Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:07:52 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug is "fixed"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hardinfo
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
this package FTBFS in unstable:
hardinfo | hardinfo | 0.3.7pre-4 | unstable | alpha, arm, ia64, m68k,
s390
hardinfo | hardinfo | 0.4.1-2 | unstable | source, amd64, hppa,
i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
as I said before upstream is not envolved at this moment to add support
for archs: alpha, ia64, s390 and m68k. On other archs, I tested today
and everything goes ok. I am working myself to add support for this
arches, and I will release one by one as soon as possible, but I am
closing this bug for this moment because I think that is not nice to
avoid users from others archs to use hardinfo while I finish my work.
Maybe an another bug can be open as wishlist (asking for other archs
support) to hardinfo.
see you all.
--
---
Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://agney.linuxhome.com.br
GPG fingerprint: 4B6D C72F 824D CF3B 75AE 6479 0FDF 48D6 59B9 57AE
--- End Message ---
