Hi,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:35:46 +0200, Nicolas François
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> reassign 389291 libselinux1-dev thanks
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:20:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Could you check if changing "-lpthread" to "-pthread" works?
> Yes, it works. Thanks.
> It also wor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387762 important
Bug#387762: proxy_arp for host network device has to be set to 1
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381272: fixed in heroes 0.21-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 19:38 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Since the upgrade to X.org 7.1 the server crashes always on startup.
> I didn't change my configuration and this never hapenned before.
> Here's the end of Xorg.0.log:
>
> Ba
severity 387762 important
thanks
Hi Sebastian
I have now looked at this problem and determined that it is only a documentation
issue. This is what I have added to the code.
if [ $(cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/$DEV/proxy_arp) == 0 ] ; then
vzwarning "Function proxy_arp for $DEV is set to 0
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.14.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #389126
I've been going through the strace, and I see at line 102641, (pid?) 4962
calls an ioctl to read fd 15, from which it never returns. Not sure where it's
getting fd 15 from, though, or where (pid?) 4962 comes from.
-- System Infor
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357326: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357326: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327288: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357326: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327288: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.14.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #389126
I've tried a few times to attach my strace of gnome-session with no luck, so
it's at:
http://touset.org/gnome-session.gz
I currently have no python-dbus packages installed.
pn python-dbus (no description availa
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327288: fixed in gs-gpl 8.54.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:25:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389459: cacti-cactid: purging the package fails (ucf
unavailable)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Em Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:18:28 +0200 (CEST)
Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> There's a new Gnash package in Debian SID. As there have been many
> changes upstream, I'm not sure if you're still getting the bug
> #384904 ("gnash simply segfaults"). Can you check it and confirm
> whether thi
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:02:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Package: cmus
Version: 2.0.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #389422
Hi,
I've just tested cmus with the latest libmodplug0c2 package and it
didn't crash with the generated AMF file by the program attached in the
bugreport.
cmus is *not* linked statically against libmodplug. it uses plugins
loaded at startup
The problem was fixed by setting my debconf priority to 'low'.
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:04, David Härdeman wrote:
> Agreed...the problem is probably with the on-demand loading of modules
> and not with p-a-c. It's weird though, partman-crypto-dm does rely
> on the virtual crypto-modules package...
>
> Did the syslog have any failure messages wrt. udeb d
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:51:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old NMUs directly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:51:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old NMUs directly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: grave
I installed etch from a beta3 CD and upgraded to sid. After installing
xserver-xorg to satisfy the dependency of fglrx-driver, I got a dialog
box saying:
Empty value: A null entry is not permitted for this value.
Hitting OK just causes it
Package: kde-icons-crystalclear
Version: 0.0.20050623-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
kde-icons-crystalclear's copyright file indicates that the package is
under the LGPL, but a non-LGPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/crystalclear/48x48/apps/firefox.png (and others).
A
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Considering the idea of a "feature freeze" for "grub" and a move to
> > try and consolidate "grub2" instead, I think this solution is simpler
> > to use than Solution 1 and 2.
>
> I tend to agree
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.28.8-1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
can't build, check the build log in attachment
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
Package: sisu
Version: 0.37.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
sisu's copyright file states that the package's content is by default
under the GPL 2, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/sisu/image/firefox.png. Additionally, sisu is in main but the
Firefox icon is not
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:39:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389460: debian-installer: netinst image is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi Guenter,
I hope you're fine, it's been a long time since we met in Barcelona,
years ago... Are you still there ?
I'm dealing with bug #385665 and your help would be greatly
appreciated.
Someon is requesting to move fluidsynth from main/ to contrib/ arguing
that 'fluidsynth needs non-free m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 364213 pending
Bug#364213: libwbxml2: Package should rather be named libwbxml2-0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 382616 pending
Bug#382616: package is unusable for standal
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 11:25:53PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:53:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
/var/log/syslog shows:
kernel: device-mapper: crypt: Error allocating crypto tfm
kernel: device-mapper: error adding target to table
kernel: device-mapper: device doesn't appea
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23c-1
Severity: grave
When I upgrade to samba 3.0.23c-1 the shares causes a segmentation fault
in the smbd, but the process don't stop.
Here is a copy of the email send to root:
--- BEGIN ---
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugg
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:57:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380587: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:57:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358300: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:44:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384211: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:57:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358300: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:57:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380587: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:52:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385703: fixed in maxima 5.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Le lundi 25 septembre 2006 à 17:14 -0400, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> Package: gnome-themes-extras
> Version: 0.9.0-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> gnome-themes-extras's copyright file indicates that the package is under
> the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:52:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340151: fixed in maxima 5.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 369517 + pending
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to
allocate percpu data
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping bluez-pin
> **
> Finished at 20060925-1808
> Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space
Bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love.
-- Commissioner Nan
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:48:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389173: fixed in gnome-osd 0.11.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382245: fixed in libcairo-perl 1.01-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: grave
Tags: pending, upstream, fixed-upstream
See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29132.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:49:35 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 24 septembre 2006 à 23:32 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
[...]
> > Here, the restriction clearly forbids creating a derivative work
> > that is a drop-in replacement of the original, and thus interferes
> > with interoperabi
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:52:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338215: fixed in maxima 5.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:52:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389302: fixed in maxima 5.10.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > In file included from linux-joystick.c:9:
> > /usr/include/linux/joystick.h:114: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
> > before 'int32_t'
> > make[1]: *** [linux-joystick.o] Error 1
AFAIK this was a tr
Package: gnome-themes-extras
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
gnome-themes-extras's copyright file indicates that the package is under
the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/Nuvola/scalable/apps/firefox.svg. Additionally,
gnome-themes-extra
Package: gdm
Severity: grave
Tags: patch l10n d-i
This is due to changes in location where information about locale is
stored. Attached patch fixes this problem. This bug may not be "grave"
for gdm itself, but IMHO it is release-critical for d-i.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/uns
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:53:31PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> /var/log/syslog shows:
> kernel: device-mapper: crypt: Error allocating crypto tfm
> kernel: device-mapper: error adding target to table
> kernel: device-mapper: device doesn't appear to be in the dev hash table.
> partman-crypto: Command
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 389447 + pending
Bug#389447: openoffice.org-core: uninstallable in unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
tag 389447 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Michael Prokop wrote:
> % sudo apt-get install openoffice.org openoffice.org-core
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you ar
Jaakko Hyvätti schreef:
> I implemented --nordtsc and --slow options, and put out 1.8.2 version..
> http://www.iki.fi/hyvatti/pic/picprog.html
When I try to download this file I get an error:
| Forbidden
|
| You don't have permission to access /~jaakko/pic/picprog-1.8.2.tar.gz on this
server.
Package: xmms-sid
Version: 0.7.4+0.8.0beta15-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The current package has an unresolved symbol, probably introduced by a
new xmms package with less third-party patches.
Output when running xmms:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ xmms
/usr/lib/xmms/
Package: debian-installer
Severity: grave
Current netinst package is broken. Installation stops just before
"Detecting network hardware ..." step. There is no way to run it (d-i
returns to main menu). Most of translations are missing in main menu. In
syslog there are many string like "INFO: Fallin
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:36:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> is any kind soul out there that is able to send me a patch
> for this problem. I have no real idea what to do.
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main wordnet 1:2.0g-14 (tar) [5464kB]
Where's the source?
> >cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:37:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by 2.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:37:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed by 2.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # tagging bug fixed in NEW but not mentionned in changelog
> tags 341450 + pending
Bug#341450: tulip: dependency problem, tlprender requires libOSMesa.so.6
There were no tags set.
Bug
reassign 389291 libselinux1-dev
thanks
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:20:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:07:47AM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> > In libselinux (1.30.28-1), -lpthread was added to the libselinux's
> > pkg-config.
>
> > dpkg is statically linked against
Package: partman-auto-crypto
Version: 1
Severity: serious
Doing a basic install in vmware (i386), I selected p-a-c, confirmed that I
wanted to use block device encryption, selected separate /home scheme,
and was then presented with a dialog "Configuration of encrypted volumes
failed".
Re that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389291 libselinux1-dev
Bug#389291: dpkg FTBFS
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `libselinux1-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: cacti-cactid
Version: 0.8.6g-3
Severity: serious
Hello Sean,
There is an error when attempting to purge cacti-cactid:
Removing cacti-cactid ...
Purging configuration files for cacti-cactid ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cacti-cactid.postrm: line 7: ucf: command not found
dpkg: error pro
Package: mserv
Version: 0.35-6
Severity: serious
Hello Nick,
There is an error when attempting to purge mserv:
Removing mserv ...
Purging configuration files for mserv ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mserv.postrm: line 10: deluser: command not found
dpkg: error processing mserv (--purge):
subp
Hi,
There's a new Gnash package in Debian SID. As there have been many changes
upstream, I'm not sure if you're still getting the bug #384904 ("gnash simply
segfaults"). Can you check it and confirm whether this bug still exists or it
can be closed?
Lots of thanks,
Miry
On Sep 25, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just done a local build of d-i which picked up the latest upload. The
> image fails to boot. Last messages I see can be seen here:
> http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/d-i_udev-failure.png
If mounting sysfs (which is done by some other packag
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006, Stephen Touset wrote:
> I recently upgraded to Xorg 7.1. Since doing so, logging into GNOME produces
> my background, and dark-grey where the gnome-panel should be.
I think I had this bug today. It seemed due to dbus. Do you have
python-dbus or python2.4-dbus
Hi,
There's a new Gnash package in Debian SID. As there have been many changes
upstream, I'm not sure if you're still getting the bug #374996 ("kills all
your processes (including browser) on open a web page with flash"). Can you
check it and confirm whether this bug still exists or it can be clos
Hi,
There's a new Gnash package in Debian SID. As there have been many changes
upstream, I'm not sure if you're still getting the bug #386781 ("Crashes
browser"). Can you check it and confirm whether this bug still exists or it
can be closed?
Lots of thanks,
Miry
_
well, if mozilla _corporation_ is having problems with debian using firefox, why not just remove it? or at least move it into non-free - from what i've read here firefox licence cannot be thought as gpl compatibile.btw, is that ok for mozilla _corporation_ that mandriva is using heavily patched fir
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384211 + pending
Bug#384211: linux-kbuild-2.6.17: FTBFS * 2 (two problems, proposed fixes)
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:55:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389440: Acknowledgement (udev-udeb: Installer boot failure
with latest udev)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
I modified tetex-base.postinst as indicated in the patch above to
postinst.in. The problem remains.
Ross Boylan
Here's the end of postinst after my changes:
# Update language.dat (update-language is in tex-common on which we
depend)
#update-language
# if tetex-base is upgraded while tetex-b
Package: openoffice.org-core
Version: 2.0.4~rc1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
% sudo apt-get install openoffice.org openoffice.org-core
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requ
Hi, whats happening with this bug?
Some new info on this would be great. I find no other sources of info about
whats going on with this.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 384243 - fixed-in-experimental
thanks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:54:02 +0200, Michel Quercia wrote:
> Below is a better fix for the s4addq error (saves one instruction) :
>
> ---
> -
Package: udev-udeb
Version:0.100-2
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
I've just done a local build of d-i which picked up the latest upload. The
image fails to boot. Last messages I see can be seen here:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/d-i/d-i_udev-failure.png
Cheers,
FJP
pgp0h4GrsLM1c.pgp
Description: P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384243 - fixed-in-experimental
Bug#384243: FTBFS (alpha): assembly syntax errors
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch
Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:22:47 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389287: Package built against libraries from experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
- Forwarded message from Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: xawtv-plugin-qt: segfaults on start recording
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:53:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3
Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Port some of the atomic code from 1.2.x to 0.9.x, in particular make
>> mutex operations that fail cause an abort and make the generic C
>> implementation of apr_atomic_cas work on 64 bit platforms.
>
> A less radical change to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 330084 + moreinfo
Bug#330084: xawtv-plugin-qt: segfaults on start recording
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Package: libsnmp-base
Version: 5.2.3-1
Severity: critical
Justification: may lead to DoS
I just noticed that somehow the file /usr/share/snmp/mibs/.index had been
created, probably due to the hplip package using SNMP; despite creating a file
dynamically in /usr probably violates FHS, the permissio
o by sbuild/ia64 85
Build started at 20060925-1037
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.23-1.1), autotools-dev, patchutils (>= 0.2.25),
debhelper (>= 5), tk8.4-dev, tcl8.4-dev, libxaw7-dev, flex, dictzip
[...]
creating wn
cc -DHAVE_CONF
Le 25.09.2006, à 05:50:27, Steve Langasek a écrit:
> Package: malsync
> Version: 2.2.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The current malsync package doesn't build with libpisock9 in unstable:
>
> [...]
> cc -Wall -g -DMALSYNC -I./mal/common -I./mal/client/common
> -I./pilot-link-0.11.7/include -I./mal/c
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:32:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379414: fixed in sparc-utils 1.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Lucas,
you are right, there is a second argument. But not on the German manual
page. ;-)
Looks like the second parameter was introduced recently (maybe in PHP5).
Is there any reason why the class_exists-call cannot be removed? Peter,
can you discuss this with upstream?
Greetings
Roland
On 9/24/06, Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Port some of the atomic code from 1.2.x to 0.9.x, in particular make
> mutex operations that fail cause an abort and make the generic C
> implementation of apr_atomic_cas work on 64 bit platforms.
A
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-1
Severity: grave
Since the upgrade to X.org 7.1 the server crashes always on startup.
I didn't change my configuration and this never hapenned before.
Here's the end of Xorg.0.log:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4334]
1: [0xe420
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:32:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216131: fixed in sparc-utils 1.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:06:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of libmodplug 1:0.7-5.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Frank Küster wrote:
>purge)
> +update-texmf
Shouldn't that be
update-texmf || true
? The rest looks fine to me.
cheerio
ralf
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:28:29AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > thunar-vfs-io-local-xfer.c:206: error: 'POSIX_MADV_SEQUENTIAL'
> > undeclared (first use in this function)
On hppa, bits/mman.h doesn't declare this.
#381294 against libc6-dev is a similar bug for mips (and arm) and indeed
mip
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package dokuwiki
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dokuwiki
> tags 387972 + pending
Bug#387972: tries to stop deinstalled apache
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 3879
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388115 pending
Bug#388115: tetex-base: postinst fails, can not upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> In the Linux kernel,
> drivers/media/video/usbvideo/vicam.c
>
> contains *long* sequences which appear to have been lifted from some other
> driver without permission or attribution, probably by wire-sniffing.
>
> Not short sequences, really long ones.
>
> This is not ju
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
