Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:42:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 1.0.8178-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject: AMD64: nvidia-glx deadlock upon upgrade to x11-common
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 1.0.8178-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm left with a deadlock situation - and non-functional X setup - after
initiating the upgrade to x11-common (Xorg 7.0).
nvidia-glx can't be upgraded since it depends on
nividia-kernel-1.0.8756, which is
unavailable.
Any attempts to work around this are halted by the fact that even 'dpkg
-r --force-all nvidia-glx' results in the following issue:
dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting '/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2' with
different file '/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa', not allowed
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (550, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages nvidia-glx depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii nvidia-kernel-2.6.15 1.0.8178-1+2.6.15-8 NVIDIA binary kernel module for Li
ii xserver-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 files and utilities common to all
nvidia-glx recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Although the submitter may have just missed the point about building a
kernel module I am closing this bug now as there has been no reply.
--- End Message ---
