Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:02:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnome-themes-extras
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

gnome-themes-extras's copyright file indicates that the package is under
the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/Nuvola/scalable/apps/firefox.svg. Additionally,
gnome-themes-extras is in main and the Firefox icon is not modifiable.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Josselin Mouette a écrit :

Le lundi 25 septembre 2006 à 17:14 -0400, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Package: gnome-themes-extras
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

gnome-themes-extras's copyright file indicates that the package is under
the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/icons/Nuvola/scalable/apps/firefox.svg. Additionally,
gnome-themes-extras is in main and the Firefox icon is not modifiable.

As the icon was made from scratch, I don't think there is any licensing
issue. As the copyright states, the icon is GPL.

The only issue here is a trademark one, but as the icon is used to
reference firefox itself, I'd have guessed it is allowed. I'm CCing
debian-legal, as this has been discussed to death and I guess someone
will have more clues than myself.
Thank you and sorry. On closer inspection I can indeed see some differences with the original Firefox logo. Assuming that you are right about gnome-themes-extras's version not being a variant but simply a high-quality imitation, I'm closing my report as invalid.

As for the trademark issues, I do not know the role of gnome-themes-extras well, but assuming that the logo is used as an icon for Debian's "Firefox", I expect this to be problematic since Debian ships an altered Firefox that even has to be renamed to avoid trademark infringement.
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to