On 26/09/06, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:51:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> >which is just garbage.  static const char Id[] = "..." would make sense.
> Well, this sounds very reasonable in dead.
>
> >How does that build on any architecture?
>
> As expected fine on i386 and probably better than before on any other.
> So if you commit that it compiles on ia64 chances seems to be good for
> any other, IMHO.

The thing is, it doesn't even build on i386.  So I don't understand how
you uploaded it.


Just as a datapoint: wordnet with the abovementioned fix compiles fine on amd64.
The line 'static ld="hello"; ' doesn't compile with gcc 3.3, 4.0, 4.1 on amd64, but it does compile fine on i386 with gcc 3.3 and 4.0 (didn't have 4.1 installed on i386). So maybe a different compiler was used for the i386 build.

Reply via email to