Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387798: fixed in sg3-utils 1.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: teapop-mysql
> Version: 0.3.7-4.1+b1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello Nick,
>
> There is an error when attempting to purge teapop-mysql:
>
> Removing teapop-mysql ...
> Purging configuration files for teapop-mysql ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/teapop-mysql.postrm: lin
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.46
Severity: grave
#_> aptitude -u
... upgrade ...
#_> aptitude -vvv upgrade
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Unable to parse package file /var/lib/dpkg/status (1)
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Una
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 384146 386833
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long long
unsigned int u_int64_t'
Bug#386833: plptools: FTBFS (i386/gcc-4.1) bad
Merged 384146 386833.
> tags 384146 patch
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): c
merge 384146 386833
tags 384146 patch
tags 386833 patch
thanks for all the fish
---
Attached is a patch which gets the package building again.
Basically I split the ENUM_DEFINITION macro into a ENUM_DEFINITION_BEGIN
and a ENUM_DEFINITION_END so that the enums can be defined by the _BEGIN
and inst
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:12:42PM -0400, H. S. wrote:
> (here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)
Thanks. geda-gschem 20060906 should be in etch in a day or two. Can you
try it again then and see if the problem is solved?
system-gafrc is provided by geda-symbols, which is
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Alex,
Could you verify and upload this package please?
http://knars.be/bartm/debian/etch/open-cobol_0.32-3.dsc
* debian/rules, debian/control: Switch to cdbs.
* debian/control: open-cobol depends on libdb4.3-dev. Closes: #387937.
* debian/control: Standards ver
Hello,
On reading of this problem in using the grub "shell" setup command
instead of "grub-install" I looked through the documentation since I
was sure that it had asked me to copy the files.
Sure enough, under the node "Installation" in the grub info there is
the following paragraph:
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388628: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.1.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: geda-gschem
Version: 20060123-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
(here is the bug again here for geda-gschem, instead of for geda)
If I try to start gschem, I get these errors:
On 9/21/06, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:39:56PM -0400, H. S. wrote:> Package: geda> Version: 20060123-1> Severity: grave> Justification: renders package unusableHi,This bug is with gschem so please report it against gschem.
Done.
I have also answered your
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Removal of the autogenerated files *is* what the "clean" target
> already does. The problem is that upstream source comes with its own
> set of autogenerated files and these get removed/replaced during the
> autoconf run.
That doesn't make any sense. If the files are
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:54:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Nothing depends on libpthread2 any more, so is there any reason to keep
> this package in the achive?
Actually, it's that nothing has depended on libpthread2 ever. This is a new
binary package recently added to the pth source package.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 385980 patch
Bug#385980: grub - clean target does not undo changes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388484: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-mga 1:1.4.1.dfsg.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
nmotion_1:1.4.1-3 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060921-1610
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), pkg-config, xserver-xorg-dev (>=
> 2:1.1.1), x11proto-video-dev, x11proto-xext-dev, x11proto-c
Confirmed (by bug reporter), this bug fixes the issue with the segfault
David
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 16:20 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #388355: mdadm: Segfaults on sid upgrade,
> which was filed against the mdadm package.
allero by
> sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060921-1609
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), pkg-config, xserver-xorg-dev (>=
> 2:1.1.1), x11proto-video-dev, x11proto-xext-dev, x11proto-gl-dev, libdrm-dev,
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:21:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #385800,
regarding libassa: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: error: cast from
'ASSA::EventHandler*' to 'int' loses precision
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 387913
Bug#387913: FTBFS on a few arches
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:28:11 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug is "fixed"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
reopen 387913
thanks
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:07:52PM -0300, Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz wrote:
> Hi all,
> as I said before upstream is not envolved at this moment to add support
> for archs: alpha, ia64, s390 and m68k. On other archs, I tested today
> and everything goes ok. I am working myself to
scrabble isn't in etch, but if the concern is a trademark violation then
we still have a problem, since it's still present in unstable.
Brian said that he was going to rename it, but that was a year ago.
Unless there's some plan to fix it RSN, I think we should remove it from
the archive in the m
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I this raised the question on debian-qa and the opinion there seemed
> > to be that the "clean" target not be faulted for removing such files.
>
> That's not how I read the short thread; you got one suggestion to remove the
> autogenerated files in the cl
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388660: fixed in lurker 2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318546: fixed in libproc-process-perl 0.41-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: ibm-3270
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
The copyright file for ibm-3270 says:
"Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance
in clarifying them would be appreciated."
but there's no active bug about some issues.
Particularly, "public use" needs clarificati
Nothing depends on libpthread2 any more, so is there any reason to keep
this package in the achive?
If the maintainer hasn't responded in a week or two, this bug could be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org and turned into a removal request.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> I this raised the question on debian-qa and the opinion there seemed
> to be that the "clean" target not be faulted for removing such files.
That's not how I read the short thread; you got one suggestion to remove the
autogenerated files in the clean target (a suggestion I agree with), and one
r
It's been two months since you asked Ian to sponsor the upload of the new
package of hat. Maybe you should find someone else involved in haskell
to do it?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:17:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377990: fixed in libopengl-perl 0.54.alan1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:07:52 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug is "fixed"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 386784 normal
Bug#386784: RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4 -- RoQA; RC-buggy (unusable, etch will
be 2.6-only)
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:34:44PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: pconsole
> Version: 1.0-6
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello Jesus,
>
> There is an error when attempting to purge pconsole:
> Removing pconsole ...
> Purging configuration files for pconsole ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/pcon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 386784 RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4 -- RoQA; RC-buggy (unusable, etch
> will be 2.6-only)
Bug#386784: RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4 -- RoQA; etch will be 2.6-only
Changed Bug title.
> severity 386784 serious
Bug#386784: RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote:
> Fernando M. Maresca schreef:
>
> > Yes, it works. Thank you both,
>
> Ok, I have taken a closer look to the source of picprog and think that I
> have found a good solution.
>
> Can you test if the following works for you?
>
> In
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:48:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225750: fixed in discus 0.2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388355: fixed in mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
The error message is the one that would occur if Subversion's DB_ENV
cache failed in some way, and since most of the tests are being run
with FSFS the failing test might be the only one that exercises the
cache. Perhaps gcc is miscompiling Subversion's cache code; how about
building without optimi
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:39:56PM -0400, H. S. wrote:
> Package: geda
> Version: 20060123-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
This bug is with gschem so please report it against gschem.
Then I would get gschem's dependency information (eg your libgeda20 and
geda-sym
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386202 + fixed
Bug#386202: gnome-pilot-conduits: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0)
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 388633 pending
Bug#388633: x11-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails (/usr/X11R6 issue)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 41731 !
Bug number 41731 not found.
> submitter 48217 !
Bug number 48217 not found.
> submitter 54704 !
Bug number 54704 not found.
> submitter 54722 !
Bug number 54722 not found.
> submitter 72488 !
Bug number 72488 not found.
> submitte
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 11:40 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > The easiest solution is to remove the debug_echo. If it is needed for some
> > reason, a construct like this should be made (note that this happens in a
> > set
> > +e block)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:38:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Resolved with 1.1.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 384784 Incomplete documentation about SparesMissing event
Bug#384784: RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4 -- RoQA; RC-buggy (unusable,
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> severity 384784 minor
Bug#384784: Incomplete
Package: pconsole
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: serious
Hello Jesus,
There is an error when attempting to purge pconsole:
Removing pconsole ...
Purging configuration files for pconsole ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/pconsole.postrm: line 6: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpkg
Package: lurker
Version: 2.1-4
Severity: serious
Hello Jonas,
There is an error when attempting to purge lurker:
Removing lurker ...
Purging configuration files for lurker ...
Removing lurker group ../var/lib/dpkg/info/lurker.postrm: line 50: delgroup:
command not found
dpkg: error proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 384784 RM: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.4 -- RoQA; RC-buggy (unusable,
Bug#384784: Incomplete documentation about SparesMissing event
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> etch will be 2.6-only)
Unknown command or ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 385486 serious
Bug#385486: RM: mcvs [ia64 mipsel s390 sparc] -- RoM; FTBFS
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: namazu2
Version: 2.0.16-6
Severity: serious
Hello Nokubi,
There is an error when attempting to purge namazu2:
Removing namazu2 ...
Purging configuration files for namazu2 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/namazu2.postrm: line 7: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpk
Ok, here is the patch. Comment inside the patch explains what it does:
diff -ru pam-0.79-3.2/Linux-PAM/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c
pam-0.79-3.2.0vh/Linux-PAM/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c
--- pam-0.79-3.2/Linux-PAM/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c 2006-09-20
13:32:48.0 +0300
+
Package: dvipdfmx
Version: 1:20050831-2
Severity: serious
Hello Yu,
There is an error when attempting to purge dvipdfmx:
Removing dvipdfmx ...
Purging configuration files for dvipdfmx ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dvipdfmx.postrm: line 5: /usr/sbin/update-texmf: No such
file or directory
dpkg:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The xfonts-* installed/non-installed in my system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ COLUMNS=120 dpkg -l xfonts-*
Desitjat=Desconegut(u)/Instal·la(i)/Elimina(r)/Neteja(p)/Atura(h)
| Estat=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(no
Here's a patch. I'm not sure if it's quite the right way to do it, but it
seems to create a python-metakit package that works for me.
-Brian
diff -ur metakit-2.4.9.3/debian/control libmetakit2.4.9.3-2.4.9.3/debian/control
--- metakit-2.4.9.3/debian/control 2006-09-21 11:23:00.0 -070
Package: solid-pop3d
Version: 0.15-16
Severity: serious
Hello Robert,
There is an error when attempting to purge solid-pop3d:
Removing solid-pop3d ...
Purging configuration files for solid-pop3d ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/solid-pop3d.postrm: line 20: update-inetd: command not
found
/var/lib
Package: gwhois
Version: 20060419
Severity: serious
Hello Michael,
There is an error when attempting to purge gwhois:
Removing gwhois ...
Purging configuration files for gwhois ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gwhois.postrm: line 7: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing gwhois (--
Package: geda
Version: 20060123-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
If I try to start gschem, I get these errors:
--
$> gschem
gEDA/gschem version 20060123
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 385114
Bug#385114: incoming nvidia-glx conflicts with xorg 7.1 in experimental
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 385114 1.0.8774-2
Bug#385114: incoming nvidia-glx conflicts with xorg 7.1 in experimental
'close' is deprecated; see htt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388116 libcairo
Bug#388116: pan: crashes at startup when launched remotely
Bug reassigned from package `pan' to `libcairo'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326922: fixed in raidutils 0.0.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.3.0-9
Severity: serious
Hello Francesco,
There is an error when attempting to purge proftpd:
Removing proftpd ...
Purging configuration files for proftpd ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/proftpd.postrm: line 5: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing prof
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385114: fixed in nvidia-graphics-drivers 1.0.8774-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:47:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388273: fixed in ggz-gtk-games 0.0.13-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:47:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386032: fixed in djvulibre 3.5.17-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:47:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341172: fixed in evolution 2.6.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:42:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Grüezi,
My apologies for the delay, some of my mails were not forwarded
correctly to me...
Basically, I don't really have the energy to care about intricacies of
licenses, but if you feel that a) you want to do the work and provide
me with a file that I can then upload to CTAN, and b) that this
Package: cpad-kernel-source
Version: 0.9-10
Severity: serious
Hello Ron,
There is an error when attempting to purge cpad-kernel-source:
Removing cpad-kernel-source ...
Purging configuration files for cpad-kernel-source ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cpad-kernel-source.postrm: line 20:
/usr/share/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 388399 "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha,
> mips and mipsel
Bug#388399: gnuplot: FTBFS
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 388399 tetex-bin
Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha, mips
and
retitle 388399 "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha,
mips and mipsel
reassign 388399 tetex-bin
thanks
On 20 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: gnuplot
> Version: 1:2.5.0p2-2
>
>
> Buildd logs show that gnuplot is failing to build from source on
> alpha, mips and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package pan
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for #
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388221: fixed in bugzilla 2.22-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:50:36AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:09:34 +0200
> From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of ctn 3.0.6-8.1
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 au
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388322: fixed in logilab-common 0.19.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On 21-Sep-06, at 1:38 AM, Eric Dorland wrote:
If this isn't possible, could we at least get a stay of execution?
Etch is going into deep freeze in less than a month. Would it be
possible to resolve this after the release?
I would think it makes much more sense to resolve this before you put
Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage
Version: 1:2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-savage_1:2.1.1-3 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060921-1609
[...]
> ** Using build
Package: xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion
Version: 1:1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion_1:1.4.1-3 on caballero by
> sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060921-1610
[...]
> **
v_1:1.1.2-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa
> 85
> Build started at 20060921-0918
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), pkg-config, xserver-xorg-dev,
> linux-kernel-headers, x11proto-core-dev, x11proto-randr-dev,
> x11proto-in
Package: libplpc2a
Version: 0.14-4
Severity: serious
Hello John,
There is an error when upgrading the package from sarge to etch,
it should at least Replaces plptools:
Selecting previously deselected package libplpc2a.
Unpacking libplpc2a (from .../libplpc2a_0.14-4_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: erro
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.22
Severity: serious
Hello Debian X Strike Force,
There is an error when upgrading from sarge to etch.
Selecting previously deselected package x11-common.
(Reading database ... 46949 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking x11-common (from
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386673: fixed in electricsheep 2.6.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package evolution evolution-common evolution-dbg evolution-dev
> evolution-plugins evolution-plugins-experimental
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: evolution-dev evolution-dbg evolution
Package: xorg-server
Version: 2:1.1.1-6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xorg-server_2:1.1.1-6 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> gcc -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wmissing-declarations -Wnes
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:20:24PM +0200, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Well spotted. The current use of Debconf by the postrm script serves
> these purposes:
> - check what web servers were auto-configured at install to deconfigure them
> - check whether the user asked for site data to be
severity 388621 important
tags 388621 pending
thanks
David Baron wrote:
> Compilation error on main.c, get_sb_nodev() too many arguments.
> I cannot find a prototype for this function in the unionfs sources to try to
> fix it so must be part of the kernel.
This is a snapshot for linux 2.6.18 only
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:02:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388291: fixed in libraw1394 1.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Ludovic,
> The guys came yesterday and dug a hole in the pavement in front of my
> house, and pulled the wires to the house. They're supposed to come back
> today to actually connect the thing to the network.
Are you connected now ?
> My package for GtkAda 2.8.1 is ready for upload.
> Hol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388621 important
Bug#388621: unionfs-source: Compilation error in main.c
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 388621 pending
Bug#388621: unionfs-source: Compilation error in main.c
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> than
severity 342053 important
thanks
Lowering the severity of this bug to important.
This issue is the main reason that g-i is only provided as experimental
mini.iso for powerpc. However, that does not make RC for the package as a
whole.
pgpTphILVkGri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: isdnutils-base
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-2
Severity: serious
Hello Paul,
There is an error when attempting to purge isdnutils-base:
Removing isdnutils-base ...
Purging configuration files for isdnutils-base ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnutils-base.postrm: line 6:
/usr/share/debconf/co
Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> okay, here is some sort of current status:
Thanks for the update.
> VTK_COMMON_CLASSES contains several paths starting with
> "/debian" (starting at line 139). Clearly, these paths shouldn't be
> there; in fact, the files mentioned there are not include
Package: unionfs-source
Version: 1.3.20060918.2217+debian-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Compilation error on main.c, get_sb_nodev() too many arguments.
I cannot find a prototype for this function in the unionfs sources to try to
fix it so must be part of the kernel.
Si
Package: teapop-mysql
Version: 0.3.7-4.1+b1
Severity: serious
Hello Nick,
There is an error when attempting to purge teapop-mysql:
Removing teapop-mysql ...
Purging configuration files for teapop-mysql ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/teapop-mysql.postrm: line 28: update-inetd: command not
found
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:09:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of ctn 3.0.6-8.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 387183 + fixed
Bug#387183: ctn: Cannot open ANY dicom file on AMD64
Tags were: help upstream
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 342053 important
Bug#342053: DirectFrameBuffer crashes on PPC systems if HW accelerated drivers
are used
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388604: fixed in drupal 4.5.8-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23c-1
Severity: serious
Hello Eloy,
There is an error when attempting to purge samba:
Removing samba ...
Purging configuration files for samba ...
Removing configuration file /etc/default/samba...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/samba.postrm: line 18: update-inetd: command
Package: tvtime
Version: 1.0.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Hello Simon,
There is an error when attempting to purge tvtime:
Removing tvtime ...
Purging configuration files for tvtime ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tvtime.postrm: line 29: ucf: command not found
dpkg: error processing tvtime (--purge):
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
