Bug#387319: ocamldap needs to be rebuilt against the new pcre-ocaml

Hello, On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 06:19:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Package: libldap-ocaml-dev > Version: 2.1.8-1 > Severity: serious > > After my upload of libpcre-ocaml-dev 5.11.1-1 ocamldap needs to be > rebuilt against it: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ledit ocaml > Objective

Bug#387268: flashplugin-nonfree

Hi Andrew, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 21:34 -0500, Andrew Booth wrote: > I tried installing the flashplugin-nonfree.deb package today, and had a > problem with the update-flashplugin script not working. I decided to > download the tarball myself and use the --local-file flag. It gave me an > error that

Processed: Re: What to do if acpid is installed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 380520 Bug#380520: acpid and hald conflict 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug#352512: hal: hal locks out acpid Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity

Bug#380520: What to do if acpid is installed?

reopen 380520 severity 380520 normal thanks [Sorry for the delay, had to learn a bit what's a socket before replying] Sjoerd Simons a écrit : On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:34:10PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: I don't want hal depending on acpid. I will patch the hal acpi addon to not direc

Bug#354693: marked as done (FTBFS: old dependency on libdb4.2-dev)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:17:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of modxslt 2004112100-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#379278: how to treat upgrade bugs that only affect unstable->unstable?

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Peter Samuelson wrote: > That raises a philosophical question: > > If a bug was in a prerm script in unstable for 7 days, but never > appeared in stable or testing, should we include cruft in present and > future prerm versions to work around it? > > Or, put another way: a pr

Bug#387389: POE::Filter::IRCD is not a subclass of POE::Filter, which breaks POE::Component::IRC

Package: libpoe-filter-ircd-perl Severity: serious Version: 1.2-1 Because POE::Filter::IRCD is not a subclass of POE::Filter, POE::Filter::Stackable bails out. The new upstream version, 2.0, fixes this problem. Don Armstrong -- Grimble left his mother in the food store and went to the laundere

Bug#387390: POE::Filter::{IRC,CTCP} are not a subclasses of POE::Filter, which breaks POE::Component::IRC

Package: libpoe-component-irc-perl Severity: serious Version: 4.77-1 Because POE::Filter::{IRC,CTCP} are not subclasses of POE::Filter, POE::Filter::Stackable bails out. The new upstream version, 5.02, fixes this problem. Don Armstrong -- Grimble left his mother in the food store and went to t

Bug#387388: marked as done (fontconfig_2.4.0-4 (mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: ./fc-arch: unknown signature)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:12:55 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387388: fontconfig_2.4.0-4 (mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: ./fc-arch: unknown signature has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#387388: fontconfig_2.4.0-4 (mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: ./fc-arch: unknown signature

On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 18:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: fontconfig > Version: 2.4.0-4 > Severity: serious > > Hi Keith, > > fontconfig is failing to build on mipsel with the following error: HA. Fixed it before you reported the bug. 2.4.0-5 has been uploaded about 30 seconds ago. A

Bug#387388: fontconfig_2.4.0-4 (mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: ./fc-arch: unknown signature

Package: fontconfig Version: 2.4.0-4 Severity: serious Hi Keith, fontconfig is failing to build on mipsel with the following error: [...] ./fc-arch auto < ../fc-arch/fcarch.tmpl.h > fcarch.h ./fc-arch: unknown signature "78563412_0001_0004_0004_0004_0010_0004_0004_00

Bug#385776: marked as done (odyssey FTBFS on alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, sparc)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:17:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385776: fixed in odyssey 0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#379278: how to treat upgrade bugs that only affect unstable->unstable?

CC: debian-devel, as I'm asking about packaging best practices. [Agustin Martin] > >* python-subversion.{prerm,postinst}: use pyversions, fix stupid > > bug (Closes: #379278) in prerm. Tighten python build-dep to > > ensure availability of pyversions. > > Note that some upgrades m

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libx11 2:1.0.0-9

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 368655 + fixed Bug#368655: libx11-data: incorrect locale alias for russian Tags were: l10n Tags added: fixed > tag 386471 + fixed Bug#386471: libx11-data: Wrong Compose sequnces for Greek polytonic breathing signs There were no tags set. Tags adde

Bug#387238: closed by Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (fixed)

On Wednesday 13 September 2006 16:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #387238: xen-hypervisor: Xen hypervisor reboots when scrubbing ram message > is reached: confirmed on AMD64 and i386, which was filed against the > xen-hypervisor-

Bug#387378: ggz-gtk-games: still depends on ggz-gtk-game-data (not g-g-games-d)

Package: ggz-gtk-games Version: 0.0.13-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable) ggz-gtk-games continues to depend on ggz-gtk-game-data (= ${Source-Version}), although the data package is now called ggz-gtk-games-data. Please correct this discrepancy. Thanks! --

Bug#345931: If the problem is that the user doesn't know he won't be able to reboot...

option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches the stage files and if not generate an ERROR message. On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:05:38AM +0200, Marc Fargas wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write

Processed: Re: Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387136 normal Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > close 387136 Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. B

Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames

On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 08:16 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > on zabbix-server-mysql installation a user can possibly choose to > autogenerate the password for the database user. If zabbix-frontend-php > is installed on the same machine as zabbix-server-mysql i used to read > the database passwor

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 05:59:13PM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote: > Fernando M. Maresca schreef: > > > picprog does not detect the chip in the programmer in my amd64 unstable > > box. I'm using the programmer from the package docs. > > [...] > > > In another box running 32bit unstable picprog work

Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames

severity 387136 normal close 387136 thanks hi michael, On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 12:59 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > 1.8.15: > kida:/home/abi# dbconfig-load-include -f sh -pmypass > /etc/dbconfig-common/zabbix-server-mysql.conf > mypass='abi' this was incorrect behaviour. sometime betwee

Bug#384311: marked as done (firefox-locale-fr: localization can't be used with firefox 1.5.0.6)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:35:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384311: fixed in mozilla-firefox-locale-all 1.5.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:21:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hmmm, I do not get your point. Which build failure do you have in mind? > > Well, the gnome-lokkit build failure is one such example. Can you show me a > patch for this package that fixes the problem using autopoint, *not* using

Processed: Fixed in NMU of splashy 0.1.8.1-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 383175 + fixed Bug#383175: Uninstallable on alpha/ia64 due to unmet dep on libc6 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#384962: marked as done (locale unusable with current firefox)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:35:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384311: fixed in mozilla-firefox-locale-all 1.5.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:51:37PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:07:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > [...] > > > The only problem is with 2.b. In this case, developers should call > > > autopoint before aclocal. Bruno Haible provided autopoint for this > > > exact pu

Processed: reopening 386237, closing 386237

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > reopen 386237 Bug#386237: bind9: Security update! Please! 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug#3862

Bug#384311: marked as done (firefox-locale-fr: localization can't be used with firefox 1.5.0.6)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:35:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384962: fixed in mozilla-firefox-locale-all 1.5.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#384962: marked as done (locale unusable with current firefox)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:35:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384962: fixed in mozilla-firefox-locale-all 1.5.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#387332: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:01:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387332: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: severity of 386668 is normal, retitle 386668 to Don't hide errors in build output

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > severity 386668 normal Bug#386668: FTBFS on arm Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > retitle 386668 Don't hide errors in build output Bug#386668: FTBFS on arm Changed Bug title.

Bug#387330: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:39:52PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Package: f-spot > Severity: serious > Version: 0.2.0-1 > Your package is not installable as it depends on libdbus-1-cil which is only > available in experimental. It's also available in testing. Presumably this is a language binding th

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:07:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > > The only problem is with 2.b. In this case, developers should call > > autopoint before aclocal. Bruno Haible provided autopoint for this > > exact purpose. It can regenerate m4/gettext.m4 and > > po/Makefile.in.in for any

Bug#379920: freetype: buffer overflow [CVE-2006-3467]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:33:46PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Looks like it's time for another try at freetype. CVE-2006-3467 appears to > > be a potentially exploitable integer overflow in freetype's PCF parser. > > I've uploaded freetype_2.1.7-6 to > >

Bug#387335: marked as done (python-gnome2-extras: Uninstalable on sid. Depends on unexisting libdbus-1-2)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:06:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387335: python-gnome2-extras: Uninstalable on sid. Depends on unexisting libdbus-1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#387330: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:01:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387332: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: Re: Bug#387334: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python (< 2.4)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387334 pythoncad Bug#387334: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python (< 2.4) Warning: Unknown package 'python-cad' Bug reassigned from package `python-cad' to `pythoncad'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:39:49PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:57:42AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:33:17AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > > # Rebootstrap the package > > > > aclocal -I

Bug#379920: freetype: buffer overflow [CVE-2006-3467]

Steve Langasek wrote: > Looks like it's time for another try at freetype. CVE-2006-3467 appears to > be a potentially exploitable integer overflow in freetype's PCF parser. > I've uploaded freetype_2.1.7-6 to > , replacing the previous > version the

Processed: Re: Bug#386458: libavcodec-dev: Missing dependencies for libraw1394-dev libdc1934-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 386458 patch Bug#386458: libavcodec-dev: Missing dependencies for libraw1394-dev libdc1934-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#386458: libavcodec-dev: Missing dependencies for libraw1394-dev libdc1934-dev

tags 386458 patch thanks On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:06:48PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Package: libavcodec-dev > Version: 0.cvs20060823-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > ffmpeg-config --libs mentions library whose development packages > libavcodec-dev d

Bug#384905: marked as done (bzrtools plugins do not register)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384905: fixed in bzrtools 0.10.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#386487: FTBFS: aclocal: macro `AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' required but not defined

[Sent to 386487 instead of 386263, this is a gettext issue and not gnome-lokkit] On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:57:42AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:33:17AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > # Rebootstrap the package > > >

Bug#387335: python-gnome2-extras: Uninstalable on sid. Depends on unexisting libdbus-1-2

Package: python-gnome2-extras Version: 2.14.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable dbus 0.92-2, uploaded on sept 9, 2006, no longer builds binary package libdbus-1-2. Please update the dependency to libdbus-1-3 -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2

Bug#387334: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python (< 2.4)

Package: python-cad Severity: serious Version: 0.1.33-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on python (< 2.4) which is not available in unstable anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F99

Bug#387331: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686-smp

Package: kernel-image-2.4-686-smp Severity: serious Version: 101sarge1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686-smp which is not available in unstable anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint:

Processed: Re: Bug#387286: Acknowledgement (postrm_hook is not run)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387286 kernel-package Bug#387286: grub path transition is breaking kernel removals Bug reassigned from package `grub' to `kernel-package'. > retitle 387286 postrm_hook is not run Bug#387286: grub path transition is breaking kernel removals Cha

Bug#387332: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil

Package: muine Severity: serious Version: 0.8.5-1+b1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libdbus-1-cil which is not available in unstable (it's in experimental though). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 31

Bug#387330: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libdbus-1-cil

Package: f-spot Severity: serious Version: 0.2.0-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libdbus-1-cil which is only available in experimental. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE

Bug#387286: Acknowledgement (postrm_hook is not run)

reassign 387286 kernel-package retitle 387286 postrm_hook is not run severity 387286 normal thanks On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:18, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Note that grub is not breaking, nor does grub transition break > anything -- if users follow the advice in NEWS.Debian from gr

Processed: severity of 385517 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > # Uninstallable > severity 385517 serious Bug#385517: ifrit: please migrate to VTK 5 Severity set to `serious' from `important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#387268: [Fwd: flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.68.0.1]

--- Begin Message --- Hi Alex, Could you verify and upload this package please? http://knars.be/bartm/debian/etch/flashplugin-nonfree_7.0.68.0.1.dsc Thanks, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- signature.asc Description: This i

Bug#387286: Acknowledgement (postrm_hook is not run)

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:25:54 +0200, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > reassign 387286 grub severity 387286 grave retitle 387286 grub path > transition is breaking kernel removals thanks Note that grub is not breaking, nor does grub transition break anything -- if users follow the ad

Bug#387286: marked as done (grub path transition is breaking kernel removals)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:17:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387286: fixed in kernel-package 10.056 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#359855: lilypond and thanks to Rob Browning

Rob Browning, the guile maintainer, has been doing a lot of hard work trying to get guile-1.8 into Debian. Turns out there were some critical timing bugs affecting the operation of fork in the guile threading implementation, bugs which are too intractible to solve immediately. Rob has uploaded g

Bug#386668: close this?

I successfully built and uploaded this version of arts on an arm machine. The quoted warnings don't cause the failure, the actual failing line is the link line, which is >/dev/null 2>&1 so we don't see whatever the build error was. (/dev/nulling errors during compiles considered self-defeating.)

Bug#387150: marked as done (Superfluous versioned Conflicts on older tetex-bin; breaks some upgrades)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:47:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387150: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320393: marked as done (isakmpd is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334624: fixed in isakmpd 20041012-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320393: marked as done (isakmpd is uninstallable)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334624: fixed in isakmpd 20041012-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334624: marked as done (FTBFS: struct x506_store_st has no member named flags)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334624: fixed in isakmpd 20041012-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325849: marked as done (isakmpd: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334624: fixed in isakmpd 20041012-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325849: marked as done (isakmpd: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild against libgmp3c2)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:35:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334624: fixed in isakmpd 20041012-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#387286: Acknowledgement (postrm_hook is not run)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 387286 grub Bug#387286: postrm_hook is not run Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `grub'. > severity 387286 grave Bug#387286: postrm_hook is not run Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > retitle 387286 grub path transition is b

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

Fernando M. Maresca schreef: > picprog does not detect the chip in the programmer in my amd64 unstable > box. I'm using the programmer from the package docs. [...] > In another box running 32bit unstable picprog works fine: Are you sure that the problem is amd64 related? Can you check the volta

Bug#387319: ocamldap needs to be rebuilt against the new pcre-ocaml

Package: libldap-ocaml-dev Version: 2.1.8-1 Severity: serious After my upload of libpcre-ocaml-dev 5.11.1-1 ocamldap needs to be rebuilt against it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ledit ocaml Objective Caml version 3.09.2 Findlib has been successfully loaded. Additional directives: #requ

Bug#379278: fixed in subversion 1.3.2-5

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:33:43PM -0700, Troy Heber wrote: > Source: subversion > Source-Version: 1.3.2-5 > subversion (1.3.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium > . >[ Peter Samuelson ] >* python-subversion.{prerm,postinst}: use pyversions, fix stupid bug > (Closes: #379278) in prerm. Tig

Bug#387295: marked as done (ocamlnet needs rebuild)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387295: fixed in ocamlnet 1.1-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#387111: That bug is not grave for makedev

#Maybe "important" at most. severity 387111 normal retitle 387111 New experimental package cannot make "misc" thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#386032: marked as done (FTBFS on alpha)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:06:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of djvulibre 3.5.17-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#387313: banshee crashes on startup with stacktrace

Package: banshee Version: 0.10.12-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hi, i get following stacktrace when starting banshee : = Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually indicates a fatal error in t

Processed: That bug is not grave for makedev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > #Maybe "important" at most. > severity 387111 normal Bug#387111: watchdog: Fails to configure: don't know how to make device "misc" Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > retitle 387111 New experimental package cannot make "misc" Bug#387111: watchdog:

Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Ruben Puettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes this would be the best way. Cause so it is posible that tomcat5 and >> tomcat5.5 runs on the same Server with different users. But if you do >> you must keep the people in mind t

debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:00:41 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#386367: marked as done (firefox: Newest Firefox fails to start on PowerPC)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:32:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386367: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#386073: marked as done (mapserver: bad build-dep, FTBFS)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386073: fixed in mapserver 4.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#386742: marked as done (Firefox won't start and puts up empty dialog)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:32:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386367: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#387114: marked as done (firefox: textless dialog with two buttons and then nothing, after upgrade)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:32:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386367: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#387126: marked as done (firefox: textless dialog with two buttons and then nothing, after upgrade)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:32:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386367: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#386593: marked as done (firefox: doesn't start anymore. corrupted display)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:32:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386367: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#383830: marked as done (mapserver: FTBFS: build-dep on missing libgdal1-1.3.2-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383830: fixed in mapserver 4.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#383140: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgdal1-1.3.1)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#383140: fixed in mapserver 4.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#387295: ocamlnet needs rebuild

Severity: serious Package: libocamlnet-ocaml Version: 1.1-11 ocamlnet needs rebuild against newer libpcre-ocaml. -- Luca Brivio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of djvulibre 3.5.17-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 386032 + fixed Bug#386032: FTBFS on alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#385994: marked as done (mdadm: Missing versionned dep on debconf)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385994: fixed in mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#385951: marked as done (Fail to scan array in some case when partition is at the end of the disk)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 05:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385951: fixed in mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5

Ruben Puettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes this would be the best way. Cause so it is posible that tomcat5 and > tomcat5.5 runs on the same Server with different users. But if you do > you must keep the people in mind that already has installed the package. I think the better way would be t

Processed: reopening 348767, closing 348767

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > reopen 348767 Bug#348767: ERROR: Unbound variable: gnc:menuname-ncreports 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate i

Processed: flashplugin-nonfree: Fails to install; fails to fail to install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387263 wishlist Bug#387263: flashplugin-nonfree: Fails to install; fails to fail to install Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#387195: patch

> Patch is already in subversion :-) > I hope to upload a new console-data as soon as I've pulled in some > other patches - 379110, 382507, 319069, etc. Hopefully today or tomorrow. I also have a possible patch for #385467 which I'm working on. Actually, I'm a bit handicapped by the dbs build sy

Processed: Re: Fixed in NMU of phpmyadmin 4:2.8.2-0.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 385889 Bug#385889: link var/www -> /usr/share/phpmyadmin/ not good ! 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity normal Unk

Bug#386578: speechd-el: speechd-speak-read-.* don't speak

Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "BD" == Boris Daix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > BD> My conclusion is that speechd-el is not fully installed. Could > BD> you add the lines mentioned in point 5, section 2.1 > BD> "installation" of speechd-el info file to >

Bug#385889: Fixed in NMU of phpmyadmin 4:2.8.2-0.2

reopen 385889 severity normal thanks > I've NMUed for this bug (fixing the bug to use versioning instead of the > "fixed" tag, to ease tracking through testing); here's the changelog: > > > phpmyadmin (4:2.8.2-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Non-maintainer upload. > >* Fix issu

Processed: Re: Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387136 grave Bug#387136: dbconfig-load-include ignores varnames Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#386897: marked as done (FTBFS on sparc: maximum interrupt nesting depth (32) exceeded)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:03:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line SBCL has built on Sparc now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Processed: Re: Bug#387261: watchdog: Fails to configure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387261 normal Bug#387261: watchdog: Fails to configure Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > tag 387261 unreproducible Bug#387261: watchdog: Fails to configure There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > tag 387261 moreinfo Bug#387

Bug#387195: patch

Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> Tags: patch >> >> The attached patch fixes compilation by removing dependency from >> ${unidatadir}/UnicodeData.txt in the $(AUTO_FALLBACKS_FB) and >> $(AUTO_FALLBACKS_NFB) rules >> > > > Thanks, Davide. I'd prefer Ala

Processed: found 387268 in 7.0.25-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > found 387268 7.0.25-5 Bug#387268: flashplugin-nonfree: APSB06-11 fixes multiple vulnerabilities in Flash player Bug marked as found in version 7.0.25-5. > End of message, stopping p

Processed: Fixed in NMU of lynx 2.8.5-2sarge1.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 238057 + fixed Bug#238057: lynx: FTBFS on GNU/Hurd (and GNU/k*BSD) Tags were: fixed-upstream patch sid Tags added: fixed > tag 384725 + fixed Bug#384725: lynx: [CVE-2004-1617] remote DoS-fix missing from etch/sid package Tags were: security patch T

Bug#386831: User tomcat5 problem after removing tomcat5 but keeping tomcat5.5

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > I don't know how to solve this issue. > A solution could be to change the user of tomcat5.5 as tomcat5-5. Yes this would be the best way. Cause so it is posible that tomcat5 and tomcat5.5 runs on the same Server with different us

Processed: Re: amaya crashes with GDK error traced to this component

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 382706 normal Bug#382706: amaya crashes with GDK error traced to this component Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > retitle 382706 libgl1-mesa-dri: rendering glitches on radeon Bug#382706: amaya crashes with GDK error traced to this compon

  1   2   >