
3) parses the config files, and does a full apache setup, which
4) tries to load all the modules, but
5) apache2-mpm-prefork has already been rem
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390533: fixed in pykaraoke 0.5.0.ds1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388633: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: gnutls12
Severity: serious
This is an obsolete version of gnutls whose removal has been requested from
the archive. I'm filing this dummy bug to keep the package from re-entering
testing.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Devel
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388568: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389506: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389506: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 20:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389506: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: cddb.bundle
Version: 0.2-2.1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The cddb.bundle package has a hard-coded dependency on libgnustep-base1.11.
This needs to be updated for the gnustep transition.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Package: ecj-bootstrap-gcj
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: grave
upon removal of ecj-bootstrap-gcj, find starts recursing down / (with
errors), I'm thinking due to the find call in rebuild_db() of
rebuild-gcj-db. This happened while attemping to dpkg -P all of the build
depends of openoffice.org that
Hi,
I've compiled a new version of the package with --without-gcc-arch added to
./configure in debian/rules and placed it temporarily at
http://pkg-flash.alioth.debian.org/gnash/
I don't know if the error would be repetible with a package compiled in my
compiler, as I guess the version in Debian
Hi All
On Tue, Oct 03 2006, at 22:12 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for
> > > some
> > > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 382645 patch
Bug#382645: mypasswordsafe: FTBFS with sudo as gain-root command
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:51:02PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Your package fails to build from source with sudo as gain-root command
> as can be seen in the build log on the alpha buildd [1].
The problem is that qmake automatically creates 3 directories during
`make clean`. As clean is being called
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In the postinst, I get a dialog saying:
Configuring xserver-xorg
Empty value
A null entry is not permitted for this value.
OK
If I type Return,
On 26/09/06, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: sisu
> Version: 0.37.4-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> sisu's copyright file states that the package's content is by default
> under the GPL 2, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
> usr/share/sisu/ima
Your message dated Wed, 4 Oct 2006 02:21:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389500 closed by 0.47.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lirc-modules-source
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lirc-modules-source
> severity 390945 serious
Bug#390945: lirc-modules-source: Does not compile with Linux 2.6.17
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:36:15PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> * What does your /etc/rcS.d look like? In particular, do you have an S03udev
> symlink?
I just found out that upgrades from semi-old versions without purging
in-between would not make the new init script symlinks go into the
retitle 390926 libnss-ldap needs a versioned dependency on initscripts
thanks
(Taking it once more, this time in the BTS so others can get an idea of what
I think of the bug(s).)
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:22:13PM +0200, Jan Evert van Grootheest wrote:
> Package: libnss-ldap
> Version: 251-5.2
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 390926 libnss-ldap needs a versioned dependency on initscripts
Bug#390926: libnss-ldap: Startup scripts take ages to perform duties
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #390927: xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386: Xen kernel panics when booting,
> which was filed against the xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386 package.
>
> It has been closed by Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
>
Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-kpasswd
> Version: 1.4.2~fc4-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Every Debian box here, with a variety of kernels is now failing the
> klog command with:
Thanks, already fixed upstream. I'd thought it w
Hi,
> You asked for proxies: There is a squid in the network where I'm
> located, which should handle HTTP and FTP.
If you have apt proxy config in apt.conf, then it should be fixed now.
If you have http_proxy env var set; then you need to also set
SOAP_USE_PROXY=on also.
regards,
ju
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 390930 important
Bug#390930: data files should be in /usr/share/games
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390907 grave
Bug#390907: lirc-modules-source: Does not compile with Linux 2.6.18
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Package: python-central
Version: 0.5.5
Severity: critical
Justification: makes unrelated software on the system break
Hi!
First, feel free to downgrade the severity or reassign it to reportbug
(if the problem is on it).
Today I have uninstalled apt-listbugs (see #389681) to install and
update s
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:22:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389324: fixed in xgalaga 2.0.34-41
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 383060 critical
Bug#383060: splashy: Shouldn't move to Etch until we manage to solve initramfs
issues
Severity set to `critical' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping
Package: d4x-common
Version: 2.5.7.1-3
Severity: serious
Hello Debian QA Group,
There is an error when upgrading d4x-common from sarge to etch,
Selecting previously deselected package d4x-common.
Unpacking d4x-common (from .../d4x-common_2.5.7.1-3_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 390364 patch
Bug#390364: chinput: FTBFS: error: X11/IntrinsicP.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
tag 390364 patch
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:01:32PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
[...]
> This looks like a missing build dependency on libxt-dev.
Yes, with an added libxt-dev build-dep the package builds fine
within pbuilder.
The (primitiv
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390533 + pending
Bug#390533: pykaraoke - FTBFS: dh_pysupport: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:57:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390505: libicu36: openoffice.org-2.0.4~rc2-2 hangs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.22
Severity: serious
Hello Debian X Strike Force,
There is an error when upgrading x11-common from sarge to etch,
Selecting previously deselected package x11-common.
(Reading database ... 88175 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking x11-com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fathi wrote:
> hi,
>
> me too, i'm unable to reproduce the bug on unstable.
> You can take a look at /var/log/dpkg.log for your recent changes.
> Michael Biebl seems to reproduce
> it. Is it also on testing ? I'm not sure it is caused by kaffeine.
>
>
Package: openafs-kpasswd
Version: 1.4.2~fc4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Every Debian box here, with a variety of kernels is now failing the
klog command with:
__ctype_tolower_loc()= 0xb7df06ac
strcpy(0xbfad6c64, "STLLP.SANJOSE.IBM.COM")
El Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:24:59 -0400
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Jose Antonio Salgueiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: libicu36
> > Version: 3.6-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > See bug reports: #390106, #390133, #390128
> > gdb
forcemerge 390874 390928
thanks
Bastian Blank writes:
> unmerge 390928
> severity 390928 grave
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye.
>
> Wrong bug. libgcj7-0 was not sheduled for installation.
same bug.
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 390928
Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable
Bug is not marked as being merged with any others.
> severity 390928 grave
Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable
Severity set to `grave' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390488 +moreinfo
Bug#390488: pan: freezes at random intervals
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
unmerge 390928
severity 390928 grave
thanks
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye.
Wrong bug. libgcj7-0 was not sheduled for installation.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon
forcemerge 390874 390928
thanks
even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye.
Bastian Blank writes:
> Package: gij-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-15
> Severity: grave
>
> | Setting up gij-4.1 (4.1.1-15) ...
> | gcj-dbtool-4.1: error while loading shared libraries: libgcj.so.70: cannot
> open shared object f
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:10:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#390927: xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386: Xen
kernel panics when booting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:44:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some
> > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a
> > set
> > +e block):
>
> > db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE"
> > retval
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and
> Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files
> which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but
> which are not DFSG-compliant from sourc
hey there,
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 13:09 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> libapache2-mod-php4 has a dependency on apache2-mpm-prefork >> 2.0.52.
> The ABI is broken with Apache 2.2, so it should either have a dependency
> on apache2-common (which is called apache2.2-common with Apache 2.2) or
> a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 390773
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 390773 important
Bug#
* Theodore Tso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061003 21:19]:
> I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and
> Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files
> which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but
> which are not DFSG-compliant f
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
This version of libnss-ldap attempts to do something about the issue
that the ldap server might be unreachable due to not-yet started
services. (i.e. bind-policy soft)
Well. There are two simple techn
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 01:11:00PM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
>> After an upgrade to 251-5.2, during the boot sequence i have an
>> increasing timeout during udev initialization (16, 32, 64 seconds).
> I confirm that. No fix with -5.2 too.
OK, let's see.
* What does your /etc/rcS.d look like?
i also experience this bug.
im turning off statistics to see what happens.
--
Chris Taylor
House Music Corp.
http://geeks.homelinux.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: glob2-data
Version: 0.8.21-2
Severity: serious
As said in subject,
the data files of games should be in /usr/share/games
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (650, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bi
reopen 390773
severity 390773 important
stop
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> I don't have another system of similar age to upgrade to try to
> reproduce it.
I was suggesting downgrading and reupgrading, via snapshot, perhaps in
a pbuilder?
I'll try to reproduce this WE, reopening for
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-15
Severity: grave
| Setting up gij-4.1 (4.1.1-15) ...
| gcj-dbtool-4.1: error while loading shared libraries: libgcj.so.70: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
| dpkg: error processing gij-4.1 (--configure):
| subprocess post-installation sc
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386
Version: 3.0.2-3+hg9762-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When booting Xen Dom0 on my Dell 2950, the kernel panics. I have been
unable to get the serial console working under xen (works under normal
kernels), so the best debugging info
Hi there,
I've caught this work-around:
% rm -rf ~/.openoffice.org2 # Sorry, it seems to be necessary
% export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
then
% ooffice # should work!
Hope this helps!
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390488 +needinfo
Unknown tag/s: needinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 316321 apache2.2-common
Bug#316321: reload must not start not-running apache
Bug reassigned from package `apache2-common' to `apache2.2-common'.
>
End of message, stopping p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387875 important
Bug#387875: [PR29206] gcj-dbtool segfauls on hppa-linux and arm-linux
Bug#388505: gcj-dbtool-4.1 call in postinst segfaults on fresh installs on arm,
hppa
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing
severity 387875 important
thanks
there's an ugly workaround in gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15, which just ignores
gcj-dbtool's exit value. If the classmap db cannot be found, then gij
isn't able to use the precompiled java byte-code. Call it a missed
optimization for now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364819 - unreproducible
Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu
Tags were: upstream unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> severity 364819 important
Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu a
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389990: fixed in libcrypt-rijndael-perl 0.05-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389988: fixed in libunicode-map-perl 0.112-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xawtv
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xawtv
> tag 390287 patch
Bug#390287: xawtv: Don't show any tv
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Package: gnash
Version: 0.7.1+cvs20060924.1330-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Steps to reproduce:
1) gnash foo.swf
Expected results:
1) gnash opens a window and shows output of the interpreter flash program.
Actual results:
1) gnash crashes with the following message:
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:47:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389874: fixed in libtime-piece-perl 1.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
tags 364819 - unreproducible
severity 364819 important
thanks
gij-4.1 now ignores the unaligned accesses. by running the interpreter
with "prctl --unaligned=default". ecj-bootstrap did build on the
buildd.
I dont't see db4.4 build failures on alpha, the build failures on hppa
have a workaround. l
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This is out of scope of debian-legal, I think, because it's not a
>> matter of interpreting the DFSG or a license. It's really matter for
>> the FTP masters and the Release manager, I think.
FWIW, I'm happy to say as an FTP master that the requireme
Salut,
to reproduce this bug run "kaffeine -session meuh", kaffeine will lauch but
will not appears in systray or as a normal window (ps aux | grep kaffeine
will show it). Any latter kaffeine run will not do anything because
kaffeine only use on instance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Are you able to reproduce? Perhaps you have a dpkg.log?
Sure, I have logs, http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/logs.tgz
I don't have another system of similar age to upgrade to try to
reproduce it.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:17:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385980: fixed in grub 0.97-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Stephan A. Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri Sep 29 15:21:56 2006):
> Joshua Rodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun Sep 10 14:06:46 2006):
(...)
>> Symptoms:
>>
>> uae-x brings up the configuration screen without problem. When the
>> system is "unpaused", the classic amiga grey screens begin to appear
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:17:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387729: fixed in grub 0.97-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Adding submitter for bug #387500, as well as Petter Reinholdtsen who
>> provided a fix, to Cc. This bug and #387500 were basically different
>> aspects of the same problem (failure of grub-install in d-i and on
>> grub updates), therefore #387500 is
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:17:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389879: fixed in libopengl-perl 0.54.alan1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yes you should IMO because the current dh_python assumes pycompat==2 if
> there's no pycompat file and if there's a Python-Version control field.
>
> That's because pycompat has only been introduced after the start of the
> migration when Josselin decided to change his min
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> Now that I've purged python-gst and reinstalled it, I cannot reproduce
> the bug. I assume this means it's upgrade order dependant.
One thing I was told might happen is that some *.pyc files are left
behind when switching from pycentral to pysupport (not
"Pier Luigi Pau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In debian/rules, in fact, a line to install the wrapper to /usr/sbin is
> missing:
The wrapper isn't need on /usr/bin but the wrapper needs to check the
.real script or it'll fail.
> I understand that a wrapper in /usr/sbin is not wanted and this i
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Randall,
>
Howdy Steve,
> The nvidia-glx-legacy package is uninstallable in unstable, and not being
> updated in testing, because there are no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
> packages built for the current version. As this prev
Hi
> The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some
> reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a set
> +e block):
> db_input "$PRIORITY" "$TEMPLATE"
> retval=$?
> if [ $retval -ne 0 ] ; then debug_echo "v_s_d_i/db_input $PRIORITY $TEMP
tags 390902 + confirmed
retitle 390902 Fails to start when Composite is enabled
thanks
Tom Parker wrote:
Running electricsheep from command line gets the following
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] electricsheep
X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
Major opcode of failed re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390902 + confirmed
Bug#390902: electricsheep dies: X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid
parameter attributes)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> retitle 390902 Fails to start when Composite is enabled
Bug#390902: electricshee
hi,
me too, i'm unable to reproduce the bug on unstable. You can take a look at
/var/log/dpkg.log for your recent changes. Michael Biebl seems to reproduce
it. Is it also on testing ? I'm not sure it is caused by kaffeine.
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I'm closing the bug as I think you reported against the wrong version,
> but please reopen if you still get the bug with 0.10.5-5 and send me
> the output of:
> import pygst
> pygst.require("0.10")
> import gst
> print gst.gst_version, gst.pygst_version
Yes,
Hi,
I'm unable to reproduce this in testing. If this is the result of an
upgrade, please try to identify which package upgrade triggered the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message blocked by mail server.
Missatge original
Assumpte: Re: tomcat5 don't find the ejc.jar
Data: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:54:33 +0200
De: Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: Ruben Puettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
I do
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:02:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323511: fixed in glib1.2 1.2.10-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
As this prevents bug #372252 from
being fixed in testing, this will most probably result in nvidia-glx-legacy
being dropped from etch if new binary packages aren't made available soon.
This bug does not prevent #372252 from being fixed in testing. britney
is simply unhappy about introducing a
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
