Hi Bill and Steve,
2006/9/26, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > 2006/9/25, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >Package: nut
> > >Version: 2.0.4-2
> > >Severity: serious
> > >There is an error when attempting to purge nut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 381452 - fixed
Bug#381452: emacs21: FTBFS on mips, mipsel
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389415: fixed in wordnet 1:2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385295: fixed in siege 2.65-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.54
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
After upgrading from 0.0.53 to 0.0.54 I get the following message:
E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Le sous-processus if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep
Package: jpilot
Version: 0.99.9.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
jpilot fails to start and segfault.
I've rebuiled it unstripped and ran ii in gdb,
here is the backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 47675884812704 (LWP
* Mike Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On 21-Sep-06, at 1:38 AM, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> >>>If this isn't possible, could we at least get a stay of execution?
> >>>Etch is going into deep freeze in less than a month. Would it be
> >>>possible to resolve this after the release?
> >>>
> >>
>
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> severity 389542 grave
The only reason it's still not installable is that the binNMU for libpisock
has not yet arrived in the archive... So actually we should close this bug,
though with kde it might be better to wait till it's actually fixed as kde
users like to report the
Package: meta-gnome2
Severity: grave
Version: 1:2.14.3.2
Hi,
the current gnome meta-package fails with this:
---snipp---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome: Depends: gnome-desktop-environment (= 1:2.14.3.2) but it is not
going to be installed
Depends: rhythmbox (>=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389542 grave
Bug#389542: kde: can't be installed due to broken dependencies
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388611 serious
Bug#388611: python-scipy-core: empty package on sparc
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 388611 serious
thanks
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:02:19AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> python-scipy-core failed to build back in June due to postinst problems
> with python2.4-minimal. Would it be possible to trigger a retry?
Hi,
I've tried building the package in a pbuilder chroot
Hello,
It looks like KDE 3.5.5 will have Kopete 0.12.x, a big update over the
version shipped in KDE 3.5.4.
Could you please test whether that version of Kopete still suffers from
the bug? It's currently available unofficially from
http://manfred.cp69.de/debian. I'd really appreciate it if tho
Package: libcrypto++5.2c2a
Version: 5.2.1c2a-3
Severity: serious
It appears that libcrypto++ is compiled with support for the IDEA block
cipher algorithm, which is patented in the US and in Europe until 2010
or thereabouts. Please see Bug #65368 for details.
It may be that RC2, RC5 and RC6 (all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388611 grave
Bug#388611: python-scipy-core: empty package on sparc
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 375472 patch
Bug#375472: libcfitsio3-dev: missing /usr/lib/libcfitsio.so symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:23:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old NMUs directly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:23:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old NMUs directly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:24:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old NMUs directly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The kernel image provided by Debian freezes my system without notice. No
relations with used program nor
up-time uses. The system slow down fasta until freeze. All commands and
console
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 310979 pending
Bug#310979: rssreader.app: rssreader hangs at various times
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 352392 pending
Bug#352392: rssreader.app: FTBFS due to unmet bui
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375472 grave
Bug#375472: libcfitsio3-dev: missing /usr/lib/libcfitsio.so symlink
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 381452 + fixed
Bug#381452: emacs21: FTBFS on mips, mipsel
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 326810 + fixed
Bug#326810: dokuwiki: When you select "local network" on configuration, it
misses to add an entry for localhost
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 340028 + fixed
Bug#340028: dokuwiki: package should recommend imagemagic
Brent S. Elmer wrote:
> I moved qtrc out of the way. I don't think there is any difference.
>
> (gdb) r
> Starting program: /home/brente/firegl/fireglcontrol
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread -176896 (LWP 25293)]
> Qt: gdb: -nograb added to command-line options.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389506 + pending
Bug#389506: fails to configure with debconf
Tags were: patch
Bug#388568: xserver-xorg: postinst can hang
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:36:10PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
- tools="/bin/blockdev-keygen /sbin/dmsetup /sbin/cryptsetup"
+ tools="$tools /sbin/dmsetup /sbin/cryptsetup /lib/libpopt.so.0"
This won't work, I think? We test for [ -x $tool ] further down
in crypto_check
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:03:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of simba 0.8-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 356654 serious
Bug#356654: apt-spy: FTP response 550 and HTTP error 404 from servers that are
up
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processi
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:03:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of otrs2 2.0.4p01-14.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
tags 389506 + pending
thanks
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:11:20PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> I installed etch from a beta3 CD and upgraded to sid. After installing
> xserver-xorg to satisfy the dependency of fglrx-driver, I got a dia
Package: teapop-pgsql
Version: 0.3.7-4.1+b1
Severity: serious
Hello Nick,
There is an error when attempting to purge teapop-pgsql:
Removing teapop-pgsql ...
Purging configuration files for teapop-pgsql ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/teapop-pgsql.postrm: line 28: update-inetd: command not
found
d
Package: bidentd
Version: 1.0.10.dfsg-0.1
Severity: serious
Hello Wesley,
There is an error when attempting to purge bidentd:
Removing bidentd ...
Purging configuration files for bidentd ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/bidentd.postrm: line 15: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:32:28AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Package: dcc
> Version: 1.3.42-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: violating DFSG §5 and DFSG §6
>
> * This agreement is not applicable to any entity which sells anti-spam
> * solutions to others or provides an anti
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 20:10, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Both commands exist in fact. get_revision is used to generate
> package_full_revision.txt, and get_base_revision_id is used to
> generate package_revision.txt. Both of these commands require a
> monotone workspace though, and the tarball do
Package: smartpm
Version: 0.41+svn727-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Executing smart gives this error:
error: 'rpm' python module is not available
Installing python-rpm fixes the problem.
Since we don't use rpms maybe it would be better to patch smartpm than to add a
Package: smartpm
Version: 0.41+svn727-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
Smartpm installs its modules in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/smart, but the
first line of /usr/bin/smart says:
#!/usr/bin/python
Since I have both python2.3 and python2.4 installed, m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389274 nvidia-graphics-modules-i386
Bug#389274: nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-686: not built against the latest kernel
Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-686' to
`nvidia-graphics-modules-i386'.
> merge 389274 384261
Bug#384261: nvid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 386814 grave
Bug#386814: debian uae 0.8.25 fails to boot roms in any configuration
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Joost Witteveen wrote:
On 26/09/06, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The thing is, it doesn't even build on i386. So I don't understand how
you uploaded it.
It builds on my recent testing machine. I admit I should have used
pbuilder.
Just as a datapoint: wor
I believe I'm hit by this bug to.
I also believe #389416 is a dupe of this bug.
I see there is a patch submitted and I hope the bug will be fixed
soon. Is there an ETA?
I didn't manage how to revert to an older version of the package.
My workaround;
1) install xserver-xorg-video-vesa
2) backup
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355245: fixed in lam 7.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:33:34PM +0200, geiger wrote:
> I have read through the bug-report and I have to admit that I am
> surprised. Swami is a soundfile editor and therefore it can be
> used to generate soundfonts, so in Steve's word a "cut-and-dried"
> case.
For my own edificati
Package: pdnsd
Version: 1.2.4par-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject: pdnsd: Does NOT install::MAYBE adduser or
directories-owner/permission problems
-- System Information:
Debian Release: etch
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i
On 9/26/06, Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The bug still happens with 0.30. I was browsing the monotone-devel
archives and something went *tick* in my head:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> The monotone-0.30.tar.gz tarball shipped with package_revision.txt set
> to `unknown'. Should this be fi
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for looking into this. Is there some work-around that will get
> > past the jadetex problem (as I guess you found, it was precisely the
> > same error message).
>
> Sorry for forgetting t
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:58:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389590: gnutls-bin: Illegal packet received
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, latex-ucs-doc should not start shipping directories that were
>> symlinks all the time. What's your version of latex-ucs-doc? If it is
>> 20041017-5 or older, then this is a duplicate of #388376. Please
>> upgrade to 20041017-6 in unstable where the
Hi, I have the same problem.
After the upgrade (one or two days ago) my fonts started to show those
symptons.
This is my aptitude log (sorry, but it is in spanish):
===
Registro completado.
Aptitude 0.4.3: informe de
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 18:37 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for looking into this. Is there some work-around that will get
>> > past the jadetex problem (as I guess you found, it was precisely the
>> > s
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is actually a bug in latex-ucs-doc not in tex-common which has been
> reported (#388376 and #388407) before. It is fixed in latex-ucs
> 20041017-6. If I interpret latex-ucs's changelog correctly, this problem
> was introduced in version 20041017-4 upl
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:48:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389299: fixed in linuxlogo 4.14-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:49:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389315: fixed in strigi 0.3.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hey David,
Thanks for adding the checks.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:37:59PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> This leaves libpopt0 and cdebconf-newt-entropy
cdebconf-newt-entropy is already taken care of through db_capb;
blockdev-keygen will return an error dialog if it needs but cannot
find the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 389274 grave
Bug#389274: nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-686: not built against the latest kernel
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> merge 389274 384261
Bug#384261: nvidia-ke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #>> merge 389584 388376
> #> Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
> close 389584 20041017-6
Bug#389584: tex-common: file confict with latex-ucs
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
Hey again,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:37:59PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> This leaves libpopt0 and cdebconf-newt-entropy
>
> I've committed a preliminary test for the presence of those two libs to
> crypto_check_required_tools.
case $1 in
dm-crypt)
- tools="/bin
I moved qtrc out of the way. I don't think there is any difference.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/brente/firegl/fireglcontrol
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -176896 (LWP 25293)]
Qt: gdb: -nograb added to command-line options.
Use the -dograb option to
> No, latex-ucs-doc should not start shipping directories that were
> symlinks all the time. What's your version of latex-ucs-doc? If it is
> 20041017-5 or older, then this is a duplicate of #388376. Please
> upgrade to 20041017-6 in unstable where the bug is fixed. If it still
Yes, that fixe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389584 latex-ucs-doc
Bug#389584: tex-common: file confict with latex-ucs
Bug reassigned from package `tex-common' to `latex-ucs-doc'.
> merge 389584 388376
Bug#388376: latex-ucs-doc: installs files into /usr/share/texmf/doc against
Debian TeX
reassign 389584 latex-ucs-doc
merge 389584 388376
stop
Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /usr/share/texmf/doc is a directory in package latex-ucs-doc, but a
> symlink in tex-common 0.29.
>
> So IMHO tex-common should conflict (replace?) with latex-ucs-doc and
> latex-ucs-doc should change
Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the cc; this information should be
recorded in the bug report.
Brent S. Elmer wrote:
> I downloaded qt-x11-free-dbg and ran your debug version of
> fireglcontrol. I didn't download the source to debug but here is the
> gdb info anyway:
As far as I can tell, it's
Package: gnutls-bin
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: grave
I recently upgraded the gnutls-bin package, and I can no longer
use gnutls to connect over TLS to the SMTP server I use. starttls
works fine with the same server. Below is the output from gnutls-cli.
gnutls-cli -d 2 smtp.mail.gatech.edu -p 25
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 389456 partman-crypto
Bug#389456: p-a-c: Fails to configure encrypted volumes
Bug reassigned from package `partman-auto-crypto' to `partman-crypto'.
> found 389456 13
Bug#38
Willi Mann wrote:
> Package: tex-common
> Version: 0.28
> Severity: serious
> Justification: file (directory) conflict, breaks upgrade
>
> Sorry for german, but with today's upgrade run I got:
>
> Entpacke Ersatz für tex-common ...
> dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
> /var/cache/apt/archives/tex
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. Is there some work-around that will get
> past the jadetex problem (as I guess you found, it was precisely the
> same error message).
Sorry for forgetting to mention the workaround.
mv /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf /etc/t
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:52:28AM -0400, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> Hi Robert
>
> On Monday 25 September 2006 10:17, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> > > Venerable Maintainers of Grub,
> > >
> > > I offer you a patch that should clos
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > * xserver-xorg/config/device/driver: vesa
>
> Does this also happen with the 'ati' driver?
No, it works, but this driver is almost unusable with my card: it
supports max 8bit colour, so GNUstep apps won't run, and it totally
messes the console colours making it garbled
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:02:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 09:51, Frans Pop wrote:
Also, if loading modules can result in new devices, update-dev (from
di-utils) needs to be called.
Again, grep in hwdetect for examples.
Adding a 'depmod -a' does fix the problem.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:37:31PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> clone 388115 -1
> reassign -1 jadetex
> retitle -1 40jadetex.cnf is missing magic header
> tags -1 -pending
> stop
>
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And some more questions.
>
> No more answers needed. The bug was
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:47:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388067: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 26/09/06, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:>> >which is just garbage. static const char Id[] = "..." would make sense.
> Well, this sounds very reasonable in dead.
>> >How does th
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.28
Severity: serious
Justification: file (directory) conflict, breaks upgrade
Sorry for german, but with today's upgrade run I got:
Entpacke Ersatz für tex-common ...
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
/var/cache/apt/archives/tex-common_0.29_all.deb (--unpack):
versu
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388840: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:23:45PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:15:57AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > I have tested the patches provided by Michael Ablassmeier and Christian
> > Aichinger, and I have confirmed that applying both these patches together
> >
Philip Craig a écrit :
it seemed to be the apache.pem key cert. Not the config files.
Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
* Philip Craig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 10:43]:
I have more info. I did a stack trace with apache-ssl.dbg built from
source, and it was crashing in libssl.
i test 'apache-ss
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382038: fixed in fglrx-driver 8.28.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> >which is just garbage. static const char Id[] = "..." would make sense.
> Well, this sounds very reasonable in dead.
>
> >How does that build on any architecture?
>
> As expected fin
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Eric,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:32:38AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > I hope you're fine, it's been a long time since we met in Barcelona,
> > years ago... Are you still there ?
>
> > I'm dealing with bug #385665 and your help would be gr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 374996 0.7.1+cvs20060924.1330-1
Bug#374996: kills all your processes (including browser) on open a web page
with flash
Bug marked as found in version 0.7.1+cvs20060924.1330-1.
Hi Robert
On Monday 25 September 2006 10:17, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:26:37PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> > Venerable Maintainers of Grub,
> >
> > I offer you a patch that should close bug report
> > #345931.
> >
> > The patch has been built on top of grub-0.9
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #> Bug 388115 cloned as bug 389550.
> #> Bug reassigned from package `tetex-base' to `jadetex'.
> #
> # Helm-a-lee
> reassign 389550 tex-common
Bug#389550: 40jadetex.cnf is missing magic header
Bug reassigned from package `jadetex' to `tex-common'.
> r
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
which is just garbage. static const char Id[] = "..." would make sense.
Well, this sounds very reasonable in dead.
How does that build on any architecture?
As expected fine on i386 and probably better than before on any other.
So if you commit tha
Package: fluxbox
Version: 0.9.14-1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
i've happy used fluxbox for long time, but 2 days ago it won't
start. But the strange thing is that if i create a new users, with no
groups at all, it starts fine. So i removed .fluxbox on my
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389382: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.17-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Okay, just dput a fix.
Sorry for all the libs trouble w/ this package. It is a strange
situation: the ABI is (at least in principle) utterly unstable across
releases for the bits of the library that upstream uses, but the calls
into the library that are blessed for external use should be stable.
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:15:57AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I have tested the patches provided by Michael Ablassmeier and Christian
> Aichinger, and I have confirmed that applying both these patches together
> fixes the problem.
>
> I'm attaching the full interdiff output of the upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386491 + fixed
Bug#386491: FTBFS on sparc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:05:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line build-dep on automake1.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 386781 0.7.1+cvs20060924.1330-1
Bug#386781: Crashes browser
Bug marked as found in version 0.7.1+cvs20060924.1330-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 388239 + fixed
Bug#388239: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common,
probably ucf)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Subject: Conflict between fglrx-driver and xserver-xorg-core
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.28.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
There's a conflict between fglrx-driver and xserver-xorg-core. When I try to
install the fg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 388231 + fixed
Bug#388231: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common,
probably ucf)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:40:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of postfix-policyd 1.80-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 388219 + fixed
Bug#388219: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common,
probably ucf)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:31:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of webcalendar 1.0.4-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: classpath-gtkpeer
Version: 2:0.92-3
Severity: grave
I'm still seeing upgrade problems:
Selecting previously deselected package classpath-gtkpeer.
Unpacking classpath-gtkpeer (from
.../classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_powerpc.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/classp
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:05:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Eric,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:32:38AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > I hope you're fine, it's been a long time since we met in Barcelona,
> > years ago... Are you still there ?
>
> > I'm dealing with bug #385665 a
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 05:25:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389546: Conflict between fglrx-driver and xserver-xorg-core
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:47:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388235: fixed in simba 0.8.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
